amontillado, the Drosophila Homolog of the Prohormone Processing Protease PC2, Is Required During Embryogenesis and Early Larval Development
- Lowell Y. M. Rayburn*,
- Holly C. Gooding*,1,
- Semil P. Choksi*,2,
- Dhea Maloney*,3,
- Ambrose R. Kidd III*,4,
- Daria E. Siekhaus†,5 and
- Michael Bender*,6
- * Department of Genetics, The University of Georgia, Athens, Georgia 30602
- † Department of Biochemistry, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, California 94305
- 6 Corresponding author: Department of Genetics, Life Sciences Bldg. C418, 1057 Green St., University of Georgia, Athens, GA 30602-7223. E-mail: bender{at}arches.uga.edu
Abstract
Biosynthesis of most peptide hormones and neuropeptides requires proteolytic excision of the active peptide from inactive proprotein precursors, an activity carried out by subtilisin-like proprotein convertases (SPCs) in constitutive or regulated secretory pathways. The Drosophila amontillado (amon) gene encodes a homolog of the mammalian PC2 protein, an SPC that functions in the regulated secretory pathway in neuroendocrine tissues. We have identified amon mutants by isolating ethylmethanesulfonate (EMS)-induced lethal and visible mutations that define two complementation groups in the amon interval at 97D1 of the third chromosome. DNA sequencing identified the amon complementation group and the DNA sequence change for each of the nine amon alleles isolated. amon mutants display partial embryonic lethality, are defective in larval growth, and arrest during the first to second instar larval molt. Mutant larvae can be rescued by heat-shock-induced expression of the amon protein. Rescued larvae arrest at the subsequent larval molt, suggesting that amon is also required for the second to third instar larval molt. Our data indicate that the amon proprotein convertase is required during embryogenesis and larval development in Drosophila and support the hypothesis that AMON acts to proteolytically process peptide hormones that regulate hatching, larval growth, and larval ecdysis.
MOST biologically active peptide hormones and neuropeptides are produced from larger inactive precursor proteins by endoproteolytic cleavage and further processing within the secretory pathway (Sossinet al. 1989; Rouilleet al. 1995b; Bergeronet al. 2000). Endoproteolytic processing of peptide hormones and other secreted and transmembrane proteins is carried out by a family of serine proteases, the subtilisin-like proprotein convertases (SPCs), that typically cleave precursor proteins after single or paired basic residues (Creemerset al. 1998; Seidahet al. 1999; Zhouet al. 1999). SPCs function in constitutive and regulated secretory pathways in a variety of cell types. Precursor proteins may be cleaved by SPCs to liberate multiple bioactive products (Sossinet al. 1989; Zhouet al. 1999), and a given precursor may be differentially processed in a cell-specific fashion depending on the SPC processing enzymes expressed (Rouilleet al. 1995a; Furutaet al. 1997).
To date, seven members of the SPC family have been identified in vertebrates (Muller and Lindberg 2000). All of the family members share a common structural organization and are themselves synthesized as inactive propeptides. The N-terminal signal sequence, or Pre domain, is required to target the protein to the secretory pathway and is removed by a signal peptidase once the protein has reached the endoplasmic reticulum. The Pro domain is believed to be an intramolecular chaperone and its removal during enzyme maturation is essential for the protein to become active (Zhuet al. 1989). The catalytic domain of the proprotein convertases is the most conserved among family members; vertebrate members display 40-50% homology with subtilisin in this domain, which contains the catalytic triad residues aspartate, histidine, and serine (Rouilleet al. 1995a). The catalytic domain also contains an oxyanion hole that is essential for catalysis (Bryanet al. 1986). Interestingly, in all family members except for prohormone convertase 2 (PC2), this residue is an asparagine. PC2 contains an aspartate at this position. The asparagine or aspartate residue stabilizes the negative charge induced on the carbonyl oxygen of the peptide bond being cleaved (Bryanet al. 1986). The P domain influences proper folding of the protein as well as contributes to the calcium dependence, pH requirement, and stability of the convertase (Zhouet al. 1998). All family members end with a small C-terminal extension that is not highly conserved within the family.
Cleavage of precursor molecules by the convertases occurs after basic residues, most often Lys-Arg (K-R↓) or Arg-Arg (R-R↓) sequences (Rockwellet al. 1997). PC2 is able to cleave after Lys-Lys (K-K) sequences, a property potentially due to its uniqueMxyanion hole residue (Shennanet al. 1991). Because of its more diverse array of cleavage sites, PC2 is often described as the most highly adapted member of the subtilisin-like proprotein convertase family (Rouilleet al. 1995a). PC2 displays a neuroendocrine tissue-specific expression pattern (Smeekenset al. 1991) and is responsible for the activation of peptide hormones including proinsulin, proglucagon, and proopiomelanocortin in mice (Benjannetet al. 1991; Rouilleet al. 1994; Furutaet al. 1998). Loss of PC2 activity has been linked to diabetes, obesity, and breast cancer (Yoshidaet al. 1995; Steineret al. 1996; Brar and Lowry 1999).
The gene encoding the Drosophila homolog of mammalian PC2 has been identified and named amontillado (amon; Siekhaus and Fuller 1999). The amon protein is 75% identical to human PC2 in the catalytic domain and 66% identical overall. Whole-animal Northern blots show that amon expression peaks during late embryogenesis and in the adult. amon is expressed in a subset of cells of the brain and ventral nervous system during late embryogenesis and in a smaller set of brain and ventral nervous system cells during first and second instar larval development (Siekhaus and Fuller 1999). Recently, the amon protein has been shown to be an active protease on a KR containing synthetic peptide when expressed in Drosophila S2 cells with the d7B2 protein, a homolog of the 7B2 helper protein that functions in maturation of PC2 (Hwanget al. 2000). Initial investigation of amon function indicated a requirement for amon during hatching behavior (Siekhaus and Fuller 1999). However, this study lacked amon-specific mutants, instead using overlapping deficiencies that remove the chromosomal region including amon and flanking genes.
To identify point mutations that inactivate amon, we have screened for EMS-induced mutants that are lethal when heterozygous to chromosomal deficiencies that remove amon. DNA sequencing shows that one of the two complementation groups identified corresponds to amon. Six amon missense mutations have been identified while three amon mutations are predicted to result in truncation of the amon protein. amon mutants display partial embryonic lethality and fail to complete the first to second instar larval molt. amon mutants can be rescued by heat-shock-induced expression of the amon protein and some rescued animals arrest at the second to third instar larval molt. These data indicate that amon is required during embryogenesis and larval development and support the hypothesis that AMON acts to proteolytically process peptide hormones that regulate hatching, larval growth, and larval molting.
MATERIALS AND METHODS
Fly strains: The red e and red parental strains, Df(3R)Tl-X/TM3, Df(3R)ro80b/TM3, and w1118; Ly/TM6B, P{w[+mW.hs]= Ubi-GFP.S65Y} PAD2, Tb (referred to here as TM6B GFP Tb), were obtained from the Bloomington Stock Center.
EMS mutagenesis and F2 lethal screens: Males homozygous for a marked third chromosome (red e or red) were treated with 0.025 m EMS using the procedure of Lewis and Bacher (1968). Mutagenized males were mated en masse to TM3 Sb/ TM6B virgin females at 25°. Individual F1 progeny (red e or red/TM6B and red e or red/TM3 Sb) were then pair-mated to Df(3R)ro80b/TM3 Sb, Df(3R)Tl-X/TM3 Ser, or Df(3R)Tl-X/TM3 Sb flies and crosses were scored for absence of the F2 progeny class that was heterozygous for the mutagenized chromosome and the deficiency. If this class was absent, stocks were established from red e or red/TM3 siblings and then tested for the ability to complement Df(3R)Tl-X or Df(3R)ro80b.
We recovered 16 lethal mutations and 1 visible mutation that fail to complement either Df(3R)Tl-X or Df(3R)ro80b from 5300 fertile pair matings scored. Nine lethal mutations and the visible mutation fail to complement both Df(3R)Tl-X and Df(3R)ro80b and are described in this manuscript. Each of these mutations was placed in complementation groups by complementation tests to all other mutations within the amon interval defined by the overlap between Df(3R)Tl-X and Df(3R)ro80b. The remaining 7 lethal mutations that fail to complement only one of these deletions and thus map outside of the amon interval have been described elsewhere (Kiddet al. 1999). Of the EMS-induced mutations described here, amonC254Y was induced on a red background chromosome, amonG473R, amonQ507sa, and doc99 were induced on an ebony background, and the remainder of the mutations was induced on a red e background. Allelism of the l(3)rK344 P-element insertion mutation to Toll was established by complementation tests to the Tollr3 allele carried out at the restrictive temperature (Lindsley and Zimm 1992).
DNA sequence analysis: Primers for PCR amplification were designed using the Oligo 4.0 program (Molecular Biology Insights) and were synthesized by the Molecular Genetics Instrumentation Facility (MGIF) at the University of Georgia using an ABI 394 synthesizer. Ten pairs of PCR primers (18-20 mers) were used for PCR amplification of amon protein-coding sequences and DNA sequencing. PCR product sizes range from 387 to 840 bp. Primer sequences are available upon request. Initial attempts to PCR amplify DNA from genomic DNA extracted from homozygous mutant larvae were unsuccessful. We therefore sequenced PCR products amplified from genomic DNA of flies heterozygous for lethal mutations and a balancer chromosome. Mutations were identified by comparison of sequence from mutant heterozygotes to that obtained from the homozygous parental strain upon which the mutations were induced. Genomic DNA was obtained for each mutant line using a small-scale phenol/chloroform extraction (10-50 flies).
DNA was amplified using EnzyOne polymerase (ENZYPOL). The DNA template (1 μl) to be amplified was added to a solution of 1.5 mm MgCl2, 2.5 μl 10× NH4 reaction buffer, 200 μm dNTP, 2.0 μl each of the sense and antisense primers diluted to 5 pmol/μl, 0.25 μl EnzyOne 500 unit DNA polymerase, and dH2O to bring the final volume to 25 μl. Products were analyzed on a 1.0% agarose gel and were purified with a High Pure PCR product purification kit (Boehringer Mannheim, Indianapolis).
—At least three complementation groups map within the amon chromosomal interval. The extent of two deficiencies that remove amon, Df(3R)Tl-X and Df(3R)ro80b, is indicated by the open bars at the top, and cytological endpoints of these deficiencies are shown at the center. Two complementation groups identified in this screen (doc and amon) and the Toll gene map to the overlap between these two deficiencies. Mutant alleles within each complementation group are listed at the bottom. For amon mutant nomenclature, the first affected amino acid is followed by the mutant change (sa, splice acceptor; st, stop).
Double-stranded sequencing of a minimum of two independent PCR products was conducted by MGIF using an ABI 373 automated sequencer. Sequence data were analyzed with the Sequencher 3.0 program (Gene Codes Ann Arbor, MI). During the course of our sequence analysis we noted a minor error in the amino acid sequence reported by Siekhaus and Fuller (1999). Amino acids 344-348 are incorrectly reported as glutamate, aspartate, aspartate, cysteine, and asparagine (E D D C N). The correct order should be aspartate, aspartate, cysteine, asparagine, cysteine (D D C N C). We also identified 19 polymorphisms within amon coding sequences. These polymorphisms are reported elsewhere (Rayburnet al. 2002).
Lethal phase determination: Twenty-five yw;amon/TM6B GFP Tb males were mated to 25 yw; Df(3R)Tl-X/TM6B GFP Tb virgin females in an egg collection apparatus at 25°. As a control, 25 red e/TM6B GFP Tb males were mated to 25 Df(3R)Tl-X/TM6B GFP Tb virgin females. Flies were fed yeast paste and grape juice agar egglay plates were changed daily. On the third day a 10-hr egg collection was taken and 200 eggs from this collection were kept for further analysis. F1 larvae were scored at 36, 60, 96, and 120 hr after egg laying (ael) corresponding to the approximate midpoints of the first larval instar, second larval instar, and third larval instar and to pupariation. Mutant larvae were transferred to fresh egglay plates after each scoring. F1 larvae were scored for the dominant green fluorescent protein (GFP) marker to separate amon (or red e parental)/Df(3R)Tl-X flies lacking GFP from siblings carrying the TM6B GFP Tb balancer chromosome. The percentage of survival of amon mutant or parental larvae was calculated by dividing the number of mutant or parental animals alive at each time point by the Mendelian expectation for mutant or parental hemizygotes from these crosses (25%). To examine terminal phenotypes, amon mutants found dead at 36, 60, and 96 hr ael and live wild-type sibling larvae collected at the same times were placed in a polyvinyl lactophenol mounting medium on glass slides. Photographs were taken with a Zeiss Axiophot microscope.
Rescue: A previous study (Siekhaus and Fuller 1999) described the construction of the hs-amon transgene and showed that amon mRNA is induced following heat shock. In our experiments 30 yw; +/+; amon/TM3 Sb Ser y+ e males were mated to 30 yw; hs-amon/hs-amon; Df(3R)Tl-X e/TM3 Sb Ser y+ e virgin females in an egg collection apparatus at 25°. In parallel, 30 yw; +/+; amon/TM3 Sb Ser y+ e males were mated to 30 yw/yw; +/+; Df(3R)Tl-X e/TM3 Sb Ser y+ e females. Ten-hour egg collections (n = 200 eggs) were taken as described above. Animals were heat-shocked (30 min at 37°) every 12 hr beginning at 36 hr ael. Plates were scored at 36, 60, 96, and 120 hr ael and at subsequent times until adulthood. Mutant animals [yw; amon/Df(3R)Tl-X] were recognized by the yellow marker. Percentage of survival was calculated by dividing the number of mutant animals alive at each time point by one-half the total number of wild-type non-yellow siblings present at 36 hr. In the course of these experiments, we found that percentage of survival of amonC241Y/Df(3R)Tl-X mutants is reproducibly lower in the TM3 Sb Ser y+ e background than in the TM6B GFP Tb background (data not shown). This fact, plus the observation that heat-shock treatment (in the absence of hs-amon transgenes) reduced the viability of amon mutants, accounts for differences in viability of amonC241Y/Df(3R)Tl-X mutants in Figure 6A and Table 3.
RESULTS
Isolation of candidate amon mutations: The amon gene has been mapped to the 97D1 region of chromosome 3R by in situ hybridization to the overlapping deficiency chromosomes Df(3R)ro80b and Df(3R)Tl-X (Siekhaus and Fuller 1999). To generate point mutations in amon, we screened for EMS-induced lethal and visible mutations in this interval. From a total of 5300 mutagenized chromosomes, we identified nine lethal mutations and one visible mutation that fail to complement both Df(3R)ro80b and Df(3R)Tl-X and are therefore candidate amon mutations (see materials and methods). Figure 1 shows that these mutations, plus three other lethal EMS-induced mutations and a lethal P-element insertion mutation [l(3)rK344], kindly provided by K. Anderson, fall into three complementation groups. We show below that the largest of these, containing nine lethal mutations, corresponds to amon.
—The docked1 mutant displays a visible wing phenotype. (A) A wild-type (CS) wing; (B) the irregularly shaped wing of a doc1 (doc1/Df(3R)Tl-X) mutant. The wing margin of the doc1 mutant appears normal, but distal portions of the wing are absent, resulting in a docked-wing appearance (arrow).
Of the remaining two complementation groups, one corresponds to the Toll gene and is represented by the TollrK344 allele (Figure 1). The final group identified consists of three lethal mutations and one recessive visible mutation, docked1 (doc1). When heterozygous to Df(3R)Tl-X or Df(3R)ro80b, doc1 mutants exhibit irregularly shaped wings with reduced size relative to wild type (Figure 2). doc1 mutants have normal wing margins but appear to lack distal wing derivatives, resulting in a docked wing appearance. The three lethal mutations in the docked complementation group are viable when heterozygous to doc1 but partially or completely fail to complement the docked wing phenotype, with doc99 being the strongest and doc13 the weakest allele in this regard. When hemizygous to Df(3R)Tl-X, doc mutants die during embryogenesis and during the first larval instar (data not shown).
Exon-intron junctions of the amon gene
amon gene structure: To facilitate identification of amon mutants by DNA sequencing, we first determined the amon gene structure by comparing a previously published amon cDNA sequence (Siekhaus and Fuller 1999) to the Drosophila genome sequence (Adamset al. 2000). Table 1 shows the predicted amon splice donor and acceptor sequences and exon and intron sizes while Figure 3 shows the position of exon/intron boundaries relative to amon cDNA sequences. The amon gene is composed of 12 exons and spans ∼16 kb of genomic sequence. The first of the gene’s 11 introns is 9687 bp in length, while the remaining introns are all <1000 bp (range, 54-842 bp). While determining the gene structure of amon, we discovered that the first 43 nucleotides of the published cDNA (Siekhaus and Fuller 1999) do not align with upstream amon genomic DNA. Because these nucleotides match sequences within more 3′ areas of the cDNA (see Rayburnet al. 2002) and because 11 amon expressed sequence tags (ESTs) sequenced by the Berkeley Drosophila Genome Project (BDGP) contain sequences 5′ of the start of the published cDNA that do match genomic sequences, we believe that the reported amon cDNA contained a cloning artifact at the 5′ end. The cDNA sequence shown in Figure 3 is a composite of the BDGP cDNA with the greatest 5′ extent (clone no. RE06156) and the previously published amon cDNA (Siekhaus and Fuller 1999).
—A composite amon cDNA sequence. The first 64 nucleotides of this sequence derive from the BDGP amon EST with the greatest 5′ extent (clone no. RE06156). The remainder of the cDNA sequence is composed of nucleotides 44-3392 of a previously published amon cDNA (Siekhaus and Fuller 1999). The vertical bars within the amon cDNA sequence refer to intron/exon boundaries as deduced by comparison with the genomic sequence. The residues comprising the catalytic triad are circled. The oxyanion hole aspartate residue is boxed.
Mutations in the amon gene
Identification of amon mutants: To determine which complementation group in the amon interval corresponds to the amon gene, we sequenced PCR products amplified from genomic DNA of flies heterozygous for lethal mutations and a balancer chromosome. The sequence generated was compared to the genomic DNA sequence from the parental chromosome and to genomic sequence from sibling chromosomes heterozygous to the same balancer chromosome to identify base pair changes induced by EMS. Initial sequencing of amon genomic DNA encoding exons 9-12 from lethal mutants in both complementation groups showed that four members of the larger complementation group contained mutations in amon while none of the members of the smaller complementation group contained such mutations, identifying the larger group as the amon complementation group (see Figure 1). Subsequent sequencing efforts focused on this complementation group.
Table 2 shows the mutation and predicted effect on coding sequences for each of the nine amon complementation group members and Figure 4 shows the location of each mutation relative to amon coding sequences. Three mutations are predicted to lead to truncation of the amon protein. One, amonQ178st, results in a stop codon and is predicted to produce a protein lacking most of the catalytic domain and all of the P domain of the protein. Two others, amonQ507sa and amonE601sa, affect conserved splice acceptor site dinucleotides. The Q507sa mutation is predicted to disrupt the joining of exon 9 to exon 10, resulting in a truncated protein. This mutant protein is predicted to lack the final 147 amino acids if there is readthrough into intron 9 to an immediate stop codon (see Table 1) or predicted to lack amino acids 508-562 if the subsequent splice acceptor site preceding exon 11 is used, thereby skipping exon 10. Either of these possibilities would result in a protein lacking most of the P domain. The E601sa mutation is predicted to disrupt the correct joining of exon 11 to exon 12, thus causing 7 extraneous amino acids to be added to the protein before a premature stop codon occurs if there is readthrough into intron 11. This mutation would thereby eliminate 23 amino acids of the P domain and all 30 amino acids of the C-terminal extension.
Of the six amon missense mutations, four map to the catalytic domain (Figure 4) and each of these four affects highly conserved residues in the kexin subfamily of subtilisin-like serine proteases or “subtilases” (Siezen and Leunissen 1997). The first of these, amonC241Y, is predicted to result in a substitution of cysteine 241 by a tyrosine residue. This cysteine is conserved in 30 of 31 kexin subfamily members (Siezen and Leunissen 1997). Homology modeling of the catalytic domain of subtilases has been carried out on the basis of the crystal structure of seven subtilases (Siezen and Leunissen 1997). The amonC241Y missense change is predicted to map within helix C of this structure, a short α-helix in the core of the protein directly under the catalytic site of the enzyme (see Figure 1 of Siezen and Leunissen 1997). The cysteine residue is predicted to be a partner in a disulfide bond among members of the kexin subfamily (Siezen and Leunissen 1997).
The amonC254Y mutation is also predicted to change a cysteine residue conserved in the kexin subfamily (29 of 31; Siezen and Leunissen 1997) to a tyrosine. Within the subtilase catalytic domain model, the amonC254Y missense change is predicted to map within a variable loop at the surface connecting helix C to a conserved β-sheet strand (e3). This cysteine is predicted to be a partner in a separate disulfide bond in kexin subfamily members (Siezen and Leunissen 1997).
The amonG367V mutation is predicted to result in substitution of glycine 367 by valine. This conserved glycine residue (27 of 31) maps to a conserved loop between two β-sheet strands (e6 and e7; Siezen and Leunissen 1997, Figure 1). Finally, the amonG473R missense change (arginine for glycine 473) maps to a conserved loop between helix G and helix H near the C terminus of the catalytic domain. This glycine residue is completely conserved (31 of 31) among the kexin subfamily and strongly conserved (92 of 126) among the entire subtilase protein family (Siezen and Leunissen 1997).
The remaining two missense mutations, amonS557L1 and amonS557L2, affect the same nucleotide and are predicted to result in substitution of serine 557 by a leucine residue within the P domain. Although no P-domain structures have yet been determined, a model of P-domain structure has been proposed on the basis of analysis of P-domain sequences from seven human kexin protein family members plus Kex2p (Lipkindet al. 1998). The amonS557L missense change maps within a conserved loop between two β-strands (β4 and β5) of the proposed β-barrel-like structure.
—Mutations within the amon gene. The location of each mutation within the gene structure of amon is indicated by an arrow. The domain structure of AMON is shown at the top (Siekhaus and Fuller 1999). Boxes and lines below indicate exons and introns, respectively. Shaded boxes indicate amon protein-coding sequence. The catalytic triad (D, H, S) and the oxyanion hole residue (D) in exon 8 are indicated.
amon mutants exhibit embryonic lethality, delays in larval growth, and defects in larval molting: Table 3 shows the percentage of amon mutants surviving to a given time after egg laying when heterozygous to the Df(3R)Tl-X chromosome. Animals were scored at 36, 60, 96, and 120 hr ael, times corresponding in wild-type animals to the approximate midpoints of the first, second, and third larval instars and to pupariation, respectively. All amon mutants demonstrate some degree of embryonic lethality, with a range of 37% (amonE601sa) to 84% (amonC254Y) of expected larvae surviving at 36 hr ael (Table 3). Very few amon mutants survive at 96 hr ael (range, 0-8% of expected), indicating that most amon mutants that complete embryogenesis and hatch from the egg die during larval development. Although the 60- and 96-hr time points correspond to the midpoints of second and third larval instar development in wild-type animals, amon mutants surviving at this time were dramatically smaller than wild-type sibling controls. Surviving larvae were also lethargic and unresponsive to an external stimulus and the few animals surviving to 96 and 120 hr ael failed to exhibit larval wandering behavior (data not shown). No amon mutant larvae pupariated and none survived to adulthood (Table 3).
amon mutants that arrest during larval development are defective in larval molting. The majority of arrested mutant larvae show the presence of duplicated pairs of larval mouth hooks (Figure 5) identifiable by morphology as first and second instar larval mouth hooks. Thus amon mutants that complete embryogenesis and hatching exhibit delayed growth during larval development and arrest during the first to second instar larval molt.
amon mutants can be rescued by heat-shock-driven expression of AMON: Expression of AMON from a heat-shock-inducible transgene (hs-amon; Siekhaus and Fuller 1999) partially rescues the embryonic lethality of the amon mutants (71% survival vs. 43% for no transgene controls when scored at 36 hr ael). Figure 6A shows that expression of AMON from the transgene also increases the survival of amon mutants at 60 and 96 hr ael relative to no transgene controls. In contrast to controls lacking the hs-amon transgene, rescued amon mutants [yw; hs-amon; amonC241Y/Df(3R)Tl-X] were comparable in size to wild-type second and third instar siblings (data not shown). As shown in Figure 6A, expression of AMON is not sufficient to rescue 100% of amon mutants to later time points. Examination of amon mutants carrying the hs-amon transgene that arrest between the 60- and 96-hr time points showed that these animals arrest with duplicated mouthparts consisting of one pair of second and one pair of third instar larval mouth hooks (Figure 6B). Thus expression of AMON allows these mutants to complete the first to second instar larval molt and to progress through second instar larval development before arresting during the second to third instar larval molt.
In this experiment, rescue of the amon mutants continued to the adult stage, with one amonC241Y/Df(3R) Tl-X mutant rescued to adulthood. Although the total development time from egg to adulthood was ∼25% greater than normal, the resulting female was fertile. Nine subsequent rescue experiments using a 30-min heat-shock pulse delivered every 12 hr or every 24 hr also produced adult amon mutant flies, recognizable by the absence of balancer chromosome markers, in the range of 2-43% of expected. In these experiments, control amon mutants lacking the hs-amon gene never survived beyond 96 hr ael.
DISCUSSION
Isolation of amon point mutants: We have identified point mutations that inactivate amon, the Drosophila homolog of the vertebrate prohormone convertase PC2, by screening for EMS-induced lethal and visible mutants that fail to complement overlapping deficiencies that remove the amon gene. Two complementation groups were identified in our screens (Figure 1). DNA sequencing showed that each of the nine members of the larger complementation group exhibits a DNA sequence change in amon gene sequences that is predicted to result in an altered amon protein (Table 2; Figure 4). This result and the fact that heat-shock-induced expression of amon protein is sufficient to rescue the amonC241Y mutant allele (Figure 6) indicate that this complementation group corresponds to amon. Three amon mutations (amonQ178st, amonQ507sa, and amonE601sa) are predicted to result in truncation of the amon protein due to premature stop codons or improper RNA splicing. The remaining six amon mutations are missense mutations that affect residues essential for amon function. Four of these mutations (amonC241Y, amonC254Y, amonG367V, and amonG473R) affect residues highly conserved within the kexin subfamily of the subtilisin-like serine proteases (Siezen and Leunissen 1997) while the other two mutations (amonS557L1 and amonS557L2) reveal a residue within the P domain that is critical for AMON activity.
Lethal phase analysis of amon mutants
The other complementation group identified here, doc, consists of three lethal mutations and one recessive viable mutation that affects distal wing derivatives (Figure 2). Comparison of the genetic map shown in Figure 1 to the annotated Drosophila genome sequence (FlyBase 2002) yields centromere proximal and distal limits for annotated genes that may correspond to doc. A proximal limit is provided by the scribbled (scrib) gene, which maps within Df(3R)Tl-X but proximal to Df(3R)ro80b (Kiddet al. 1999). A distal limit is provided by the Toll gene, which is disrupted by the distal endpoint of Df(3R)Tl-X (Andersonet al. 1985). Within this interval of ∼200 kb are 10 genes whose predictions are supported by cDNA evidence (FlyBase 2002). Seven of these predicted genes are centromere proximal to amon and the remaining three genes lie between amon and Toll. Determination of the position of the proximal endpoint of Df(3R)ro80b within the genome sequence will provide a closer proximal limit and may narrow this interval considerably. In addition, determination of the relative proximal-distal order of amon and doc within the overlap of Df(3R)Tl-X and Df(3R)ro80b will be helpful in assigning the doc complementation group to an annotated gene.
—amon mutants are defective in molting. (A) A wild-type sibling [Df(3R)Tl-X/TM6B GFP Tb] second instar larva shows normal mouth hook formation. Second instar mouth hooks are indicated by arrows. (B) An amon mutant [amonQ178st/Df(3R)Tl-X] larva arrested during the first larval instar. Second instar mouth hooks are indicated by arrows and first instar mouth hooks are indicated by arrowheads.
amon mutants display early developmental phenotypes: Hemizygous amon point mutants die during early development. All amon mutants exhibit some degree of embryonic lethality and most amon mutants die within 96 hr after egg laying (Table 3). At times corresponding to mid-second and mid-third instar larval stages in wild-type animals, amon mutants are dramatically smaller than control larvae, suggesting that larval growth is delayed or blocked in amon mutants. The majority of arrested amon mutants exhibit duplicated larval mouthparts (Figure 5), indicating that amon mutants arrest during the first to second instar larval molt. The presence of both first and second instar larval mouthparts suggests that amon mutants complete early stages of the molting cycle, including apolysis of the first instar cuticle and formation of second instar derivatives, but are incapable of undergoing ecdysis to shed the first instar larval cuticle. Heat-shock-controlled expression of amon protein from a transgene is sufficient to rescue both growth and larval molting (Figure 6) defects exhibited by amon mutants. In a few cases, amon mutants were rescued to adult eclosion, although most rescued animals died during late larval or early pupal development. Animals that arrest during late larval development exhibited both second and third instar larval mouthparts, suggesting that amon is also required for the second to third instar larval molt.
—Rescue of amon mutants. (A) Hemizygous amon mutants carrying an hs-amon transgene on the second chromosome [yw; hs-amon/+; amonC241Y/Df(3R)Tl-X] were scored for survival at 60 and 96 hr ael (solid bars). After egg collection (n = 200 eggs), animals were heat-shocked for 30 min at 37° every 12 hr starting at 36 hr ael. Control animals hemizygous for amon but lacking the transgene [yw; amonC241Y/Df(3R)Tl-X] were treated in the same way (shaded bars). Percentage of survival was calculated by dividing the number of surviving amon mutants (marked by yellow) by the number of amon mutants expected (50% of non-yellow siblings). (B) An amon mutant carrying the transgene arrested at the 96-hr time point has second (arrowheads) and third (arrows) instar larval mouth hooks, indicating rescue beyond the first to second instar larval molt arrest observed in amon mutants lacking the transgene.
A previous study concluded that amon is required for a hatching behavior consisting of a series of head-swinging episodes in which the larva scrapes its mouth-hooks against the anterior portion of the eggshell prior to hatching (Siekhaus and Fuller 1999). This study showed that animals heterozygous for two overlapping deficiencies [Df(3R)Tl-X/Df(3R)ro80b] fail to hatch from the egg and are defective for hatching behavior. Df(3R)Tl-X/Df(3R)ro80b animals are deficient for amon and flanking genes. Hatching behavior can be rescued in Df(3R)Tl-X/Df(3R)ro80b animals by heat-shock-induced expression of amon, indicating that amon is required for the hatching behavior described. However, amon’s role in hatching itself could not be assessed in these experiments since Df(3R)Tl-X/Df(3R)ro80b animals lack not only amon but also Toll, doc, and at least two and up to nine other genes predicted by EST evidence (FlyBase 2002). While we have not directly analyzed the hatching behavior of the amon mutants, the embryonic lethality of each of the nine point mutants indicates that amon contributes to but is not absolutely required for hatching from the egg. Thus, each of the amon point mutants described here displays some degree of embryonic lethality but none is completely defective in hatching (Table 3). These results suggest that multiple behavioral pathways may be integrated to control successful hatching from the egg. If so, this situation would be analogous to adult eclosion in insects, where the peptide eclosion hormone is sufficient to initiate eclosion (reviewed in Horodyski 1996) but is not strictly required for ecdysis (McNabbet al. 1997).
Potential targets for AMON activity: Ultimately, we want to identify the AMON substrates that are responsible for the larval growth and molting defects exhibited by amon mutants. The high degree of homology between AMON and the vertebrate PC2 prohormone convertase and the expression of amon in cells of the brain and ventral nerve cord (Siekhaus and Fuller 1999) suggest that AMON functions as a prohormone processing protease within neural cells in Drosophila. This conclusion is supported by rescue experiments in which mutation of one of the three predicted catalytic residues of AMON strongly reduces rescue of hatching behavior compared to the wild-type amon protein (Siekhaus and Fuller 1999).
One aspect of the amon mutant phenotype is delayed growth during larval development. Loss of vertebrate PC2 in the mouse results in defects in proinsulin and proglucagon processing and alterations in normal carbohydrate metabolism (Furuta et al. 1997, 1998). The insulin signaling pathway is remarkably well conserved in Drosophila (reviewed in Garofalo 2002). Drosophila has seven insulin-like peptides (dilp 1-7), five of which are significantly homologous to human and mouse insulin. A recent study (Rulifsonet al. 2002) has shown that ablation of the brain insulin-producing cells (IPCs) in Drosophila results in severe growth defects and developmental delays. Larvae with ablated IPCs reached only 58% of the normal size and took 12 days to develop to the puparium stage, a process that normally takes only 5 days. These phenotypes are intriguing because the amon mutants also consistently appeared smaller than their wild-type siblings during our lethal phase analysis. We speculate that amon may influence insulin signaling in Drosophila, perhaps by proteolytically processing and activating insulin-like peptides.
amon mutants are also defective in larval molting. Larval molting is a highly regulated process involving interactions among the steroid hormone ecdysone and the peptide hormones eclosion hormone (EH), ecdysistriggering hormone (ETH), and crustacean cardioactive peptide (CCAP; reviewed in Mesce and Fahrbach 2002). A drop in ecdysone titer is required to trigger ecdysis in insects. Furthermore, mutations that inactivate the EcR subunit of the ecdysone receptor in Drosophila arrest during larval ecdysis with duplicated larval mouthparts (Schubigeret al. 1998; Li and Bender 2000), a phenotype identical to that described here for amon. Ecdysis itself is coordinated by the peptide hormones EH, ETH, and CCAP. EH and ETH act in a positive feedback loop in which low levels of circulating ETH trigger the release of EH from the brain, which induces exhaustive release of ETH from the Inka cells and EH from the brain (Eweret al. 1997; Zitnanet al. 1999). Studies in the moth, Manduca sexta, have demonstrated that EH acts through a second messenger system to cause elevated levels of cGMP in CCAP-expressing cells (Eweret al. 1997). CCAP release elicits ecdysis motor bursts while suppressing the pre-ecdysis behaviors initiated by EH (Gammie and Truman 1997). Thus CCAP appears to serve as the proximate trigger for ecdysis.
The EH, ETH, and CCAP genes have all been identified in Drosophila. All three peptides contain potential dibasic endoproteolytic cleavage sites (Horodyskiet al. 1993; Parket al. 1999; Loiet al. 2001), thus making them potential AMON substrates. Targeted ablation of EH-producing cells results in disruption of larval and adult ecdysis, although disruption is not complete as approximately one-third of targeted animals emerge as adults with specific behavioral defects (McNabbet al. 1997). Inactivation of eth results in blockage of ecdysis behaviors and nearly complete arrest during larval molting (Parket al. 2002). Arrested eth mutants also exhibit duplicated larval mouthparts, indicating that loss of either amon or eth results in arrest at a similar stage during the larval molting cycle. These results are consistent with the hypothesis that the amon protein acts to proteolytically process neuropeptide hormones that function to trigger larval ecdysis in Drosophila. Further experiments, including colocalization of AMON and potential neuropeptide targets and direct biochemical assay of AMON activity, will be required to establish a direct link between AMON and candidate neuropeptide hormone targets.
It is notable that mutants in another peptide hormone processing enzyzme, PHM, also die during late embryogenesis and early larval development and exhibit defects in larval molting similar to those described here for amon (Jianget al. 2000). PHM acts to α-amidate C-terminal residues of secretory peptides, a modification often required for normal activity of the peptide. By conditional rescue of PHM mutants via heat-shock-controlled PHM expression, Jiang et al. (2000) have also shown that PHM is required for later development including puparium formation and completion of adult development. These results suggest that amidated secretory peptides are required during multiple developmental transitions during the Drosophila life cycle. Does AMON similarly act to process neuropeptide hormones throughout the life cycle? It is interesting to note that, in addition to its embryonic expression, amon expression is detectable during larval and pupal development, increases in late pupae, and peaks during the adult stage (Siekhaus and Fuller 1999). Conditional rescue of amon mutants by heat-shock-induced AMON expression, currently in progress (L. Y. M. Rayburn, S. Jocoy and M. Bender, unpublished data), should allow investigation of amon requirements during pupal development and in the adult.
Acknowledgments
We thank Dr. Kathryn Anderson for providing Drosophila stocks and David Brown, Jennifer Keyes, Don Latner, and Anne Robertson for expert technical assistance. We also acknowledge two reviewers for comments that improved the manuscript. This work was supported by a grant from the National Institutes of Health (NIH; GM-53681) to M.B., by an NIH training grant (GM-07103) to L.Y.M.R., and by a summer undergraduate research fellowship from the Howard Hughes Medical Institute and a Barry M. Goldwater undergraduate scholarship to D.M.
Footnotes
-
Communicating editor: A. J. Lopez
- Received August 19, 2002.
- Accepted October 23, 2002.
- Copyright © 2003 by the Genetics Society of America