Table 3 Top 10 variants ranked by PIPs from different methods and the corresponding P-values on the San Diego cohort
BIMBAMCAVIARBFPAINTOR
SNPP-valuePIPSNPP-valuePIPSNPP-valuePIP
rs131815616.43E-170.596rs131815616.43E-170.651rs131815616.43E-170.707
rs131534611.62E-160.374rs131534611.62E-160.391rs131534611.62E-160.284
rs97160698.45E-150.108rs97160698.45E-150.094rs97160698.45E-150.006
rs74479275.03E-140.062rs74479275.03E-140.054rs117449171.52E-010.004
rs74443131.16E-130.048rs74443131.16E-130.041rs284191914.03E-100.001
rs74461977.76E-120.047rs74461977.76E-120.040rs74479275.03E-140.001
rs284191914.03E-100.037rs284191914.03E-100.031rs283968051.27E-061E-03
rs557921535.92E-130.036rs557921535.92E-130.030rs732573231.20E-044E-04
rs131662146.36E-130.032rs131662146.36E-130.027rs74443131.16E-134E-04
rs361379785.26E-120.030rs361379785.26E-120.026rs73800621.58E-044E-04
  • The SNPs in boldface type are shared in the top 10 SNPs between two cohorts for each method.