Table 5 

Performance of traditional and Bayesian models in inference and prediction for 295 simulated “BSabms” models

BayesDiallel
Simulated componentGriffing linear modelStandard normal modelOutlier model
Full modelBayesSpike:
GCA:GCA + SCA:Full model:True model:Full hglm fit:BayesSpike:d.f. = 3:d.f. = 6:d.f. = 15:d.f. = 6:
NameDiscrepancy“a”“av”“BsSasbs msvsws“BsSasbs msvsws“BsSasbs msvsws“BsSasbs msvswsO3“BsSasbs msvswsO6“BsSasbsms vswsO15
Additive (a)Embedded Image9.42288.417.256.856.737.318.207.607.367.67
(3.2, 18.3)(177.5, 406.3)(2, 15.3)(1.9, 14.4)(2, 14.7)(2, 15.3)(2, 17.4)(1.8, 16.1)(1.8, 15.5)(1.8, 16.3)
Inbreeding (b)Embedded Image255.86b113.20110.8291.21144.65118.66116.03113.85147.12
bb(28.7, 216.6)(27.8, 216.2)(23.9, 202.1)(31.8, 255.9)(30.5, 221.7)(30.4, 218.5)(27.6, 218.3)(33.9, 255.9)
Maternal (m)Embedded Image92.10b5.455.335.335.436.055.635.475.60
bb(1.2, 11.9)(1.1, 12)(1.1, 11.8)(1.2, 12.1)(1.5, 12.3)(1.4, 12)(1.4, 12.3)(1.3, 11.8)
Sex-specific maternal (ms)Embedded Image326.16b20.3520.1320.1420.4622.6921.0920.4621.29
bb(5.2, 47.2)(5, 47.5)(5, 46.6)(5.4, 48.8)(5, 51.8)(6.2, 49.5)(6.1, 48.9)(6.1, 49.8)
Prediction MSEa173.68326.71126.60125.95126.79131.72127.71126.99126.68132.03
(171.4, 175.9)(323.2, 330)(124.8, 128.3)(124.3, 127.7)(125, 128.6)(130, 133.5)(126, 129.5)(125.3, 128.7)(124.9, 128.5)(130.3, 133.8)
  • a Mean and 95% confidence interval of MSEs from 300 independent simulation experiments.

  • b These parameters are not explicitly modeled by the tested procedure.