TABLE 7

Estimated QTL position, effect, LOD score, and variance component for the rice data using the MIM model for design III

PositionEffecta
QTLChromosomecMLODa*LODd*LODEmbedded Image (%)bEmbedded Image (%)b
I232.95.160.4424.860.1510.7912.0912.83
II417.91.53−0.0670.22−0.1141.390.991.05
III728.80.40−0.0810.340.0110.010.340.36
IV85.95.28−0.3123.580.1411.525.696.04
V1124.99.43−0.7238.890.1110.8329.3331.13
VI11115.73.29−0.0930.52−0.1962.962.632.79
  • a Augmented additive (a*) and dominance (d*) effects in tons/hectare.

  • b Embedded Image and Embedded Image are the fraction of the phenotypic variance in backcrosses to indica (Embedded Image) and japonica (Embedded Image), respectively, accounted for by each putative QTL.