TABLE 4

Estimates of QTL position, effect, LOD score, and coefficient of determination for the maize data using the MIM model for design III

PositionEffecta
QTLChromosomecMLODa*LODd*LODEmbedded Image (%)bEmbedded Image (%)b
I189.75.762.281.824.054.772.423.41
II1151.411.11−4.536.514.494.824.406.20
III223.818.80−1.661.127.7616.916.569.25
IV389.715.606.2812.454.536.256.228.77
V42.96.612.011.564.445.932.473.49
VI456.110.723.855.424.827.054.115.79
VII569.823.360.090.019.1823.168.7612.34
VIII5124.910.21−5.489.800.360.033.154.44
IX714.89.48−0.740.265.548.483.224.54
X820.92.48−0.660.054.242.281.932.73
XI866.30.891.880.631.510.400.610.87
XII972.514.33−1.751.216.7312.695.047.11
XIII1078.97.171.661.104.866.782.543.58
  • a Augmented additive (a*) and dominance (d*) effects in bushels/acre.

  • b Embedded Image and Embedded Image are the fraction of the phenotypic variance in backcrosses to Mo17 (Embedded Image) and B73 (Embedded Image), respectively, accounted for by each putative QTL r.