TABLE 2

Comparison of the exact C_LR(t) with the analytic approximation (35) when the selected locus is to the right of locus R

	r_RS = 0.01s		r_RS = 0.05s		r_RS = 0.1s		r_RS = 0.2s		r_RS = 0.3s
t	Exact	Equation 35	Exact	Equation 35	Exact	Equation 35	Exact	Equation 35	Exact	Equation 35
0	2.42	2.42	2.42	2.42	2.42	2.42	2.42	2.42	2.42	2.42
500	2.21	2.20	2.20	2.20	2.20	2.19	2.20	2.19	2.20	2.19
1000	2.17	2.15	2.12	2.06	2.07	2.01	2.02	1.99	2.00	1.98
1500	3.47	3.39	2.83	2.55	2.36	2.08	1.96	1.83	1.85	1.80
2000	6.94	6.93	5.48	5.15	3.59	3.15	2.05	1.85	1.72	1.65
2500	4.33	4.35	6.04	5.98	3.96	3.76	1.96	1.83	1.57	1.52
3000	3.26	3.27	5.54	5.51	3.64	3.52	1.78	1.68	1.42	1.38
3500	2.90	2.90	5.01	5.00	3.30	3.20	1.61	1.52	1.29	1.25
3982	2.63	2.63	4.55	4.54	2.99	2.90	1.46	1.38	1.17	1.13

The values shown are in units of 10⁻². We used r_LR = 0.02s and the same set of initial conditions as in Table 1. As expected, (35) is quite accurate for .