TABLE 3

Comparison of Embedded Image and Embedded Image

Embedded Image Embedded Image
θ BiasMSEVarBiasMSEVarVar(T)aEfficiencyb
10.0521.161.16–0.0021.651.651.671.44
20.0713.073.070.0156.116.116.001.96
30.0625.365.35–0.01012.5712.5713.002.43
40.0458.368.360.00123.3223.3222.672.71
50.04511.9811.970.01235.7135.7135.002.92
60.04916.2516.250.00651.5451.5450.003.08
80.04025.8525.85–0.01686.6686.6688.003.40
100.04336.8836.88–0.059129.69129.69136.673.71
120.06451.2351.22–0.023191.19191.19196.003.83
140.07165.1065.090.005262.74262.74266.004.09
160.05581.9481.93–0.109337.60337.59346.674.23
180.021101.61101.61–0.070423.15423.14438.004.31
20–0.028122.48122.480.108549.14549.13540.004.41
25–0.003182.73182.730.019847.60847.60841.674.61
30–0.006256.49256.490.1241221.031221.011210.004.72
35–0.068340.53340.53–0.1051649.561649.541645.004.83
400.020441.63441.63–0.1292103.782103.762146.674.86
  • a Theoretical value of variance of Embedded Image .

  • b Relative efficiency of Embedded Image over Embedded Image .