TABLE 2

Estimated number of underlying QTL assuming an exponential distribution of effect sizes with dominance

nNF2ndQTL (θ = amin)QTL [θ from (11)]CWZ (C = 1)
205008.87 {3, 14}21.37 {8.55, 37.35}18.69 {6.54, 34.24}15.42 {5.89, 21.75}
Embedded Image Embedded Image [21.3%]
202005.78 {3, 9}27.14 {12.27, 63.41}22.22 {9.32, 51.23}16.19 {10.55, 23.19}
Embedded Image Embedded Image [42.7%]
  • Dominance effects for each QTL were drawn at random from purely recessive to purely dominant as described in the text. See Table 1 for more details.