TABLE 3

Comparison of simulation and analytic results for ε > 0

IJKkAkBϕ2ρ2CFFE
A.2Nα = 500, 2Nβ = 2Nγ = 300, 4Nu = 0.05, 4Nv = 0.2
Analytic0.880.267.188.69.20.980.99710
2Nc = 01.40.397.410.011.20.871.00.9870.004
2Nc = 0.11.50.65.39.911.30.941.00.8940.015
2Nc = 10.50.060.69.211.40.861.00.4600.080
2Nc = 10000.069.211.40.0870.279
B.2Nα = 100, 2Nβ = 2Nγ = 60, 4Nu = 0.05, 4Nv = 0.2
Analytic0.550.173.324.214.600.960.9910
2Nc = 01.40.12.54.76.10.881.00.9670.011
2Nc = 0.10.780.282.45.36.31.01.00.8830.036
2Nc = 10004.96.10.1830.310
C.2Nα = 500, 2N(3 = 2Ny = 450, 4Nu = 0.05, 4Nv = 0.2
Analytic0.250.077.387.777.950.9970.99910
2Nc = 00.890.178.19.410.20.910.670.9960.002
2Nc = 0.10.610.336.88.69.20.901.00.9620.005
2Nc = 10.610.393.59.310.00.901.00.7320.037
2Nc = 50.5600.1110.512.110.0960.201
D.2Nα = 500, 2N(3 = 475, 2Ny = 50, 4Nu = 4Nv = 0.2
Analytic2.750.034.147.010.50.710.99910
2Nc = 03.304.48.112.60.670.9800.002
2Nc = 0.12.00.063.27.812.30.611.00.8300.019
2Nc = 10.1100.285.812.91.00.3840.112
2Nc = 50005.412.30.1080.292
  • In all simulations N = 5000. Each set of parameter values was run for 200,000 generations and data were accumulated every 10,000 generations beginning in generation 30,000.