TABLE 1

Summary of QTL detected by MIM in Radiata pine

Quantitative trait loci
Linkage groupCone numberTree diameterBranch score
PositionEffectLRTPositionEffectLRTPositionEffectLRT
1[1, 1, 3]a (4.60)b ([1, 1, 0], [1, 2, 3])c–0.5745 (0.1796)9.64[1, 3, 61] (1.96) ([1, 3, 48], [1, 3, 66])81.05 (8.48)24.00[1, 4, 11] (7.49) ([1, 3, 47], [1, 5, 7])0.5273 (0.1734)10.37
[1, 4, 0] NA ([1, 4, 0], [1, 4, 1])–92.99 (8.89)24.00
2[2, 6, 0]d NA ([2, 5, 1], [2, 6, 10])0.5228 (0.1965)14.85[2, 2, 0]f NA ([2, 1, 2], [2, 2, 9])14.71 (4.49)25.91[2, 1, 0] NA ([2, 1, 0], [2, 2, 7])–0.4597 (0.1647)15.62
5[5, 10, 0]d,e NA ([5, 8, 1], [5, 10, 7])0.4537
0.1756
23.77[5, 5, 0]g NA ([5, 4, 7], [5, 5, 16])7.16 (4.46)9.48
6[6, 4, 18] (1.63) ([6, 3, 7], [6, 5, 5])0.8505 (0.1719)15.71
10[10, 5, 7] (1.01) ([10, 4, 46], [10, 5, 14])1.2679 (0.2361)24.56[10, 5, 9]g NA ([10,4,34], [10,6,4])15.92 (4.70)18.90
[10, 9, 0] NA ([10, 8, 2], [10, 9, 10])–0.9656 (0.2230)25.06
11[11, 4, 21] (1.95) ([11, 4, 8.5], [11, 4, 25])–1.3144 (0.2317)27.39
[11, 6, 0] NA ([11, 5, 8], [11, 5, 12]1.1122 (0.2361)20.47
12[12, 3, 2]e (1.76) ([12, 2, 6], [12, 3, 6])–0.8178 (0.1874)25.03[12, 5, 9]f NA ([12, 4, 1], [12, 6, 3])–8.41 (4.49)17.90[12, 5, 0] NA ([12, 2, 8]), [12, 5, 11])0.5085 (0.1597)10.36

NA, not available.

  • a [1, 1, 3] denotes the QTL at 3 cM away from the left marker of the first interval on linkage group 1.

  • b Asymptotic standard deviation.

  • c Lod support interval. ([1, 1, 0], [1, 2, 3]) denotes the interval with lower bound at [1, 1, 0] and upper bound at [1, 2, 3].

  • d QTL interact with epistatic effect –0.9783 (LRT = 10.22).

  • e QTL interact with epistatic effect –1.0800 (LRT = 4.48).

  • f QTL interact with epistatic effect 39.54 (LRT = 15.23).

  • g QTL interact with epistatic effect 22.64 (LRT = 4.84).