TABLE 1

Summary of QTL detected by MIM in Radiata pine

	Quantitative trait loci
Linkage group	Cone number			Tree diameter			Branch score
Linkage group	Position	Effect	LRT	Position	Effect	LRT	Position	Effect	LRT
1	[1, 1, 3]^{^a} (4.60)^{^b} ([1, 1, 0], [1, 2, 3])^{^c}	–0.5745 (0.1796)	9.64	[1, 3, 61] (1.96) ([1, 3, 48], [1, 3, 66])	81.05 (8.48)	24.00	[1, 4, 11] (7.49) ([1, 3, 47], [1, 5, 7])	0.5273 (0.1734)	10.37
				[1, 4, 0] NA ([1, 4, 0], [1, 4, 1])	–92.99 (8.89)	24.00
2	[2, 6, 0]^{^d} NA ([2, 5, 1], [2, 6, 10])	0.5228 (0.1965)	14.85	[2, 2, 0]^{^f} NA ([2, 1, 2], [2, 2, 9])	14.71 (4.49)	25.91	[2, 1, 0] NA ([2, 1, 0], [2, 2, 7])	–0.4597 (0.1647)	15.62
5	[5, 10, 0]^{^d,^e} NA ([5, 8, 1], [5, 10, 7])	0.4537 0.1756	23.77	[5, 5, 0]^{^g} NA ([5, 4, 7], [5, 5, 16])	7.16 (4.46)	9.48
6	[6, 4, 18] (1.63) ([6, 3, 7], [6, 5, 5])	0.8505 (0.1719)	15.71
10	[10, 5, 7] (1.01) ([10, 4, 46], [10, 5, 14])	1.2679 (0.2361)	24.56	[10, 5, 9]^{^g} NA ([10,4,34], [10,6,4])	15.92 (4.70)	18.90
	[10, 9, 0] NA ([10, 8, 2], [10, 9, 10])	–0.9656 (0.2230)	25.06
11							[11, 4, 21] (1.95) ([11, 4, 8.5], [11, 4, 25])	–1.3144 (0.2317)	27.39
							[11, 6, 0] NA ([11, 5, 8], [11, 5, 12]	1.1122 (0.2361)	20.47
12	[12, 3, 2]^{^e} (1.76) ([12, 2, 6], [12, 3, 6])	–0.8178 (0.1874)	25.03	[12, 5, 9]^{^f} NA ([12, 4, 1], [12, 6, 3])	–8.41 (4.49)	17.90	[12, 5, 0] NA ([12, 2, 8]), [12, 5, 11])	0.5085 (0.1597)	10.36

NA, not available.

↵a [1, 1, 3] denotes the QTL at 3 cM away from the left marker of the first interval on linkage group 1.
↵b Asymptotic standard deviation.
↵c Lod support interval. ([1, 1, 0], [1, 2, 3]) denotes the interval with lower bound at [1, 1, 0] and upper bound at [1, 2, 3].
↵d QTL interact with epistatic effect –0.9783 (LRT = 10.22).
↵e QTL interact with epistatic effect –1.0800 (LRT = 4.48).
↵f QTL interact with epistatic effect 39.54 (LRT = 15.23).
↵g QTL interact with epistatic effect 22.64 (LRT = 4.84).