TABLE 2

Interactions between cut mutations and heterozygous Nipped mutations

Wing margin phenotypea
Nipped allelectL-32/Y; su(Hw)e2ct53d/Yct2s/ +
Nipped+b<0.027.23 ± 0.10<0.01
l(2)41Ae34-14<0.027.73 ± 0.170.05 ± 0.02
l(2)41Af 45-72<0.0220.32 ± 0.510.09 ± 0.05
Nipped-A34-127.78 ± 0.14
Nipped-A3230.41 ± 0.208.52 ± 0.12<0.01
Nipped-A222.30.16 ± 0.0911.07 ± 0.210.25 ± 0.05
T(2;3)Nipped-A394212.70 ± 0.240.94 ± 0.12
T(2;3)Nipped-B46.17 ± 0.120.02 ± 0.02
T(2;3)Nipped-B35917.34 ± 0.130.03 ± 0.02
Nipped-B292.11.20 ± 0.347.63 ± 0.090.09 ± 0.03
Nipped-B4074.76 ± 0.827.98 ± 0.120.05 ± 0.02
Nipped-C160.10.31 ± 0.146.75 ± 0.090.08 ± 0.03
T(2;3)Nipped-C138217.75 ± 0.280.06 ± 0.02
Nipped-D341.10.91 ± 0.2418.69 ± 0.340.48 ± 0.06
Nipped-D263.30.74 ± 0.2524.63 ± 0.480.76 ± 0.08
Nipped-E299.11.90 ± 0.5516.60 ± 0.490.45 ± 0.08
Nipped-E431.09 ± 0.2917.77 ± 0.230.43 ± 0.05
Nipped-E3380.48 ± 0.1723.06 ± 0.340.68 ± 0.07
Df(2R)M41A8>30
  • a Wing margin nicks per fly; error values are standard errors. The number of flies scored ranged from 20 to 39 for ctL32/Y; su(Hw)e2, 68 to 303 for ct53d/Y, and 64 to 211 for ct2s/+. See Figure 4 for sample phenotypes with ct53d.

  • b From Oregon R; all Nipped+ alleles tested gave virtually the same phenotypes.