TABLE 2

Interactions between cut mutations and heterozygous Nipped mutations

	Wing margin phenotype^a
Nipped allele	ct^L-32/Y; su(Hw)^e2	ct^53d/Y	ct^2s/ +
Nipped⁺^b	<0.02	7.23 ± 0.10	<0.01
l(2)41Ae^34-14	<0.02	7.73 ± 0.17	0.05 ± 0.02
l(2)41Af ^45-72	<0.02	20.32 ± 0.51	0.09 ± 0.05
Nipped-A^34-12		7.78 ± 0.14
Nipped-A³²³	0.41 ± 0.20	8.52 ± 0.12	<0.01
Nipped-A^222.3	0.16 ± 0.09	11.07 ± 0.21	0.25 ± 0.05
T(2;3)Nipped-A³⁹⁴²		12.70 ± 0.24	0.94 ± 0.12
T(2;3)Nipped-B⁴		6.17 ± 0.12	0.02 ± 0.02
T(2;3)Nipped-B³⁵⁹1		7.34 ± 0.13	0.03 ± 0.02
Nipped-B^292.1	1.20 ± 0.34	7.63 ± 0.09	0.09 ± 0.03
Nipped-B⁴⁰⁷	4.76 ± 0.82	7.98 ± 0.12	0.05 ± 0.02
Nipped-C^160.1	0.31 ± 0.14	6.75 ± 0.09	0.08 ± 0.03
T(2;3)Nipped-C¹³⁸²		17.75 ± 0.28	0.06 ± 0.02
Nipped-D^341.1	0.91 ± 0.24	18.69 ± 0.34	0.48 ± 0.06
Nipped-D^263.3	0.74 ± 0.25	24.63 ± 0.48	0.76 ± 0.08
Nipped-E^299.1	1.90 ± 0.55	16.60 ± 0.49	0.45 ± 0.08
Nipped-E⁴³	1.09 ± 0.29	17.77 ± 0.23	0.43 ± 0.05
Nipped-E³³⁸	0.48 ± 0.17	23.06 ± 0.34	0.68 ± 0.07
Df(2R)M41A8		>30

↵^a Wing margin nicks per fly; error values are standard errors. The number of flies scored ranged from 20 to 39 for ct^L32/Y; su(Hw)^e2, 68 to 303 for ct^53d/Y, and 64 to 211 for ct^2s/+. See Figure 4 for sample phenotypes with ct^53d.
↵^b From Oregon R; all Nipped⁺ alleles tested gave virtually the same phenotypes.