Skip to main content
  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • YouTube
  • LinkedIn
  • Google Plus
  • Other GSA Resources
    • Genetics Society of America
    • G3: Genes | Genomes | Genetics
    • Genes to Genomes: The GSA Blog
    • GSA Conferences
    • GeneticsCareers.org
  • Log in
Genetics

Main menu

  • HOME
  • ISSUES
    • Current Issue
    • Early Online
    • Archive
  • ABOUT
    • About the journal
    • Why publish with us?
    • Editorial board
    • Early Career Reviewers
    • Contact us
  • SERIES
    • All Series
    • Genomic Prediction
    • Multiparental Populations
    • FlyBook
    • WormBook
    • YeastBook
  • ARTICLE TYPES
    • About Article Types
    • Commentaries
    • Editorials
    • GSA Honors and Awards
    • Methods, Technology & Resources
    • Perspectives
    • Primers
    • Reviews
    • Toolbox Reviews
  • PUBLISH & REVIEW
    • Scope & publication policies
    • Submission & review process
    • Article types
    • Prepare your manuscript
    • Submit your manuscript
    • After acceptance
    • Guidelines for reviewers
  • SUBSCRIBE
    • Why subscribe?
    • For institutions
    • For individuals
    • Email alerts
    • RSS feeds
  • Other GSA Resources
    • Genetics Society of America
    • G3: Genes | Genomes | Genetics
    • Genes to Genomes: The GSA Blog
    • GSA Conferences
    • GeneticsCareers.org

User menu

Search

  • Advanced search
Genetics

Advanced Search

  • HOME
  • ISSUES
    • Current Issue
    • Early Online
    • Archive
  • ABOUT
    • About the journal
    • Why publish with us?
    • Editorial board
    • Early Career Reviewers
    • Contact us
  • SERIES
    • All Series
    • Genomic Prediction
    • Multiparental Populations
    • FlyBook
    • WormBook
    • YeastBook
  • ARTICLE TYPES
    • About Article Types
    • Commentaries
    • Editorials
    • GSA Honors and Awards
    • Methods, Technology & Resources
    • Perspectives
    • Primers
    • Reviews
    • Toolbox Reviews
  • PUBLISH & REVIEW
    • Scope & publication policies
    • Submission & review process
    • Article types
    • Prepare your manuscript
    • Submit your manuscript
    • After acceptance
    • Guidelines for reviewers
  • SUBSCRIBE
    • Why subscribe?
    • For institutions
    • For individuals
    • Email alerts
    • RSS feeds
Previous ArticleNext Article

Novel Loci Control Variation in Reproductive Timing in Arabidopsis thaliana in Natural Environments

Cynthia Weinig, Mark C. Ungerer, Lisa A. Dorn, Nolan C. Kane, Yuko Toyonaga, Solveig S. Halldorsdottir, Trudy F. C. Mackay, Michael D. Purugganan and Johanna Schmitt
Genetics December 1, 2002 vol. 162 no. 4 1875-1884
Cynthia Weinig
* Department of Ecology and Evolutionary Biology, Brown University, Providence, Rhode Island 02912† Department of Plant Biology, University of Minnesota, St. Paul, Minnesota 55108
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • For correspondence: cweinig@tc.umn.edu
Mark C. Ungerer
‡ Department of Genetics, North Carolina State University, Raleigh, North Carolina 27695
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Lisa A. Dorn
* Department of Ecology and Evolutionary Biology, Brown University, Providence, Rhode Island 02912
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Nolan C. Kane
* Department of Ecology and Evolutionary Biology, Brown University, Providence, Rhode Island 02912
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Yuko Toyonaga
* Department of Ecology and Evolutionary Biology, Brown University, Providence, Rhode Island 02912
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Solveig S. Halldorsdottir
‡ Department of Genetics, North Carolina State University, Raleigh, North Carolina 27695
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Trudy F. C. Mackay
‡ Department of Genetics, North Carolina State University, Raleigh, North Carolina 27695
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Michael D. Purugganan
‡ Department of Genetics, North Carolina State University, Raleigh, North Carolina 27695
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Johanna Schmitt
* Department of Ecology and Evolutionary Biology, Brown University, Providence, Rhode Island 02912
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
Loading

Article Figures & Data

Figures

  • Tables
  • Figure 1.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Figure 1.

    —QTL detected under short and long days in the phytotron at NCSU and in experimental field plantings in Rhode Island and North Carolina. Solid symbols represent QTL detected under SD conditions in the phytotron and SD field conditions experienced by the fall seasonal cohorts. Open symbols represent QTL detected under LD conditions in the phytotron and LD conditions experienced in the field by the spring seasonal cohorts. Lines bracketing the QTL symbols denote the 2-LOD support limits (see Table 4 for exact values). Significance of individual QTL at an experiment-wide error rate of α= 0.05 was determined through permutation tests, with the exception that the QTL with a “+” is significant only at α< 0.15. Multiple symbols with overlapping support limits within an experimental treatment indicate that the LR test statistic dropped below the significance threshold between the two QTL peaks. Colors highlight specific results: pink denotes QTL for bolting date common to all environments; green denotes QTL common to long days in the phytotron and long-day field settings (>12 hrs); blue denotes QTL common to short days in the phytotron and short-day field settings (<12 hrs); gold denotes QTL common to long and short days in the phytotron; and red denotes QTL that significantly affected bolting date only in one or more field environments.

Tables

  • Figures
  • TABLE 1

    Differences in photoperiod at time of germination and bolting among the seasonal environments and geographic regions

    EnvironmentApproximate
    date of
    germination
    Date of first
    bolting
    Days to
    first
    bolting
    Average
    days to
    bolting
    Shortest photoperiod
    between germination
    and bolting
    Photoperiod
    at bolting
    Fall
        Rhode IslandOct. 17-19March 11341509 hr 09 min11 hr 14 min
        North CarolinaOct. 31-Nov. 3December 19497310 hr 26 min9 hr 45 min
    Spring
        Rhode IslandMarch 21-23April 28384412 hr 10 min13 hr 53 min
        North CarolinaFeb. 22-24April 15526011 hr 09 min13 hr 05 min
    • Dates of germination are the dates on which the seed stratification treatments ended and seed trays were placed under ambient photoperiods. Date of first bolting indicates the date the first plants in a cohort began bolting, that is, differentiated a flowering inflorescence, while days to bolting is the absolute number of days elapsed between the time of germination to the time of bolting. The following column provides the average number of days to bolting for a cohort. Because changes in day length may influence bolting date, the shortest photoperiod experienced by a cohort after planting, in addition to the photoperiod on the date of bolting, are presented in the last two columns. Note that the North Carolina fall and Rhode Island spring cohorts experienced day lengths consistently shorter and longer than 12 hr, respectively, from the time of germination to bolting, while the other two cohorts experienced increasing day lengths prior to bolting.

  • TABLE 2

    Restricted maximum-likelihood estimates of the among-line variance component, VL, and associated P value within each field and controlled environment

    EnvironmentVLVerrorP
    Fall
        Rhode Island2.2113.62<0.0001
        North Carolina77.40435.04<0.0001
    Spring
        Rhode Island5.3118.51<0.0001
        North Carolina5.6950.21<0.0001
    Long days2.662.77<0.0001
    Short days11.6814.70<0.0001
  • TABLE 3

    Two-way ANOVA for bolting date responses to seasonal environments in Rhode Island and North Carolina

    Sourced.f.Mean Variance
    square
    PMean Variance
    component
    A. Rhode Island
    Line94118.300.011.05
    Season11.20 × 106<0.0001—
    Line × season9475.29<0.00012.80
    Error404718.0618.04
    B. North Carolina
    Line941527.740.0510.57
    Season15.00 × 106<0.0001—
    Line × season941080.54<0.000138.55
    Error3880250.26250.59
  • TABLE 4

    QTL for bolting date under short and long days in the phytotron and in fall and spring seasonal cohorts in Rhode Island and North Carolina

    TraitChromosomeQTL map position in
    cM (nearest marker)
    2-LOD
    support limit
    (cM range)
    LRAdditive
    effect/σG
    [r2]
    Short days in phytotron149.45 (CATTS039)41.64-54.6631.6-0.120.14
    241.55 (er)39.24-45.0531.8-0.150.14
    279.76 (RRS2)69.05-79.7621.90.100.08
    458.74 (JGB9)47.70-69.3920.60.100.09
    469.31 (mi232)47.70-69.3919.20.090.08
    5126.05 (SNP153)121.54-129.6534.10.170.16
    Fall cohort in Rhode Island188.81 (agp1e)82.71-97.7115.1-0.140.04
    193.15 (CH.215L)91.01-96.8719.7-0.170.06
    240.89 (er)39.24-44.0544.2-0.280.15
    353.40 (ve021)47.39-56.9039.20.200.12
    40.01 (mi51)0.01-3.3225.10.190.07
    456.40 (AG)53.02-58.7424.20.160.08
    584.01 (mi83)69.67-90.9617.4-0.140.04
    5128.15 (CATHHANK)122.54-132.1537.90.210.12
    Fall cohort in North Carolina15.40 (apx1A)0.01-11.1714.9-0.040.06
    115.27 (ATTS0477)11.17-15.5714.6-0.040.06
    1111.73 (mi103)111.73-114.2424.90.070.16
    1123.82 (ve011)121.62-127.0934.10.090.18
    260.27 (ve018)42.05-79.7614.80.040.06
    276.26 (RRS2)42.05-79.7614.10.040.06
    450.23 (mi260)43.45-62.1016.20.050.07
    456.90 (AG)43.45-62.1014.50.050.07
    558.40 (mi291b)54.91-63.1723.8-0.060.10
    5127.05 (ve032)106.45-132.1510.10.030.04+
    Long days in phytotron10.01 (ve001)0.01-11.1714.3-0.180.07
    216.93 (g4133)10.20-29.1518.30.200.08
    225.15 (mi398)10.20-29.1516.30.200.07
    242.55 (er)36.74-50.0523.2-0.250.13
    519.60 (ve033)16.60-24.4226.70.350.15
    5125.05 (SNP153)120.09-128.1535.20.280.19
    Spring cohort in Rhode Island10.01 (ve001)0.01-3.0132.9-0.200.15
    1111.73 (mi103)111.73-136.3715.30.140.07
    1123.32 (ve011)119.04-131.3725.50.180.10
    20.05 (ve012)0.01-12.0015.20.130.06
    361.07 (g4564b)49.89-71.9413.90.120.06
    514.34 (g3837)10.01-31.4218.50.150.08
    519.60 (ve033)9.73-31.2718.50.150.08
    5110.99 (emb514)109.45-132.1513.80.130.07
    5125.05 (SNP153)116.33-128.1521.30.150.09
    Spring cohort in North Carolina10.01 (ve001)0.01-11.1713.6-0.160.07
    15.40 (apx1A)0.01-11.1714.3-0.160.08
    184.35 (mi209)79.82-96.3717.5-0.190.10
    189.81 (agp1e)79.82-97.7114.1-0.180.09
    1126.59 (agp64)120.04-134.8720.40.210.13
    49.77 (mi301)6.08-13.3416.7-0.220.10
    5122.04 (g2368)114.99-132.1514.10.170.08
    5127.55 (CATHHANK)114.99-132.1514.10.160.08
    • QTL for each trait were mapped using composite interval mapping within each geographic region and season. The first three columns indicate the chromosomal location of the QTL, the nearest marker locus, and the centimorgan range defining the 2-LOD support limits around the QTL. The LR is the test statistic for composite interval mapping, the significance of which is determined through permutation analyses (Doerge and Churchill 1996); for all traits, the significance threshold for an experiment-wide error rate of α= 0.05 was <14.2. The “+” symbol denotes a QTL significant at α< 0.15. The second to last column denotes the additive effects. Effects are positive if the Col allele confers bolting later than the Ler allele and negative if the Col allele confers bolting earlier. The final column shows the proportion of variance explained by a QTL, which was calculated as the proportion of the model sums of squares explained by a given QTL in an ANOVA including all significant QTL as main effects.

Previous ArticleNext Article
Back to top

PUBLICATION INFORMATION

Volume 162 Issue 4, December 2002

Genetics: 162 (4)

ARTICLE CLASSIFICATION

INVESTIGATIONS
View this article with LENS
Email

Thank you for sharing this Genetics article.

NOTE: We request your email address only to inform the recipient that it was you who recommended this article, and that it is not junk mail. We do not retain these email addresses.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Novel Loci Control Variation in Reproductive Timing in Arabidopsis thaliana in Natural Environments
(Your Name) has forwarded a page to you from Genetics
(Your Name) thought you would be interested in this article in Genetics.
Print
Alerts
Enter your email below to set up alert notifications for new article, or to manage your existing alerts.
SIGN UP OR SIGN IN WITH YOUR EMAIL
View PDF
Share

Novel Loci Control Variation in Reproductive Timing in Arabidopsis thaliana in Natural Environments

Cynthia Weinig, Mark C. Ungerer, Lisa A. Dorn, Nolan C. Kane, Yuko Toyonaga, Solveig S. Halldorsdottir, Trudy F. C. Mackay, Michael D. Purugganan and Johanna Schmitt
Genetics December 1, 2002 vol. 162 no. 4 1875-1884
Cynthia Weinig
* Department of Ecology and Evolutionary Biology, Brown University, Providence, Rhode Island 02912† Department of Plant Biology, University of Minnesota, St. Paul, Minnesota 55108
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • For correspondence: cweinig@tc.umn.edu
Mark C. Ungerer
‡ Department of Genetics, North Carolina State University, Raleigh, North Carolina 27695
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Lisa A. Dorn
* Department of Ecology and Evolutionary Biology, Brown University, Providence, Rhode Island 02912
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Nolan C. Kane
* Department of Ecology and Evolutionary Biology, Brown University, Providence, Rhode Island 02912
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Yuko Toyonaga
* Department of Ecology and Evolutionary Biology, Brown University, Providence, Rhode Island 02912
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Solveig S. Halldorsdottir
‡ Department of Genetics, North Carolina State University, Raleigh, North Carolina 27695
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Trudy F. C. Mackay
‡ Department of Genetics, North Carolina State University, Raleigh, North Carolina 27695
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Michael D. Purugganan
‡ Department of Genetics, North Carolina State University, Raleigh, North Carolina 27695
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Johanna Schmitt
* Department of Ecology and Evolutionary Biology, Brown University, Providence, Rhode Island 02912
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
del.icio.us logo Digg logo Reddit logo Twitter logo CiteULike logo Facebook logo Google logo Mendeley logo
Citation

Novel Loci Control Variation in Reproductive Timing in Arabidopsis thaliana in Natural Environments

Cynthia Weinig, Mark C. Ungerer, Lisa A. Dorn, Nolan C. Kane, Yuko Toyonaga, Solveig S. Halldorsdottir, Trudy F. C. Mackay, Michael D. Purugganan and Johanna Schmitt
Genetics December 1, 2002 vol. 162 no. 4 1875-1884
Cynthia Weinig
* Department of Ecology and Evolutionary Biology, Brown University, Providence, Rhode Island 02912† Department of Plant Biology, University of Minnesota, St. Paul, Minnesota 55108
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • For correspondence: cweinig@tc.umn.edu
Mark C. Ungerer
‡ Department of Genetics, North Carolina State University, Raleigh, North Carolina 27695
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Lisa A. Dorn
* Department of Ecology and Evolutionary Biology, Brown University, Providence, Rhode Island 02912
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Nolan C. Kane
* Department of Ecology and Evolutionary Biology, Brown University, Providence, Rhode Island 02912
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Yuko Toyonaga
* Department of Ecology and Evolutionary Biology, Brown University, Providence, Rhode Island 02912
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Solveig S. Halldorsdottir
‡ Department of Genetics, North Carolina State University, Raleigh, North Carolina 27695
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Trudy F. C. Mackay
‡ Department of Genetics, North Carolina State University, Raleigh, North Carolina 27695
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Michael D. Purugganan
‡ Department of Genetics, North Carolina State University, Raleigh, North Carolina 27695
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Johanna Schmitt
* Department of Ecology and Evolutionary Biology, Brown University, Providence, Rhode Island 02912
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero

Related Articles

Cited By

More in this TOC Section

  • Comparative Genomics and Transcriptomics To Analyze Fruiting Body Development in Filamentous Ascomycetes
  • The Fate of Deleterious Variants in a Barley Genomic Prediction Population
  • The Enigmatic Canal-Associated Neurons Regulate Caenorhabditis elegans Larval Development Through a cAMP Signaling Pathway
Show more Investigations
  • Top
  • Article
    • Abstract
    • MATERIALS AND METHODS
    • RESULTS AND DISCUSSION
    • Acknowledgments
    • Footnotes
    • LITERATURE CITED
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics

GSA

The Genetics Society of America (GSA), founded in 1931, is the professional membership organization for scientific researchers and educators in the field of genetics. Our members work to advance knowledge in the basic mechanisms of inheritance, from the molecular to the population level.

Online ISSN: 1943-2631

  • For Authors
  • For Reviewers
  • For Subscribers
  • Submit a Manuscript
  • Editorial Board
  • Press Releases

SPPA Logo

GET CONNECTED

RSS  Subscribe with RSS.

email  Subscribe via email. Sign up to receive alert notifications of new articles.

  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • YouTube
  • LinkedIn
  • Google Plus

Copyright © 2019 by the Genetics Society of America

  • About GENETICS
  • Terms of use
  • Advertising
  • Permissions
  • Contact us
  • International access