Skip to main content
  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • YouTube
  • LinkedIn
  • Google Plus
  • Other GSA Resources
    • Genetics Society of America
    • G3: Genes | Genomes | Genetics
    • Genes to Genomes: The GSA Blog
    • GSA Conferences
    • GeneticsCareers.org
  • Log in
Genetics

Main menu

  • HOME
  • ISSUES
    • Current Issue
    • Early Online
    • Archive
  • ABOUT
    • About the journal
    • Why publish with us?
    • Editorial board
    • Early Career Reviewers
    • Contact us
  • SERIES
    • All Series
    • Genomic Prediction
    • Multiparental Populations
    • FlyBook
    • WormBook
    • YeastBook
  • ARTICLE TYPES
    • About Article Types
    • Commentaries
    • Editorials
    • GSA Honors and Awards
    • Methods, Technology & Resources
    • Perspectives
    • Primers
    • Reviews
    • Toolbox Reviews
  • PUBLISH & REVIEW
    • Scope & publication policies
    • Submission & review process
    • Article types
    • Prepare your manuscript
    • Submit your manuscript
    • After acceptance
    • Guidelines for reviewers
  • SUBSCRIBE
    • Why subscribe?
    • For institutions
    • For individuals
    • Email alerts
    • RSS feeds
  • Other GSA Resources
    • Genetics Society of America
    • G3: Genes | Genomes | Genetics
    • Genes to Genomes: The GSA Blog
    • GSA Conferences
    • GeneticsCareers.org

User menu

Search

  • Advanced search
Genetics

Advanced Search

  • HOME
  • ISSUES
    • Current Issue
    • Early Online
    • Archive
  • ABOUT
    • About the journal
    • Why publish with us?
    • Editorial board
    • Early Career Reviewers
    • Contact us
  • SERIES
    • All Series
    • Genomic Prediction
    • Multiparental Populations
    • FlyBook
    • WormBook
    • YeastBook
  • ARTICLE TYPES
    • About Article Types
    • Commentaries
    • Editorials
    • GSA Honors and Awards
    • Methods, Technology & Resources
    • Perspectives
    • Primers
    • Reviews
    • Toolbox Reviews
  • PUBLISH & REVIEW
    • Scope & publication policies
    • Submission & review process
    • Article types
    • Prepare your manuscript
    • Submit your manuscript
    • After acceptance
    • Guidelines for reviewers
  • SUBSCRIBE
    • Why subscribe?
    • For institutions
    • For individuals
    • Email alerts
    • RSS feeds
Previous ArticleNext Article

Predicting Evolutionary Potential: In Vitro Evolution Accurately Reproduces Natural Evolution of the TEM β-Lactamase

Miriam Barlow and Barry G. Hall
Genetics March 1, 2002 vol. 160 no. 3 823-832
Miriam Barlow
Biology Department, University of Rochester, Rochester, New York 14627-0211
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Barry G. Hall
Biology Department, University of Rochester, Rochester, New York 14627-0211
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • For correspondence: drbh@mail.rochester.edu
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
Loading

Article Figures & Data

Figures

  • Tables
  • Figure 1.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Figure 1.

    Phylogeny of the TEM and SHV β-lactamases. Branch lengths, in nucleotide substitutions, are adjacent to the branches. Except as indicated all clades have posterior probabilities of >75%. Clades indicated by a single dot have probabilities of 60–75%, and those with two dots have probabilities of 50–59%. Because TEM β-lactamases are named strictly according to differences in protein sequence(http://www.lahey.org/studies/webt.htm) variants that differ only by silent mutations are assigned names such as TEM-1a, TEM-1b, and so on. A complete list of accession numbers and references is available at http://www.rochester.edu/College/BIO/labs/HallLab/TEM_Phylo.html.

Tables

  • Figures
  • TABLE 1

    Mutational spectra

    Spontaneous (%)
    MutationlacIaebgRbE. coli averageTaqc (%)Nucleoside analogs (%)dMutazymee (%)
    AT to GC698317510
    GC to AT562440212045
    GC to TA1642297<120
    GC to CG444009
    AT to CG91110754
    AT to TA9111034011
    • ↵Values shown are the percentages of base substitutions.

    • ↵a Halliday and Glickman (1991).

    • ↵b Hall (1999).

    • ↵c Shafikhani et al. (1997).

    • ↵d Zaccolo and Gherardi (1999).

    • e GeneMorph PCR mutagenesis kit instruction manual (Stratagene).

  • TABLE 2

    MICs of evolved TEM alleles

    Isolate no.
    DrugaClinical MICbpACSE3TEM11234567a7b89
    AMC322>4096>40964096409640964096>4096>40964096>40964096
    PIP1282>20482048204820482048204820484096102420482048
    TZP1281256161664321283264323232
    TIC1284>4096>4096>4096>4096>4096>4096>4096>4096>40962048>4096
    TIM128451225612812812825612812864128128
    CEF32410245125121024512512642566464256
    CXM32816512512102410241024321286432512
    (CRO)640.0630.2551212864128643232163264
    (CTX)640.1250.1255122565122565123232163232
    (CAZ)320.2511286464645122048204851220482048
    FEP320.0630.516888832164648
    (ATM)320.1250.53264646412851210241281024512
    • The MICs of the antibiotic in which the lines were first selected appear italic.

    • ↵a Abbreviations for (β-lactams are the following: AMC, ampicillin; PIP, pipericillin; TZP, pipericillin and tazobactam (8:1); TIC, ticarcillin; TIM, ticarcillin and clavulanate; CEF, cephalothin; CXM, cefuroxime; CRO, ceftriaxone; CTX, cefotaxime; CAZ, ceftazadime; FEP, cefepime; ATM, aztreonam. The “extended-spectrum” drugs used for selection are in parentheses.

    • ↵b The indicated MICs are the NCCLS breakpoints for resistance (National Committee for Clinical Laboratory Standards 1999).

  • TABLE 3

    Mutations recovered from in vitro evolved TEM alleles

    Amino acid substitutionb
    DNA siteaMutation1234567a7b89
    11A>GQ6R
    45G>As
    105A>Gss
    199C>GA42G
    220C>Ts
    304G>A(E104K)(E104K)(E104K)(E104K)(E104K)(E104K)(E104K)
    484C>A(R164S)(R164S)R164Nc(R164S)
    485G>A(R164H)R164Nc
    496G>AE168K
    498G>As
    511A>GI173VI173VI173V
    512T>GI173T
    539T>C(M182T)(M182T)
    546A>Gs
    562T>Cs
    571C>Ts
    660C>Ts
    697T>As
    703G>TA237SA237S
    706G>A(G238S)(G238S)(G238S)(G238S)(G238S)(G238S)
    709G>A(E240K)(E240K)(E240K)
    748G>CD254H
    749A>GD254G
    756G>As
    782C>T(T265M)(T265M)
    784A>GT266A
    787G>AG267R
    825C>As
    • Substitutions that have arisen multiple times in nature are in parentheses. s, a silent mutation.

    • ↵a Position in the coding sequence.

    • ↵b Substitutions are given as the TEM-1 amino acid according to the IUPAC single-letter code, the position in the protein numbered according to Ambler et al. (1991), and the mutant amino acid. E104K means that the glutamate at position 104 of TEM-1 was replaced by lysine.

    • ↵c The R164N mutation is the result of two base substitutions.

  • TABLE 4

    Amino acid substitutions in naturally occurring extended-spectrum TEM alleles

    Amino acid position
    Enzyme2139425192104153164182237238240244265268
    TEM-1LQALGEHRMAGERTS
    TEM-2aKKS
    TEM-3KKS
    TEM-5STK
    TEM-6KH
    TEM-8KKSS
    TEM-9FKSM
    TEM-10SK
    TEM-11KH
    TEM-12S
    TEM-15KS
    TEM-17K
    TEM-20TS
    TEM-21KKRS
    TEM-22KKGS
    TEM-24KKSTK
    TEM-25FSM
    TEM-26KS
    TEM-27HKM
    TEM-28HK
    TEM-29H
    TEM-42KVSKM
    TEM-43KHT
    TEM-47SKM
    TEM-48FSKM
    TEM-49FSKMG
    TEM-53FS
    TEM-54L
    TEM-60KPKS
    TEM-66KDKS
    TEM-72TSK
    No. of times the mutation has arisen3111171H5 S73G1 T256121
    • Data are from http://www.lahey.org/studies/webt.htm. The number of times each mutation has arisen independently is based on the phylogeny shown in Figure 1.

    • ↵a TEM-2 is not an extended-spectrum allele but is shown because the Q39K substitution that is found in nine extended-spectrum alleles arose in TEM-2.

Previous ArticleNext Article
Back to top

PUBLICATION INFORMATION

Volume 160 Issue 3, March 2002

Genetics: 160 (3)

ARTICLE CLASSIFICATION

INVESTIGATIONS
View this article with LENS
Email

Thank you for sharing this Genetics article.

NOTE: We request your email address only to inform the recipient that it was you who recommended this article, and that it is not junk mail. We do not retain these email addresses.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Predicting Evolutionary Potential: In Vitro Evolution Accurately Reproduces Natural Evolution of the TEM β-Lactamase
(Your Name) has forwarded a page to you from Genetics
(Your Name) thought you would be interested in this article in Genetics.
Print
Alerts
Enter your email below to set up alert notifications for new article, or to manage your existing alerts.
SIGN UP OR SIGN IN WITH YOUR EMAIL
View PDF
Share

Predicting Evolutionary Potential: In Vitro Evolution Accurately Reproduces Natural Evolution of the TEM β-Lactamase

Miriam Barlow and Barry G. Hall
Genetics March 1, 2002 vol. 160 no. 3 823-832
Miriam Barlow
Biology Department, University of Rochester, Rochester, New York 14627-0211
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Barry G. Hall
Biology Department, University of Rochester, Rochester, New York 14627-0211
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • For correspondence: drbh@mail.rochester.edu
del.icio.us logo Digg logo Reddit logo Twitter logo CiteULike logo Facebook logo Google logo Mendeley logo
Citation

Predicting Evolutionary Potential: In Vitro Evolution Accurately Reproduces Natural Evolution of the TEM β-Lactamase

Miriam Barlow and Barry G. Hall
Genetics March 1, 2002 vol. 160 no. 3 823-832
Miriam Barlow
Biology Department, University of Rochester, Rochester, New York 14627-0211
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Barry G. Hall
Biology Department, University of Rochester, Rochester, New York 14627-0211
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • For correspondence: drbh@mail.rochester.edu

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero

Related Articles

Cited By

More in this TOC Section

  • Comparative Genomics and Transcriptomics To Analyze Fruiting Body Development in Filamentous Ascomycetes
  • The Fate of Deleterious Variants in a Barley Genomic Prediction Population
  • The Enigmatic Canal-Associated Neurons Regulate Caenorhabditis elegans Larval Development Through a cAMP Signaling Pathway
Show more Investigations
  • Top
  • Article
    • Abstract
    • MATERIALS AND METHODS
    • RESULTS AND DISCUSSION
    • Acknowledgments
    • Footnotes
    • LITERATURE CITED
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics

GSA

The Genetics Society of America (GSA), founded in 1931, is the professional membership organization for scientific researchers and educators in the field of genetics. Our members work to advance knowledge in the basic mechanisms of inheritance, from the molecular to the population level.

Online ISSN: 1943-2631

  • For Authors
  • For Reviewers
  • For Subscribers
  • Submit a Manuscript
  • Editorial Board
  • Press Releases

SPPA Logo

GET CONNECTED

RSS  Subscribe with RSS.

email  Subscribe via email. Sign up to receive alert notifications of new articles.

  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • YouTube
  • LinkedIn
  • Google Plus

Copyright © 2019 by the Genetics Society of America

  • About GENETICS
  • Terms of use
  • Advertising
  • Permissions
  • Contact us
  • International access