Skip to main content
  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • YouTube
  • LinkedIn
  • Google Plus
  • Other GSA Resources
    • Genetics Society of America
    • G3: Genes | Genomes | Genetics
    • Genes to Genomes: The GSA Blog
    • GSA Conferences
    • GeneticsCareers.org
  • Log in
Genetics

Main menu

  • HOME
  • ISSUES
    • Current Issue
    • Early Online
    • Archive
  • ABOUT
    • About the journal
    • Why publish with us?
    • Editorial board
    • Contact us
  • SERIES
    • Centennial
    • Genetics of Immunity
    • Genetics of Sex
    • Genomic Selection
    • Multiparental Populations
    • FlyBook
    • WormBook
    • YeastBook
  • ARTICLE TYPES
    • About Article Types
    • Commentaries
    • Editorials
    • GSA Honors and Awards
    • Methods, Technology & Resources
    • Perspectives
    • Primers
    • Reviews
    • Toolbox Reviews
  • PUBLISH & REVIEW
    • Scope & publication policies
    • Submission & review process
    • Article types
    • Prepare your manuscript
    • Submit your manuscript
    • After acceptance
    • Guidelines for reviewers
  • SUBSCRIBE
    • Why subscribe?
    • For institutions
    • For individuals
    • Email alerts
    • RSS feeds
  • Other GSA Resources
    • Genetics Society of America
    • G3: Genes | Genomes | Genetics
    • Genes to Genomes: The GSA Blog
    • GSA Conferences
    • GeneticsCareers.org

User menu

Search

  • Advanced search
Genetics

Advanced Search

  • HOME
  • ISSUES
    • Current Issue
    • Early Online
    • Archive
  • ABOUT
    • About the journal
    • Why publish with us?
    • Editorial board
    • Contact us
  • SERIES
    • Centennial
    • Genetics of Immunity
    • Genetics of Sex
    • Genomic Selection
    • Multiparental Populations
    • FlyBook
    • WormBook
    • YeastBook
  • ARTICLE TYPES
    • About Article Types
    • Commentaries
    • Editorials
    • GSA Honors and Awards
    • Methods, Technology & Resources
    • Perspectives
    • Primers
    • Reviews
    • Toolbox Reviews
  • PUBLISH & REVIEW
    • Scope & publication policies
    • Submission & review process
    • Article types
    • Prepare your manuscript
    • Submit your manuscript
    • After acceptance
    • Guidelines for reviewers
  • SUBSCRIBE
    • Why subscribe?
    • For institutions
    • For individuals
    • Email alerts
    • RSS feeds

5 Results

for term "sites"

  • Refine Search
  • Get Alerts
Limit Results
Limit search results by date
Date of Publication
e.g., 2017-07-16
—
e.g., 2017-07-16
Format Results
Authors, Keywords
Search for specific authors and/or words and phrases.
e.g., Smith, JS
e.g., Smith, JS
Type any phrase that appears in the article title
Type any phrase that appears within article title or abstract
Type any phrase that appears within article body, title or abstract
e.g., Smith, JS
Book publisher name
Citation
Citation-specific search information
e.g., 2009
e.g., 20
e.g., 3
e.g., 29
e.g., 10.9999/123XYZ456
Type a term to search within all articles in this journal: e.g., stem cell
  • Genetic Architectures of Quantitative Variation in RNA Editing Pathways
    Tongjun Gu, Daniel M. Gatti, Anuj Srivastava, Elizabeth M. Snyder, Narayanan Raghupathy, Petr Simecek, Karen L. Svenson, Ivan Dotu, Jeffrey H. Chuang, Mark P. Keller, Alan D. Attie, Robert E. Braun, Gary A. Churchill
    Genetics February 2016 202: 787-798; https://doi.org/10.1534/genetics.115.179481
    ...the specicity and degree of editing are not well understood. We examined quantitative variation of site-specic editing in a genetically diverse multiparent population, Diversity Outbred mice, and mapped polymorphic loci that alter editing ratios globally for C-to-U editing and at specic sites for A ~~~
  • You have access
    Genetic Architectures of Quantitative Variation in RNA Editing Pathways
    Tongjun Gu, Daniel M. Gatti, Anuj Srivastava, Elizabeth M. Snyder, Narayanan Raghupathy, Petr Simecek, Karen L. Svenson, Ivan Dotu, Jeffrey H. Chuang, Mark P. Keller, Alan D. Attie, Robert E. Braun, Gary A. Churchill
    Genetics Feb 2016, 202 (2) 787-798; DOI: 10.1534/genetics.115.179481
    Figure 1
    Figure 1
    By Tongjun Gu, Daniel M. Gatti, Anuj Srivastava, Elizabeth M. Snyder, Narayanan Raghupathy, Petr Simecek, Karen L. Svenson, Ivan Dotu, Jeffrey H. Chuang, Mark P. Keller, Alan D. Attie, Robert E. Braun and Gary A. Churchill
    Mapping of C-to-U and A-to-I RNA editing reveals distinct patterns of genetic regulation. (A) Marker location (horizontal axis) vs. editing-site location (vertical axis) for the C-to-U editing sites shows that editing variation is due to genetic variants near the editing site (diagonal band) and at a location on chromosome 6 (vertical band). Open circles show sites from the RADAR or DARNED databases, and closed circles show sites from the de novo editing site discover. (B) Marker location vs. editing-site location for the A-to-I edit sites shows that editing variation is primarily due to genetic variants near the editing site. Note that some points represent multiple overlapping editing sites.
  • You have access
    Genetic Architectures of Quantitative Variation in RNA Editing Pathways
    Tongjun Gu, Daniel M. Gatti, Anuj Srivastava, Elizabeth M. Snyder, Narayanan Raghupathy, Petr Simecek, Karen L. Svenson, Ivan Dotu, Jeffrey H. Chuang, Mark P. Keller, Alan D. Attie, Robert E. Braun, Gary A. Churchill
    Genetics Feb 2016, 202 (2) 787-798; DOI: 10.1534/genetics.115.179481
    Figure 2
    Figure 2
    By Tongjun Gu, Daniel M. Gatti, Anuj Srivastava, Elizabeth M. Snyder, Narayanan Raghupathy, Petr Simecek, Karen L. Svenson, Ivan Dotu, Jeffrey H. Chuang, Mark P. Keller, Alan D. Attie, Robert E. Braun and Gary A. Churchill
    Mean C-to-U editing ratios for most editing sites map to a region on chromosome 6 at 122 Mb. (A) Genome scan of mean C-to-U editing for 70 editing sites shows a strong association on chromosome 6. Horizontal axis shows the mouse genome; vertical axis plots the LOD score. Red line is the permutation-derived α = 0.05 significance threshold. (B) Founder allele effects on chromosome 6 reveal a complex pattern of allele effects. Horizontal axis shows chromosome 6 in Mb. Vertical axis shows the founder allele effects.
  • You have access
    Genetic Architectures of Quantitative Variation in RNA Editing Pathways
    Tongjun Gu, Daniel M. Gatti, Anuj Srivastava, Elizabeth M. Snyder, Narayanan Raghupathy, Petr Simecek, Karen L. Svenson, Ivan Dotu, Jeffrey H. Chuang, Mark P. Keller, Alan D. Attie, Robert E. Braun, Gary A. Churchill
    Genetics Feb 2016, 202 (2) 787-798; DOI: 10.1534/genetics.115.179481
    Figure 4
    Figure 4
    By Tongjun Gu, Daniel M. Gatti, Anuj Srivastava, Elizabeth M. Snyder, Narayanan Raghupathy, Petr Simecek, Karen L. Svenson, Ivan Dotu, Jeffrey H. Chuang, Mark P. Keller, Alan D. Attie, Robert E. Braun and Gary A. Churchill
    Genomic variants in the DO founders fit the pattern of Apob editing. (A) A nonsynonymous SNP in exon 6 of Apobec1 contributed by CAST/EiJ and PWK/PhJ converts an arginine (R) residue to a glutamine (Q), highlighted in red. Residues in the active site are highlighted in blue. (B) Most mammals have a glutamine residue at this location. Shannon entropy for each base position shows that the glutamine is somewhat conserved. (C) RNA-seq pileups of Apobec1 in the eight DO founders show transcriptional variation between alleles. C57BL/6J and NZO/HlLtJ alleles carry an insertion (shaded in red) in the fifth intron that overlaps a retained intron. 129S1/SvImJ, A/J, and NOD/ShiLtJ alleles carry a SNP (red box) in the 5′ UTR of exon 4 that has increased expression in those strains. The y-axis shows the read depth normalized to library size. (D) Consensus mooring sequence motif for C-to-U edited genes. (Top) The Apobec1 mooring sequence. (Bottom) The consensus binding motif discovered using MEME. (E) Sequence information content around the edited C-to-U site shows that bases at the proximal and distal positions are either A or U. There does not appear to be sequence preference at other nearby base positions.
  • You have access
    Genetic Architectures of Quantitative Variation in RNA Editing Pathways
    Tongjun Gu, Daniel M. Gatti, Anuj Srivastava, Elizabeth M. Snyder, Narayanan Raghupathy, Petr Simecek, Karen L. Svenson, Ivan Dotu, Jeffrey H. Chuang, Mark P. Keller, Alan D. Attie, Robert E. Braun, Gary A. Churchill
    Genetics Feb 2016, 202 (2) 787-798; DOI: 10.1534/genetics.115.179481
    Figure 5
    Figure 5
    By Tongjun Gu, Daniel M. Gatti, Anuj Srivastava, Elizabeth M. Snyder, Narayanan Raghupathy, Petr Simecek, Karen L. Svenson, Ivan Dotu, Jeffrey H. Chuang, Mark P. Keller, Alan D. Attie, Robert E. Braun and Gary A. Churchill
    Structural differences between the founder strains may influence A-to-I editing efficiency. (A) Founder allele effects for 0610005C13Rik show that DO mice carrying the NZO/HlLtJ allele have more edited transcripts. (B) Among the DO founder strains, NZO/HlLtJ has the highest editing ratio. (C) RNA secondary structure of the full mRNA for 0610005C13Rik for C57BL/6J and NZO/HlLtJ shows that the NZO/HlLtJ strain contains a longer dsRNA region around the editing sites. The location of the editing sites on the full-length RNA is circled; the nucleotides around the editing site are enlarged and outlined by rectangles. (D) Founder allele effects for Lact2b show that DO mice carrying the PWK/PhJ allele have lower editing. (E) Among the DO founder strains, PWK/PhJ has the lowest editing ratio. (F) Full-length mRNA for Lact2b in C57BL/6J and PWK/PhJ shows that PWK/PhJ carries a shorter dsRNA region near the editing sites. (G) Founder allele effects for 2010106G01Rik in DO mice show a complex pattern of editing ratios, with NOD/ShiLtJ having high editing and CAST/EiJ having low editing. (H) Editing ratios. The founders are similar to the allele effects observed in the DO population but differ in the order of editing ratios. (I) Full-length mRNA for 2010106G01Rik shows that the dsRNA region around the editing sites is slightly shorter in CAST/EiJ.
Refine Search

Selected Facets

  • MULTIPARENTAL POPULATIONS (Article Type)

GSA

The Genetics Society of America (GSA), founded in 1931, is the professional membership organization for scientific researchers and educators in the field of genetics. Our members work to advance knowledge in the basic mechanisms of inheritance, from the molecular to the population level.

Online ISSN: 1943-2631

  • For Authors
  • For Reviewers
  • For Subscribers
  • Submit a Manuscript
  • Editorial Board
  • Press Releases

GET CONNECTED

RSS  Subscribe with RSS.

email  Subscribe via email. Sign up to receive alert notifications of new articles.

  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • YouTube
  • LinkedIn
  • Google Plus

Copyright © 2017 by the Genetics Society of America

  • About GENETICS
  • Terms of use
  • Advertising
  • Permissions
  • Contact us
  • International access