25 Results

for term "sites"

Limit Results
Limit search results by date
Date of Publication
e.g., 2017-07-17
—
e.g., 2017-07-17
Format Results
Authors, Keywords
Search for specific authors and/or words and phrases.
e.g., Smith, JS
e.g., Smith, JS
Type any phrase that appears in the article title
Type any phrase that appears within article title or abstract
Type any phrase that appears within article body, title or abstract
e.g., Smith, JS
Book publisher name
Citation
Citation-specific search information
e.g., 2009
e.g., 20
e.g., 3
e.g., 29
e.g., 10.9999/123XYZ456
Type a term to search within all articles in this journal: e.g., stem cell
  • Corrigendum
    Genetics January 2015 199: 263; https://doi.org/10.1534/genetics.114.172528
    ...the ATG start site in SHEP protein isoform PA (see Flybase http://ybase.org). Primers that add an upstream EcoRI site (59-ATCGAATTCCAGGTGGGTGGCTATCCAGTG-39) and a downstream XhoI site (59-TGACTCGAGTGATGCAGCT GTGCTAGCCTGTT-39) were used to generate the required PCR fragment from the shep cDNA clone LD ~~~
  • Corrigendum
    Genetics April 2013 193: 1311;
    ...CORRIGENDUM In the article by Alexander J. Stewart and Joshua B. Plotkin (GENETICS 192: 973985), entitled Why Transcription Factor Binding Sites Are Ten Nucleotides Long, an author name and acknowledgment were unintentionally omitted. Sridhar Hannenhalli is second author on this article and has ~~~
  • Corrigendum
    Genetics October 2012 192: 757;
    ...called break and copy. A subsequent article (Meselson 1964) did indeed demonstrate l-recombination via breakage and joining of DNA duplexes although, unknown at the time, the recombination observed in that case was conned to the specic site (att) employed by l to enter or leave the Escherichia coli ~~~
  • Corrigendum
    Genetics February 2012 190: 829-830;
    ...of P(C, e), the probability of producing the observed data if the underlying genotype is homozygous, given C, the number of reads, and an assumed error rate e for those reads (measured per site, per read, and dened as in the article; see Robustness in Results section). For computational convenience ~~~
  • CORRIGENDUM
    Genetics October 2001 159: 913-914;
    ...on pages 13211322 showing that E(DC) E(Nd) is now rewritten (Equations 110) as follows. This correction does not affect any of the results or conclusions of the article. In fact, the new proof now extends the equality in Equation 10 even when there is among-site (i) heterogeneity in substitution rates ~~~
  • CORRIGENDUM
    Genetics January 2009 181: 353;
    ...-1 confirmed that one T-DNA border is located 34 nucleotides upstream from the translation start site (Y. Onodera, data not shown). The location of a second border noted at SeedGenes remains unresolved. Because the protein coding region is not disrupted, it is possible that the emb 1989-1 allele is partially ~~~
  • Crossover Interference in Saccharomyces cerevisiae Requires a TID1/RDH54- and DMC1-Dependent Pathway
    M. Shinohara, K. Sakai, A. Shinohara, D. K. Bishop
    Genetics April 2005 169: 2389-2390;
    ...(s) of recombination, the hypothesis that crossover sites are chosen prior to synapsis, we erroneously stated on page 1281 that lateor the tid1-pTID1 strain may express at a different level of Tid1 protein than the TID1 strain. recombination nodules had been observed prior to synapsis. The relevant observation ~~~
  • CORRIGENDUM
    Genetics August 1979 92: 1361-1363;
    ..., and Optic lobes (and the relevant sites therein) are listed for the second time-Licking behavior should have been inserted. Other- wise the table makes no sense, as it appears as if all the data refer to cases that showed no licking. For Table 4, the same kind of omission occurred. This time, Attempted ~~~
  • CORRIGENDA
    Genetics December 2001 159: 1867;
    ...-Hadrian, Marianne Sela, Lea CarmelGoren, Dani Zamir and Robert Fluhr (Genetics 155: 309322) entitled Comparative Genetics of Nucleotide Binding Site-Leucine Rich Repeat Resistance Gene Homologues in the Genomes of Two Dicotyledons: Tomato and Arabidopsis, the sequences used have the following accession numbers ~~~
  • CORRIGENDA
    Genetics February 1999 151: 915;
    ....67; in addition, bands to closest site (column 5) for Inversion C190 is correct, but was mistakenly taken as 4.83 for statistical analysis. As a consequence, the partial regression coefcients on page 933, column 1, lines 5 to 9 should be: b1 5 0.577 (P 5 0.075), b2 5 0.517 (P 5 0.006), b3 5 0.260 (P 5 0 ~~~

Pages

Refine Search

Selected Facets

  • Corrigendum (Article Type)

Publication date