TABLE 7

Results for the Singh and Rhomberg (1987) data set

FstP-valuePi = 1 | data):
LocusArticleOriginalReparameterizedVariable selectionArticleOriginalReparameterizedVariable selection
G6-PD0.47a0.50a0.50a0.310.00a0.01a0.01a0.12
ADH0.45a0.49a0.49a0.300.01a0.01a0.01a0.09
EST-60.18a0.150.150.240.95a0.940.940.01
PT-90.43a0.41a0.41a0.270.05a0.04a0.04a0.02
PT-15b0.52a0.53a0.53a0.34a0.00a0.00a0.00a0.20a
XDH0.13a0.14a0.14a0.230.98a0.98a0.98a0.03
a-FUC0.14a0.14a0.14a0.240.97a0.97a0.97a0.02
LAP-60.47a0.44a0.44a0.280.03a0.03a0.03a0.04
ACON-10.15a0.12a0.12a0.230.99a0.98a0.98a0.04
a-GLU-40.17a0.15a0.15a0.240.96a0.96a0.96a0.02
  • Estimated Fst-values for all methods, corresponding Bayesian P-values Pi < 0 | data) for the original and the reparameterized algorithm, and corresponding posterior probabilities Pi = 1 | data) for the reparameterized algorithm including Bayesian variable selection for loci detected being subject to selection by one of the methods are shown. Article, Beaumont and Balding (2004) results; Original, original algorithm; Reparameterized, reparameterized algorithm; Variable selection, reparameterized algorithm including Bayesian variable selection.

  • a The locus is classified subject to selection by the corresponding method.

  • b All methods classify the corresponding locus subject to selection.