TABLE 2

Relative viabilities of ETS markers for F2 hybrids in AB × SD population crosses

RV, current resultsaRV, 2001 resultsb
LocusCrossSexSD/SDAB/ABSD/SDAB/AB
CYCABm × SDfCombinedc0.67 (0.08)d0.43 (0.05)1.03 (0.14)0.87 (0.12)
ABf × SDmFemale0.52 (0.09)0.47 (0.08)0.77 (0.15)1.86 (0.33)
Male0.50 (0.08)0.33 (0.06)1.31 (0.26)0.34 (0.09)
CYC1ABm × SDfCombined0.46 (0.06)0.60 (0.07)
ABf × SDmFemale0.21 (0.05)0.78 (0.12)
Male0.69 (0.11)0.60 (0.10)
RISPABm × SDfCombined0.54 (0.07)0.58 (0.07)
ABf × SDmFemale0.50 (0.08)0.27 (0.05)
Male0.47 (0.08)0.63 (0.10)
  • RV, relative viabilities.

  • a Underlined viabilities are cases when the higher viability of the homozygote classes matches the mtDNA background of the cross.

  • b Previous results for CYC are from Willett and Burton (2001).

  • c Combined sexes for the ABm × SDf cross for each marker because there was no significant difference between the sexes (either in Table 1 or in Willett and Burton 2001).

  • d Relative viability is calculated assigning a heterozygote a fitness of 1. Standard deviations of relative viabilities are in parentheses.