Identification of Novel Genes That Mediate Innate Immunity Using Inbred Mice
Ivana V. Yang, Claire M. Wade, Hyun Min Kang, Scott Alper, Holly Rutledge, Brad Lackford, Eleazar Eskin, Mark J. Daly, David A. Schwartz


Innate immunity is the first line of defense against microbial infections. Although polymorphisms in toll-like receptors (TLRs) and downstream signaling molecules (CD14, TLR2, TLR4, TLR5, and IRAK4) affect the innate immune response, these variants account for only a portion of the ability of the host to respond to bacteria, fungi, and viruses. To identify other genes involved in the innate immune response, we challenged 16 inbred murine strains with lipopolysaccharide (LPS) systemically and measured serum concentrations of pro-inflammatory cytokines IL-1β, IL-6, and TNFα, and the chemokine KC 6 hr post-treatment. Loci that segregate with strain phenotypes were identified by whole genome association (WGA) mapping of cytokine concentrations. Published gene expression profiles and quantitative trait loci (QTL) were then utilized to prioritize loci and genes that potentially regulate the host response to LPS. Sixteen loci were selected for further investigation by combining WGA analysis with previously published QTL for murine response to LPS or gram negative bacteria. Thirty-eight genes within these loci were then selected for further investigation on the basis of the significance of the identified locus, transcriptional response to LPS, and biological plausibility. RNA interference-mediated inhibition of 4 of 38 candidate genes was shown to block the production of IL-6 in J774A.1 macrophages. In summary, our analysis identified 4 genes that have not previously been implicated in innate immunity, namely, 1110058L19Rik, 4933415F23Rik, Fbxo9, and Ipo7. These genes could represent potential sepsis biomarkers or therapeutic targets that should be further investigated in human populations.

LIPOPOLYSACCHARIDE (LPS), a major component of the cell wall of gram negative (GN) bacteria, is a potent stimulator of the innate immune response in mice and humans. Binding of LPS to the receptor complex consisting of TLR4, CD14, and MD-2 initiates a signaling cascade that leads to translocation of NF-κB into the nucleus and the release of pro-inflammatory cytokines and chemokines (Akira and Takeda 2004). This inflammatory response affects development and progression of a number of diseases including sepsis and septic shock. However, antiinflammatory agents have failed in the treatment of the systemic inflammatory response induced by sepsis due to the pathophysiologic complexity of the syndrome that involves cardiovascular, immunological, and endocrine systems (Baron et al. 2006). It is therefore imperative to develop new therapeutic targets for treating patients at risk of developing the inflammatory response to sepsis.

Genetic factors play a significant role in the regulation of systemic inflammation. In addition to representing potential therapeutic targets for diseases such as sepsis, innate immune genes could also be used to identify individuals at highest risk for complications from sepsis. Polymorphisms in genes in the TLR4 pathway (TLR4, CD14, IRAK4), downstream pro-inflammatory cytokines (TNFα, IL-1β, IL-6), as well as genes in the coagulation/fibrinolysis cascade (PAI1, Factor V, TAFI) and other pathways (MBL, heat shock proteins) have been shown to predispose individuals for increased susceptibility to sepsis and adverse outcomes (Cook et al. 2004a; Papathanassoglou et al. 2006; Garantziotis et al. 2008).

Many features of human disease pathophysiology are successfully recapitulated in animal models of sepsis (Buras et al. 2005). The systemic LPS or endotoxemia model involves a bolus injection of LPS and is characterized by an overwhelming innate immune response, mediated by pro-inflammatory cytokines such as TNF-α that are produced rapidly (several hours) post-LPS injection. This strong cytokine response can ultimately lead to multiple organ failure and death. Studies performed in murine models support the notion that genetic background plays a significant role in development and progression of infection. For example, there is a range of responses among inbred strains of mice to inhaled (Lorenz et al. 2001) and systemic LPS (De Maio et al. 1998).

Genetic studies in mice have been used extensively to identify novel innate immune genes that potentially contribute to host defense against microbial infections. QTLs controlling various aspects of inflammation and survival in response to LPS (Matesic et al. 1999, 2000; Cook et al. 2004b; Fulton et al. 2006) and different species of Salmonella (Sebastiani et al. 1998; Caron et al. 2002, 2005) have been identified using F2 intercrosses between inbred strains of mice, recombinant inbred (RI) panels, and congenic strains. However, as is the case with mapping of other complex traits, QTL studies in mice identify large genomic regions of interest, and very rarely lead to identification of a single gene controlling differences in response in the two parent strains, even when combined with other approaches such as fine mapping and gene expression profiling.

Recent advances in genomic sequence analysis and SNP discovery have led to the availability of dense SNP maps for a large number of inbred strains of mice (Frazer et al. 2007). These dense mouse SNP maps are a rich resource for mapping of complex traits and have been used for both GWA mapping (Grupe et al. 2001; Liu et al. 2006; McClurg et al. 2007) and for refinement of previously identified QTL (Pletcher et al. 2004). In the present study, we measured serum concentrations of the pro-inflammatory cytokines IL-1β, IL-6, and TNFα, and the chemokine KC, following systemic administration of LPS in 16 inbred strains of mice. We subsequently performed WGA mapping to identify loci that segregate with strain cytokine/chemokine phenotypes. We prioritized the loci and genes identified by this in silico approach by combining the results with previously published QTL and gene expression profiles. The role of 38 candidates revealed by this combined analysis in controlling inflammatory response to LPS was tested by RNA interference in a mouse macrophage cell line. Four genes (1110058L19Rik, 4933415F23Rik, Fbxo9, and Ipo7) affected LPS-induced cytokine production in this assay and are therefore high-priority novel innate immune targets for the potential development of therapeutics and for risk profiling.


Animal model:

We used an established model of endotoxic shock in which mice are injected with a high dose of LPS with no D-galactosamine sensitization (Buras et al. 2005). All procedures were approved by the animal care and use committees at Duke University Medical Center, the National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences, and the National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute. Mice were injected intraperitoneally with 125,000 EU/g body weight of Escherichia coli 0111:B4 LPS (Sigma) or sterile saline control.

One group of mice that received LPS (N = 8) was observed for clinical signs of morbidity over 5 days and euthanized according to guidelines set by Morton and Griffiths (1985). The study was repeated and combined data were used to construct Kaplan-Meier survival curves. Animals that received saline only (N = 8) were also observed for 5 days and exhibited no signs of morbidity. The second group of animals (N = 8) was euthanized 6-hr post-LPS challenge for serum and organ collection. Control mice (N = 8) were euthanized 6 hr following the saline injection. Serum concentrations of IL-1β, IL-6, KC, and TNFα were determined using standard ELISA kits and the manufacturer's protocol (R&D Systems).

Whole genome association mapping using Plink:

Genotype files were extracted for 138,793 curated mouse haplotype map SNPs (〈〉) for each of the strains used in mapping (129S1/SvImJ, A/J, AKR/J, BALB/cByJ, BUB/BnJ, C57BL/6J, CE/J, DBA/2J, FVB/NJ, LP/J, MA/MyJ, NOD/LTJ, NON/LtJ, and NZW/LacJ). The SM/J strain was excluded from this analysis because of the low genotyping rate in the database (>10% missing genotypes). The CAST/Ei strain was excluded from the analysis because the genetic differences between wild-derived and classical inbred strains are difficult to account for in mapping studies (Wade and Daly 2005). Map files corresponded to the identities and positions of these SNP on the 2004 Mouse Assembly (mm3). Log10-transformed mean serum concentrations of IL-1β, IL-6, KC, and TNFα for each strain were analyzed using the genetic analysis program Plink v0.99d (Purcell et al. 2007) to perform quantitative association. For all analyses, SNPs with minor allele frequency (MAF) <0.1 were excluded and adaptive permutation was employed to assess significance of association. After pruning of strains and SNP, 84,253 SNP and 14 strains remained in the analysis.

Whole genome association mapping using EMMA:

In addition to our analysis using the Plink software, we analyzed the murine data using a recently established method that accounts for different degrees of relatedness among inbred strains of mice (Kang et al. 2008). This efficient mixed model association (EMMA) algorithm was applied to log10-transformed individual measurements of serum cytokine concentrations in 15 strains of mice using haplotype map SNPs. CAST/Ei strain was included in this analysis because EMMA adequately accounts for genetic diversity of wild-derived and classical inbred strains of mice.

RNA interference:

RNA interference assays were carried out as recently described (Alper et al. 2008). Briefly, siRNAs (Dharmacon, pools of four siRNA duplexes/gene) were transfected into the mouse macrophage cell line J774A.1 using the Amaxa Nucleofector Shuttle according to the manufacturer's instructions. Transfections were carried out in 96-well format using 100,000 cells/well and 2 μm siRNA. Twenty-four to 36 hr after siRNA transfection, LPS was added to a final concentration of 20 ng/ml LPS (List Biological Labs). Supernatant was collected 5 hr post-LPS treatment, and cytokine production was assayed using the Lincoplex kit (Linco) and read on a Luminex system (Bio-Rad). Cell viability was monitored and cell number normalized using fluorescein diacetate . Cytokine production was normalized relative to a negative control siRNA. RNA was isolated using the RNAEasy kit (Qiagen) and the extent of gene knockdown was monitored by real-time RT–PCR with SYBR Green on an ABI 7900HT sequence detection system (Applied Biosystems). siRNAs were initially tested in triplicate, and siRNAs that had an effect were assayed three additional times using different concentrations of siRNA (2 μm, 1 μm, 0.5 μm, and 0.25 μm). siRNAs that still affected cytokine production after these retests were further tested by transfecting each siRNA in the pool individually to verify that multiple siRNAs targeting each gene could still induce the same phenotype.


Inbred mouse strain phenotypes:

To study the genetic basis of the inflammatory response to LPS, we challenged 16 inbred strains of mice represented in the mouse haplotype map project at the Broad Institute (Wade and Daly 2005) with LPS systemically and measured concentrations of IL-1β, IL-6, KC, and TNFα in the serum 6 hr following administration of LPS. We observed a range of phenotypes from almost no cytokine production to ng/ml range for TNFα and IL-1β, and to several hundreds to over a thousand ng/ml for IL-6 and KC (Figure 1) with both consistencies and discrepancies in the production of different cytokines/chemokine in response to LPS in the strains examined. Three strains of mice, 129/SvIm, NZW/LacJ, and LP/J, produce consistently low serum concentrations of all three cytokines and the chemokine KC. On the other hand, the MA/MyJ and BUB/BnJ strains produce very high concentrations of the pro-inflammatory cytokines IL-1β, IL-6, and TNFα but an intermediate concentration of the chemokine KC relative to other strains examined. These observations suggest that both common and diverse genetic factors contribute to production of IL-1β, IL-6, TNFα, and KC in response to systemic LPS challenge. Saline-injected control animals produced low concentrations of all inflammatory markers with very little variation among different strains of mice.

Figure 1.—

Cytokine production by inbred strains of mice. Serum concentrations of TNFα (A), IL-1β (B), IL-6 (C), and KC (D) for 16 inbred strains 6 hr postintraperitoneal LPS challenge. Values shown are means with SEMs for N = 8.

The strong inflammatory response induced by LPS in these mice can ultimately lead to organ failure and death. We therefore also monitored a separate group of the inbred mouse strains for survival over the course of 5 days following LPS injection and found that 13 of the strains studied were sensitive (>75% morbidity within 48 hr post-LPS) and 3 strains (129/SvIm, C57/BL6, and NZW/LacJ) were resistant to LPS (<25% morbidity at the end of 5 days) (supporting information, Figure S1). Two out of three resistant strains (129/SvIm and NZW/LacJ) have low serum concentrations of IL-1β, IL-6, KC, and TNFα following LPS challenge, which is consistent with the idea that the extent of inflammatory cytokine production affects LPS-induced mortality. However, some of the sensitive strains, especially LP/J, also produce low amounts of the cytokines measured, indicating that factors other than pro-inflammatory cytokines in the serum also contribute to mortality following LPS challenge.

Whole genome association mapping:

To identify loci that segregate with inflammatory phenotypes (IL-1β, IL-6, TNFα, and KC production) in inbred strains, we performed whole genome association mapping by analyzing HapMap SNP data using two different statistical approaches. In one approach, we mapped cytokine/chemokine concentrations as quantitative traits by standard linear regression of phenotype on allele dosage as implemented in the Plink software (Purcell et al. 2007). A number of SNPs with P < 1 × 10−5 were associated with each of the four cytokine production phenotypes, for a total of 38 unique loci, with some of the identified loci regulating the production of several cytokines/chemokine (Table S1 and Figure S2 A). To determine the boundaries of each of the statistically significant loci, we plotted Wald statistic values for the top associated (P < 1 × 10−5) and neighboring SNPs for each locus identified; an example of this analysis is depicted in Figure 2 for a representative locus on chromosome 1.

Figure 2.—

Whole genome association mapping. Plink Wald statistic values for SNPs in each of the loci were plotted to identify the extent of linkage disequilibrium (LD) and determine the boundaries of each locus. Shown is the graph for locus 1 on chromosome 1. *, three SNPs most highly associated (P = 4.9 × 10−7) with IL-6 concentrations; †, the most associated SNP (P = 3.9 × 10−10) with IL-1β production.

In another approach, we utilized a statistical method that was recently developed specifically for association mapping in model organisms called efficient mixed model association (EMMA) (Kang et al. 2008). In this method, a linear mixed model is incorporated into the analysis to correct for population structure and genetic relatedness among inbred strains of mice. EMMA analysis also identified a number of SNPs throughout the genome that segregate with the strain cytokine phenotypes (P < 0.001), but the number of associated SNPs/locus is fewer than in the Plink analysis (27 unique loci) (Table S2 and Figure S2 B). Five out of 27 loci identified by EMMA were also identified by Plink, suggesting only a modest degree of overlap and providing justification for using both methods.

Candidate loci and gene selection for further investigation:

To prioritize loci for further investigation, we considered four factors: whether the locus lies within a previously published QTL for response to LPS or a GN pathogen, whether the locus was identified as significant by both statistical methods, whether the locus was identified as regulating the production of more than one cytokine/chemokine, and the level of statistical significance in one or both of the whole genome association analyses. Sixteen loci met at least one of the four criteria (Table 1). The majority of these loci are 1.5–4.5 Mb in size with two exceptions, locus number 8 on chromosome 7 and the locus on chromosome 13, where linkage disequilibrium extends over 23.5 and 10 Mb, respectively. There are 676 known genes within these 16 loci, with some loci being much more gene rich than others (two loci contain no known genes) (Table S3). It is likely that several of these 676 genes could represent novel innate immune regulators.

View this table:

Sixteen in silico loci chosen as high priority loci controlling serum cytokine concentrations in inbred murine strains in response to systemic LPS challenge

To identify a reasonable number of high-priority candidates, out of 676 identified, to screen in a medium-throughput RNAi assay in mouse macrophages (Alper et al. 2008), we used three approaches. We first selected all 11 genes in the three loci identified by both whole genome association analyses (Plink and EMMA) that also lie within published QTL (Figure 3A; loci nos. 1, 2, and 6 in Table 1). Second, we overlaid the results from our unpublished gene expression data set (I. Yang and D. Schwartz, unpublished results) from 11 inbred strains of mice, the majority of which are included in the current study, on all 16 loci. By combining mapping data from this work with transcriptional response data from our unpublished data, we identified 62 candidates as differentially expressed genes (in at least one organ) within one of the 16 loci of interest (Figure 3B and Table 2). Thus, using the first two approaches, we identified 72 gene candidates for further study (11 from the first approach, 62 from this second approach; 1 of the 11 genes in the three loci identified above, 1110058L19RIK, is also differentially expressed). Finally, we then chose 38 of these 72 candidates for further functional investigation on the basis of their predicted function. We included genes that have a known role in immunity (Itgam, for example), those that could have a potential role (kinases, proteases, transcription factors), and genes of unknown function. We excluded genes involved in metabolism, those encoding ribosomal proteins, methyltransferases, and a few others.

Figure 3.—

Strategy used to prioritize genes for further investigation. (A) Identification of three loci containing 11 genes. These three loci were mapped by both Plink and EMMA methods and overlap with published QTLs. (B) Sixty-two genes within all 16 loci are differentially expressed in at least one organ (liver, lung, and spleen) of strains sensitive to LPS challenge compared to resistant strains in response to systemic LPS challenge (I. Yang and D. Schwartz, unpublished results). By combining the two approaches (overlap of all three mapping approaches in Figure 3A and overlap of at least one mapping approach with expression profiling in Figure 3B), 72 candidate genes were identified (1 gene, 1110058L19RIK, was common to both approaches).

View this table:

Differentially expressed genes within 16 in silico loci

RNA interference of 38 candidate genes identifies four novel innate immune genes:

To test the role of the selected candidate genes in innate immunity, we transfected the J774A.1 mouse macrophage cell line with siRNA pools (made up of four siRNA duplexes per gene) for the 38 candidate genes, stimulated the cells with LPS, and measured cytokine production. Pooling of four siRNA duplexes greatly reduces off-target effects of individual siRNAs, while maintaining high levels of target silencing (Svoboda 2007). Shown in Figure 4A are the results of this initial RNAi screen for inhibition of IL-6 production for the 38 candidates. As expected, several negative control siRNA treatments that do not target any gene had little or no effect on cytokine production (first four siRNA treatments in Figure 4A). Inhibition of genes known to be involved in the response to LPS, including the LPS receptor TLR4, the signaling adaptor CD14, and IL-6 itself, strongly blocked the production of IL-6, serving as positive controls for the assay (Figure 4A). In addition, RNAi-mediated inhibition of 12 of the 38 candidate genes prevented the production of IL-6 by ≥50%. On the basis of this initial screen, we repeated the assay three additional times for these 12 candidates using decreasing concentrations of siRNA (2 μm, 1 μm, 0.5 μm, and 0.25 μm). These data showed that knockdown of four genes (1110058L19Rik, 4933415F23Rik, Fbxo9, and Ipo7) consistently inhibited production of IL-6, with the effect lost at lower siRNA concentrations (Figure 4B). We also measured the extent of RNA knockdown in this titration data set using real time RT–PCR and showed that the siRNA-mediated inhibition of IL-6 production correlates with RNAi knockdown (Figure 4C). To verify that the siRNA effect was specific, we transfected each of the four individual siRNAs in the pool into macrophages, and found that at least two out of the four individual siRNAs in each pool significantly inhibit production of IL-6 (Figure 4D), demonstrating that multiple siRNAs targeting each gene can induce the same phenotype. Taken together, the data in Figure 4 demonstrate that knockdown of four candidate innate immune genes inhibits cytokine production and that these data are not false positives due to off-target effects of RNA interference.

Figure 4.—

An RNA interference assay in cultured macrophages identifies four genes that regulate cytokine production. (A) The effect of siRNA-mediated gene inhibition in the J77A4.1 macrophage cell line on IL-6 production in response to LPS stimulation. A pool of four siRNA duplexes was transfected for each gene. Shown are the results for four negative controls (all data are normalized to the first negative control), three positive controls, and 34 candidates from our analysis. (B) Inhibition of IL-6 production by J774A.1 macrophages in response to LPS by different concentrations of siRNA pools. (C) Gene expression knockdown by different concentrations of siRNA pools monitored using qPCR. The extent of gene inhibition roughly correlates with the phenotype in panel B. (D) Four genes that consistently affected cytokine production in the initial pooled siRNA screen (panel A) and siRNA titrations (panel B) were retested using each of the individual siRNAs in the pool. All four siRNAs were transfected individually, the cells were stimulated with LPS, and the supernatant was assayed for IL-6 production by ELISA. In all panels, means of three independent measurements are plotted with error bars representing standard deviations.


By integrating WGA mapping of cytokine/chemokine phenotypes in inbred mouse strains with additional genetic and genomic studies, we have identified four novel genes that regulate the inflammatory response to LPS. We utilized two related but somewhat divergent statistical approaches to determine polymorphisms throughout the mouse genome that are most significantly associated with serum concentrations of IL-1β, IL-6, KC, and TNFα. More loci with lower P-values were identified using the Plink method than EMMA due to the fact that Plink does not account for the population structure in the inbred mouse strains. Because of this, some of the significant loci identified by Plink but not EMMA may be false positives. However, only a modest degree of overlap in loci identified by Plink and EMMA justifies the use of both methods. Since mapping was done with a very low number of mouse strains, our study was underpowered. This may be another reason for a small number of overlapping loci; a number of loci identified by either method may be false positives. For this reason, we prioritized the loci for further investigation by combining our GWA mapping data with previously established QTLs for innate immune response to LPS and GN pathogens in genetic crosses. Additionally, we assigned higher priority to loci identified by both Plink and EMMA analyses and loci that were associated with multiple cytokine/chemokine strain phenotypes. Although this approach is reasonable for focusing our initial investigation, one limitation is that some of the loci that were not chosen may contain very important and interesting genes that specifically control production of one of the four pro-inflammatory markers.

We next selected genes within the 16 high-priority loci to investigate functionally by utilizing RNA interference in macrophages. We believe that the 38 selected genes are the best candidates for preliminary investigation but acknowledge the fact that there are limitations to our selection. The remaining 34 genes that were not chosen on the basis of the current knowledge of their biological function should also be investigated in the future. Moreover, genes that are not differentially expressed but lie within the boundaries of the remaining 13 loci (∼600 genes) should also be prioritized for further examination as they may contain important polymorphisms that do not alter gene expression but affect gene function.

Finally, our investigation of the 38 candidate genes by RNA interference showed that inhibition of 1110058L19Rik, 4933415F23Rik, Fbxo9, and Ipo7 consistently blocked production of IL-6 in mouse macrophages, suggesting a functional role for these four genes in innate immune response to LPS. However, genes whose inhibition by RNAi did not affect cytokine production in J774A.1 macrophages should not be disregarded as potentially important in innate immunity. There are several limitations to the RNAi assay that we utilized in this study. First, the assay was performed in a cultured macrophage cell line and not in vivo. Second, some of our candidate genes may regulate innate immunity through mechanisms that do not affect cytokine production and their function may be revealed in assays that measure other phenotypes such as production of superoxide or nitric oxide, phagocytosis, apoptosis, etc. Finally, RNA interference is not always effective in silencing target genes due to a number of factors, including the chosen siRNA sequence and the structure of the siRNA.

The gene 1110058L19Rik is located in locus 1 (Table 1), which is associated with IL-1β and IL-6 phenotypes by Plink mapping as well as the KC phenotype by EMMA mapping, and also overlaps with the Ses1.1 QTL controlling bacterial load in the spleen in response to iv Salmonella enteritidis (Caron et al. 2002, 2005). In addition, 1110058L19Rik is downregulated in the liver and the spleen of mice sensitive to systemic LPS challenge (Table 2) and its inhibition by RNA interference significantly and consistently decreases production of IL-6 in macrophages (Figure 4). 1110058L19Rik is a gene of unknown function with an uncharacterized conserved small protein domain. Since there are no published studies on this gene, it is difficult to speculate how it may be involved in innate immunity; however, its novelty also makes it an attractive candidate for further study.

Similarly, 4933415F23Rik is also located in locus 1 and also regulates IL-6 production in LPS-stimulated macrophages; however, it is not differentially expressed in response to systemic LPS. The gene 4933415F23Rik is also of unknown function, and has not been studied previously. It contains a protein kinase C (PKC)-activated protein phosphatase-1 inhibitor conserved domain that is involved in modulation of the contractility of vascular smooth muscle, but nothing else is known about this gene.

Fbxo9 is located in locus 9, which was mapped to the IL-1β and IL-6 phenotypes by the Plink method and overlaps with the Ses2 locus that controls bacterial load in the spleen in response to iv S. enteritidis (Caron et al. 2002, 2005). Moreover, Fbxo9 is significantly downregulated in the liver of LPS-sensitive strains of mice, and it has a phenotype in our RNA-interference assay in macrophages. The function of Fbxo9 is unknown, but it is possible that it may be involved in polyubiquitination of IκB or another important signaling molecule in the TLR4 pathway or another pathway that is activated in response to LPS (Fong and Sun 2002).

Finally, importin 7 (Ipo7) is in locus 7, which is associated with IL-6 and TNFα phenotypes by Plink mapping as well as the KC phenotype by EMMA mapping. Ipo7 is significantly induced in the lung of sensitive strains of mice in response to systemic LPS, and its inhibition by RNA interference inhibits the production of IL-6 in macrophages. Ipo7 was recently shown to be one of the import receptors for the transcription factor c-Jun, a component of the transcriptional complex AP-1 (Waldmann et al. 2007). It is feasible that the role of importin 7 in nuclear import of c-Jun explains its involvement in the murine response to LPS as it is well established that AP-1 is activated in response to LPS via MAP kinases (Liew et al. 2005). However, importin 7 also controls transport of many other molecules and could therefore have a role in LPS signaling through other presently unknown mechanisms.

In summary, our whole genome association analysis of inbred murine strain phenotypes combined with previously established QTL, gene expression, and RNA interference data identified four novel genes that regulate the host response to systemic LPS. We believe that the function of these genes in innate immunity should be further investigated using targeted mutations in mice and other approaches. However, as discussed above, there are several limitations to the way we used to prioritize and functionally study candidates, and it is likely that other genes identified by whole genome association mapping could also be important targets of LPS signaling in vivo. Additional genetic and genomic studies, namely, whole genome association mapping of phenotypes other than pro-inflammatory cytokines and chemokines, such as survival, other genetic crosses in mice, and in vivo RNA interference, will aid in identification of other important candidates that mediate the host response to LPS.


This study was funded by the Department of Veterans Affairs (merit review), the National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences (ES11375 and ES011961), and the Intramural Research Program of the National Institutes of Health, National Institute of the Environmental Health Sciences, and National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute.


  • Received July 20, 2009.
  • Accepted September 23, 2009.


View Abstract