Skip to main content
  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • YouTube
  • LinkedIn
  • Google Plus
  • Other GSA Resources
    • Genetics Society of America
    • G3: Genes | Genomes | Genetics
    • Genes to Genomes: The GSA Blog
    • GSA Conferences
    • GeneticsCareers.org
  • Log in
Genetics

Main menu

  • HOME
  • ISSUES
    • Current Issue
    • Early Online
    • Archive
  • ABOUT
    • About the journal
    • Why publish with us?
    • Editorial board
    • Contact us
  • SERIES
    • Centennial
    • Genetics of Immunity
    • Genetics of Sex
    • Genomic Selection
    • Multiparental Populations
    • FlyBook
    • WormBook
    • YeastBook
  • ARTICLE TYPES
    • About Article Types
    • Commentaries
    • Editorials
    • GSA Honors and Awards
    • Methods, Technology & Resources
    • Perspectives
    • Primers
    • Reviews
    • Toolbox Reviews
  • PUBLISH & REVIEW
    • Scope & publication policies
    • Submission & review process
    • Article types
    • Prepare your manuscript
    • Submit your manuscript
    • After acceptance
    • Guidelines for reviewers
  • SUBSCRIBE
    • Why subscribe?
    • For institutions
    • For individuals
    • Email alerts
    • RSS feeds
  • Other GSA Resources
    • Genetics Society of America
    • G3: Genes | Genomes | Genetics
    • Genes to Genomes: The GSA Blog
    • GSA Conferences
    • GeneticsCareers.org

User menu

Search

  • Advanced search
Genetics

Advanced Search

  • HOME
  • ISSUES
    • Current Issue
    • Early Online
    • Archive
  • ABOUT
    • About the journal
    • Why publish with us?
    • Editorial board
    • Contact us
  • SERIES
    • Centennial
    • Genetics of Immunity
    • Genetics of Sex
    • Genomic Selection
    • Multiparental Populations
    • FlyBook
    • WormBook
    • YeastBook
  • ARTICLE TYPES
    • About Article Types
    • Commentaries
    • Editorials
    • GSA Honors and Awards
    • Methods, Technology & Resources
    • Perspectives
    • Primers
    • Reviews
    • Toolbox Reviews
  • PUBLISH & REVIEW
    • Scope & publication policies
    • Submission & review process
    • Article types
    • Prepare your manuscript
    • Submit your manuscript
    • After acceptance
    • Guidelines for reviewers
  • SUBSCRIBE
    • Why subscribe?
    • For institutions
    • For individuals
    • Email alerts
    • RSS feeds
Previous ArticleNext Article

Multilocus Patterns of Nucleotide Diversity and Divergence Reveal Positive Selection at Candidate Genes Related to Cold Hardiness in Coastal Douglas Fir (Pseudotsuga menziesii var. menziesii)

Andrew J. Eckert, Jill L. Wegrzyn, Barnaly Pande, Kathleen D. Jermstad, Jennifer M. Lee, John D. Liechty, Brandon R. Tearse, Konstantin V. Krutovsky and David B. Neale
Genetics September 1, 2009 vol. 183 no. 1 289-298; https://doi.org/10.1534/genetics.109.103895
Andrew J. Eckert
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Jill L. Wegrzyn
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Barnaly Pande
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Kathleen D. Jermstad
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Jennifer M. Lee
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
John D. Liechty
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Brandon R. Tearse
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Konstantin V. Krutovsky
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
David B. Neale
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • Supplemental
  • Info & Metrics
Loading

Abstract

Forest trees exhibit remarkable adaptations to their environments. The genetic basis for phenotypic adaptation to climatic gradients has been established through a long history of common garden, provenance, and genecological studies. The identities of genes underlying these traits, however, have remained elusive and thus so have the patterns of adaptive molecular diversity in forest tree genomes. Here, we report an analysis of diversity and divergence for a set of 121 cold-hardiness candidate genes in coastal Douglas fir (Pseudotsuga menziesii var. menziesii). Application of several different tests for neutrality, including those that incorporated demographic models, revealed signatures of selection consistent with selective sweeps at three to eight loci, depending upon the severity of a bottleneck event and the method used to detect selection. Given the high levels of recombination, these candidate genes are likely to be closely linked to the target of selection if not the genes themselves. Putative homologs in Arabidopsis act primarily to stabilize the plasma membrane and protect against denaturation of proteins at freezing temperatures. These results indicate that surveys of nucleotide diversity and divergence, when framed within the context of further association mapping experiments, will come full circle with respect to their utility in the dissection of complex phenotypic traits into their genetic components.

A long history of common garden experiments has shown that forest trees are adapted phenotypically to local and regional climates (Morgenstern 1996). Latitudinal clines for phenological traits have been documented across a diverse set of temperate forest tree species ranging from Norway spruce [Picea abies (L.) Karst.] to European aspen (Populus tremula L.). The frequent nature of these patterns, as well as the high heritabilities and polygenic nature for many of these traits (Howe et al. 2003), suggest that forest tree genomes should be rife with signatures of positive natural selection.

Early efforts to detect these signatures using molecular markers were largely unsuccessful (McKay and Latta 2002). One of the limiting factors for these efforts was the genomic distribution, availability, and nonfunctional nature of the genetic markers that were utilized (Merkle and Adams 1987). The development of high-throughput allele-specific marker detection for large sets of functional genes has revolutionized the search for adaptive genetic variation within conifers (González-Martínez et al. 2006). Surveys of nucleotide diversity across a diverse set of conifer species have highlighted common genomic attributes, such as the rapid decay of linkage disequilibrium (LD), and have documented the first tangible evidence of natural selection in forest tree genomes (Savolainen and Pyhäjärvi 2007; Eveno et al. 2008; Palmé et al. 2008, 2009).

Here, we take a candidate gene approach to the identification of genes underlying cold-hardiness phenotypes in coastal Douglas fir [Pseudotsuga menziesii (Mirb.) Franco var. menziesii]. A 40-year history of common garden experiments, provenance trials, and genecological studies has documented the genetic basis of growth, germination, and bud phenology traits, as well as the steep clines in genetic variability for those traits along environmental gradients (Campbell and Sorensen 1973; Campbell 1979; Aitken and Adams 1996, 1997; St. Clair et al. 2005; St. Clair 2006). The structure of these clines is consistent with the hypothesis that diversifying selection (McKay and Latta 2002) or local selective sweeps (Slatkin and Wiehe 1998; Santiago and Caballero 2005) should characterize most of the signatures of positive natural selection in the genome of coastal Douglas fir. If this is the case, we expect to observe signatures of elevated levels of intermediate-frequency polymorphisms in the site frequency spectrum for those genes that underlie these clinal traits.

While the phenotypes involved with adaptation to cold temperatures are well known, the identities of the genes underlying these traits have remained elusive. Several quantitative trait loci (QTL) have been identified (Jermstad et al. 2001a,b, 2003), and a handful of candidate genes have been shown to collocate with these QTL (Wheeler et al. 2005). The genes underlying physiological responses to cold, however, are well known in Arabidopsis thaliana L. (Thomashow 1999). Similar types of genes are thought to underlie cold-hardiness related traits in conifers (Yakovlev et al. 2006; Holliday et al. 2008). An initial survey of nucleotide diversity at 18 candidate genes in coastal Douglas fir, however, found only limited departures from neutrality (Krutovsky and Neale 2005). The vast majority of candidate genes, as well as inference of demographic influences upon genomic patterns of nucleotide diversity, thus remain to be investigated.

Mounting evidence indicates that patterns of positive selection are pervasive throughout the genomes of Drosophila (Begun et al. 2007), Arabidopsis (Clark et al. 2007), and humans (Voight et al. 2006). Evidence on a genome scale is only beginning to emerge for conifers (Namroud et al. 2008). We used an expanded set of candidate genes to address three goals: (i) describe patterns of polymorphism and divergence within a set of 121 candidate genes for cold hardiness, (ii) identify those genes with patterns of polymorphism and divergence inconsistent with neutral expectations, and (iii) discuss the types and prevalence of selection across a conifer genome.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Plant material and DNA isolation:

A sample of 24 unrelated trees obtained from six regions located across Washington and Oregon was assembled as a diversity panel (supporting information, Table S1) for the discovery of single-nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs). These regions are situated along temperature, precipitation, and genecological gradients identified previously for coastal Douglas fir in Oregon and Washington (St. Clair et al. 2005; St. Clair 2006). A single sample of bigcone Douglas fir [P. macrocarpa (Vasey) Mayr] collected from the Angeles National Forest was used as an outgroup. Total genomic DNA was isolated from haploid megagametophyte tissues dissected out from multiple open-pollinated seeds collected from each tree, using a DNeasy 96 plant kit (QIAGEN, Valencia, CA). All DNA extractions and quantifications were performed at the U.S. Department of Agriculture National Forest Genetics Laboratory (Placerville, CA).

Choice of candidate genes:

Candidate genes with a putative role in conferring tolerance to cold temperatures were selected according to three criteria: (i) genes found to collocate with QTL for cold hardiness in Douglas fir (Wheeler et al. 2005), (ii) genes with physiological roles in cold tolerance response, and (iii) genes showing differential expression in microarray studies in A. thaliana L. (Lee et al. 2005). Standard BLAST tools were used to mine the Douglas fir expressed sequence tags (EST) collections housed at Virginia Polytechnic University (http://staff.vbi.vt.edu/estap) for orthologous sequences to selected candidate genes. Those collections represent four EST libraries, three of which are cold-hardiness libraries derived from 1-year-old seedlings subjected to fall, winter, and spring ambient air conditions in Corvallis, Oregon during 2003. A threshold of 1E-10 was used to define homology during BLAST analyses. In total, 553 putative homologs were selected for primer design, of which 378 were able to have primers designed successfully. A total of 121 of those 378 genes were selected on the basis of diversity of function and sequence-based primer validation from a single Douglas fir sample (Table S2 and Table S3).

PCR, DNA sequencing, and sequence analysis:

Sequence data for each candidate gene were obtained using standard PCR and Sanger sequencing protocols (Table S4). The Pine Alignment and SNP Identification Pipeline (PineSAP) was used to assemble, call bases for, align, and identify SNPs from the 5220 sequence reads (Wegrzyn et al. 2009). The final alignments for each candidate gene were generated using a minimum Phred quality score of 20 for base calls associated with SNPs. All alignments were further trimmed, edited, and validated using CodonCode Aligner v. 2.0.4 (CodonCode, Dedham, MA). Gene annotation, data summaries, and laboratory protocols are given at our website (http://dendrome.ucdavis.edu/dfgp).

SNP genotyping and linkage mapping analyses:

A subset of the 933 discovered SNPs (n = 384) was chosen to validate polymorphism identifications made by PineSAP and to investigate the distribution of those polymorphisms across existing linkage maps of Douglas fir through the genotyping of 192 progeny from a three-generation outbred pedigree (cf. Jermstad et al. 1998) using Illumina's GoldenGate SNP genotyping platform. This high-throughput platform works well for the large and complex genomes of conifers (Pavy et al. 2008). Multiplexed genotyping was conducted at the DNA Technologies Core facility located at the University of California, Davis Genome Center. Signal intensities were quantified and matched to specific alleles, using the BeadStudio v 3.1.14 software (Illumina). A minimum GenCall50 (GC50) score of 0.20 was chosen for inclusion of SNP loci in the final data set and genotypic clusters were edited manually as needed (Eckert et al. 2009a).

The existing linkage maps for coastal Douglas fir are based largely on anonymous RFLP markers. Here, we used 189 fully informative RFLP markers, 3 isozyme markers, and the 77 segregating SNPs to infer a sex-averaged genetic linkage map using JoinMap v. 1.4 (Stam 1993). All SNP loci were assessed for conformity to Mendelian segregation ratios prior to linkage mapping, using goodness-of-fit χ2-tests. We removed SNPs from the same candidate gene that mapped to <0.5 cM from each other prior to the production of the final genetic map. Generation of linkage maps within this pedigree is described in detail elsewhere (Jermstad et al. 1998, 2001a,b, 2003; Krutovsky et al. 2004). In brief, we used a LOD threshold of 4.0 to assign markers to linkage groups followed by a threshold of 0.10 to order markers within those inferred linkage groups. Recombination frequencies were converted to map distances in centimorgans, using the Kosambi mapping function. Linkage map results are deposited and freely available at the forest tree CMAP website (http://dendrome.ucdavis.edu/cmap/; accession no. TG05).

Linkage disequilibrium analyses:

LD between pairs of sites within each candidate gene and between pairs of sites in different candidate genes mapped to the same linkage group were evaluated by using DnaSP v. 4.50.3 (Rozas et al. 2003). We used the squared allelic correlation coefficient (r2) between pairs of parsimony informative sites to estimate LD. We used Fisher's exact tests to calculate P-values under the null hypothesis that LD estimates at least as extreme as those observed could have arisen under linkage equilibrium. The decay of LD with distance in base pairs between sites within the same candidate gene was evaluated with nonlinear regression, using the Gauss–Newton algorithm as implemented in the nls function of R (Hill and Weir 1988; Remington et al. 2001).

Population structure and historical demography:

The extent of structure among populations of coastal Douglas fir observed at chloroplast and nuclear microsatellites, as well as allozymes, is low and consistent with weak effects of isolation by distance (Li and Adams 1989; Viard et al. 2001; Krutovsky et al. 2009). We analyzed patterns of differentiation for all 115 polymorphic candidate genes, using pairwise measures of divergence (Dxy) among the six populations, and related this measure to geographical distance using Mantel tests.

To assess the effects of historical demography, especially given the weak patterns of population structure, on the ability to identify candidate genes under selection, we used a likelihood-free Markov chain Monte Carlo (MCMC) approach to estimate parameters under an instantaneous growth model (IGM) (Marjoram et al. 2003; Marjoram and Tavaré 2006). This model is specified by two parameters, the ratio (f) of the current effective population size (Nec) to the effective population size prior to the growth event (Nep) and the time in units of 4Nec generations at which the growth event began (τ). We assigned uniform priors to both parameters, used the average Tajima's D over the18 loci analyzed by Krutovsky and Neale (2005) as the metric (D = −0.248), and specified a rejection threshold (ε) of 0.05.

Parameters were estimated with Markov chains that were run for 1.2 × 106 steps with the first 0.2 × 106 steps being discarded as burn-in and a thinning interval of 100 steps. The resulting 10,000 samples for each parameter were taken as an approximation of their unknown posterior distributions. The joint posterior distribution of f and τ was smoothed, using the kernel smoothing functions available in R. Convergence was assessed through three independent MCMC runs by analyzing similarities between the resulting approximate posterior distributions and using effective sample size (ESS) estimates calculated using the CODA ver. 0.13-2 package in R.

To understand the effects of more complicated demographic scenarios on our abilities to detect loci under selection, we also analyzed two bottleneck models, where we set the time of the bottleneck to occur at 10,000 (BIM_10; τ = 0.001) or 100,000 (BIM_100; τ = 0.015) years ago with bottleneck sizes that were 1% of the current population size. The duration of the bottleneck was set to 0.005 coalescent time units, and the estimate of Θ upon which the simulations were conditioned was adjusted so that the average simulated value of θπ per locus was equal to the observed value for each of the 18 loci used to fit the model. Model fit was assessed by simulating 10,000 sets of 18 loci for which we calculated the average and standard deviation of Tajima's D. We used these simulated sets of data to differentiate among models (instantaneous growth or the two bottleneck models), using rejection sampling (ε = 0.05 for both D and the standard deviation of D) and the relationship between acceptance rates and Bayes factors (BF = P(S|BIM_i)/P(S|IGM), where P(S|Model) is given by the acceptance rate and represents the probability of the observed statistics given the model). The observed values of average D and the standard deviation of D were −0.248 and 0.837, respectively (Krutovsky and Neale 2005). Following Jeffreys (1998), we considered values >10−1/2 for the BF as “substantial” evidence for a given model (cf. Ross-Ibarra et al. 2009). This scheme conditions all comparisons on the estimates of τ and f from the instantaneous growth model (i.e., these were not estimated again) given added demographic effects (e.g., bottlenecks).

Nucleotide diversity and neutrality tests:

Several estimators of Θ = 4Neu, where Ne is the effective population size and u is the mutation rate, were used to assess the magnitude of nucleotide diversity across candidate genes. A likelihood-ratio test was performed subsequently to test the null hypothesis that Θ is constant across loci (Hudson 1991). The number of haplotypes (h) and haplotypic diversity (Hd) were calculated for comparison with diversity estimators based on the site frequency spectrum. Pairwise divergence (Dxy) for each candidate gene was calculated by comparing the sequences of coastal Douglas fir to a single sequence from bigcone Douglas-fir. We assumed for all calculations that our data conformed to the infinite-sites model. Sites violating these assumptions, or those with missing data, were ignored.

A suite of summary statistics was used to detect departures of the site frequency spectrum from neutral expectations within each candidate gene. The significance of each statistic was determined under three different null models, using 10,000 coalescent simulations conditional on the observed value of θπ. When simulating data under the demographic models, we adjusted the value of Θ so that the median value of the simulated θπ was equal to the observed data. This was done to account for the fact that θπ is only an unbiased estimator of Θ under genetic drift. The positive false discovery rate (FDR) method was used to correct for multiple testing (Storey 2003). We chose to focus on positive selection, because many of the tests we employed are most powerful in differentiating positive from background selection (Zeng et al. 2006, 2007a,b). We employed the DHEW test to search further for departures from neutrality. This test uses the combination of Tajima's D, Fay and Wu's normalized H, and the Ewens–Watterson test of neutrality to detect positive selection. The rejection region for this test was determined through 50,000 coalescent simulations conditional on the observed value of θπ. We used a nominal threshold of P = 0.0005 in the calculation of this region for each locus to account for the fact that we are performing 115 independent tests.

Finally, we used polymorphism–divergence-based tests to search for candidate genes with reduced levels of polymorphism relative to divergence. A maximum-likelihood implementation of the Hudson–Kreitman–Aguade (HKA) test was carried out with MLHKA ver. 2.0 (Wright and Charlesworth 2004). We implemented a likelihood-ratio test by choosing randomly 20 candidate genes exhibiting neutral site frequency spectra and 3 candidate genes exhibiting reduced levels of polymorphism relative to divergence. These 3 genes were chosen because they had reduced levels of polymorphism relative to divergence (θπ/Dxy < 0.15). The likelihood function was evaluated and parameters were estimated under both models, using MCMC with 1.0 × 108 steps. Statistical significance was determined by comparing twice the difference between the log-likelihood scores to a χ2-distribution with 3 d.f., where in model 1 it was assumed that all 23 loci were neutral and in model 2 it was assumed that the 3 focal genes were nonneutral. Three independent MCMC simulations were used to check for convergence of the likelihood score and parameter estimates.

We also computed the ratio of nonsynonymous (Ka) to synonymous (Ks) divergence for each gene using DnaSP and correlated the Ka/Ks ratio to the polymorphism/divergence ratio using simple linear regression in R. This ratio is the average of each pairwise estimate of Ka/Ks of the coastal Douglas fir samples to the single bigcone Douglas fir. We used bootstrapping (n = 10,000 replicates) across samples to construct 95 and 99% confidence intervals for our measure of Ka/Ks.

RESULTS

Patterns of nucleotide diversity and divergence:

A total of 59,173 bp of aligned sequence data, of which 932 bp had missing, ambiguous, or indel data, were generated through the partial resequencing of 121 candidate genes (GenBank accession nos. EU864545–EU867209). The average length of these gene fragments was 489 bp (± 204 bp). These genes are distributed throughout the genome of coastal Douglas fir (Figure S1), with 64 of the 77 segregating SNPs being placed on the existing linkage map. These 64 SNPs represent 42 candidate genes, 36 from this study and 6 from Krutovsky and Neale (2005). Sequence data were obtained for 21 of the 24 samples per gene on average. Of the 121 candidate genes, 115 were polymorphic, yielding a total of 933 SNPs. The number of polymorphisms varied greatly across genes with an average of 8 SNPs per locus (range: 0–29). The majority of SNPs were silent (n = 732), with 478 of those being located in noncoding regions. The remaining 201 SNPs were nonsynonymous, with an average of 2 nonsynonymous SNPs per gene (range: 0–12). The average SNP density ranged from a maximum of 1 SNP per 43 bp for silent sites to a minimum of 1 SNP per 112 bp for nonsynonymous sites.

Average estimates of nucleotide diversity were on the order of 4.0 × 10−3 per site, with silent sites having the greatest (θW = 0.00777, θπ = 0.00756) and nonsynonymous sites the smallest (θW = 0.00214, θπ = 0.00200) average estimates of diversity (Figure 1, Table 1 and Table S5). Diversity at synonymous (θπs) and silent (θπsil) sites was approximately fourfold greater than at nonsynonymous sites (θπa), with most genes exhibiting a θπa/θπs ratio less than one (n = 77). Six genes, however, had θπa/θπs ratios greater than one, with values ranging from 1.13 to 3.09 (Table S2).

Figure 1.—
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Figure 1.—

The distribution of diversity and divergence across different categories of sites. Values are given on a per site scale. Divergence is measured against bigcone Douglas-fir. Vertical lines extend to 1.5 times the interquartile range. Syn, synonymous sites; Sil, silent sites; NSyn, nonsynonymous sites; Total, all sites.

View this table:
  • View inline
  • View popup
TABLE 1

Measures of diversity and divergence across 121 candidate genes putatively affecting cold hardiness in Douglas fir

Nucleotide diversity was also heterogeneous across candidate genes. A likelihood-ratio test indicated that Θ significantly varied across genes when considering all sites (χ2 = 156.59, d.f. = 114, P = 0.005), with the same result occurring for different categories of sites (silent, χ2 = 189.11, d.f. = 111, P < 0.001; nonsynonymous, χ2 = 95.67, d.f. = 71, P = 0.027). In general, θW was larger than θπ, illustrating an excess of rare SNP alleles relative to expectations under neutrality.

All candidate genes exhibited an excess of divergence relative to diversity, with the average divergence estimate approximately twofold greater than the average diversity estimate (Figure 1, Table 1, and Table S6). The magnitudes of divergence also differed by category of sites. Divergence at synonymous (Ks) and silent (Ksil) sites was greater than at nonsynonymous (Ka) sites, with 76 genes exhibiting a Ka/Ks ratio less than one or zero. However, 18 genes had a Ka/Ks ratio that was greater than one, with values ranging from 1.01 to 14.48. Two of these 18 genes had bootstrap confidence intervals excluding one (Table 1). The remaining 27 genes had undefined values for Ka/Ks.

Patterns of intra- and intergenic linkage disequilibrium:

The number of haplotypes at each polymorphic locus varied from 2 (Hd = 0.087) to 20 (Hd = 0.991), with an average of 5 (Math) per locus. The estimated minimum number of recombination events (RM) was positively correlated with the number of haplotypes and the number of segregating sites (Kendall's τ > 0.409), whereas divergence for all, silent, synonymous, and nonsynonymous sites was uncorrelated with RM (c.f. Hudson and Kaplan 1985). Nucleotide diversity at synonymous and nonsynonymous sites was also uncorrelated with RM.

The relationship of the squared allelic correlation coefficient (r2) with physical distance illustrated that LD decayed ∼50% over 1100 bp, with r2 dropping to <0.25 by 900 bp (Figure 2A). Using Fisher's exact tests, the value of r2 for 866 of the 2837 intragenic site pairs remained significant after a Bonferroni correction. Significant intergenic LD was also apparent for candidate genes that were located proximally on linkage groups. For example, linkage group 17 has two candidate genes whose polymorphisms are almost in complete LD despite being ∼30 cM apart, while genes farther apart show little LD (Figure 2B).

Figure 2.—
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Figure 2.—

Patterns of intra- and interlocus linkage disequilibrium (LD) for coastal Douglas fir. (A) Intragenic patterns of LD using only parsimony informative sites. The fitted lines are the expectation of r2 (plus a 95% confidence interval for C), using the nonlinear least squares estimate of C = 4Ner, where Ne is the effective population size and r is the recombination rate. The thick line is that given for the decay of LD in a previous study of coastal Douglas fir (Krutovsky and Neale 2005). (B) Patterns of intergenic LD along linkage group 17. Solid lines delineate comparisons within and among candidate genes, with letters indicating placement of the candidate genes within the matrix.

Historical demography:

The IGM yielded well-defined approximate posterior probability distributions for the parameters of interest. Replicated runs of the MCMC sampler converged to similar posterior probability distributions, as well as to roughly similar point estimates of the parameters (Figure S2, Table S7). Parameter estimates for this model are consistent with population growth producing a modest increase in effective population size (f = 0.60–0.73), beginning ∼0.039–0.045 coalescent time units ago. These translate into minimum age estimates for the onset of growth of ∼270,000–310,000 years ago if we assume a mutation rate on the order of 1.0 × 10−9 mutations/bp/year (Willyard et al. 2006), a generation time of 50 years, and a genomewide estimate for Θ of 5.92.

We also fit the data to two extreme bottleneck models, where the effective population size during the bottleneck was 5% of the current size (Figure 3). All other parameters were set to the mean values across the MCMC replications (Table S7). When this event was set to occur at 10,000 years ago, the Bayes factor with respect to the instantaneous growth model was 0.15. When the bottleneck, however, was set to be 100,000 years ago, the Bayes factor was 2.5. Following Jeffreys (1998), the IGM fits the data substantially better than the BIM_10 (BF = 6.67, i.e., 1/0.15), but the IGM and BIM_100 models are not differentiated substantially by the data (BF = 2.50). We focus subsequently on the two best models for the purpose of neutrality testing.

Figure 3.—
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Figure 3.—

The distribution of and historical demographic inferences for coastal Douglas fir. (A) The distribution of coastal Douglas fir in Oregon and Washington. Locations for samples are indicated with solid circles and grouped into local populations. (B) Patterns of population structure in coastal Douglas fir. Data and results are from Krutovsky et al. (2009), who used 1283 samples and 31 allozyme and microsatellite loci. Illustrated is the smallest value of K judged as optimal using the ΔK method (Evanno et al. 2005) for categories corresponding to individuals (top) and populations (bottom). (C) Demographic inferences for coastal Douglas fir. The solid line represents the average value of Tajima's D across the 18 loci used to fit the model (cf. Krutovsky and Neale 2005), whereas the dashed line denotes the mean of the simulated distribution under each model (IGM, instantaneous growth model; BIM_10, bottleneck 10,000 years ago; BIM_100, bottleneck model 100,000 years ago). Listed for the BIM models are Bayes factors relative to the IGM.

Neutrality tests:

Six candidate genes exhibited clear patterns of polymorphism and divergence consistent with natural selection. The results from univariate tests are given in Table S8 and Table S9, as well as P-values under null models corresponding to Wright–Fisher mating, the instantaneous growth model, and the extreme bottleneck model set to occur at 100,000 years ago. On average, the summary statistics reflected the excess of low-frequency SNP alleles (D = −0.142) and the slight excess of high-frequency (Fay and Wu's H = −0.106) derived SNP alleles.

A compound test based on D, H, and the Ewens–Watterson haplotype test (DHEW) identified four genes as having patterns of diversity consistent with selective sweeps (Table 2, Figure S3). Products from all four genes function as structural components of the plasma membrane or provide protection against temperature-dependent denaturation of proteins. Inclusion of demographic models (IGM and BIM_100) into the simulations caused one of these loci (CN634517.1) to become nonsignificant.

View this table:
  • View inline
  • View popup
TABLE 2

A list of candidate genes putatively affected by positive natural selection

Three genes exhibited a significant excess of divergence relative to diversity, using a maximum-likelihood implementation of the HKA test (χ2 = 12.60, d.f. = 3, P = 0.006). These excesses ranged from a two- to threefold reduction in diversity relative to divergence (Table S10, Figure S3), which was also apparent across different categories of sites (Figure S4). All three loci function in generalized stress responses at the levels of protein folding and transcriptional regulation, with locus Pm_CL908Contig1 also being significant for the DHEW test. A weak, yet statistically significant, relationship also existed between Ka/Ks and θπ/Dxy (F1,91 = 4.79, P = 0.031, r2 = 0.05). The driver behind this result was three loci with extreme values of Ka/Ks (i.e., >5, cf. Table 1), all of which had θπ/Dxy < 0.15 (Table 2). Removal of these three loci changed the relationship to be nonsignificant.

Several additional genes exhibited patterns of polymorphism consistent with balancing or diversifying selection, depending upon the null model and summary statistic that was used (Table S8 and Table S9). None of these were significant using the DHEW test. For three of these five genes, a significant and positive relationship existed between geographical distance and pairwise Dxy among populations (Figure S5). This pattern is suggestive of diversifying selection along environmental gradients, especially given that only five candidate genes had a significant value of Mantel's r and three of those five had positive values of D that were nominally significant. Two of these genes remained significant at the FDR threshold of Q = 0.10 for Tajima's test when an extreme bottleneck was included as part of the null model. These loci, CN636901.1 and Pm_CL1400Contig1, encode proteins that are involved with abiotic stress response and cell wall architecture, respectively.

DISCUSSION

Nucleotide diversity and linkage disequilibrium:

Nucleotide diversity in coastal Douglas fir is similar to, but slightly higher than, that observed in other conifer species (Savolainen and Pyhäjärvi 2007). The average nucleotide diversities for all, silent, and nonsynonymous sites were similar to those reported previously (Krutovsky and Neale 2005). Magnitudes of intragenic LD were moderate as compared to those reported for conifers. Our estimate of recombination (ρ/Θ = 0.86) was similar to that reported in loblolly pine (ρ/Θ = 0.29; Brown et al. 2004), but almost an order of magnitude less than that reported in Norway spruce (ρ/Θ = 1.23–4.05; Heuertz et al. 2006) and the central populations of Scots pine (ρ/Θ = 3.80–5.80; Pyhäjärvi et al. 2007).

Interlocus LD was higher than expected on the basis of results from loblolly pine and the previous study in coastal Douglas fir (Brown et al. 2004; Krutovsky and Neale 2005). While genomic variation in recombination rates has been documented across plants (Gaut et al. 2007), which could reflect repetitive regions of the genome where recombination is suppressed, several additional processes such as natural selection, mutation rate variation, population structure, and extreme bottlenecks can also account for these patterns. This is important given that interlocus LD has dramatic effects on the amount and pattern of genetic diversity and population differentiation, as well as on the response to and efficacy of natural selection, across the genome of an organism (Le Corre and Kremer 2003).

Patterns of selection:

Most genes exhibited an excess of nucleotide diversity at synonymous relative to nonsynonymous sites, suggesting the widespread occurrence of purifying selection in coastal Douglas fir (cf. Palmé et al. 2009). Values of Tajima's D across different categories of sites were consistent with this pattern as well (Figure S6). These patterns have been noted extensively in forest trees and have driven the hypothesis that detectable patterns of positive selection in conifers are rare. This hypothesis has been confirmed in a recent examination of genomewide patterns of population differentiation in white spruce (Namroud et al. 2008; but see Eveno et al. 2008). Further examination using phylogenetic approaches, however, has detected patterns consistent with directional selection (Palmé et al. 2008, 2009), suggesting that consideration of relevant timescales is important to the search for selection.

We concur with this hypothesis showing that ∼5% of the genes exhibited patterns consistent with positive selection. Our estimate is likely to be a lower bound due to low statistical power and the conservative assumptions that we made, as well as to the fact that causal variants may exhibit patterns of polymorphism that are indistinguishable from neutral variants due strictly to the quantitative genetic mechanisms underlying the trait (Le Corre and Kremer 2003). Also of consideration are other models of selective sweeps incorporating selection on a standing crop of neutral variants (cf. Innan and Kim 2004). In those models, linked neutral variants are less likely to show the traditional signs of selective sweeps. Contrary to expectations based on patterns of low levels of intragenic LD, the strongest signals came from those genes where patterns were consistent with selective sweeps. The vast majority of candidate genes showed little evidence of elevated levels of intermediate-frequency SNP alleles as expected under diversifying selection and recurrent selective sweep models. Under the bottleneck scenarios, however, two genes had significantly positive values of Tajima's D.

It is likely that these patterns represent relatively recent and single, not recurrent, selective sweep events. A genomewide phenomenon of recurrent selective sweeps would produce average values of D and H that were negative and positive, respectively (Przeworski 2002). Our genes, however, are not random genomic samples, and 42 of the 121 candidate genes exhibit this predicted pattern, producing average values of D = −0.83 and H = 0.55. A conclusion to rule out all occurrences of recurrent sweep models (Gillespie 2001) within conifer genomes, therefore, is premature, especially given our ignorance about large-scale genomic patterns of LD, the spatial distribution of genes across chromosomes, and the historical demography of these lineages.

The simplicity of our demographic models may not account for all of the confounding effects of demography on tests for selection. It also is possible that we have missed evidence supportive of other demographic models due to our limited sampling with respect to the range of coastal Douglas fir. Expansion from bottlenecks could produce patterns consistent with signatures of single and recurrent selective sweeps, depending on the timing and severity of the bottleneck. This is the most common form of demographic model fitted to European forest trees (Heuertz et al. 2006; Pyhäjärvi et al. 2007). The severity of the bottleneck would have to be extreme to produce genomewide patterns mirroring single selective sweeps. Incorporation of an extreme bottleneck (99% reduction of Nec) occurring 100,000 years ago into the null model caused one of the four genes significant previously in the DHEW test to become nonsignificant. It remains significant, however, at a nominal threshold of P = 0.001.

Paleobotanical and geological evidence indicate that Pleistocene glaciation in North America differed dramatically from that in Europe, making an extreme bottleneck model unlikely for coastal Douglas fir. The spatial extent of continental glaciers was smaller and vegetation was not compressed to the same degree, especially on the west coast (Graham 1999). The most parsimonious demographic model for coastal Douglas fir is one of population expansion. Inclusion of a bottleneck following the instantaneous expansion, however, did provide a marginally better fit to the data (Figure 3). The data used to test the demographic models did not have outgroup information, and further work, therefore, should examine rigorously a broad range of demographic models (cf. Ingvarsson 2008).

Putative targets of selection:

The most significant departures from neutrality came from genes that encoded proteins that are structural components of or associated with cellular membranes or those that function as or regulate chaperones. Locus Pm_CL908Contig1 contains a GRAM domain, which characterizes membrane-associated proteins such as glucosyltransferases (Doerks et al. 2000; Caro et al. 2007). The Arabidopsis homolog of locus ES420171.1 is a multispanning G-protein coupled receptor that stabilizes the plasma membrane in response to freezing temperatures (Breton et al. 2003). Both CN634517.1 and Pm_CL61Contig1 have homologs whose primary functions are to act as or in the regulation of chaperones (Romano et al. 2004). Locus Pm_CL922Contig1 encodes a thaumatin-like protein, whose homolog in Arabidopsis has gene expression induced by fungal infection (Hu and Reddy 1997). While the link between cold hardiness and disease resistance is speculative, it is tempting to correlate overall health with the ability to grow and tolerate cold efficiently. Several of these genes are also responsive to abscisic acid (ABA). Controversy has surrounded the role of ABA during cold acclimation in Arabidopsis, however, due to its general effect on plant growth in response to stress (Gilmour and Thomashow 1991).

Limitations and implications:

There are several limitations to our analyses. We used a single sequence from a recently diverged outgroup so that misspecification of ancestral states is possible. This would reduce greatly the power of the HKA test employed here and significantly affect estimation of H (cf. Baudry and Depaulis 2003). This also justifies our avoidance of McDonald–Kreitman-type analyses. Background selection could have produced signatures of selective sweeps, but not with respect to H (Hudson and Kaplan 1995). Finally, we did not incorporate effects of population structure into our hypothesis testing. The effects of undetected structure on inference of selection from summary statistics are tied closely to sampling design and the strength of substructure (Przeworski 2002; Städler et al. 2009), and thus conclusions regarding the conservative or liberal nature of our estimates are premature.

Selective sweeps, while not likely the dominant type of selection across the genome of coastal Douglas fir, are nevertheless important. Here, we have identified several genes whose patterns of diversity and divergence are inconsistent with the standard neutral model, as well as simple demographic scenarios involving instantaneous growth and bottlenecks. Depending upon demographic assumptions, we have identified three to eight such loci. These genes are prime targets for further association genetic (cf. Eckert et al. 2009b) and functional studies, thus beginning to bring molecular population and quantitative genetic approaches full circle with respect to the dissection of complex traits.

Acknowledgments

The authors thank F. Thomas Ledig for contributing bigcone Douglas fir seeds, Valerie Hipkins and her staff at National Forest Genetics Laboratory for performing the DNA extractions, Katie Tsang and Jacqueline Silva for helping to obtain sequence data, and Jeff Ross-Ibarra for helpful discussion about demographic inference. The manuscript was much improved by comments from two anonymous reviewers. Funding for this project was made available through a U.S. Department of Agriculture National Research Initiative Plant Genome grant (04-712-0084).

Footnotes

  • Supporting information is available online at http://www.genetics.org/cgi/content/full/genetics.109.103895/DC1.

  • Communicating editor: O. Savolainen

  • Received April 13, 2009.
  • Accepted July 3, 2009.
  • Copyright © 2009 by the Genetics Society of America

References

  1. ↵
    Aitken, S. N., and W. T. Adams, 1996 Genetics of fall and winter cold hardiness of coastal Douglas-fir in Oregon. Can. J. For. Res. 26: 1828–1837.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  2. ↵
    Aitken, S. N., and W. T. Adams, 1997 Cold hardiness under strong genetic control in Oregon populations of Pseudotsuga menziesii var. menziesii. Can. J. For. Res. 27: 1773–1780.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  3. ↵
    Baudry, E., and F. Depaulis, 2003 Effect of misoriented sites on neutrality tests with outgroup. Genetics 165: 1619–1622.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  4. ↵
    Begun, D. J., A. K. Holloway, K. Stevens, L. W. Hillier, Y.-P. Poh et al., 2007 Population genomics: whole-genome analysis of polymorphism and divergence in Drosophila simulans. PLoS Biol. 5: e310.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  5. ↵
    Breton, G., J. Danyluk, J. B. F. Charron and F. Sarhan, 2003 Expression profiling and bioinformatic analyses of a novel stress-regulated multispanning transmembrane protein family from cereals and Arabidopsis. Plant Physiol. 132: 64–74.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  6. ↵
    Brown, G. R., G. P. Gill, R. J. Kuntz, C. H. Langley and D. B. Neale, 2004 Nucleotide diversity and linkage disequilibrium in loblolly pine. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 101: 15255–15260.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  7. ↵
    Campbell, R. K., 1979 Genecology of Douglas-fir in a watershed in the Oregon Cascades. Ecology 60: 1036–1050.
    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
  8. ↵
    Campbell, R. K., and F. C. Sorensen, 1973 Cold acclimation in seedling Douglas-fir related to phenology and provenance. Ecology 54: 1148–1151.
    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
  9. ↵
    Caro, E., M. M. Castellano and C. Gutierrez, 2007 A chromatin link that couples cell division to root epidermis patterning in Arabidopsis. Nature 447: 213–217.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  10. ↵
    Clark, R. M., G. Schweikert, C. Toomajian, S. Ossowski, G. Zeller et al., 2007 Common sequence polymorphisms shaping genetic diversity in Arabidopsis thaliana. Science 317: 338–342.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  11. ↵
    Doerks, T., M. Strauss, M. Brendel and P. Bork, 2000 GRAM, a novel domain in glucosyltransferases, myotubularins and other putative membrane-associated proteins. Trends Biochem. Sci. 25: 483–485.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  12. ↵
    Eckert, A. J., B. Pande, E. S. Ersoz, M. H. Wright, V. K. Rashbrook et al., 2009a High-throughput genotyping and mapping of single nucleotide polymorphisms in loblolly pine (Pinus taeda L.). Tree Genet. Genomes 5: 225–234.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  13. ↵
    Eckert, A. J., A. D. Bower, J. L. Wegrzyn, B. Pande, K. D. Jermstad et al., 2009b Association genetics of coastal Douglas-fir (Pseudotsuga menziesii var. menziesii, Pinaceae) I. Cold-hardiness related traits. Genetics 182: 1289–1302.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  14. ↵
    Evanno, G., S. Regnaut and J. Goudet, 2005 Detecting the number of clusters of individuals using the software STRUCTURE: a simulation study. Mol. Ecol. 14: 2611–2620.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  15. ↵
    Eveno, E., C. Collada, M. A. Guevara, V. Léger, A. Soto et al., 2008 Contrasting patterns of selection at Pinus pinaster Ait. drought stress candidate genes as revealed by genetic differentiation analyses. Mol. Biol. Evol. 25: 417–437.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  16. ↵
    Gaut, B. S., S. I. Wright, C. Rizzon, J. Dvorak and L. K. Anderson, 2007 Recombination: an underappreciated factor in the evolution of plant genomes. Nat. Rev. Genet. 8: 77–84.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  17. ↵
    Gillespie, J. H., 2001 Is the population size of a species relevant to its evolution? Evolution 55: 2161–2169.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  18. ↵
    Gilmour, S. J., and M. F. Thomashow, 1991 Cold acclimation and cold-regulated gene expression in ABA mutants of Arabidopsis thaliana. Plant Mol. Biol. 17: 1233–1240.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  19. ↵
    González-Martínez, S. C., K. V. Krutovsky and D. B. Neale, 2006 Forest tree population genomics and adaptive evolution. New Phytol. 170: 227–238.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  20. ↵
    Graham, A., 1999 Late Cretaceous and Cenozoic History of North American Vegetation. Oxford University Press, New York.
  21. ↵
    Heuertz, M., E. De Paoli, T. Källman, H. Larsson, I. Jurman et al., 2006 Multilocus patterns of nucleotide diversity, linkage disequilibrium and demographic history of Norway spruce [Picea abies (L.) Karst]. Genetics 174: 2095–2105.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  22. ↵
    Hill, W. G., and B. S. Weir, 1988 Variances and covariances of squared linkage disequilibria in finite populations. Theor. Popul. Biol. 33: 54–78.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  23. ↵
    Holliday, J. A., S. Ralph, R. White, J. Bohlmann and S. N. Aitken, 2008 Global monitoring of gene expression during autumn cold acclimation among rangewide populations of Sitka spruce [Picea sitchensis (Bong.) Carr.]. New Phytol. 178: 103–122.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  24. ↵
    Howe, G. T., S. N. Aitken, D. B. Neale, K. D. Jermstad, N. C. Wheeler et al., 2003 From genotype to phenotype: unraveling the complexities of cold adaptation in forest trees. Can. J. Bot. 81: 1247–1266.
    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
  25. ↵
    Hu, X., and A. S. Reddy, 1997 Cloning and expression of a PR5-like protein from Arabidopsis: inhibition of fungal growth by bacterially expressed protein. Plant Mol. Biol. 34: 949–959.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  26. ↵
    Hudson, R. R., 1991 Gene genealogies and the coalescent process. Oxf. Surv. Evol. Biol. 7: 1–44.
    OpenUrl
  27. ↵
    Hudson, R. R., and N. L. Kaplan, 1985 Statistical properties of the number of recombination events in the history of a sample of DNA sequences. Genetics 111: 147–164.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  28. ↵
    Hudson, R. R., and N. L. Kaplan, 1995 The coalescent process and background selection. Philos. Trans. R. Soc. Lond. B Biol. Sci. 349: 19–23.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  29. ↵
    Ingvarsson, P., 2008 Multilocus patterns of nucleotide polymorphism and the demographic history of Populus tremula. Genetics 180: 329–340.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  30. ↵
    Innan, H., and Y. Kim, 2004 Pattern of polymorphism after strong artificial selection in a domestication event. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 101: 10667–10672.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  31. ↵
    Jeffreys, H., 1998 Theory of Probability. Oxford University Press, Oxford.
  32. ↵
    Jermstad, K. D., D. L. Bassoni, N. C. Wheeler and D. B. Neale, 1998 A sex-averaged linkage map in coastal Douglas-fir (Pseudotsuga menziesii [Mirb.] Franco) based on RFLP and RAPD markers. Theor. Appl. Genet. 97: 762–770.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  33. ↵
    Jermstad, K. D., D. L. Bassoni, K. S. Jech, N. C. Wheeler and D. B. Neale, 2001a Mapping of quantitative trait loci controlling adaptive traits in coastal Douglas-fir. I. Timing of vegetative bud flush. Theor. Appl. Genet. 102: 1142–1151.
    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
  34. ↵
    Jermstad, K. D., D. L. Bassoni, N. C. Wheeler, T. S. Anekonda, S. N. Aitken et al., 2001b Mapping of quantitative trait loci controlling adaptive traits in coastal Douglas-fir. II. Spring and fall cold-hardiness. Theor. Appl. Genet. 102: 1152–1158.
    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
  35. ↵
    Jermstad, K. D., D. L. Bassoni, K. S. Jech, G. A. Ritchie, N. C. Wheeler et al., 2003 Mapping of quantitative trait loci controlling adaptive traits in coastal Douglas-fir. III. Quantitative trait loci-by-environment interactions. Genetics 165: 1489–1506.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  36. ↵
    Krutovsky, K.V., and D. B. Neale, 2005 Nucleotide diversity and linkage disequilibrium in cold–hardiness and wood-quality related candidate genes in Douglas-fir. Genetics 171: 2029–2041.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  37. ↵
    Krutovsky, K. V., M. Troggio, G. R. Brown, K. D. Jermstad and D. B. Neale, 2004 Comparative mapping in the Pinaceae. Genetics 168: 447–461.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  38. ↵
    Krutovsky, K. V., J. B. St. Clair, R. Saich, V. D. Hipkins and D. B. Neale, 2009 Estimation of population structure in coastal Douglas-fir [Pseudotsuga menziesii (Mirb.) Franco var. menziesii] using allozyme and microsatellite markers. Tree Genet. Genomes (in press).
  39. ↵
    Le Corre, V, and A. Kremer, 2003 Genetic variability at neutral markers, quantitative trait loci and trait in a subdivided population under selection. Genetics 164: 1205–1219.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  40. ↵
    Lee, B.-H., D. A. Henderson and J.-K. Zhu, 2005 The Arabidopsis cold-responsive transcriptome and its regulation by ICE1. Plant Cell 17: 3155–3175.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  41. ↵
    Li, P., and W. T. Adams, 1989 Range-wide patterns of allozyme variation in Douglas-fir (Pseudotsuga menziesii). Can. J. For. Res. 19: 149–161.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  42. ↵
    Marjoram, P., and S. Tavare, 2006 Modern computational approaches for analyzing molecular genetic variation data. Nat. Rev. Genet. 7: 759–770.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  43. ↵
    Marjoram, P., J. Molitor, V. Plagnol and S. Tavaré, 2003 Markov chain Monte Carlo without likelihoods. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 100: 15324–15328.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  44. ↵
    McKay, J. K., and R. G. Latta, 2002 Adaptive population divergence: markers, QTL and traits. Trends Ecol. Evol. 17: 285–291.
    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
  45. ↵
    Merkle, S. A., and W. T. Adams, 1987 Patterns of allozyme variation within and among Douglas-fir breeding zones in southwest Oregon. Can. J. For. Res. 17: 402–407.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  46. ↵
    Morgenstern, E. K., 1996 Geographic Variation in Forest Trees. UBC Press, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada.
  47. ↵
    Namroud, M.-C., J. Beaulieu, N. Juge, J. Laroche and J. Bousquet, 2008 Scanning the genome for gene single nucleotide polymorphisms involved in adaptive population differentiation in white spruce. Mol. Ecol. 17: 3599–3613.
    OpenUrlPubMedWeb of Science
  48. ↵
    Palmé, A. E., M. Wright and O. Savolainen, 2008 Patterns of divergence among conifer ESTs and polymorphism in Pinus sylvestris identify putative selective sweeps. Mol. Biol. Evol. 25: 2567–2577.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  49. ↵
    Palmé, A. E., T. Pyhäjärvi, W. Wachowiak and O. Savolainen, 2009 Selection on nuclear genes in a Pinus phylogeny. Mol. Biol. Evol. 26: 893–905.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  50. ↵
    Pavy, N., B. Pelgas, S. Beauseigle, S. Blais, F. Gagnon et al., 2008 Enhancing genetic mapping of complex genomes through the design of highly-multiplexed SNP arrays: application to the large and unsequenced genomes of white and black spruce. BMC Genomics 9: 21.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  51. ↵
    Przeworski, M., 2002 The signature of positive selection at randomly chosen loci. Genetics 160: 1179–1189.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  52. ↵
    Pyhäjärvi, T., M. R. García-Gil, T. Knürr, M. Mikkonen, W. Wachowiak et al., 2007 Demographic history has influenced nucleotide diversity in European Pinus sylvestris populations. Genetics 177: 1713–1724.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  53. ↵
    Remington, D. L., J. M. Thornsberry, Y. Matsuoka, L. M. Wilson, S. R. Whitt et al., 2001 Structure of linkage disequilibrium and phenotypic associations in the maize genome. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 98: 11479–11484.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  54. ↵
    Romano, P. G. N., P. Horton and J. E. Gray, 2004 The Arabidopsis cyclophilin gene family. Plant Physiol. 134: 1268–1282.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  55. ↵
    Ross-Ibarra, J., M. Tenaillon and B. S. Gaut, 2009 Historical divergence and gene flow in the genus Zea. Genetics 181: 1399–1413.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  56. ↵
    Rozas, J., J. C. Sánchez-DelBarrio, X. Messegyer and R. Rozas, 2003 DnaSP, DNA polymorphism analyses by the coalescent and other methods. Bioinformatics 19: 2496–2497.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  57. ↵
    Santiago, E., and A. Caballero, 2005 Variation after a selective sweep in a subdivided population. Genetics 169: 485–488.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  58. ↵
    Savolainen, O., and T. Pyhäjärvi, 2007 Genomic diversity in forest trees. Curr. Opin. Plant Biol. 10: 162–167.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  59. ↵
    Slatkin, M., and T. Wiehe, 1998 Genetic hitch-hiking in a subdivided population. Genet. Res. 71: 155–160.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  60. ↵
    St. Clair, J. B., 2006 Genetic variation in fall cold hardiness in coastal Douglas-fir in western Oregon and Washington. Can. J. Bot. 84: 1110–1181.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  61. ↵
    St. Clair, J. B., N. L. Mandel and K. W. Vance-Borland, 2005 Genecology of Douglas-fir in western Oregon and Washington. Ann. Bot. 96: 1199–1214.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  62. ↵
    Städler, T., B. Haubold, C. Merino, W. Stephan and P. Pfaffelhuber, 2009 The impact of sampling schemes on the site frequency spectrum in nonequilibrium subdivided populations. Genetics 182: 205–216.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  63. ↵
    Stam, P., 1993 Construction of integrated genetic linkage maps by means of a new computer package: JoinMap. Plant J. 3: 739–744.
    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
  64. ↵
    Storey, J. D., 2003 The positive false discovery rate: a Bayesian interpretation and the q-value. Ann. Stat. 31: 2013–2035.
    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
  65. ↵
    Thomashow, M. F., 1999 Plant cold acclimation: freezing tolerance genes and regulatory mechanisms. Annu. Rev. Plant Physiol. Plant Mol. Biol. 50: 571–599.
    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
  66. ↵
    Viard, F., Y. A. El-Kassaby and K. Ritland, 2001 Diversity and genetic structure in populations of Pseudotsuga menziesii (Pinaceae) at chloroplast microsatellite loci. Genome 44: 336–344.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  67. ↵
    Voight, B. F., S. Kudaravalli, X. Wen and J. K. Pritchard, 2006 A map of recent positive selection in the human genome. PLoS Biol. 4: e72.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  68. ↵
    Wegrzyn, J. L., J. M. Lee, J. D. Liechty and D. B. Neale, 2009 PineSAP–Pine alignment and SNP Identification Pipeline. Bioinformatics (in press).
  69. ↵
    Wheeler, N. C., K. D. Jermstad, K. V. Krutovsky, S. N. Aitken, G. T. Howe et al., 2005 Mapping of quantitative trait loci controlling adaptive traits in coastal Douglas-fir. IV. Cold-hardiness QTL verification and candidate gene mapping. Mol. Breed. 15: 145–156.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  70. ↵
    Willyard, A., J. Syring, D. S. Gernandt, A. Liston and R. Cronn, 2006 Fossil calibration of molecular divergence infers a moderate mutation rate and recent radiations for Pinus. Mol. Biol. Evol. 24: 90–101.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  71. ↵
    Wright, S. I., and B. Charlesworth, 2004 The HKA test revisited: a maximum likelihood ratio test of the standard neutral model. Genetics 168: 1071–1076.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  72. ↵
    Yakovlev, I. A., C.-G. Fossdal, Ø. Johnson, O. Junttlia and T. Skrøppa, 2006 Analysis of gene expression during bud burst initiation in Norway spruce via ESTs from subtracted cDNA libraries. Tree Genet. Genomes 2: 39–52.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  73. ↵
    Zeng, K., Y. X. Fu, S. Shi and C.-I. Wu, 2006 Statistical tests for detecting positive selection by utilizing high-frequency variants. Genetics 174: 1431–1439.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  74. ↵
    Zeng, K., S. Mano, S. Shi and C.-I. Wu, 2007a Comparisons of site- and haplotype-frequency methods for detecting positive selection. Mol. Biol. Evol. 24: 1562–1574.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  75. ↵
    Zeng, K., S. Suhua and C.-I. Wu, 2007b Compound tests for the detection of hitchhiking under positive selection. Mol. Biol. Evol. 24: 1898–1908.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
View Abstract
Previous ArticleNext Article
Back to top

PUBLICATION INFORMATION

Volume 183 Issue 1, September 2009

Genetics: 183 (1)

ARTICLE CLASSIFICATION

INVESTIGATIONS
Population and evolutionary genetics
View this article with LENS
Email

Thank you for sharing this Genetics article.

NOTE: We request your email address only to inform the recipient that it was you who recommended this article, and that it is not junk mail. We do not retain these email addresses.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Multilocus Patterns of Nucleotide Diversity and Divergence Reveal Positive Selection at Candidate Genes Related to Cold Hardiness in Coastal Douglas Fir (Pseudotsuga menziesii var. menziesii)
(Your Name) has forwarded a page to you from Genetics
(Your Name) thought you would be interested in this article in Genetics.
Print
Alerts
Enter your email below to set up alert notifications for new article, or to manage your existing alerts.
SIGN UP OR SIGN IN WITH YOUR EMAIL
View PDF
Share

Multilocus Patterns of Nucleotide Diversity and Divergence Reveal Positive Selection at Candidate Genes Related to Cold Hardiness in Coastal Douglas Fir (Pseudotsuga menziesii var. menziesii)

Andrew J. Eckert, Jill L. Wegrzyn, Barnaly Pande, Kathleen D. Jermstad, Jennifer M. Lee, John D. Liechty, Brandon R. Tearse, Konstantin V. Krutovsky and David B. Neale
Genetics September 1, 2009 vol. 183 no. 1 289-298; https://doi.org/10.1534/genetics.109.103895
Andrew J. Eckert
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Jill L. Wegrzyn
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Barnaly Pande
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Kathleen D. Jermstad
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Jennifer M. Lee
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
John D. Liechty
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Brandon R. Tearse
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Konstantin V. Krutovsky
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
David B. Neale
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
del.icio.us logo Digg logo Reddit logo Twitter logo CiteULike logo Facebook logo Google logo Mendeley logo
Citation

Multilocus Patterns of Nucleotide Diversity and Divergence Reveal Positive Selection at Candidate Genes Related to Cold Hardiness in Coastal Douglas Fir (Pseudotsuga menziesii var. menziesii)

Andrew J. Eckert, Jill L. Wegrzyn, Barnaly Pande, Kathleen D. Jermstad, Jennifer M. Lee, John D. Liechty, Brandon R. Tearse, Konstantin V. Krutovsky and David B. Neale
Genetics September 1, 2009 vol. 183 no. 1 289-298; https://doi.org/10.1534/genetics.109.103895
Andrew J. Eckert
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Jill L. Wegrzyn
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Barnaly Pande
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Kathleen D. Jermstad
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Jennifer M. Lee
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
John D. Liechty
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Brandon R. Tearse
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Konstantin V. Krutovsky
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
David B. Neale
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero

Related Articles

Cited By

More in this TOC Section

  • Beyond Thermodynamic Constraints: Evolutionary Sampling Generates Realistic Protein Sequence Variation
  • Mutational Pleiotropy and the Strength of Stabilizing Selection Within and Between Functional Modules of Gene Expression
  • Regulation of Glutamate Signaling in the Sensorimotor Circuit by CASY-1A/Calsyntenin in Caenorhabditis elegans
Show more Investigations
  • Top
  • Article
    • Abstract
    • MATERIALS AND METHODS
    • RESULTS
    • DISCUSSION
    • Acknowledgments
    • Footnotes
    • References
  • Figures & Data
  • Supplemental
  • Info & Metrics

GSA

The Genetics Society of America (GSA), founded in 1931, is the professional membership organization for scientific researchers and educators in the field of genetics. Our members work to advance knowledge in the basic mechanisms of inheritance, from the molecular to the population level.

Online ISSN: 1943-2631

  • For Authors
  • For Reviewers
  • For Subscribers
  • Submit a Manuscript
  • Editorial Board
  • Press Releases

SPPA Logo

GET CONNECTED

RSS  Subscribe with RSS.

email  Subscribe via email. Sign up to receive alert notifications of new articles.

  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • YouTube
  • LinkedIn
  • Google Plus

Copyright © 2018 by the Genetics Society of America

  • About GENETICS
  • Terms of use
  • Advertising
  • Permissions
  • Contact us
  • International access