Comparisons among closely related species have led to the proposal that the duplications found in many extant genomes are the remnants of an ancient polyploidization event, rather than a result of successive duplications of individual chromosomal segments. If this interpretation is correct, it would support Ohno's proposal that polyploidization drives evolution by generating the genetic material necessary for the creation of new genes. Paradoxically, analysis of contemporary polyploids suggests that increased ploidy is an inherently unstable state. To shed light on this apparent contradiction and to determine the effects of nascent duplications of the entire genome, we generated isogenic polyploid strains of the budding yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Our data show that an increase in ploidy results in a marked decrease in a cell's ability to survive during stationary phase in growth medium. Tetraploid cells die rapidly, whereas isogenic haploids remain viable for weeks. Unlike haploid cells, which arrest growth as unbudded cells, tetraploid cells continue to bud and form mitotic spindles in stationary phase. The stationary-phase death of tetraploids can be prevented by mutations or conditions that result in growth arrest. These data show that whole-genome duplications are accompanied by defects that affect viability and subsequent survival of the new organism.
THE generation of complete genome sequences has revealed that many organisms contain a large number of duplicated genomic regions. This is particularly evident in Saccharomyces cerevisiae where duplications compose 50% of the genome. The genes within these paralogous segments are often found to be in the same order and orientation with respect to the centromere. These features led Wolfe and others to propose that the duplications found in S. cerevisiae are the remnants of an ancient whole-genome duplication rather than the result of many sporadic partial duplications of smaller genomic regions (Wolfe and Shields 1997; Gibson and Spring 2000). Recent sequencing of the genome of Kluyveromyces waltii showed that it is related to the genome of S. cerevisiae by a 1:2 mapping in the manner expected for the postulated whole-genome duplication (Kellis et al. 2004). The lack of complete correspondence between duplicated regions is a consequence of sequence divergence that has occurred by mutations or deletions over time. The evolution of genomes by polyploidization rather than by small duplications supports Ohno's proposal that whole-genome duplications spawn the evolution of new genes (Ohno et al. 1968).
Although whole-genome duplications would seem to be an efficient mechanism for evolving new genes, the sudden doubling of every gene may present physiological difficulties for the nascent polyploid organism. Studies of polyploids made in the laboratory indicate that organisms with whole-genome duplications have problems in genomic stability, gene regulation, and development (Mayer and Aguilera 1990; Guo et al. 1996; Matzke et al. 1999; Lin et al. 2001; Pikaard 2001; Storchova and Pellman 2004). Polyploidization can induce a flurry of genetic and epigenetic events that include DNA sequence elimination and gene silencing (Song et al. 1995; Mittelsten Scheid et al. 1996; Feldman et al. 1997; Ozkan et al. 2001; Shaked et al. 2001). Genome-wide transcription analysis in yeast demonstrates that there are genes whose expression is repressed by increases in ploidy (Galitski et al. 1999).
The budding yeast S. cerevisiae provides the opportunity to study the consequences of polyploid formation under laboratory conditions and without the extensive selection that must inevitably take place during evolutionary time. Although S. cerevisiae is normally haploid or diploid, its ploidy can be manipulated at will because cells with a ploidy content >2n are viable and can mate with other cells to create organisms of yet higher ploidy. Haploid yeast cells are either MATa or MATα and mate with cells of the opposite mating type to form diploids that are MATa/MATα. Although these MATa/MATα diploids do not mate, they can easily be converted to mating-type homozygotes (MATa/MATa or MATα/MATα) that are fully capable of mating with haploids to produce triploids or with diploids to produce tetraploids. The ease with which cells of higher ploidy can be generated raises the question: “What limits the ploidy of cells?”
In this report, we take advantage of the facility with which one can create isogenic polyploid yeast strains to determine the consequences of nascent whole-genome duplications. Polyploids show chromosome instability during exponential growth but do not manifest any other obvious growth defects. However, in stationary phase, recently constructed tetraploids show a striking loss of viability. Whereas haploids survive for months, newly formed tetraploids die rapidly. This death is not due to the increased cell size of polyploids, but rather to their failure to arrest growth during stationary phase. The inviability of nascent tetraploid cells in stationary phase suggests that whole-genome duplications may require additional genetic and/or epigenetic changes to permit their survival.
MATERIALS AND METHODS
Strains, plasmids, and media:
Strains used in this study are listed in Table 1. All strains were derived from S. cerevisiae strain ∑1278b (also known as MB1000; Grenson et al. 1966; Brandriss and Magasanik 1979). Isogenic ploidy series were constructed as previously described (Galitski et al. 1999). Cells were cultured in synthetic complete (SC) media or YPD prepared using conventional methods (Guthrie and Fink 1991). Yeast transformation was accomplished by the lithium acetate method (Gietz et al. 1992).
The original strain from which the polyploid series was constructed was a haploid MATα ura3-52 his3::hisG leu2::hisG strain (Galitski et al. 1999). To make many of our comparisons, we transformed the ploidy series to Leu+. Therefore, strains AAy111–AAy115 are all Leu+ (e.g., AAy114 is MATα/α/α/α ura3-52/ura3-52/ura3-52/ura3-52 his3::hisG/his3::hisG/his3::hisG/his3::hisG leu2::hisG/leu2::hisG/leu2::hisG/leu2::hisG::LEU2). The cln3::LEU2 disruption was generated using plasmid pBSSK-cln3::LEU2 (kindly provided by A. Amon). This plasmid was digested with PvuII and gel purified prior to transformation. Positive transformants were verified by PCR and by comparison of cell size relative to wild-type cells.
Calcofluor white (Fluorescent Brightener 28), menadione, paraquat (methyl viologen), hydrogen peroxide, sorbitol, NaCl, and LiCl were obtained from Sigma Chemical. All were added at the designated concentration to cooled (<60°), premixed SC agar (2%). Plates were dried at room temperature and used for spot assays within 48 hr.
Cells were inoculated at low density (optical density at 600nm < 0.05) into the appropriate media and continuously grown at 30°. At the indicated intervals, 100 μl of culture was sampled and serially diluted. Five microliters of each dilution was spotted sequentially onto YPD plates and grown overnight at 30° prior to visualization. The colony-forming units per milliliter of culture (CFU per milliliter) were determined by counting a sufficient number of colonies (50–200) from two duplicate spots and multiplying the average by the appropriate dilution factor. For each time point, the mean values from at least three experiments are plotted. Error bars in all figures represent standard deviations.
Yeast cultures were grown overnight at 30° in SC. Saturated cultures were then diluted to optical density (OD) 600nm = 0.1 into SC prewarmed to 30° and grown into log (OD 600nm = 0.8–1.0) or stationary phase (2.5–4 days of incubation). Samples were collected and serially diluted in water in a thin-walled 96-well PCR plate. Diluted samples were subjected to 50° heat shock in a 96-well PCR block for 2 hr and mixed by pipette in 10-min intervals. Samples were then spotted onto YPD plates as described above to assess survival. The percentage viable is (the number viable after heat shock/number viable before heat shock) × 100.
Cultures were grown as in heat-shock assay and samples were collected. A 1-OD 600nm unit of cells was collected. Cells were pelleted, washed in water, and resuspended in 1 ml of 0.15 mg/ml zymolase 100T (Seikagaku) in 10 mm Tris-HCl, pH 7.5, 1 mm dithiothreitol. Samples were agitated on a roller at 30°. After 2 hr, the OD 600nm was measured to assess the amount of cell lysis.
For the diauxic-shift time course, cells were grown overnight in SC and diluted the next morning to an optical density of 600nm < 0.05. Cells were then incubated at 30° and the growth measured by OD 600nm. The glucose content of the media was measured using Diastix reagent strips (Bayer). Cells were collected during mid-logarithmic phase at an optical density ∼1.0. This sample was designated as t = 0. All other time points reflect the number of hours after glucose depletion. RNA was extracted using hot acidic phenol and mRNA was isolated using the PolyA tract kit (Promega, Madison, WI). A total of 2 μg of mRNA was labeled for each sample as previously described (Wodicka et al. 1997), hybridized to the Y36100 oligonucleotide array set (Affymetrix), and data were extracted. Scan-to-scan variations in intensity were corrected by applying a scaling factor to each experiment so that the median value of all experiments was equal. To evaluate the relative change in expression in each strain throughout the time course, a ratio was created by dividing the expression value in all time points by the t = 0 value on a gene-by-gene basis. Cluster analysis was performed using Cluster and visualized with TreeView (Eisen et al. 1998). Genes were considered differentially regulated if their expression fluctuated at least twofold during the time course. The statistical significance of the overlap between regulated genes in different experiments was calculated using a hypergeometric distribution. P-values were calculated using the online hypergeometric distribution calculator at http://www.alewand.de/stattab/tabdiske.htm. Raw data and supplementary materials are available at http://jura.wi.mit.edu/fink_public/duplication.
Cultures were grown as in heat shock assay and samples collected at the indicated intervals. Cells were collected by low speed centrifugation, washed in 1× phosphate buffered saline (PBS), and fixed in 80% ethanol for 10 min. Cells were collected again, washed two times in 1× PBS, and resuspended in 1× PBS containing a final concentration of 1 μg/ml 4′,6-diamidino-2-phenylindole (DAPI; Sigma Chemical). Samples were incubated at room temperature in the dark for 30 min prior to visualization.
Genotypes of strains used in these experiments are shown in Table 3A. Strains were grown in liquid SC to log phase (12 hr) or stationary phase (40 hr). At each stage, 100 μl of culture was sampled and serially diluted. Ten microliters of each dilution was spotted sequentially onto YPD and SC + 5-fluoroorotic acid (5-FOA) plates. Cells that were able to grow on SC + 5-FOA were patched onto SC −leucine plates. The number of cells that were able to grow on SC + 5-FOA but unable to grow on SC −Leu was divided by the number of CFU/ml formed on YPD. This provided an estimate of the number of cells that had lost a single chromosome V as compared to the total number of viable cells.
Starvation in water:
Cultures were grown in SC at 30°. At the indicated intervals, cells were collected from 10 ml of culture by centrifugation. Spent SC was removed into a sterile test tube. Cells were washed with 10 ml of room temperature water and resuspended in their spent SC or in 10 ml of sterile water. All strains were then incubated at 30° and their viability was monitored as described.
All strains were grown in liquid SC media at 30° for 7 days. Cells were fixed with formaldehyde (3.7%) for 90 min. Fixed cells were washed three times with solution B (1.2 m sorbitol, 100 mm KH2PO4 × K2HPO4 at pH 7.5) and resuspended in 250 μl of solution B with 0.4 mg/ml lyticase, 2 μl/ml β-mercaptoethanol, and 3 μl/ml phenylmethylsulfonyl fluoride (PMSF). Cells were then incubated at 30° and monitored for spheroplast formation under the microscope. Spheroplasts were gently harvested and washed with solution B supplemented with PMSF. Variable dilutions of spheroplasts were placed on slides covered with 2% polyethylenimine and placed in a humid chamber for 20 min. Cells were then washed twice with solution B and fixed with methanol for 5 min. Dried slides were washed twice with solution B and blocked overnight at 4° using 4% nonfat milk in solution B. The primary antibody YOL1/34 (Jackson Laboratories) was resuspended in milk solution at 1:10 and applied to slides. After 2 hr at room temperature in a humid chamber, the unbound antibody was aspirated and slides were washed 10 times with solution B. FITC-conjugated anti-rat secondary antibody (1:50) was then applied to the samples and incubated for 2 hr at room temperature in the dark. Slides were washed 10 times with solution B and incubated with DAPI (0.5 μg/ml) in solution B supplemented with PMSF (3 μl/ml) for 15 min in the dark. Slides were washed once in solution B and overlaid by mounting solution (90% glycerol, 1× PBS, 5 mg/ml phenylenediamine) and covered with coverslips. Cells were viewed using a Nikon ECLIPSE E600 fluorescence microscope (Nikon). Spindle formation was analyzed in cells that stained positively for DAPI to normalize for cell viability. Statistical significance was calculated using a heteroscedastic t-test, which is a two-sample Student's t-test that compares the means of two ranges of data with unequal variances.
Polyploids die in stationary phase:
An isogenic set of strains varying in ploidy from haploid to tetraploid was compared for viability in liquid media by monitoring their ability to form colonies when plated. Cells of higher ploidy are viable during exponential growth, but are unable to survive prolonged incubation after cell multiplication has ceased (as measured by direct cell count, plating, and turbidity). Haploids enter stationary phase and remain viable for weeks, whereas tetraploids begin to lose viability after 4 days and are completely inviable after 10–15 days (Figure 1, A and B). These cells not only fail to form colonies but also fail to mate. The loss of viability associated with polyploidy is not strain or mating type specific, as it is observed in isogenic ploidy series of both mating types (MATa → MATa/a/a/a and MATα → MATα/α/α/α) as well as strains derived from both the ∑1278b and S288c backgrounds (not shown). However, MATa/a/α/α tetraploids survive somewhat better than MATα/α/α/α tetraploids (Figure 2A). This increase in viability appears to be a consequence of heterozygosity at the mating-type locus because MATα/α/α/α tetraploids carrying the MATa locus on a plasmid are more viable than MATα/α/α/α tetraploids carrying the vector alone (Figure 2B). Throughout this study, haploids were compared with tetraploids; however, triploids show defects similar to those observed in tetraploids.
The inability of polyploid cells to survive during stationary phase is not specific to SC. When grown in YPD medium instead of SC, tetraploids still die more rapidly; however, both haploids and tetraploids remain viable for a longer period of time on YPD (Figure 3A). The nutritional requirements that result from the auxotrophic markers used for strain construction (uracil and histidine) are not responsible for the differences in viability between haploids and tetraploids because replacement of the mutant alleles of these markers with functional alleles by integrative transformation does not restore viability to the tetraploids (Figure 3B). Moreover, supplementing stationary-phase cultures with uracil and histidine does not alter the difference in viability between haploids and tetraploids (Figure 3C).
Polyploid cells do not exhibit increased sensitivity to stress:
Tetraploids do not manifest any obvious defects in morphology or development. They mate with cells of the opposite mating type and the resulting zygotes undergo meiosis to produce ascospores and viable meiotic products. Moreover, tetraploids are no more sensitive to a variety of environmental stresses than are haploids (Table 2). Tetraploid cells do not exhibit an increased sensitivity to osmotic stress (sorbitol), salt stress (Na+), toxic ions (Li+), or calcofluor white, but they are more thermosensitive. Tetraploids are also no more sensitive or resistant to oxidative stress (paraquat, menadione, and H2O2) than are isogenic haploids. This finding distinguishes the stationary-phase defect in polyploids from previous studies that have identified oxidative stress as a component of stationary-phase survival (Fabrizio et al. 2001).
Increased chromosome loss in polyploids:
Diploids and tetraploids with a genetically marked chromosome V (Table 3A) were constructed and used to monitor the loss of this chromosome during growth. Increased chromosome instability has been reported in strains of high ploidy (Mayer and Aguilera 1990). These findings were confirmed in our isogenic strains. Cells in exponential growth display a 357-fold increase in the frequency of chromosome loss as compared to isogenic diploid cells (Table 3B). This high proportion of cells that have lost chromosome V is maintained even after the cells have entered stationary phase. However, tetraploid cells show no increase in the frequency of mitotic recombination (∼10−5 Ura− Leu+ segregants) in either exponential or stationary phase.
Tetraploids acquire transcriptional and physiological signatures of stationary phase:
To determine whether tetraploids recognize the environmental conditions that trigger stationary-phase entry, we used whole-genome arrays to analyze the transcription profile of tetraploids during the growth period in which glucose is exhausted. As yeast cells exhaust the glucose in their medium, they undergo the diauxic shift, a switch from fermentation to respiration, and transition to stationary phase. Previous studies have identified a pattern of changes in gene expression that define a transcriptional signature of the diauxic shift (DeRisi et al. 1997). To analyze our strains, samples were taken for microarray analysis as the glucose concentration decreased. The analysis of the transcription profiles in tetraploid cells demonstrates that they manifest the key features associated with the diauxic shift. Tetraploid cells regulate 51 of 77 genes (P = 6.6 × 10−25) in a manner similar to that described by DeRisi and colleagues in their study of the diauxic shift (Figure 4A; DeRisi et al. 1997). Furthermore, these genes are those expected to be elevated during the transition to respiration. These similarities are especially noteworthy considering that different media, strains, and microarray platforms were used in the two studies.
Tetraploid cells also acquire the transcriptional and physiological attributes that are signatures of stationary phase. In yeast, SNZ1 is specifically upregulated during the postdiauxic and stationary phases of growth and can be used as a transcriptional marker for the entry to stationary phase (Padilla et al. 1998). Our microarray analysis demonstrates that haploids and tetraploids both upregulate SNZ1 >3.5-fold in the period following the diauxic shift (Figure 4B). Stationary-phase cells have also been shown to acquire thermotolerance (Werner-Washburne et al. 1993) and resistance to cell-wall-degrading enzymes such as zymolase (de Nobel et al. 1990; Sobering et al. 2002). Tetraploid cells acquire zymolase resistance, but are more thermosensitive than isogenic haploids (Table 2). The failure to acquire thermotolerance is not a manifestation of a broader sensitivity to stress because tetraploids are not more sensitive to osmotic stress, salt stress, or toxic cations.
Tetraploids show no obvious deficit in the transcription of genes known to be required for exponential or stationary-phase growth. For example, the ubi4, rvs161, ard1, and bck1 mutants are hypersensitive to starvation (Whiteway and Szostak 1985; Finley et al. 1987; Crouzet et al. 1991; Costigan and Snyder 1994), but tetraploid cells are not defective in the expression of these genes (Figure 4B). Moreover, many of these mutations confer additional phenotypes (e.g., ubi4) that are not displayed by tetraploid cells.
A comparison of haploids and isogenic tetraploids shows that they have very similar transcription profiles throughout the transition to stationary phase. Of the 224 genes upregulated greater than twofold in haploids, tetraploids similarly upregulate 148 of them (P = 6.9 × 10−228). In addition, of 272 genes downregulated greater than twofold in haploids, tetraploids similarly downregulate 194 of the same genes (P = 7.6 × 10−251; Figure 4C). Despite these similarities, the transcriptional changes in these two strains are not identical. Tetraploids fail to induce 76 genes that are upregulated greater than twofold in haploids and they do not downregulate 78 genes that are repressed greater than twofold in haploids. Thus, we cannot eliminate the possibility that one or more of the genes whose regulation differs in tetraploids is responsible for their failure to survive in stationary phase.
Tetraploids fail to arrest the cell cycle in stationary phase:
Previous studies have shown that nutrient deprivation prevents the initiation of a new cell division cycle (Pringle and Hartwell 1981). In an asynchronous culture, cells that have not passed Start arrest in G1 as unbudded cells, whereas cells that have already committed to a new cell cycle continue through one cell division before arresting in G1. The resulting stationary-phase culture is composed of a homogeneous population of unbudded cells with a single nucleus. To evaluate the composition of haploid and tetraploid cultures during stationary phase, we examined cells for their nuclear staining and budding status.
Haploid cells arrest early in stationary phase as a homogeneous population of unbudded cells with a single nucleus (Figure 5A). Calculation of the budding index in a haploid culture shows that only 0.16% (n = 641) of haploid cells continue to bud after 2.5 days of growth at 30°. After 4 days, all haploids (n = 672) arrest without a bud (Figure 5B). By contrast, a population of stationary-phase tetraploids is heterogeneous, consisting of budded and unbudded cells (Figure 5A); 1.3–5.9% of tetraploid cells are budded during a 5.5-day incubation (n = 653 at 2.5 days, n = 627 at 4 days, and n = 1232 at 5.5 days; Figure 5B). Continued formation of buds in stationary phase is also a property of ∑1278b MATa/a/a/a tetraploids and of S288c MATa/a/a/a tetraploids. Interestingly, the DAPI staining in tetraploid nuclei becomes diffuse as appreciable numbers of cells begin to die. Ultimately, tetraploid cells completely fail to stain with DAPI (Figure 5A, days 7 and 9).
The frequency of budded tetraploid cells underestimates the number of cells that have initiated the cell cycle. Cells at very early stages of the cell cycle may have no observable bud. Moreover, in flocculent strains such as ∑1278b it is difficult to distinguish between two adherent cells and a cell with a large bud. For this reason, we counted only those cells with a small bud. This procedure ignored cells later in cell division, which is potentially a large component of the population. A second measure of cell cycle progression in tetraploids was obtained by visualizing the mitotic spindles in stationary-phase haploid and tetraploid cells. The fraction of cells that fail to arrest in G1 can be estimated by measuring the number of cells with duplicated spindle pole bodies, since spindle pole body duplication is required during mitotic growth (Byers and Goetsch 1975; Adams and Kilmartin 2000). In haploids, a small percentage of cells (1.8 ± 1.2) possess mitotic spindles after 7 days of growth. Strikingly, a much larger percentage of isogenic tetraploids (18.5 ± 3.7; P = 0.01) possess mitotic spindles at the same stage, suggesting that tetraploid cells fail to arrest in G1 (Figure 5C and Table 4). Interestingly, MATα/α/α/α tetraploids that overexpress MATa appear to achieve cell cycle arrest. In stationary phase fewer mitotic spindles are observed in MATα/α/α/α, 2μ-MATa tetraploids (7.2 ± 1.9%) than in MATα/α/α/α tetraploids (18.5 ± 3.7%; P = 0.018), suggesting that decreased cell cycle entry is responsible for the increased viability of MATα/α/α/α, 2μ-MATa tetraploids (Table 4).
Starvation in water suppresses polyploid death:
If stationary-phase death in tetraploids is a consequence of their failure to arrest growth in response to nutrient limitation, then a treatment that leads to growth arrest should rescue the cells. Incubation in water rather than medium completely deprives yeast cells of nutrients and subjects them to extreme starvation. To test the effects of extreme starvation on tetraploid viability, cells were grown into stationary phase, washed, and then transferred to water or returned to the conditioned medium in which they had been growing.
Starvation in water completely suppresses the loss of viability of stationary-phase tetraploids. Tetraploid cells that were transferred to water after 2–5 days of growth in SC remain viable, even after 21 days of incubation in water (Figure 6A). By contrast, tetraploids that are returned to conditioned medium die after 12–14 days. Haploids remain viable in both water and conditioned medium, although incubation in conditioned medium results in a slight decrease in viability. In addition, haploids remain viable when transferred to the conditioned medium collected from tetraploids, demonstrating that the inviability observed in stationary-phase tetraploids is not due to the accumulation of a toxic compound produced by tetraploid cells (not shown).
The analysis of the spindles and microtubules in tetraploids incubated in water demonstrates that these cells achieve cell cycle arrest. In contrast to the large percentage of mitotic spindles observed in tetraploids that remain in synthetic media (18.5 ± 3.7), mitotic spindles are observed in far fewer tetraploid cells that were incubated in water (2.3 ± 1.9%; P < 0.01; Figure 6B and Table 4).
Tetraploid cells remain metabolically active in stationary phase:
The metabolic activity of stationary-phase cells as assayed by whole-genome arrays demonstrates that global transcription is markedly higher in stationary-phase tetraploids as compared to haploids at an equivalent stage of growth. After 3–5 days in SC, the stationary-phase-associated expression of SNZ1 significantly increases in both haploid and tetraploid cells. At this point, 4952 genes were expressed greater than twofold more in tetraploids than in haploids in two/two independent experiments, whereas only 9 genes were expressed greater than twofold more in haploids than in tetraploids. Interestingly, a comparison of the global transcription in tetraploids starved in water to those that are grown in SC reveals that 2597 genes are expressed at least twofold lower in the tetraploids grown in water relative to those grown in SC. The high level of transcriptional activity observed in tetraploids grown in SC suggests that these cells remain active throughout stationary phase. Furthermore, the decrease in transcriptional activity observed in tetraploids starved in water may explain why these cells do not enter mitosis and are able to remain viable in stationary phase.
Deletion of the G1 cyclin CLN3 rescues polyploid viability in stationary phase:
The increased mitotic arrest that is observed under conditions that rescue tetraploid viability suggests that inappropriate cell cycle progression is responsible for the loss of viability in stationary-phase tetraploids. If so, then mutations like cln3 that retard entry into the cell cycle should also rescue tetraploid viability during stationary phase. CLN3 regulates the transcription of CLN1 and CLN2, which together control passage from the G1 to the S phase of the cell cycle (Tyers et al. 1993; Stuart and Wittenberg 1995). Strains deleted for CLN3 are viable but delayed for cell cycle entry, as more time is required to accumulate the levels of the other G1 cyclins, CLN1 and CLN2, which are necessary to trigger the passage through Start (Richardson et al. 1989). To determine the effect of impeded cell cycle entry on stationary-phase survival, isogenic cln3 haploids and cln3/cln3/cln3/cln3 tetraploids were constructed.
Deletion of CLN3 suppresses the stationary-phase death observed in tetraploid cells. CLN3/CLN3/CLN3/CLN3 tetraploids die after 16–18 days in culture, whereas cln3/cln3/cln3/cln3 tetraploids remain completely viable after >21 days in culture (Figure 7, A and B). Moreover, staining of the spindles and microtubules in cln3 strains by indirect immunofluorescence reveals that cln3/cln3/cln3/cln3 tetraploids possess far fewer mitotic spindles (5.4 ± 2.3%) than wild-type tetraploids do (18.5 ± 3.7%; P = 0.01; Figure 7C and Table 4), suggesting that rescue by the deletion of CLN3 is due to impeded cell cycle entry in tetraploids. The suppression of stationary-phase death in cln3/cln3/cln3/cln3 strains demonstrates that the loss of viability in wild-type tetraploids is not a consequence of the increased cell size associated with the increase in DNA content. Wild-type haploids measure 4.16 ± 0.61 μm × 3.53 ± 0.47 μm, whereas isogenic tetraploids measure 7.24 ± 0.69 μm × 5.95 ± 0.79 μm. However, cln3/cln3/cln3/cln3 tetraploid cells are even larger (10.18 ± 0.87 μm × 7.48 ± 0.63 μm) than CLN3/CLN3/CLN3/CLN3 tetraploids (Figure 7D and Table 5).
The comparison of newly formed polyploids with their haploid progenitors has revealed that nascent polyploids have a defect in stationary-phase viability. One possible explanation for the inviability of stationary-phase tetraploids is that these cells accumulate abnormalities during log phase that make them inviable in stationary phase. Our studies on isogenic diploid and tetraploid cells show that tetraploids have increased chromosome instability during exponential growth. These data agree with a previous study indicating that tetraploids experience a 1000-fold increase in chromosome loss rates relative to diploids (Mayer and Aguilera 1990). However, this increase in chromosome instability per se cannot account for their inviability in stationary phase. First, of the population of tetraploid cells that enter stationary phase, both euploid and aneuploid members can be rescued by starvation in water. Second, tetraploids lacking CLN3 function survive stationary phase as well as their haploid counterparts. Third, mating-type heterozygosity increases tetraploid viability in stationary phase. Under all these conditions, the strains had the same prehistory and, therefore, the same genetic constitution. If chromosome imbalances were responsible for the striking difference in viability, then none of these conditions would have rectified the problem.
Our experiments suggest that tetraploid cells die because they fail to arrest mitotic growth in stationary phase. First, tetraploids continue to bud in stationary phase, whereas haploids arrest as unbudded cells. Under these conditions the number of tetraploid cells does not increase, so the initiation of buds is not the prelude to a normal cell division. Second, a large number of tetraploid cells display mitotic spindles in stationary phase, whereas virtually all isogenic haploids arrest with no discernible mitotic spindles. Third, all conditions that increase tetraploid viability in stationary phase, such as mating-type heterozygosity and starvation in water, also increase mitotic arrest in stationary-phase tetraploids. Finally, deletion of CLN3, a G1 cyclin critical for cell cycle entry, dramatically increases the viability of tetraploids during stationary phase. Importantly, a much lower percentage of cln3/cln3/cln3/cln3 tetraploids display mitotic spindles during stationary phase, suggesting that impeded entry into an abnormal cell cycle leads to increased survival of stationary-phase tetraploids.
Our data suggest that polyploid cells fail to detect the nutrient conditions that normally signal entry into stationary phase in spent medium. Indeed, when tetraploids were incubated in water, the cells remained completely viable. A comparison of the transcription profile of tetraploids grown in spent medium with that of cells starved in water shows that water imposes a much greater reduction in overall transcription as compared with spent medium. Moreover, tetraploid cells do not bud or show abnormal mitotic spindles when placed in water. These data suggest that in spent medium tetraploids continue to enter the cell cycle because they fail to sense the depletion of nutrients.
Even on spent medium tetraploid cells display the transcriptional and physiological signatures that are indicative of transition through the diauxic shift and entry to stationary phase. Despite these indications that tetraploids are capable of sensing nutrient depletion, the transcriptional profiles of haploids and tetraploids are not completely identical; >150 genes are differentially regulated between haploids and tetraploids. It is possible that one or more of the genes that are inappropriately regulated in tetraploids is important for cell cycle arrest or stationary-phase survival.
Whole-genome duplications impose a selective disadvantage upon the newly formed polyploid cells. These cells rapidly lose chromosomes during exponential growth and fail to survive in stationary phase. The current models for the evolution of new genes posit an initial whole-genome duplication followed by mutation of one of the duplicated copies to acquire a new function. For the duplication to survive, the positive selective pressures must be balanced against the negative effects of those duplications. Whole-genome duplications could occur either by endoreduplication or by mating of diploids homozygous at the MAT locus. Since tetraploids heterozygous at the MAT locus survive stationary phase better than those homozygous at the MAT locus, our study would favor the latter mechanism.
We thank A. Amon for reagents and for her helpful suggestions with this work. We also thank R. Prusty for reviewing this manuscript. We acknowledge the Keck Foundation for use of the Whitehead Microscope Facility. A.A.A. is supported by the National Institutes of Health (NIH) Training Grant in Genomic Sciences, sponsored by the Biotechnology Process Engineering Center. T.G. is a recipient of a Burroughs Wellcome Fund Career Award in the Biomedical Sciences. D.P. was supported by NIH RO1 GM55772 and a Scholar Award from the Leukemia and Lymphoma Society of America. G.R.F. is supported by NIH grant GM 35010 and is an American Cancer Society Professor of Genetics.
↵ 1 Present address: Institute for Systems Biology, Seattle, WA 98103.
Communicating editor: A. P. Mitchell
- Received March 25, 2004.
- Accepted March 29, 2004.
- Genetics Society of America