- Split View
-
Views
-
Cite
Cite
Shozo Yokoyama, F Bernhard Radlwimmer, The Molecular Genetics of Red and Green Color Vision in Mammals, Genetics, Volume 153, Issue 2, 1 October 1999, Pages 919–932, https://doi.org/10.1093/genetics/153.2.919
- Share Icon Share
Abstract
To elucidate the molecular mechanisms of red-green color vision in mammals, we have cloned and sequenced the red and green opsin cDNAs of cat (Felis catus), horse (Equus caballus), gray squirrel (Sciurus carolinensis), white-tailed deer (Odocoileus virginianus), and guinea pig (Cavia porcellus). These opsins were expressed in COS1 cells and reconstituted with 11-cis-retinal. The purified visual pigments of the cat, horse, squirrel, deer, and guinea pig have λmax values at 553, 545, 532, 531, and 516 nm, respectively, which are precise to within ±1 nm. We also regenerated the “true” red pigment of goldfish (Carassius auratus), which has a λmax value at 559 ± 4 nm. Multiple linear regression analyses show that S180A, H197Y, Y277F, T285A, and A308S shift the λmax values of the red and green pigments in mammals toward blue by 7, 28, 7, 15, and 16 nm, respectively, and the reverse amino acid changes toward red by the same extents. The additive effects of these amino acid changes fully explain the red-green color vision in a wide range of mammalian species, goldfish, American chameleon (Anolis carolinensis), and pigeon (Columba livia).
MANY long wavelength- (or red-) sensitive and middle wavelength- (or green-) sensitive visual pigments absorb light maximally (λmax) at ∼560 nm and 530 nm, respectively. It has been shown that the difference in the color sensitivities of the two types of pigments is due mainly to amino acids AFA (A, F, and A at sites 180, 277, and 285, respectively) in the green pigment and SYT at the corresponding sites in the red pigment, although amino acids at sites 277 and 285 have a larger effect than those at 180 (Yokoyama and Yokoyama 1990; Neitz et al. 1991; Chan et al. 1992; Merbs and Nathans 1993; Asenjo et al. 1994). However, some exceptions to this “three-sites” rule have been found. That is, having red pigment-specific amino acids AYT at the three critical sites, the green pigments in mouse, rat, and rabbit have λmax values at ∼510 nm. These extreme blue shifts in the λmax values are fully explained by two amino acid changes, H197Y (H Y at site 197) and A308S (A S at site 308; Sun et→ 1997; Radlwimmer → al. 1998). Thus, red- and Yokoyama green color vision appears to be based on amino acids at five sites: 180, 197, 277, 285, and 308.
Using the results from the mutagenesis experiments of the human red pigment (Merbs and Nathans 1993; Asenjo et al. 1994; Sun et al. 1997) and the mouse green pigment (Sun et al. 1997), we have suggested that S180A, H197Y, Y277F, T285A, and A308S shift the λmax values of the pigments toward blue by ∼7, 28, 10, 16, and 18 nm, respectively, in an additive fashion and the reverse amino acid changes toward red by the same extents (Yokoyama and Radlwimmer 1998). More recent analyses show that the λmax values of red and green pigments of cat (Felis catus), dog (Canis familiaris), goat (Capra hircus), rabbit (Oryctolagus cuniculus), and rat (Rattus norvegicus) are accurately predicted by this “five-sites” rule, but the orthologous pigments of white-tailed deer (Odocoileus virginianus), gray squirrel (Sciurus carolinensis), guinea pig (Cavia porcellus), and bottlenose dolphin (Tursiops truncatus) differ by ∼10 nm from the predicted values (Radlwimmer and Yokoyama 1998; Yokoyama and Radlwimmer 1998). A potential problem with this argument is that the λmax values of many of these red and green pigments are estimated indirectly using the flicker photometric electroretinogram (ERG). An inherent problem with this method is that responses from rods and different types of cones can contribute to the recorded signals and the separation of a specific photoreceptor cell type is sometimes difficult (Neitz and Jacobs 1984).
Fortunately, the λmax values of virtually any pigment can now be measured by expressing specific opsins in cultured cells, reconstituting them with 11-cis-retinal, and measuring the λmax values of the purified pigments (Yokoyama 1997). Here, using in vitro assays, we have measured the λmax values of the red and green pigments of cat (F. catus), horse (Equus caballus), gray squirrel (S. carolinensis), white-tailed deer (O. virginianus), and guinea pig (C. porcellus). Using multiple regression analysis based on these and other λmax values of mammalian pigments, we estimated the magnitudes of the λmax shifts of the pigments caused by the amino acid changes at sites 180, 197, 277, 285, and 308. The results show that the additive effects of these amino acid changes fully explain virtually all observed λmax values of the red and green pigments not only in mammals but also in other vertebrates.
MATERIALS AND METHODS
cDNA cloning and DNA sequencing: Cat (F. catus), horse (E. caballus), and guinea pig (C. procellus) retinas were obtained from Pel-Freez (Rogers, AR), while gray squirrel (S. carolinensis) and white-tailed deer (O. virginianus) retinas were isolated from road-killed animals. The goldfish (Carassius auratus) retinas were isolated from individuals purchased from a local pet store. Total RNAs were prepared from one retina each by acid thiocyanate-phenol-chloroform extraction (Chomczynski and Sacchi 1987). On the basis of their partial cDNA sequences (Yokoyama and Radlwimmer 1998) and the 5′ and 3′ flanking sequences of the orthologous genes of other mammals, the 5′- and 3′-ends of the red and green opsin cDNA fragments of the five mammalian species were cloned using RT-PCR amplification. Using these sequence data, complete cDNA fragments were then cloned.
To obtain the 5′-end subclones, two forward primers, F5A [5′-G(G/T)C(T/C)G(G/A)C(G/A)GG(T/C)(G/A/T)(G/T/C)C(G/A)G(G/A)G-3′] and F5B [5′-GACAGGG(T/C) TTT(G/C)(T/C)A(G/C)AGCCATG-3′], and two reverse primers, R173 [5′-(G/A)(T/C)(G/A)CTGGTGA(G/T/C)GTG(G/A)TA(T/C)ACCC-3′] and R401 [5′-GA(G/C)AC(G/A)GTGTAGCCCTCCA(G/C)(G/A)AC-3′], were used. The 5′-end subclones of horse and cat cDNAs were obtained using primer sets F5A/R173 and F5B/R173, respectively, and those of deer, guinea pig, and squirrel using F5A/R401. Similarly, to obtain the 3′-end subclones, two forward primers, F752 [5′-AGCAGCAGAAAGAATCTGAGTC-3′] and F936 [5′-AAGTGCCACTATCTACAACC-3′], and two reverse primers, R3A [5′-T(G/A)G(G/A)(T/C)G(G/C)(G/A)(G/A)(T/C)(G/A)GGT(A/T/C) GGAGGC-3′] and R3B [5′-TTT(T/C)ACAGGGATGGAGAAGG-3′], were used. The 3′-end subclones of horse, cat, and deer cDNAs were obtained using primers F936/R3B and those of guinea pig and squirrel using F752/R3A. Using the nucleotide information of the 5′- and 3′-end subclones, we then constructed five sets of the species-specific forward and reverse primers (Figure 1). The forward and reverse primers for goldfish were constructed using the sequence information obtained by Johnson et al. (1993; Figure 1).
For each set of primers, cDNA was reverse transcribed at 42° for 1 hr and at 95° for 5 min, and then PCR was carried out for 30 cycles at 94° for 45 sec, 55° for 1.5 min, and 72° for 2 min. PCR products were gel isolated and subcloned into the T-tailed EcoRV-digested Bluescript plasmid vector with T-overhang attached to 3′-ends (Hadjeb and Berkowitz 1996). Nucleotide sequences of the entire region of the cDNA clones were determined by cycle sequencing reactions using the Sequitherm Excell II Long-Read kits (Epicentre Technologies, Madison, WI) with dye-labeled M13 forward and reverse primers. Reactions were run on a LI-COR 4200LD automated DNA sequencer (LI-COR, Lincoln, NE).
Expression and spectral analyses of pigments: The PCR-amplified cDNAs were subcloned into the EcoRI and SalI restriction sites of the expression vector pMT5 (Khorana et al. 1988). These plasmids were expressed in COS1 cells by transient transfection. The pigments were generated by incubation with 11-cis-retinal and purified in buffer W1 [50 mm N-(2-hydroxyethyl) piperazine-N′-2-ethanesulfonic acid (HEPES), pH 6.6, 140 mm NaCl, 3 mm MgCl2, 20% (w/v) glycerol, and 0.1% dodecyl maltoside], as previously described (Kawamura and Yokoyama 1998; Yokoyama et al. 1998). UV-visible spectra were recorded at 20° using a Hitachi (Mountain View, CA) U-3000 dual beam spectrophotometer. Visual pigments were bleached for 3 min using a 60-W standard light bulb equipped with a Kodak Wratten no. 3 filter at a distance of 20 cm. Data were analyzed using Sigmaplot software (Jandel Scientific, San Rafael, CA).
Sequence data analyses: The sources of the DNA sequences of the red and green opsin genes of different mammalian species are given in Table 1. Topologies and branch lengths of the phylogenetic trees were inferred by applying the NJ method (Saitou and Nei 1987) to the nucleotide and amino acid sequences. The tree topologies were tested by the bootstrap method with 1000 replications (Felsenstein 1985). The ancestral sequences of the opsins were inferred by using a computer program, PAML, based on a likelihood-based Bayesian method (Yang 1997).
RESULTS
Phylogenetic relationships of mammalian red and green pigments: The amino acid sequences of the visual pigments deduced from the red and green opsin cDNA sequences of cat (deposited in GenBank with accession no. AF132040), horse (AF132043), deer (AF132041), guinea pig (AF132042), and squirrel (AF132044) consist of 364 amino acids and can be easily aligned with those of the orthologous pigments from other mammals (Figure 2). Note that human (P552) pigment is excluded from Figure 2 because it differs from human (P560) pigment only by one amino acid, having A180 instead of S180. Applying the NJ method to both nucleotide and amino acid sequences of these pigments, the unrooted phylogenetic trees for the 12 mammalian pigments were constructed (Figure 3). The comparison of the two NJ trees reveals three common groupings of the pigments with bootstrap supports at 90-100%: (1) a group consisting of the goat, deer, dolphin, horse, and cat pigments; (2) two human pigments; and (3) two murine pigments (Figure 3). However, neither the evolutionary relationship among the three groups of pigments nor the phylogenetic positions of the rabbit, guinea pig, and squirrel pigments can be established.
. | GenBank accession no. . | Absorption spectra . | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
Pigment . | λmax (nm) . | Method . | Reference . | |
Cat (P553) | AF132040 | 553 | In vitro | This study |
555 | ERGa | Guenther and Zrenner (1993) | ||
Horse (P545) | AF132043 | 545 | In vitro | This study |
Deer (P531) | AF132041 | 531 | In vitro | This study |
537 | ERGa | Jacobs et al. (1994) | ||
Guinea pig (P516) | AF132042 | 516 | In vitro | This study |
529 | ERGa | Jacobs and Deegan (1994) | ||
Squirrel (P532) | AF132044 | 532 | In vitro | This study |
543 | ERGa | Blakeslee et al. (1988) | ||
Goat (P553) | U67999 | 553 | In vitro | Radlwimmer and Yokoyama (1997) |
553 | ERGa | Jacobs et al. (1998) | ||
Rabbit (P509) | AF054235 | 509 | In vitro | Radlwimmer and Yokoyama (1998) |
523 | ERGa | Nuboer et al. (1983) | ||
Mouse (P508) | AF011389 | 508 | In vitro | Sun et al. (1997) |
510 | ERGa | Jacobs et al. (1991) | ||
Rat (P509) | AF054241 | 509 | In vitro | Radlwimmer and Yokoyama (1998) |
510 | ERGa | Jacobs et al. (1991) | ||
Dolphin (P524) | AF055457 | 524 | In vitro | Fasick et al. (1998) |
Human (P530) | K03490 | 530 | In vitro | Oprian et al. (1991) |
531 | MSPb | Bowmaker (1990) | ||
Human (P552) | M13300c | 552 | In vitro | Merbs and Nathans (1992) |
Human (P560) | M13300 | 560 | In vitro | Oprian et al. (1991) |
564 | MSPb | Bowmaker (1990) |
. | GenBank accession no. . | Absorption spectra . | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
Pigment . | λmax (nm) . | Method . | Reference . | |
Cat (P553) | AF132040 | 553 | In vitro | This study |
555 | ERGa | Guenther and Zrenner (1993) | ||
Horse (P545) | AF132043 | 545 | In vitro | This study |
Deer (P531) | AF132041 | 531 | In vitro | This study |
537 | ERGa | Jacobs et al. (1994) | ||
Guinea pig (P516) | AF132042 | 516 | In vitro | This study |
529 | ERGa | Jacobs and Deegan (1994) | ||
Squirrel (P532) | AF132044 | 532 | In vitro | This study |
543 | ERGa | Blakeslee et al. (1988) | ||
Goat (P553) | U67999 | 553 | In vitro | Radlwimmer and Yokoyama (1997) |
553 | ERGa | Jacobs et al. (1998) | ||
Rabbit (P509) | AF054235 | 509 | In vitro | Radlwimmer and Yokoyama (1998) |
523 | ERGa | Nuboer et al. (1983) | ||
Mouse (P508) | AF011389 | 508 | In vitro | Sun et al. (1997) |
510 | ERGa | Jacobs et al. (1991) | ||
Rat (P509) | AF054241 | 509 | In vitro | Radlwimmer and Yokoyama (1998) |
510 | ERGa | Jacobs et al. (1991) | ||
Dolphin (P524) | AF055457 | 524 | In vitro | Fasick et al. (1998) |
Human (P530) | K03490 | 530 | In vitro | Oprian et al. (1991) |
531 | MSPb | Bowmaker (1990) | ||
Human (P552) | M13300c | 552 | In vitro | Merbs and Nathans (1992) |
Human (P560) | M13300 | 560 | In vitro | Oprian et al. (1991) |
564 | MSPb | Bowmaker (1990) |
. | GenBank accession no. . | Absorption spectra . | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
Pigment . | λmax (nm) . | Method . | Reference . | |
Cat (P553) | AF132040 | 553 | In vitro | This study |
555 | ERGa | Guenther and Zrenner (1993) | ||
Horse (P545) | AF132043 | 545 | In vitro | This study |
Deer (P531) | AF132041 | 531 | In vitro | This study |
537 | ERGa | Jacobs et al. (1994) | ||
Guinea pig (P516) | AF132042 | 516 | In vitro | This study |
529 | ERGa | Jacobs and Deegan (1994) | ||
Squirrel (P532) | AF132044 | 532 | In vitro | This study |
543 | ERGa | Blakeslee et al. (1988) | ||
Goat (P553) | U67999 | 553 | In vitro | Radlwimmer and Yokoyama (1997) |
553 | ERGa | Jacobs et al. (1998) | ||
Rabbit (P509) | AF054235 | 509 | In vitro | Radlwimmer and Yokoyama (1998) |
523 | ERGa | Nuboer et al. (1983) | ||
Mouse (P508) | AF011389 | 508 | In vitro | Sun et al. (1997) |
510 | ERGa | Jacobs et al. (1991) | ||
Rat (P509) | AF054241 | 509 | In vitro | Radlwimmer and Yokoyama (1998) |
510 | ERGa | Jacobs et al. (1991) | ||
Dolphin (P524) | AF055457 | 524 | In vitro | Fasick et al. (1998) |
Human (P530) | K03490 | 530 | In vitro | Oprian et al. (1991) |
531 | MSPb | Bowmaker (1990) | ||
Human (P552) | M13300c | 552 | In vitro | Merbs and Nathans (1992) |
Human (P560) | M13300 | 560 | In vitro | Oprian et al. (1991) |
564 | MSPb | Bowmaker (1990) |
. | GenBank accession no. . | Absorption spectra . | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
Pigment . | λmax (nm) . | Method . | Reference . | |
Cat (P553) | AF132040 | 553 | In vitro | This study |
555 | ERGa | Guenther and Zrenner (1993) | ||
Horse (P545) | AF132043 | 545 | In vitro | This study |
Deer (P531) | AF132041 | 531 | In vitro | This study |
537 | ERGa | Jacobs et al. (1994) | ||
Guinea pig (P516) | AF132042 | 516 | In vitro | This study |
529 | ERGa | Jacobs and Deegan (1994) | ||
Squirrel (P532) | AF132044 | 532 | In vitro | This study |
543 | ERGa | Blakeslee et al. (1988) | ||
Goat (P553) | U67999 | 553 | In vitro | Radlwimmer and Yokoyama (1997) |
553 | ERGa | Jacobs et al. (1998) | ||
Rabbit (P509) | AF054235 | 509 | In vitro | Radlwimmer and Yokoyama (1998) |
523 | ERGa | Nuboer et al. (1983) | ||
Mouse (P508) | AF011389 | 508 | In vitro | Sun et al. (1997) |
510 | ERGa | Jacobs et al. (1991) | ||
Rat (P509) | AF054241 | 509 | In vitro | Radlwimmer and Yokoyama (1998) |
510 | ERGa | Jacobs et al. (1991) | ||
Dolphin (P524) | AF055457 | 524 | In vitro | Fasick et al. (1998) |
Human (P530) | K03490 | 530 | In vitro | Oprian et al. (1991) |
531 | MSPb | Bowmaker (1990) | ||
Human (P552) | M13300c | 552 | In vitro | Merbs and Nathans (1992) |
Human (P560) | M13300 | 560 | In vitro | Oprian et al. (1991) |
564 | MSPb | Bowmaker (1990) |
Recent molecular phylogenetic analyses of mammals based on much more extensive data sets strongly suggest that (1) cat, goat, and deer are closely related with each other; (2) rabbit appears to be closely related to primates; (3) guinea pig clusters with cat, goat, deer, and rabbit; and (4) mouse, rat, and squirrel are most distantly related (e.g., see Cao et al. 1997; Kumar and Hedges 1998; Yang et al. 1998). The tree topology in Figure 3A is consistent with the first and third points. The results at the organismal level suggest that the evolutionary relationship of the mammalian pigments is best represented by (((human, rabbit) ((((deer, goat), dolphin), horse) cat)), guinea pig), ((mouse, rat), squirrel); see also Yokoyama and Radlwimmer 1998. As we see later in this article, amino acids at sites 180, 197, 277, 285, and 308 are important in determining the λmax values of the red and green pigments and the NJ tree constructed by excluding these five sites is identical to that in Figure 3B.
It should be pointed out that, when the number of amino acid substitutions is considered, the branch length for dolphin (P524) pigment is much longer than those for the corresponding goat (P553) and deer (P531) pigments (Figure 3B). For example, taking cat (P553) pigment as a reference, dolphin (P524) pigment- and deer (P531) pigment-specific branch lengths are given by 0.045 ± 0.0114 and 0.018 ± 0.0071, respectively. The difference is statistically significant at the 5% level. However, when the number of nucleotide substitutions is considered, the difference disappears (Figure 3A). As we argue later, the validity and biological significance of the accelerated amino acid substitution of dolphin (P524) pigment remains to be seen.
Light absorption profiles: When measured in the dark, the visual pigments of guinea pig, cat, deer, squirrel, and horse have λmax values at 516 ± 1 nm, 553 ± 1 nm, 531 ± 1 nm, 532 ± 1 nm, and 545 ± 1 nm, respectively (Figure 4). The regenerated pigments show very similar patterns of absorption spectra and their functions are characterized by the λmax values. The respective dark-light difference spectra are given by 518, 552, 531, 534, and 544 nm, all of which are precise to within ±1 nm (Figure 4, insets) and are very close to the corresponding dark spectra. The λmax value of cat (P553) pigment obtained from the in vitro assay is very close to the ERG estimate, whereas those of deer (P531), guinea pig (P516), and squirrel (P532) pigments are >6 nm lower than the ERG estimates (Table 1). Because responses of rods and different types of cones may contribute to the recorded signals, the noninvasive ERG results must be interpreted with caution. Compared to ERG, the visual pigments regenerated using the in vitro assay are identical and are expected to provide more reliable λmax values. Thus, the λmax values of deer (P531), guinea pig (P516), and squirrel (P532) pigments should be reexamined using ERG and other physiological methods such as microspectrophotometry (MSP; e.g., see Bowmaker 1991). Note that the λmax value of horse (P545) pigment using the in vitro assay is the only estimate available today.
Mechanism of red-green color vision: We previously proposed the “five-sites” rule using information only from the mutagenesis experiments of Merbs and Nathans (1993), Asenjo et al. (1994), and Sun et al. (1997). Using λmax values estimated from the in vitro assay, we now evaluate the effects of amino acid changes at sites 180, 197, 277, 285, and 308 on the spectral tuning of the mammalian red and green pigments.
Next, let us take human (P530) pigment with AHFAA as a reference. Then θ1, θ2, θ3, θ4, and θ5 denote the λmax-shifts caused by A180S, H197Y, F277Y, A285T, and A308S, respectively. Excluding dolphin (P524) pigment from the estimation, , and are given by 7 ± 1 nm, 7 ± 1 nm, and 15 ± 1 nm, respectively (Table 3). The estimate is close to 6 nm of the red shift generated by the amino acid change F277Y in the mutagenesis experiment using human (P530) pigment (Asenjo et al. 1994). However, and are much higher than the corresponding red shifts caused by single mutations A180S (2 nm) and A285T (10 nm). At present, the cause of this discrepancy is not clear. It is also not clear why the extents of the λmax shifts generated by amino acid changes at sites 180 and 285 are much smaller in human (P530) pigment than in human (P560) pigment. Similarly, when mouse (P508) pigment with AYYTS is taken as a reference, θ1, θ2, θ3, θ4, and θ5 denote the λmax shifts generated by A180S, Y197H, Y277F, T285A, and S308A, respectively. The value, 16 ± 1 nm (Table 3), is close to the 18-nm red shift caused by S308A in a mutagenesis experiment using mouse (P508) pigment (Sun et al. 1997).
When dolphin (P524) pigment is excluded in the estimation, have reasonably small standard errors (Table 3). This strongly suggests that the red and green color vision in mammals is controlled mainly by the five sites. Namely, S180A, H197Y, Y277F, T285A, and A308S shift the λmax values of a pigment toward blue by 7, 28, 7, 15, and 16 nm, respectively, in an additive fashion and the reverse changes toward red by the same extents. Note that these estimates are very similar to the previously suggested values 7, 28, 10, 16, and 18 nm in the formulation of the five-sites rule (Yokoyama and Radlwimmer 1998).
. | . | . | . | . | . | λmax (nm) . | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Pigment . | 180 . | 197 . | 277 . | 285 . | 308 . | Expected . | Expected - Observed . |
Cat (P553) | A | H | Y | T | A | 553a (553)b | 0a (0)b |
Deer (P531) | A | H | F | A | A | 531 (530) | 0 (-1) |
Guinea pig (P516) | S | Y | Y | A | A | 517 (518) | 1 (2) |
Horse (P545) | A | H | F | T | A | 546 (547) | 1 (2) |
Squirrel (P532) | S | Y | Y | T | A | 532 (535) | 0 (3) |
Goat (P553) | A | H | Y | T | A | 553 (553) | 0 (0) |
Rabbit (P509) | A | Y | Y | T | S | 509 (508) | 0 (-1) |
Dolphin (P524) | A | H | Y | T | S | 537 (529) | 13 (5) |
Mouse (P508) | A | Y | Y | T | S | 509 (508) | 1 (0) |
Rat (P509) | A | Y | Y | T | S | 509 (508) | 0 (-1) |
Human (P560) | S | H | Y | T | A | 560 (556) | 0 (-4) |
Human (P552) | A | H | Y | T | A | 553 (553) | 1 (1) |
Human (P530) | A | H | F | A | A | 531 (530) | 1 (0) |
. | . | . | . | . | . | λmax (nm) . | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Pigment . | 180 . | 197 . | 277 . | 285 . | 308 . | Expected . | Expected - Observed . |
Cat (P553) | A | H | Y | T | A | 553a (553)b | 0a (0)b |
Deer (P531) | A | H | F | A | A | 531 (530) | 0 (-1) |
Guinea pig (P516) | S | Y | Y | A | A | 517 (518) | 1 (2) |
Horse (P545) | A | H | F | T | A | 546 (547) | 1 (2) |
Squirrel (P532) | S | Y | Y | T | A | 532 (535) | 0 (3) |
Goat (P553) | A | H | Y | T | A | 553 (553) | 0 (0) |
Rabbit (P509) | A | Y | Y | T | S | 509 (508) | 0 (-1) |
Dolphin (P524) | A | H | Y | T | S | 537 (529) | 13 (5) |
Mouse (P508) | A | Y | Y | T | S | 509 (508) | 1 (0) |
Rat (P509) | A | Y | Y | T | S | 509 (508) | 0 (-1) |
Human (P560) | S | H | Y | T | A | 560 (556) | 0 (-4) |
Human (P552) | A | H | Y | T | A | 553 (553) | 1 (1) |
Human (P530) | A | H | F | A | A | 531 (530) | 1 (0) |
Dolphin (P524) pigment is excluded in the estimation.
Dolphin (P524) pigment is included in the estimation.
. | . | . | . | . | . | λmax (nm) . | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Pigment . | 180 . | 197 . | 277 . | 285 . | 308 . | Expected . | Expected - Observed . |
Cat (P553) | A | H | Y | T | A | 553a (553)b | 0a (0)b |
Deer (P531) | A | H | F | A | A | 531 (530) | 0 (-1) |
Guinea pig (P516) | S | Y | Y | A | A | 517 (518) | 1 (2) |
Horse (P545) | A | H | F | T | A | 546 (547) | 1 (2) |
Squirrel (P532) | S | Y | Y | T | A | 532 (535) | 0 (3) |
Goat (P553) | A | H | Y | T | A | 553 (553) | 0 (0) |
Rabbit (P509) | A | Y | Y | T | S | 509 (508) | 0 (-1) |
Dolphin (P524) | A | H | Y | T | S | 537 (529) | 13 (5) |
Mouse (P508) | A | Y | Y | T | S | 509 (508) | 1 (0) |
Rat (P509) | A | Y | Y | T | S | 509 (508) | 0 (-1) |
Human (P560) | S | H | Y | T | A | 560 (556) | 0 (-4) |
Human (P552) | A | H | Y | T | A | 553 (553) | 1 (1) |
Human (P530) | A | H | F | A | A | 531 (530) | 1 (0) |
. | . | . | . | . | . | λmax (nm) . | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Pigment . | 180 . | 197 . | 277 . | 285 . | 308 . | Expected . | Expected - Observed . |
Cat (P553) | A | H | Y | T | A | 553a (553)b | 0a (0)b |
Deer (P531) | A | H | F | A | A | 531 (530) | 0 (-1) |
Guinea pig (P516) | S | Y | Y | A | A | 517 (518) | 1 (2) |
Horse (P545) | A | H | F | T | A | 546 (547) | 1 (2) |
Squirrel (P532) | S | Y | Y | T | A | 532 (535) | 0 (3) |
Goat (P553) | A | H | Y | T | A | 553 (553) | 0 (0) |
Rabbit (P509) | A | Y | Y | T | S | 509 (508) | 0 (-1) |
Dolphin (P524) | A | H | Y | T | S | 537 (529) | 13 (5) |
Mouse (P508) | A | Y | Y | T | S | 509 (508) | 1 (0) |
Rat (P509) | A | Y | Y | T | S | 509 (508) | 0 (-1) |
Human (P560) | S | H | Y | T | A | 560 (556) | 0 (-4) |
Human (P552) | A | H | Y | T | A | 553 (553) | 1 (1) |
Human (P530) | A | H | F | A | A | 531 (530) | 1 (0) |
Dolphin (P524) pigment is excluded in the estimation.
Dolphin (P524) pigment is included in the estimation.
With the exception of dolphin (P524), this five-sites rule explains the observed λmax values of the mammalian red and green pigments extremely well (Table 2). When the five-sites rule is applied to dolphin (P524) pigment, the predicted λmax value is 13 nm higher than the observed value (Table 2). Fasick et al. (1998) obtained the λmax value of dolphin (P524) pigment using the dark-light difference spectrum in their in vitro assay. Because the values of the dark and dark-light difference can disagree (Kawamura and Yokoyama 1998), it is of interest to evaluate the absorption spectrum in the dark and see how well the two spectra coincide. As we see in the goldfish red pigment (discussion), there is also some possibility that unwanted amino acid changes might have been introduced during the cloning of the opsin cDNA, leading to an erroneous λmax value. If this occurred, the five-sites rule should not apply to the mutant pigment. As we already saw, dolphin (P524) pigment has a higher rate of amino acid substitution compared to other pigments. The cause of this accelerated evolutionary rate is not understood. This high rate may reflect an adaptive evolution of this pigment to a unique marine environment. Or, some of the amino acid changes might have been introduced by spurious mutations. Mutations involved in either of these cases may include E41D, L73P, I91M, and Q260R. E41 and L73 are completely conserved among the red and green pigments in other vertebrates. I91 is completely conserved in RH1, RH2, SWS2, and LWS/MWS pigment groups, all of which have diverged prior to the evolution of vertebrates (Yokoyama 1997). Q260 is also completely conserved among all RH1, RH2, SWS1, SWS2, and LWS/MWS pigment groups in vertebrates. Thus, it is most important to evaluate whether these and other amino acids of dolphin (P524) actually exist in nature. If these amino acids are validated, then dolphin (P524) pigment provides an exciting opportunity to study not only the molecular mechanism of adaptation of the pigment to a marine environment but also a new genetic mechanism of red-green color vision.
Evolution of the mammalian red-green color vision: Our analyses show that the five-sites rule explains the λmax values of virtually all extant red and green pigments in mammals. This implies that it also applies to the ancestral red and green pigments. Thus, it is of interest to study the evolution of red-green color vision of the mammalian ancestors.
To infer the amino acid sequences of visual pigments of ancestral organisms, we consider a composite tree topology of the mammalian red and green pigments inferred by tree topologies in Figure 3 and the organismal tree in Figure 5. Given this tree topology, the amino acid sequences for all ancestral pigments were inferred by using the Dayhoff model of amino acid substitution (Dayhoff et al. 1978; Figure 5). When the empirical substitution model (Jones et al. 1992) and equal input model are used, virtually identical ancestral amino acid sequences are obtained (results not shown). According to Figure 5, the mammalian ancestral pigment had a λmax value at 531 nm. Interestingly, this ancestral phenotype can still be seen in the extant squirrel (P532) pigment. The red color vision at a λmax at 553 nm appears to have been achieved initially in the pigment in the common ancestor of primates (human), Lagomorpha (rabbit), Carnivora (cat), Perissodactyla (horse), Cetacea (dolphin), and Artiodactyla (goat and deer) by two amino acid substitutions S180A and Y197H (Figure 5). Today, this red color vision can be seen in cat (P553) and goat (P553) pigments. Human (P560) pigment achieved further red shift in the λmax by an additional amino acid substitution A180S. The green color sensitivities of human (P530) and deer (P531) pigments were achieved by Y277F and T285A (see also Nei et al. 1997) and dolphin (P524) pigment by A308S. Horse (P545) pigment achieved its present blue-shifted λmax from the ancestral red pigment by a single amino acid substitution Y277F.
Guinea pig (P516) appears to have achieved its present green color sensitivity from the original mammalian ancestral green pigment by a single amino acid substitution T285A. The extreme blue shift in a λmax value of rabbit (P509) pigment evolved from the red pigment with a λmax at 553 nm by H197Y and A308S, whereas those of the two murine pigments evolved from the ancestral green pigment by S180A and A308S (Figure 5). Thus, the evolution of red-green color vision in mammals indicates that the extant color vision has been achieved often by independent amino acid substitutions at only a few sites.
. | Estimator (nm) . | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Amino acids . | Z . | . | . | . | . | . |
SHYTA | ||||||
Mammalian pigments | ||||||
(n = 13) | 556 ± 2 | -3.0 ± 2.9 | - 21.1 ± 2.5 | -6.0 ± 2.9 | -17.0 ± 2.6 | - 24.4 ± 2.9 |
Mammalian pigments | ||||||
(n = 12)a | 560 ± 1 | -7.3 ± 0.7 | -28.4 ± 0.8 | -7.2 ± 0.6 | -15.1 ± 0.6 | -15.6 ± 1.0 |
Vertebrate pigments | ||||||
(n = 18)a | 560 ± 0.4 | -7.2 ± 0.6 | -28.0 ± 0.8 | -6.8 ± 0.7 | -15.9 ± 0.6 | -16.0 ± 1.1 |
AHFAA (n = 12)a | 530 ± 0.4 | 7.3 ± 0.7 | -28.4 ± 0.8 | 7.2 ± 0.6 | 15.1 ± 0.6 | -15.6 ± 1.0 |
AYYTS (n = 12)a | 509 ± 0.4 | 7.3 ± 0.7 | 28.4 ± 0.8 | -7.2 ± 0.6 | -15.1 ± 0.6 | 15.6 ± 1.0 |
. | Estimator (nm) . | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Amino acids . | Z . | . | . | . | . | . |
SHYTA | ||||||
Mammalian pigments | ||||||
(n = 13) | 556 ± 2 | -3.0 ± 2.9 | - 21.1 ± 2.5 | -6.0 ± 2.9 | -17.0 ± 2.6 | - 24.4 ± 2.9 |
Mammalian pigments | ||||||
(n = 12)a | 560 ± 1 | -7.3 ± 0.7 | -28.4 ± 0.8 | -7.2 ± 0.6 | -15.1 ± 0.6 | -15.6 ± 1.0 |
Vertebrate pigments | ||||||
(n = 18)a | 560 ± 0.4 | -7.2 ± 0.6 | -28.0 ± 0.8 | -6.8 ± 0.7 | -15.9 ± 0.6 | -16.0 ± 1.1 |
AHFAA (n = 12)a | 530 ± 0.4 | 7.3 ± 0.7 | -28.4 ± 0.8 | 7.2 ± 0.6 | 15.1 ± 0.6 | -15.6 ± 1.0 |
AYYTS (n = 12)a | 509 ± 0.4 | 7.3 ± 0.7 | 28.4 ± 0.8 | -7.2 ± 0.6 | -15.1 ± 0.6 | 15.6 ± 1.0 |
Dolphin (P524) is excluded from the estimation.
. | Estimator (nm) . | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Amino acids . | Z . | . | . | . | . | . |
SHYTA | ||||||
Mammalian pigments | ||||||
(n = 13) | 556 ± 2 | -3.0 ± 2.9 | - 21.1 ± 2.5 | -6.0 ± 2.9 | -17.0 ± 2.6 | - 24.4 ± 2.9 |
Mammalian pigments | ||||||
(n = 12)a | 560 ± 1 | -7.3 ± 0.7 | -28.4 ± 0.8 | -7.2 ± 0.6 | -15.1 ± 0.6 | -15.6 ± 1.0 |
Vertebrate pigments | ||||||
(n = 18)a | 560 ± 0.4 | -7.2 ± 0.6 | -28.0 ± 0.8 | -6.8 ± 0.7 | -15.9 ± 0.6 | -16.0 ± 1.1 |
AHFAA (n = 12)a | 530 ± 0.4 | 7.3 ± 0.7 | -28.4 ± 0.8 | 7.2 ± 0.6 | 15.1 ± 0.6 | -15.6 ± 1.0 |
AYYTS (n = 12)a | 509 ± 0.4 | 7.3 ± 0.7 | 28.4 ± 0.8 | -7.2 ± 0.6 | -15.1 ± 0.6 | 15.6 ± 1.0 |
. | Estimator (nm) . | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Amino acids . | Z . | . | . | . | . | . |
SHYTA | ||||||
Mammalian pigments | ||||||
(n = 13) | 556 ± 2 | -3.0 ± 2.9 | - 21.1 ± 2.5 | -6.0 ± 2.9 | -17.0 ± 2.6 | - 24.4 ± 2.9 |
Mammalian pigments | ||||||
(n = 12)a | 560 ± 1 | -7.3 ± 0.7 | -28.4 ± 0.8 | -7.2 ± 0.6 | -15.1 ± 0.6 | -15.6 ± 1.0 |
Vertebrate pigments | ||||||
(n = 18)a | 560 ± 0.4 | -7.2 ± 0.6 | -28.0 ± 0.8 | -6.8 ± 0.7 | -15.9 ± 0.6 | -16.0 ± 1.1 |
AHFAA (n = 12)a | 530 ± 0.4 | 7.3 ± 0.7 | -28.4 ± 0.8 | 7.2 ± 0.6 | 15.1 ± 0.6 | -15.6 ± 1.0 |
AYYTS (n = 12)a | 509 ± 0.4 | 7.3 ± 0.7 | 28.4 ± 0.8 | -7.2 ± 0.6 | -15.1 ± 0.6 | 15.6 ± 1.0 |
Dolphin (P524) is excluded from the estimation.
DISCUSSION
Red-green color vision in primates: Hominoids and Old World monkeys have two X-linked genes encoding the red and green opsins. With the exception of New World (NW) monkeys, it appears that all mammalian species have only one locus that encodes either red or green opsins (Radlwimmer and Yokoyama 1997, 1998). Most NW monkeys also have one red-green opsin locus (however, see Jacobs et al. 1996), but this locus is polymorphic and contains three different alleles (Mollon et al. 1984; Neitz et al. 1991; Hunt et al. 1998). In these species, all males are red-green color blind, but females are either color blind or trichromatic depending on the allelic compositions. Using ERG and MSP, three different allelic pigments have been identified in capuchin monkey (Cebus nigrivittatus; P537, P550, and P562: Jacobs and Neitz 1987a), in marmoset monkey (Callithrix jacchus jacchus; P543, P556, and P563; Travis et al. 1988; Tovee et al. 1992), in squirrel monkey (Saimiri sciureus; P533-P538, P544-P551, and P559-P565; Mollon et al. 1984; Jacobs and Neitz 1987b; and Jacobs et al. 1993), and in tamarin monkey (Saguinus mystax; P545, P557, and P562; Jacobs et al. 1987). All 12 alleles have been sequenced at the nucleotide level. Unfortunately, the λmax values of these pigments have not been determined directly using the in vitro assay. Thus, the relevance of the five-sites rule cannot be discussed for these data yet.
To obtain direct information on the λmax values of the red and green pigments in NW monkeys, we isolated the three allelic opsin cDNAs from the marmoset retina by RT-PCR using two primers: 5′-AGGGCTGAATTCCACCATGGCCCAGCAGTGGAG-3′ (forward) and 5′-GGC AGAGTCGACGCAGGTGACACCGAGGACA-3′ (reverse; see Shyue et al. 1998). Using these opsin cDNAs, we regenerated the three allelic pigments using the in vitro assay (S. Kawamura, F. B. Radlwimmer and S. Yokoyama, unpublished data). Our analyses show that marmoset pigments with AHYAA, AHYTA, and SHYTA have the λmax values at 540, 553, and 562 nm, respectively. These λmax values agree well with the MSP estimates. Furthermore, the three λmax values are very close to the corresponding predicted values 538, 553, and 560 nm from the five-sites rule.
In human (P530) and human (P560) pigments, amino acids S and Y at site 116, I and T at 230, A and S at 233, and Y and F at 309 have minor effects on the fine tuning of their color sensitivities (Asenjo et al. 1994). Although the compositions of amino acids are not the same, the triallelic pigments of NW monkey are also polymorphic at 116, 230, and 233. However, such polymorphic amino acids at 116, 233, and 309 are found only among the primate red and green pigments (Figure 2). Thus, the effects of these polymorphic amino acids on red-green color vision are irrelevant in many other species. One interesting feature of human (P560) pigment is that the population survey shows that 62% of the red pigment consists of SHYTA, a typical human (P560) pigment, but 38% of the allelic red pigment consists of AHYTA (Winderickx et al. 1992). The latter pigment has a λmax value at 552 nm (Merbs and Nathans 1992), which is virtually identical to the predicted value, 553 nm, from the five-sites rule (Table 2).
Color vision in nonmammalian species: To date, the in vitro estimates for the λmax values of the orthologous pigments in nonmammalian species are available only for goldfish (C. auratus) and American chameleon (Anolis carolinensis). Although they have the same amino acid SHYTA at the five critical sites, the goldfish and American chameleon red pigments have λmax values at 525 nm (Johnson et al. 1993) and 561 nm (Kawamura and Yokoyama 1998), respectively. Thus, the American chameleon red pigment is consistent with the five-sites rule, but the goldfish red pigment is not.
Many freshwater fishes and amphibians utilize either 11-cis-retinal (vitamin A1 aldehyde) or 11-cis-3, 4-dehydroretinal (vitamin A2 aldehyde) as a chromophore (e.g., see Dartnall and Lythgoe 1965). In general, visual pigments with 11-cis-3, 4 dehydroretinal (A2-pigments) absorb longer wavelengths than those with 11-cis-retinal (A1-pigments; Dartnall and Lythgoe 1965; Whitmore and Bowmaker 1989). The relationship between the λmax value of the A1-pigment (L1) and that of the A2-pigment (L2) is given roughly by empirical formulas L2WB = (L1/52.5)2.5 + 250 (Whitmore and Bowmaker 1989) and L2H = 104/[(104/L1) - 0.367 - 0.05054{(104/L1) - 23.347}2] (Harosi 1994; see also Kawamura and Yokoyama 1998). Almost all the goldfish pigments are A2-types, with A1-pigments representing only 4% of the entire pigment population in the retina (Palacios et al. 1998).
Using the in vitro assay, Johnson et al. (1993) regenerated two green and one red A1-pigments with λmax values at 505 nm [goldfish (P505)], 511 nm [goldfish (P511)], and 525 nm [goldfish (P525)]. These pigments represent two evolutionarily distinct groups. The first two pigments belong to the RH2 pigment group, whereas the third pigment is orthologous to the mammalian red and green pigments and belongs to the LWS/MWS pigment group (Yokoyama 1997). Palacios et al. (1998) measured the spectral sensitivities of cone photoreceptor cells of goldfish by recording membrane photocurrents with suction pipette electrodes. They found three major groups of photoreceptor cells with λmax values at 623 ± 7 nm, 537 ± 5 nm, and 447 ± 8 nm and two rare types with λmax values at 356 and 574 nm (see also Table 4). Goldfish (P505) and goldfish (P511) A1-pigments are expected to operate as A2-pigments with λmax values at 530-540 nm, which correspond to the A2-pigments with λmax values at 537 nm found by Palacios et al. (1998; Table 4). Thus, under normal circumstances, goldfish (P505) and goldfish (P511) pigments have green sensitivities. Goldfish (P525) pigment can have a λmax value at ∼565 nm as an A2-pigment, which may correspond to a rare type of A2-pigment with a λmax value at 574 nm (Palacios et al. 1998; Table 4). However, as we see next, the existence of goldfish (P525) pigment in nature is questionable and needs to be reexamined.
. | . | A2-pigment . | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
A1-pigment (nm) . | Reference . | L2WB (nm) . | L2H (nm) . | Observeda (nm) . |
505 | Johnson et al. (1993) | 537 | 532 | 537 |
511 | Johnson et al. (1993) | 546 | 541 | 537 |
525b | Johnson et al. (1993) | 566 | 563 | 574 |
559 | This study | 620 | 624 | 623 |
. | . | A2-pigment . | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
A1-pigment (nm) . | Reference . | L2WB (nm) . | L2H (nm) . | Observeda (nm) . |
505 | Johnson et al. (1993) | 537 | 532 | 537 |
511 | Johnson et al. (1993) | 546 | 541 | 537 |
525b | Johnson et al. (1993) | 566 | 563 | 574 |
559 | This study | 620 | 624 | 623 |
L2WB = (L1/52.5)2.5 + 250 (Whitmore and Bowmaker 1989) and L2H = 104/[(104/L1) - 0.367 - 0.05054{(104/L1) - 23.347}2] (Harosi 1994), where L1 is the λmax value of the pigment with 11-cis-retinal (see also Kawamura and Yokoyama 1998).
Palacios et al. (1998).
This pigment could not be found in this study.
. | . | A2-pigment . | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
A1-pigment (nm) . | Reference . | L2WB (nm) . | L2H (nm) . | Observeda (nm) . |
505 | Johnson et al. (1993) | 537 | 532 | 537 |
511 | Johnson et al. (1993) | 546 | 541 | 537 |
525b | Johnson et al. (1993) | 566 | 563 | 574 |
559 | This study | 620 | 624 | 623 |
. | . | A2-pigment . | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
A1-pigment (nm) . | Reference . | L2WB (nm) . | L2H (nm) . | Observeda (nm) . |
505 | Johnson et al. (1993) | 537 | 532 | 537 |
511 | Johnson et al. (1993) | 546 | 541 | 537 |
525b | Johnson et al. (1993) | 566 | 563 | 574 |
559 | This study | 620 | 624 | 623 |
L2WB = (L1/52.5)2.5 + 250 (Whitmore and Bowmaker 1989) and L2H = 104/[(104/L1) - 0.367 - 0.05054{(104/L1) - 23.347}2] (Harosi 1994), where L1 is the λmax value of the pigment with 11-cis-retinal (see also Kawamura and Yokoyama 1998).
Palacios et al. (1998).
This pigment could not be found in this study.
The “true” goldfish red pigment: To date, no one has cloned the “true” goldfish red pigment. To clone the goldfish red opsin cDNA, we constructed forward and reverse primers using sequence information from the goldfish (P525) cDNA (Johnson et al. 1993; Figure 1). Using these primers, we cloned an opsin cDNA from a goldfish retina by RT-PCR amplification. The pigment regenerated using the in vitro assay has SHYTA at the five critical sites, just like the goldfish (P525) pigment, but it differs from goldfish (P525) pigment by one amino acid. That is, compared to C287 in goldfish (P525) pigment, this pigment has F287. Note that, because of the difference in the pigment lengths, the sites 287 in the human red and green pigments actually correspond to 284 in the goldfish red pigment. When it is measured in the dark, this goldfish pigment has a λmax value at 559 ± 4 nm, while its dark-light difference spectrum is given by 561 ± 2 nm (Figure 6). When goldfish (P559) pigment is reconstituted with 11-cis-3, 4 dehydroretinal, the corresponding A2-pigment is expected to have a λmax value at ∼620 nm (Table 4), which corresponds to the goldfish red A2-pigment with a λmax at 623 ± 7 nm found by Palacios et al. (1998). Thus, we have cloned the true goldfish red pigment. The λmax value of goldfish (P559) pigment is again explained nicely by the five-sites rule.
It should be noted that C287 has not been found in any other red and green pigments in a wide variety of vertebrates, including marine lamprey (Petromyzon marinus; S. Yokoyama and H. Zhang, unpublished result), Mexican cavefish (Astyanax fasciatus), killifish (Oryzias latipes), African clawed frog (Xenopus laevis), gecko (Gekko gekko), American chameleon (A. carolinensis), chicken (Gallus gallus), and pigeon (C. livia; S. Kawamura, N. S. Blow and S. Yokoyama, unpublished results), and mammals. Furthermore, we sequenced the entire coding regions of one red and two green pigments of five river dwelling, six Micos cave, and five Pachon cave fishes of Astyanax fasciatus (Yokoyama et al. 1995) and could not find C287. The two cave fish populations were derived from the river fish population during the last 1 million years (Avise and Selander 1972; Chakraborty and Nei 1974; Wilkens 1988). Thus, these cave fish populations are much older than different goldfish varieties.
These observations strongly suggest that C287 may not actually exist and might have been introduced during the cloning process of the red opsin cDNA. To check this possibility, we cloned the red opsin cDNAs from six additional morphologically different breeds of goldfish by RT-PCR using the primers given in Figure 1. This survey reveals only synonymous nucleotide polymorphisms at a small number of sites (Table 5). The critical nucleotide G at site 851 found in a red opsin cDNA identified by Johnson et al. (1993) cannot be found in the present polymorphism survey. This may mean that the frequency of nucleotides G at this site in a goldfish population is very low. However, it is more likely that the nucleotide G at site 851 was introduced during the process of cloning of the goldfish red opsin cDNA, possibly due to the error-prone reverse transcriptase activity at the time of cDNA library construction.
This site corresponds to the second position of the codon 284, where TGT and TTT encode cysteine and phenylalanine, respectively.
Johnson et al. (1993).
This site corresponds to the second position of the codon 284, where TGT and TTT encode cysteine and phenylalanine, respectively.
Johnson et al. (1993).
If goldfish (P525) pigment does not exist, how can we explain the rare goldfish photoreceptor cells with a λmax value at 574 nm? Three possibilities can be considered. First, because the goldfish retina contains a small population of A1-pigments, the rare photoreceptor cells may arise because goldfish (P559) pigments contain 11-cis-retinal rather than 11-cis-3, 4-dehydroretinal. Second, some goldfish pigments may be encoded by a polymorphic allele of goldfish (P559) opsin gene, as implicated by Johnson et al. (1993). Third, goldfish may have green pigments that belong to the LWS/MWS group in addition to those in the RH2 group, just like Mexican cavefish (Register et al. 1994).
The spectral sensitivities of the two rare photoreceptor cells are explained much better by A2-pigments than by A1-pigments (Palacios et al. 1998). Thus, 11-cis-retinal does not appear to be the cause of the rareness of the photoreceptor cells. The genetic polymorphism hypothesis for the rare photoreceptor cells is also problematic. It turns out that the rare photoreceptor cells are isolated from two retinas of a single fish, each of which contains the red-sensitive photoreceptor cells as well (Palacios et al. 1998). Now, suppose that these rare cells contain variant visual pigments, allelic forms of goldfish (P559) pigments, such as goldfish (P525) pigments. Then, this specific goldfish has to be heterozygous at the red opsin gene locus and the wild-type and variant types of red photoreceptor cells should be detected in equal frequencies. However, as already indicated, the frequency of the variant types is 2/20 (Palacios et al. 1998) and is significantly <0.5. Thus, it is unlikely that any allelic forms of goldfish (P559) pigments are contained in the rare photoreceptor cells. The third possibility that a MWS pigment may exist in goldfish has not yet been explored. In the LWS/MWS group, gene duplication of the ancestral LWS and MWS opsin genes predates the speciation between Mexican cavefish and goldfish, suggesting that goldfish can possess at least one MWS gene (Register et al. 1994). Having all other necessary retinal pigments in place, it is not unreasonable to assume that such extra pigments may be expressed less abundantly. Thus, MWS pigments appear to be viable candidates for the pigments in the rare photoreceptor cells with a λmax value at 574 nm. To study the existence of such pigments, more detailed analyses of the opsin genes in the goldfish genome are required.
The five-sites rule in vertebrates: Recently, we also studied the λmax value of the visual pigments in pigeon (Columba livia; S. Kawamura, N. S. Blow and S. Yokoyama, unpublished results). Our analyses show that the pigeon red pigment with SHYTA has a λmax value at 559 nm that is virtually identical to the predicted value of 560 nm from the five-sites rule. Thus, the red pigments of goldfish, American chameleon, pigeon, and marmoset all with SHYTA at the five critical sites show the λmax values at 559-562 nm, which are virtually identical to that of human (P560) pigment. The λmax values of marmoset (P554) and human (P552) pigments with AHYTA are very close to those of cat (P553) and goat (P553) pigments with the identical amino acids at the five sites (Table 2). The λmax value of the third allelic pigment with AHYAA in marmoset (540 nm) is also close to the predicted value, 538 nm, by the five-sites rule. Thus, when marmoset (P540), marmoset (P553), and marmoset (P562), goldfish (P559), chameleon (P561), and pigeon (P559) pigments are added in the estimation, the values inferred (vertebrate pigments, Table 3) are virtually identical to those obtained previously.
These observations show that the spectral sensitivities of virtually all red and green pigments in vertebrates known today are fully compatible with the five-sites rule. However, it should be cautioned that only a small number of the λmax values of the red and green pigments in nonmammalian species have been measured using the in vitro assays. Thus, the generality of the five-sites rule for the red-green color vision in vertebrates remains to be seen. The five-sites rule for red-green color vision in mammals may require further modification in its detail, but its validity is strongly supported by the existing data.
Acknowledgement
Comments by Drs. Tom Starmer, Ruth Yokoyama, and two anonymous reviewers were greatly appreciated. This work was supported by National Institutes of Health grant GM-42379.
Footnotes
Communicating editor: A. G. Clark
LITERATURE CITED