- THIS ARTICLE
- Full Text (Rapid PDF)
-
All Versions of this Article:
genetics.109.103333v1
genetics.109.103333v2
182/4/1159 most recent - Alert me when this article is cited
- Alert me if a correction is posted
- SERVICES
- Email this article to a friend
- Similar articles in this journal
- Similar articles in PubMed
- Alert me to new issues of the journal
- Download to citation manager
- Reprints & Permissions
- CITING ARTICLES
- Citing Articles via Google Scholar
- GOOGLE SCHOLAR
- Articles by Salathé, M.
- Articles by Feldman, M. W.
- Search for Related Content
- PUBMED
- PubMed Citation
- Articles by Salathé, M.
- Articles by Feldman, M. W.
doi:10.1534/genetics.109.103333
A more recent version of this article appeared on August 1, 2009.
REGULAR RESEARCH PAPERS |
Evolution of Stochastic Switching Rates in Asymmetric Fitness Landscapes
Marcel Salathé 1*, Jeremy W. Van Cleve 1 and Marcus W. Feldman 1
1 Stanford University
* To whom correspondence should be addressed. E-mail: salathe{at}stanford.edu.
Submitted on March 27, 2009
Accepted on 23 May 2009
Uncertain environments pose a tremendous challenge to clonal populations: The selective pressures imposed by the environment can change so rapidly that adaptation by mutation alone would be too slow. One solution to this problem is given by the phenomenon of stochastic phenotype switching which causes genetically uniform populations to be phenotypically heterogenous. Stochastic phenotype switching has been observed in numerous microbial species and is generally assumed to be an adaptive bet-hedging strategy to anticipate future environmental change. We use an explicit population genetic model to investigate the evolutionary dynamics of phenotypic switching rates. We find that whether or not stochastic switching is an adaptive strategy is highly contingent upon the fitness landscape given by the changing environment. Unless selection is very strong, asymmetric fitness landscapes - where the cost of being maladapted is not identical in all environments - strongly select against stochastic switching. We further observe a threshold phenomenon that causes switching rates to be either relatively high or completely absent, but rarely intermediate. Our finding that marginal changes in selection pressures can cause fundamentally different evolutionary outcomes is important in a wide range of fields concerned with microbial bet-hedging.
Key Words: Adaptation, Epigenetics, Fitness Landscapes, Fluctuating Environments, Phenotypic noise