- THIS ARTICLE
- Full Text (Rapid PDF)
-
All Versions of this Article:
genetics.108.089896v1
180/1/507 most recent - Alert me when this article is cited
- Alert me if a correction is posted
- SERVICES
- Email this article to a friend
- Similar articles in this journal
- Similar articles in PubMed
- Alert me to new issues of the journal
- Download to citation manager
-
Author home page(s):
Harri Vehviläinen
Antti Kause
Cheryl Quinton
- Reprints & Permissions
- CITING ARTICLES
- Citing Articles via Google Scholar
- GOOGLE SCHOLAR
- Articles by Vehviläinen, H.
- Articles by Paananen, T.
- Search for Related Content
- PUBMED
- PubMed Citation
- Articles by Vehviläinen, H.
- Articles by Paananen, T.
doi:10.1534/genetics.108.089896
A more recent version of this article appeared on September 1, 2008.
REGULAR RESEARCH PAPERS |
Survival of the Currently Fittest - Genetics of Rainbow Trout Survival Across Time and Space
Harri Vehviläinen 1*, Antti Kause 1, Cheryl Quinton 1, Heikki Koskinen 2 and Tuija Paananen 2
1 MTT Agrifood Research Finland
2 Finnish Game and Fisheries Research Institute, Tervo Fisheries Research and Aquaculture
* To whom correspondence should be addressed. E-mail: harri.vehvilainen{at}mtt.fi.
Submitted on April 4, 2008
Revised on May 8, 2008
Accepted on 16 July 2008
As a fitness trait, survival is assumed to exhibit low heritability due to strong selection eroding genetic variation, and/or spatio-temporal variation in mortality agents reducing genetic and increasing residual variation. The latter phenomenon in particular may contribute to low heritability in multigeneration data, even if certain cohorts exhibit significant genetic variation. Analysis of survival data from ten year-classes of rainbow trout reared at three test stations showed that treating survival as a single trait across all generations resulted in low heritability (h2 = 0.08-0.17). However, when heritabilities were estimated from homogeneous generation and test station specific cohorts, a wide range of heritability values was revealed (h2 = 0.04-0.71). Out of 64 genetic correlations between different cohorts, 20 were positive, but 16 were significantly negative, confirming that genetic architecture of survival is not stable across generations and environments. These results reveal the existence of hidden genetic variation for survival, and demonstrate that treating survival as one trait over several generations may not reveal its true genetic architecture. Negative genetic correlations between cohorts indicate that overall survival has limited potential to predict general resistance, and care should be taken when using it as selection criterion.
Key Words: general resistance, genetic correlation, genotype-environment interaction, mortality, robustness