- THIS ARTICLE
- Full Text (Rapid PDF)
- Data Supplement
-
All Versions of this Article:
genetics.107.079046v1
178/2/1061 most recent - Alert me when this article is cited
- Alert me if a correction is posted
- SERVICES
- Similar articles in this journal
- Similar articles in PubMed
- Alert me to new issues of the journal
- Download to citation manager
- Reprints & Permissions
- CITING ARTICLES
- Citing Articles via Google Scholar
- GOOGLE SCHOLAR
- Articles by Matsuo, T.
- Search for Related Content
- PUBMED
- PubMed Citation
- Articles by Matsuo, T.
doi:10.1534/genetics.107.079046
A more recent version of this article appeared on February 1, 2008.
REGULAR RESEARCH PAPERS |
Rapid evolution of two odorant-binding protein genes, Obp57d and Obp57e, in the Drosophila melanogaster species group
Takashi Matsuo 1*
1 Tokyo Metropolitan University
* To whom correspondence should be addressed. E-mail: mts{at}tmu.ac.jp.
Submitted on July 18, 2007
Revised on August 24, 2007
Accepted on 2 December 2007
Genes encoding odorant-binding protein (OBP) form a large family in an insect genome. Two OBP genes, Obp57d and Obp57e, were previously identified to be involved in host-plant recognition in Drosophila sechellia. Here, by comparing the genomic sequences at the Obp57d/e locus from 27 Drosophila species, we found large differences in gene number between species. Phylogenetic analysis indicates that Obp57d and Obp57e in the Drosophila melanogaster species group arose by gene duplication of an ancestral OBP gene that remains single in the obscura species group. Further gain and loss of OBP genes were observed in several lineages in the melanogaster group. Site-specific analysis of evolutionary rate suggests that Obp57d and Obp57e have functionally diverged from each other. Thus, there are two classes of gene number differences in the Obp57d/e region: the difference of the genes at the early stage of evolution after gene duplication, and the difference of the genes that have functionally diverged from each other. Our analyses demonstrate that these two classes of differences can be distinguished by comparisons of many genomic sequences from closely related species.
Key Words: functional divergence, gene duplication, gene number difference