help button home button Genetics J Neurosci
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH

Genetics. Published Articles Ahead of Print: May 4, 2007, Copyright © 2007
doi:10.1534/genetics.107.074666


A more recent version of this article appeared on July 1, 2007.
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (Rapid PDF)
Right arrow Data Supplement
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
genetics.107.074666v1
176/3/1653    most recent
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Author home page(s):
Charles F. Baer
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Ostrow, D.
Right arrow Articles by Baer, C. F.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Ostrow, D.
Right arrow Articles by Baer, C. F.

REGULAR RESEARCH PAPERS

Mutational Bias for Body Size in Rhabditid Nematodes

Dejerianne Ostrow 1, Naomi Phillips 1, Arian Avalos 1, Dustin Blanton 1, Ashley Boggs 1, Thomas Keller 1, Laura Levy 1, Jeffrey Rosenbloom 1 and Charles F. Baer 1*

1 University of Florida

* To whom correspondence should be addressed. E-mail: cbaer{at}zoo.ufl.edu.

Submitted on April 16, 2007
Revised on April 30, 2007
Accepted on 30 April 2007


   Abstract
Mutational bias is a potentially important agent of evolution, but it is difficult to disentangle the effects of mutation from those of natural selection. Mutation accumulation experiments, in which mutations are allowed to accumulate at very small population size, thus minimizing the efficiency of natural selection, are the best way to separate the effects of mutation from those of selection. Body size varies greatly among species of nematode in the family rhabditidae; mutational biases are both a potential cause and consequence of that variation. We report data on the cumulative effects of mutations that affect body size in three species of rhabditid nematode that vary five-fold in adult size. Results are very consistent with previous studies of mutations underlying fitness in the same strains: two strains of Caenorhabditis briggsae decline in body size about twice as fast as two strains of C. elegans, with a concomitant higher point estimate of the genomic mutation rate; the confamilial Oscheius myriophila is intermediate. There is an overall mutational bias, such that mutations reduce size on average, but the bias appears consistent between species. The genetic correlation between mutations that affect size and those underlying fitness is large and positive, on average.

Key Words: Caenorhabditis, mutation accumulation, mutation rate, mutational correlation, mutational variance




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
GeneticsHome page
X.-S. Zhang and W. G. Hill
The Anomalous Effects of Biased Mutation Revisited: Mean-Optimum Deviation and Apparent Directional Selection Under Stabilizing Selection
Genetics, June 1, 2008; 179(2): 1135 - 1141.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Mol Biol EvolHome page
C. G. Artieri, W. Haerty, B. P. Gupta, and R. S. Singh
Sexual Selection and Maintenance of Sex: Evidence from Comparisons of Rates of Genomic Accumulation of Mutations and Divergence of Sex-Related Genes in Sexual and Hermaphroditic Species of Caenorhabditis
Mol. Biol. Evol., May 1, 2008; 25(5): 972 - 979.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH
Copyright © 2007 by the Genetics Society of America.