- THIS ARTICLE
- Full Text (Rapid PDF)
-
All Versions of this Article:
genetics.106.067678v1
176/3/1759 most recent - Alert me when this article is cited
- Alert me if a correction is posted
- SERVICES
- Similar articles in this journal
- Similar articles in PubMed
- Alert me to new issues of the journal
- Download to citation manager
- Reprints & Permissions
- CITING ARTICLES
- Citing Articles via HighWire
- Citing Articles via Google Scholar
- GOOGLE SCHOLAR
- Articles by Desai, M. M
- Articles by Fisher, D. S
- Search for Related Content
- PUBMED
- PubMed Citation
- Articles by Desai, M. M
- Articles by Fisher, D. S
doi:10.1534/genetics.106.067678
A more recent version of this article appeared on July 1, 2007.
REGULAR RESEARCH PAPERS |
Beneficial Mutation-Selection Balance and the Effect of Linkage on Positive Selection
Michael M Desai 1* and Daniel S Fisher 2
1 Princeton University
2 Harvard University
* To whom correspondence should be addressed. E-mail: mmdesai{at}princeton.edu.
Submitted on November 1, 2006
Revised on February 15, 2007
Accepted on 19 April 2007
When beneficial mutations are rare, they accumulate by a series of selective sweeps. But when they are common, many beneficial mutations will occur before any can fix, so there will be many different mutant lineages in the population concurrently. In an asexual population, these different mutant lineages interfere and not all can fix simultaneously. In addition, further beneficial mutations can accumulate in mutant lineages while these are still a minority of the population. In this paper, we analyze the dynamics of such multiple mutations and the interplay between multiple mutations and interference between clones. These result in substantial variation in fitness accumulating within a single asexual population. The amount of variation is determined by a balance between selection, which destroys variation, and beneficial mutations, which create more. The behavior depends in a subtle way on the population parameters: the population size, the beneficial mutation rate, and the distribution of the fitness increments of the potential beneficial mutations. The mutation-selection balance leads to a continually evolving population with a steady-state fitness variation. This variation increases logarithmically with both population size and mutation rate and sets the rate at which the population accumulates beneficial mutations, which thus also grows only logarithmically with population size and mutation rate. These results imply that mutator phenotypes are less effective in larger asexual populations. They also have consequences for the advantages (or disadvantages) of sex via the Fisher-Muller effect; these are discussed briefly.
Key Words: Asexual Evolution, Clonal Interference, Linkage, Positive Selection
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
E. Brunet, I. M. Rouzine, and C. O. Wilke The Stochastic Edge in Adaptive Evolution Genetics, May 1, 2008; 179(1): 603 - 620. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
