- THIS ARTICLE
- Full Text (Rapid PDF)
- Data Supplement
-
All Versions of this Article:
genetics.106.064477v1
174/4/1963 most recent - Alert me when this article is cited
- Alert me if a correction is posted
- SERVICES
- Similar articles in this journal
- Similar articles in PubMed
- Alert me to new issues of the journal
- Download to citation manager
- Reprints & Permissions
- CITING ARTICLES
- Citing Articles via Google Scholar
- GOOGLE SCHOLAR
- Articles by Jaklevic, B.
- Articles by Su, T. T.
- Search for Related Content
- PUBMED
- PubMed Citation
- Articles by Jaklevic, B.
- Articles by Su, T. T.
doi:10.1534/genetics.106.064477
A more recent version of this article appeared on December 1, 2006.
REGULAR RESEARCH PAPERS |
Contribution of Growth and Cell Cycle Checkpoints to Radiation Survival in Drosophila
Burnley Jaklevic 1, Lyle Uyetake 1, Willy Lemstra 2, Julia Chang 1, William Leary 1, Anthony Edwards 1, Smruti J. Vidwans 1, Ody Sibon 2 and Tin Tin Su 1*
1 University of Colorado
2 University of Groningen
* To whom correspondence should be addressed. E-mail: tin.su{at}colorado.edu.
Submitted on August 6, 2006
Revised on September 5, 2006
Accepted on 21 September 2006
Cell cycle checkpoints contribute to survival after exposure to ionizing radiation (IR) by arresting the cell cycle and permitting repair. As such, yeast and mammalian cells lacking checkpoints are more sensitive to killing by IR. We reported previously that Drosophila larvae mutant for grp (encoding a homolog of Chk1) survive IR as well as wild type despite being deficient in cell cycle checkpoints. This discrepancy could be due to differences either among species or between unicellular and multicellular systems. Here, we provide evidence that Grapes is needed for survival of Drosophila S2 cells after exposure to similar doses of IR, suggesting that multicellular organisms may utilize checkpoint-independent mechanisms to survive irradiation. The dispensability of checkpoints in multicellular organisms could be due to replacement of damaged cells by regeneration through increased nutritional uptake and compensatory proliferation. In support of this idea, we find that inhibition of nutritional uptake (by starvation or onset of pupariation), or inhibition of growth factor signaling and downstream targets (by mutations in cdk4, chico or dmyc) reduced the radiation survival of larvae. Further, some of these treatments are more detrimental for grp mutants, suggesting that the need for compensatory proliferation is greater for checkpoint mutants. The difference in survival of grp and wild type larvae allowed us to screen for small molecules that act as genotype-specific radiation sensitizers in a multi-cellular context. A pilot screen of a small molecule library from the National Cancer Institute yielded known and approved radio-sensitizing anti-cancer drugs. Since radiation is a common treatment option for human cancers, we propose that Drosophila may be used as an in vivo screening tool for genotype-specific drugs that enhance the effect of radiation therapy.
Key Words: DNA damage, Drosophila, Ionizing radiation, checkpoints, growth