help button home button Genetics AJP: Cell Physiology
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH

Genetics. Published Articles Ahead of Print: March 4, 2007, Copyright © 2007
doi:10.1534/genetics.106.063149


A more recent version of this article appeared on May 1, 2007.
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (Rapid PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
genetics.106.063149v1
176/1/421    most recent
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Anderson, A. D
Right arrow Articles by Weir, B. S
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Anderson, A. D
Right arrow Articles by Weir, B. S

REGULAR RESEARCH PAPERS

A maximum likelihood method for estimation of pairwise relatedness in structured populations

Amy D Anderson 1* and Bruce S Weir 1

1 University of Washington

* To whom correspondence should be addressed. E-mail: ada891{at}u.washington.edu.

Submitted on July 10, 2006
Revised on November 29, 2006
Accepted on 16 February 2007


   Abstract
A maximum likelihood estimator for pairwise relatedness is presented for the situation in which the individuals under consideration come from a large outbred subpopulation of the population for which allele frequencies are known. We demonstrate via simulations that a variety of commonly-used estimators that do not take this kind of misspecification of allele frequencies into account will systematically overestimate the degree of relatedness between two individuals from a subpopulation. A maximum-likelihood estimator that includes Fst as a parameter is introduced with the goal of producing the relatedness estimates that would have been obtained if the subpopulation allele frequencies had been known. This estimator is shown to work quite well, even when the value of Fst is misspecified. Bootstrap confidence intervals are also examined and shown to exhibit close to nominal coverage when Fst is correctly specified.

Key Words: Fst, coancestry coefficient, genetic markers, natural populations, pairwise relatedness







HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH
Copyright © 2007 by the Genetics Society of America.