- THIS ARTICLE
- Full Text (Rapid PDF)
-
All Versions of this Article:
genetics.106.061424v1
174/1/67 most recent - Alert me when this article is cited
- Alert me if a correction is posted
- SERVICES
- Similar articles in this journal
- Similar articles in PubMed
- Alert me to new issues of the journal
- Download to citation manager
-
Author home page(s):
Youbin Xiang
R. Scott Hawley
- Reprints & Permissions
- CITING ARTICLES
- Citing Articles via HighWire
- Citing Articles via Google Scholar
- GOOGLE SCHOLAR
- Articles by Xiang, Y.
- Articles by Hawley, R. S.
- Search for Related Content
- PUBMED
- PubMed Citation
- Articles by Xiang, Y.
- Articles by Hawley, R. S.
doi:10.1534/genetics.106.061424
A more recent version of this article appeared on September 1, 2006.
REGULAR RESEARCH PAPERS |
The Mechanism of Secondary Nondisjunction in Drosophila melanogaster females
Youbin Xiang 1 and R. Scott Hawley 1*
1 Stowers Institute for Medical Research
* To whom correspondence should be addressed. E-mail: rsh{at}stowers-institute.org.
Submitted on June 1, 2006
Revised on June 20, 2006
Accepted on 20 June 2006
Abstract: Bridges (1916) observed that X chromosome nondisjunction was much more frequent in XXY females than it was in genetically normal XX females. In addition, virtually all cases of X nondisjunction in XXY females were due to XX<->Y segregational events in oocytes in which the two X chromosomes had failed to undergo crossingover. He referred to these XX<->Y segregation events as "secondary nondisjunction". Cooper (1948) proposed that secondary nondisjunction results from the formation of an X-Y-X trivalent, such that Y chromosome directs the segregation of two achiasmate X chromosomes to the opposite pole on the first meiotic spindle. Using in situ hybridization to X and YL chromosomal satellite sequences, we demonstrate that XX<->Y segregations are indeed presaged by physical associations of the X and Y chromosomal heterochromatin. The physical co-localization of the three sex chromosomes is observed in virtually all oocytes in early prophase, and maintained at high frequency until mid-prophase in all genotypes examined. Although these XXY associations are usually dissolved by late prophase in XXY oocytes that undergo crossingover, they are maintained throughout prophase in XXY oocytes with nonexchange X chromosomes. The perdurance of such XXY associations in the absence of exchange presumably facilitates the segregation of the two X chromosomes and the Y chromosome to opposite poles on the developing meiotic spindle. Moreover, the observation that XXY pairings are dissolved by the end of pachytene in exchange-competent oocytes demonstrates that exchanges can alter heterochromatic (and thus presumably centromeric) associations during meiotic prophase.
Key Words: achiasmate segregation, centromere-co-orientation, heterochromatic pairing, meiosis, secondary nondisjunction
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
C. Wu, V. Singaram, and K. S. McKim mei-38 Is Required for Chromosome Segregation During Meiosis in Drosophila Females Genetics, September 1, 2008; 180(1): 61 - 72. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
