- THIS ARTICLE
- Full Text (Rapid PDF)
- Data Supplement
-
All Versions of this Article:
genetics.106.060699v1
173/4/2199 most recent - Alert me when this article is cited
- Alert me if a correction is posted
- SERVICES
- Similar articles in this journal
- Similar articles in PubMed
- Alert me to new issues of the journal
- Download to citation manager
- Reprints & Permissions
- CITING ARTICLES
- Citing Articles via HighWire
- Citing Articles via Google Scholar
- GOOGLE SCHOLAR
- Articles by Stupar, R. M
- Articles by Springer, N. M
- Search for Related Content
- PUBMED
- PubMed Citation
- Articles by Stupar, R. M
- Articles by Springer, N. M
doi:10.1534/genetics.106.060699
A more recent version of this article appeared on August 1, 2006.
REGULAR RESEARCH PAPERS |
Cis-transcriptional variation in maize inbred lines B73 and Mo17 lead to additive expression patterns in the F1 hybrid
Robert M Stupar 1 and Nathan M Springer 1*
1 University of Minnesota
* To whom correspondence should be addressed. E-mail: springer{at}umn.edu.
Submitted on May 12, 2006
Revised on May 12, 2006
Accepted on 12 May 2006
Microarray analysis of gene expression patterns in immature ear, seedling and embryo tissues from the maize inbred lines B73 and Mo17 identified numerous genes with variable expression. Some genes had detectable expression in only one of the two inbreds; most of these genes were detected in the genomic DNA of both inbreds, indicating that the expression differences are likely caused by differential regulation rather than differences in gene content. Gene expression was also monitored in the reciprocal F1 hybrids B73XMo17 and Mo17XB73. The reciprocal F1 hybrid lines did not display parental affects on gene expression levels. Approximately 80% of the differentially expressed genes displayed additive expression patterns in the hybrids relative to the inbred parents. The ~20% of genes that display non-additive expression patterns tend to be expressed at levels within the parental range, with minimal evidence for novel expression levels above the high-parent or below the low-parent. Analysis of allele-specific expression patterns in the hybrid suggested that intraspecific variation in gene expression levels is largely attributable to cis-regulatory variation in maize. Collectively, our data suggest that allelic cis-regulatory variation between B73 and Mo17 dictates maintenance of inbred allelic expression levels in the F1 hybrid, resulting in additive expression patterns.
Key Words: allele-specific expression, cis-regulatory variation, gene expression
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
N. Hoecker, B. Keller, N. Muthreich, D. Chollet, P. Descombes, H.-P. Piepho, and F. Hochholdinger Comparison of Maize (Zea mays L.) F1-Hybrid and Parental Inbred Line Primary Root Transcriptomes Suggests Organ-Specific Patterns of Nonadditive Gene Expression and Conserved Expression Trends Genetics, July 1, 2008; 179(3): 1275 - 1283. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A. L. Eveland, D. R. McCarty, and K. E. Koch Transcript Profiling by 3'-Untranslated Region Sequencing Resolves Expression of Gene Families Plant Physiology, January 1, 2008; 146(1): 32 - 44. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
Y. Zhuang and K. L. Adams Extensive Allelic Variation in Gene Expression in Populus F1 Hybrids Genetics, December 1, 2007; 177(4): 1987 - 1996. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
R. Rottscheidt and B. Harr Extensive Additivity of Gene Expression Differentiates Subspecies of the House Mouse Genetics, November 1, 2007; 177(3): 1553 - 1567. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
I. Makarevitch, R. M. Stupar, A. L. Iniguez, W. J. Haun, W. B. Barbazuk, S. M. Kaeppler, and N. M. Springer Natural Variation for Alleles Under Epigenetic Control by the Maize Chromomethylase Zmet2 Genetics, October 1, 2007; 177(2): 749 - 760. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
R. M. Stupar, P. J. Hermanson, and N. M. Springer Nonadditive Expression and Parent-of-Origin Effects Identified by Microarray and Allele-Specific Expression Profiling of Maize Endosperm Plant Physiology, October 1, 2007; 145(2): 411 - 425. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
N. M. Springer and R. M. Stupar Allele-Specific Expression Patterns Reveal Biases and Embryo-Specific Parent-of-Origin Effects in Hybrid Maize PLANT CELL, August 1, 2007; 19(8): 2391 - 2402. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. Gore, P. Bradbury, R. Hogers, M. Kirst, E. Verstege, J. van Oeveren, J. Peleman, E. Buckler, and M. van Eijk Evaluation of Target Preparation Methods for Single-Feature Polymorphism Detection in Large Complex Plant Genomes Crop Sci., July 16, 2007; 47(S2): S-135 - S-148. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
E. Frascaroli, M. A. Cane, P. Landi, G. Pea, L. Gianfranceschi, M. Villa, M. Morgante, and M. E. Pe Classical Genetic and Quantitative Trait Loci Analyses of Heterosis in a Maize Hybrid Between Two Elite Inbred Lines Genetics, May 1, 2007; 176(1): 625 - 644. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
K. McGinnis, N. Murphy, A. R. Carlson, A. Akula, C. Akula, H. Basinger, M. Carlson, P. Hermanson, N. Kovacevic, M. A. McGill, et al. Assessing the Efficiency of RNA Interference for Maize Functional Genomics Plant Physiology, April 1, 2007; 143(4): 1441 - 1451. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
K. L. Adams Evolution of Duplicate Gene Expression in Polyploid and Hybrid Plants J. Hered., March 1, 2007; 98(2): 136 - 141. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
N. M. Springer and R. M. Stupar Allelic variation and heterosis in maize: How do two halves make more than a whole? Genome Res., March 1, 2007; 17(3): 264 - 275. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. A. Udall and J. F. Wendel Polyploidy and Crop Improvement Crop Sci., November 1, 2006; 46(Supplement_1): S-3 - S-14. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||





