- THIS ARTICLE
- Full Text (Rapid PDF)
-
All Versions of this Article:
genetics.106.059808v1
175/2/855 most recent - Alert me when this article is cited
- Alert me if a correction is posted
- SERVICES
- Similar articles in this journal
- Similar articles in PubMed
- Alert me to new issues of the journal
- Download to citation manager
- Reprints & Permissions
- CITING ARTICLES
- Citing Articles via Google Scholar
- GOOGLE SCHOLAR
- Articles by Johannes, F.
- Search for Related Content
- PUBMED
- PubMed Citation
- Articles by Johannes, F.
doi:10.1534/genetics.106.059808
A more recent version of this article appeared on February 1, 2007.
REGULAR RESEARCH PAPERS |
Mapping temporally varying quantitative trait loci in time-to-failure experiments
Frank Johannes 1*
1 The Pennsylvania State University
* To whom correspondence should be addressed. E-mail: fzj100{at}psu.edu.
Submitted on April 21, 2006
Revised on June 28, 2006
Accepted on 6 November 2006
Existing methods for mapping quantitative trait loci (QTL) in time-to-failure experiments assume that the QTL effect is constant over the course of the study. This assumption may be violated when the gene(s) underlying the QTL are up- or down-regulated on a biologically meaningful time-scale. In such situations, models that assume a constant effect can fail to detect QTL in a whole genome scan. To investigate this possibility, we utilize an extension of the Cox model (EC-model) within an interval-mapping framework. In its simplest form, this model assumes that the QTL effect changes at some time point t0, and follows a linear function before and after this change point. The approximate time point at which this change occurs is estimated. Using simulated and real data, we compare the mapping performance of the EC-model to the Cox Proportional Hazards model (CPH-model), which explicitly assumes a constant effect. The results show that the EC- model detects time-dependent QTL, which the CPH model fails to detect. At the same time, the EC-model recovers all of the QTL the CPH-model detects. We conclude that potentially important QTL may be missed if their time-dependent effects are not accounted for.
Key Words: Cox model, QTL, longitudinal, quantitative genetics, survival