Genetics. Published Articles Ahead of Print: February 19, 2006, Copyright © 2006
doi:10.1534/genetics.106.055772


A more recent version of this article appeared on April 1, 2006.


REGULAR RESEARCH PAPERS

Euchromatin and Pericentromeric Heterochromatin: Comparative Composition in the Tomato Genome

1 Cornell University
2 Institute of Genetics and Developmental Biology, Chinese Academy of Sciences

* To whom correspondence should be addressed. E-mail: sdt4{at}cornell.edu.

Submitted on October 18, 2005
Revised on February 6, 2006
Accepted on 6 February 2006


Abstract

Eleven sequenced BACs were annotated and localized via FISH to tomato pachytene chromosomes - providing the first global insights into the compositional differences of euchromatin and pericentromeric heterochromatin in this model dicot species. The results indicate that tomato euchromatin has a gene density (6.7 kb/gene) similar to that of Arabidopsis and rice. Thus, while the euchromatin comprises only 25% of the tomato nuclear DNA, it is sufficient to account for approximate 90% of the estimated 38,000 non-transposon genes that comprise the tomato genome. Moreover, euchromatic BACs were largely devoid of transposons or other repetitive elements. In contrast, BACs assigned to the pericentromeric heterochromatin had a gene density 10-100 times lower than the euchromatin and are heavily populated by retrotransposons preferential to the heterochromatin - the most abundant transposons belonging to the Jinling Ty3/gypsy-like retrotransposon family. Jinling elements are highly methylated and rarely transcribed. Nonetheless, they have spread throughout the pericentromeric heterochromatin in tomato and wild tomato species fairly recently - well after tomato diverged from potato and other related solanaceous species. The implications of these findings on evolution and sequencing the genomes of tomato and other solanaceous species are discussed.

Key Words: Gene content, euchromatin, methylation, pericentromeric heterochromatin, retrotransposon