- THIS ARTICLE
- Full Text (Rapid PDF)
-
All Versions of this Article:
genetics.105.054882v1
173/4/2103 most recent - Alert me when this article is cited
- Alert me if a correction is posted
- SERVICES
- Similar articles in this journal
- Similar articles in PubMed
- Alert me to new issues of the journal
- Download to citation manager
- Reprints & Permissions
- CITING ARTICLES
- Citing Articles via Google Scholar
- GOOGLE SCHOLAR
- Articles by Chadwick, L. H.
- Articles by Willard, H. F
- Search for Related Content
- PUBMED
- PubMed Citation
- Articles by Chadwick, L. H.
- Articles by Willard, H. F
doi:10.1534/genetics.105.054882
A more recent version of this article appeared on August 1, 2006.
REGULAR RESEARCH PAPERS |
Genetic control of X chromosome inactivation in mice: definition of the Xce candidate interval
Lisa Helbling Chadwick 1, Lisa Pertz 1, Karl W. Broman 2, Marisa S Bartolomei 3 and Huntington F Willard 1*
1 Duke University
2 Johns Hopkins University
3 University of Pennsylvania
* To whom correspondence should be addressed. E-mail: willa009{at}imap.duke.edu.
Submitted on December 19, 2005
Revised on February 15, 2006
Accepted on 30 March 2006
In early mammalian development, one of the two X chromosomes is silenced in each female cell as a result of X chromosome inactivation, the mammalian dosage compensation mechanism. In the mouse epiblast, the choice of which chromosome is inactivated is essentially random, but can be biased by alleles at the X-linked X controlling element (Xce). Although this locus was first described nearly four decades ago, the identity and precise genomic localization of Xce remains elusive. Within the X inactivation center region of the X chromosome, previous linkage disequilibrium studies comparing strains of known Xce genotype have suggested that Xce is physically distinct from Xist, although this has not yet been established by genetic mapping or progeny testing. In this report, we used quantitative trait locus (QTL) mapping strategies to define the minimal Xce candidate interval. Subsequent analysis of recombinant chromosomes allowed for the establishment of a maximum 1.85 MB candidate region for the Xce locus. Finally, we use QTL approaches in an effort to identify additional modifiers of X chromosome choice, as we have previously demonstrated that choice in Xce heterozygous females is significantly influenced by genetic variation present on autosomes (CHADWICK and WILLARD 2005). We did not identify any autosomal loci with significant associations and thus show conclusively that Xce is the only major locus to influence X inactivation patterns in the crosses analyzed. This study provides a foundation for future analyses into the genetic control of X chromosome inactivation and defines a 1.85 MB interval encompassing all major elements of the Xce locus.
Key Words: X inactivation, epigenetics