Differential Usage of Alternative Pathways of Double-Strand Break Repair in Drosophila

Double strand DNA breaks can be repaired by any of several alternative mechanisms which differ greatly in the nature of the final repaired products. We used a reporter construct, designated "Repair reporter 3" (Rr3), to measure the relative usage of these pathways in Drosophila germ cells. The method works by creating a double-strand break at a specific location such that expression of the red fluorescent protein, DsRed, in the next generation can be used to infer the frequency at which each pathway was used. A key feature of this approach is that most data come from phenotypic scoring, thus allowing large sample sizes and considerable precision in measurements. Specifically, we measured the proportion of breaks repaired by (1) conversion repair, (2) nonhomologous end-joining (NHEJ) or (3) single-strand annealing (SSA). For conversion repair, the frequency of mitotic crossing over in the germ line indicates the relative prevalence of repair by double-Holliday junction formation versus the synthesis-dependent strand annealing pathway. We used this method to show that breaks occurring early in germ line development were much more frequently repaired via single-strand annealing and much less likely by end joining compared with identical breaks occurring later in development. Conversion repair was relatively rare when breaks were made either very early or very late in development, but much more frequent in between. Significantly, the changes in relative usage occurred in a compensatory fashion, such that an increase in one pathway was accompanied by decreases in others. This negative correlation is interpreted to mean that the pathways for double-strand break repair compete with each other to handle a given breakage event.

Key Words: DNA recombination, DNA repair, Double-strand break, DsRed

This article has been cited by other articles:

				A. Deredec, A. Burt, and H. C. J. Godfray The Population Genetics of Using Homing Endonuclease Genes in Vector and Pest Management Genetics, August 1, 2008; 179(4): 2013 - 2026. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				J. Sudi, S. Zhang, G. Intrieri, X. Hao, and P. Zhang Coincidence of P-Insertion Sites and Breakpoints of Deletions Induced by Activating P Elements in Drosophila Genetics, May 1, 2008; 179(1): 227 - 235. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				J.-H. Chen, C. N. Hales, and S. E. Ozanne DNA damage, cellular senescence and organismal ageing: causal or correlative? Nucleic Acids Res., December 3, 2007; 35(22): 7417 - 7428. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				D. S. Wei and Y. S. Rong A Genetic Screen For DNA Double-Strand Break Repair Mutations in Drosophila Genetics, September 1, 2007; 177(1): 63 - 77. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				V. Shedge, M. Arrieta-Montiel, A. C. Christensen, and S. A. Mackenzie Plant Mitochondrial Recombination Surveillance Requires Unusual RecA and MutS Homologs PLANT CELL, April 1, 2007; 19(4): 1251 - 1264. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				E. A. Moehle, J. M. Rock, Y.-L. Lee, Y. Jouvenot, R. C. DeKelver, P. D. Gregory, F. D. Urnov, and M. C. Holmes Targeted gene addition into a specified location in the human genome using designed zinc finger nucleases PNAS, February 27, 2007; 104(9): 3055 - 3060. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				D. Johnson-Schlitz and W. R. Engels Template disruptions and failure of double Holliday junction dissolution during double-strand break repair in Drosophila BLM mutants PNAS, November 7, 2006; 103(45): 16840 - 16845. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				D. M. Johnson-Schlitz and W. R. Engels The Effect of Gap Length on Double-Strand Break Repair in Drosophila Genetics, August 1, 2006; 173(4): 2033 - 2038. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Online ISS 1091-6490
Copyright 2008 by the Genetics Society of America
phone: 412-268-1812   fax: 412-268-1813   email: genetics-gsa{at}andrew.cmu.edu