- THIS ARTICLE
- Full Text (Rapid PDF)
- Supplemental Data
-
All Versions of this Article:
genetics.105.049973v1
172/2/1093 most recent - Alert me when this article is cited
- Alert me if a correction is posted
- SERVICES
- Similar articles in this journal
- Similar articles in PubMed
- Alert me to new issues of the journal
- Download to citation manager
-
Author home page(s):
John E Pool
- Reprints & Permissions
- CITING ARTICLES
- Citing Articles via HighWire
- Citing Articles via Google Scholar
- GOOGLE SCHOLAR
- Articles by Pool, J. E
- Articles by Aquadro, C. F
- Search for Related Content
- PUBMED
- PubMed Citation
- Articles by Pool, J. E
- Articles by Aquadro, C. F
doi:10.1534/genetics.105.049973
A more recent version of this article appeared on February 1, 2006.
REGULAR RESEARCH PAPERS |
A scan of molecular variation leads to the narrow localization of a selective sweep affecting both Afrotropical and cosmopolitan populations of Drosophila melanogaster
John E Pool 1*, Vanessa Bauer DuMont 1, Jacob L Mueller 1 and Charles F Aquadro 1
1 Cornell University
* To whom correspondence should be addressed. E-mail: jep36{at}cornell.edu.
Submitted on August 23, 2005
Revised on October 30, 2005
Accepted on 10 November 2005
Drosophila melanogaster originated in tropical Africa but has achieved a cosmopolitan distribution in association with human habitation. Cosmopolitan populations of D. melanogaster are known to have reduced genetic variation, particularly on the X chromosome. However, the relative importance of population bottlenecks and selective sweeps in explaining this reduction is uncertain. We surveyed variation at 31 microsatellites across a 330 kilobase section of the X chromosome located between the white and kirre genes. Two linked clusters of loci were observed with reduced variation and a skew toward rare alleles in both an Ecuador and a Zimbabwe population sample. Examining Zimbabwe DNA sequence polymorphism within one of these regions allowed us to localize a selective sweep to a 361 bp window within the 5' regulatory region of the roughest gene, with one nucleotide substitution representing the best candidate for the target of selection. Estimates of sweep age suggested that this fixation event occurred prior to the expansion of D. melanogaster from sub-Saharan Africa. For both putative sweep regions in our data set, cosmpolitan populations showed wider footprints of selection compared to Zimbabwe. This pattern appears consistent with the demographic amplification of pre-existing sweep signals due to one or more population bottlenecks.
Key Words: DNA sequence variability, Drosophila melanogaster, Microsatellite variabililty, Selective sweep, roughest
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
L.-M. Chevin, S. Billiard, and F. Hospital Hitchhiking Both Ways: Effect of Two Interfering Selective Sweeps on Linked Neutral Variation Genetics, September 1, 2008; 180(1): 301 - 316. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
H. S. Makinen, T. Shikano, J. M. Cano, and J. Merila Hitchhiking Mapping Reveals a Candidate Genomic Region for Natural Selection in Three-Spined Stickleback Chromosome VIII Genetics, January 1, 2008; 178(1): 453 - 465. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. D. Jensen, V. L. Bauer DuMont, A. B. Ashmore, A. Gutierrez, and C. F. Aquadro Patterns of Sequence Variability and Divergence at the diminutive Gene Region of Drosophila melanogaster: Complex Patterns Suggest an Ancestral Selective Sweep Genetics, October 1, 2007; 177(2): 1071 - 1085. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
D. J. Orengo and M. Aguade Genome Scans of Variation and Adaptive Change: Extended Analysis of a Candidate Locus Close to the phantom Gene Region in Drosophila melanogaster Mol. Biol. Evol., May 1, 2007; 24(5): 1122 - 1129. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. F. Baines and B. Harr Reduced X-Linked Diversity in Derived Populations of House Mice Genetics, April 1, 2007; 175(4): 1911 - 1921. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
K. R. Thornton and J. D. Jensen Controlling the False-Positive Rate in Multilocus Genome Scans for Selection Genetics, February 1, 2007; 175(2): 737 - 750. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
T. Wiehe, V. Nolte, D. Zivkovic, and C. Schlotterer Identification of Selective Sweeps Using a Dynamically Adjusted Number of Linked Microsatellites Genetics, January 1, 2007; 175(1): 207 - 218. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A. M. Casa, S. E. Mitchell, J. D. Jensen, M. T. Hamblin, A. H. Paterson, C. F. Aquadro, and S. Kresovich Evidence for a Selective Sweep on Chromosome 1 of Cultivated Sorghum Crop Sci., November 1, 2006; 46(Supplement_1): S-27 - S-40. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. E. Pool and C. F. Aquadro History and Structure of Sub-Saharan Populations of Drosophila melanogaster Genetics, October 1, 2006; 174(2): 915 - 929. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
H. Quesada, S. E. Ramos-Onsins, J. Rozas, and M. Aguade Positive Selection Versus Demography: Evolutionary Inferences Based on an Unusual Haplotype Structure in Drosophila simulans Mol. Biol. Evol., September 1, 2006; 23(9): 1643 - 1647. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. T. Hamblin, A. M. Casa, H. Sun, S. C. Murray, A. H. Paterson, C. F. Aquadro, and S. Kresovich Challenges of Detecting Directional Selection After a Bottleneck: Lessons From Sorghum bicolor Genetics, June 1, 2006; 173(2): 953 - 964. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||


