- THIS ARTICLE
- Full Text (Rapid PDF)
-
All Versions of this Article:
genetics.105.047464v1
171/4/1823 most recent - Alert me when this article is cited
- Alert me if a correction is posted
- SERVICES
- Email this article to a friend
- Similar articles in this journal
- Similar articles in PubMed
- Alert me to new issues of the journal
- Download to citation manager
- Reprints & Permissions
- CITING ARTICLES
- Citing Articles via HighWire
- Citing Articles via Google Scholar
- GOOGLE SCHOLAR
- Articles by Cui, W.
- Articles by Hawley, R. S.
- Search for Related Content
- PUBMED
- PubMed Citation
- Articles by Cui, W.
- Articles by Hawley, R. S.
doi:10.1534/genetics.105.047464
A more recent version of this article appeared on December 1, 2005.
REGULAR RESEARCH PAPERS |
The HhH(2)/NDD Domain of the Drosophila Nod Chromokinesin-Like Protein Is Required for Binding to Chromosomes in the Oocyte Nucleus
Wei Cui 1 and R. Scott Hawley 1*
1 Stowers Institute for Medical Research
* To whom correspondence should be addressed. E-mail: rsh{at}stowers-institute.org.
Submitted on June 29, 2005
Revised on August 9, 2005
Accepted on 25 August 2005
Nod is a chromokinesin-like protein that plays a critical role in segregating achiasmate chromosomes during female meiosis. The C-terminal half of the Nod protein contains two putative DNA binding domains. The first of these domains, known as the HMGN domain, consists of three tandemly repeated High Mobility Group-N motifs. This domain was previously shown to be both necessary and sufficient for binding of the C-terminal half of Nod to mitotic chromosomes in embryos. The second putative DNA binding domain, denoted HhH(2)/NDD, is a Helix-hairpin-Helix(2)/Nod-like DNA binding Domain. Although the HhH(2)/NDD domain is not required or sufficient for chromosome binding in embryos, several well-characterized nod mutations have been mapped in this domain. To characterize the role of the HhH(2)/NDD domain in mediating Nod function, we created a series of UAS-driven transgene constructs capable of expressing either a wildtype Nod-GFP fusion protein or proteins in which the HhH(2)/NDD domain had been altered by site-directed mutagenesis. Although wildtype Nod-GFP localizes to the oocyte chromosomes and rescues the segregation defect in nod mutant oocytes, two of three proteins carrying mutants in the HhH(2)/NDD domain fail to either rescue the nod mutant phenotype or to bind to oocyte chromosomes. However, these mutant proteins do bind to the polytene chromosomes in nurse cell nuclei and enter the oocyte nucleus. Thus, even though the HhH(2)/NDD domain is not essential for chromosome binding in other cell types, it is required for chromosome binding in the oocyte. These HhH(2)/NDD mutants also block the localization of Nod to the posterior pole of stage 9-10A oocytes, a process that is thought to facilitate the interaction of Nod with the plus ends of microtubules (Cui et al., 2005). This observation suggests that the Nod HhH2/NDD domain may play other roles in addition to binding Nod to meiotic chromosomes.
Key Words: Nod, chromokinesin, distributive pairing, meiosis
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
D. Li, Q. Kang, and D.-M. Wang Constitutive Coactivator of Peroxisome Proliferator-Activated Receptor (PPAR{gamma}), a Novel Coactivator of PPAR{gamma} that Promotes Adipogenesis Mol. Endocrinol., October 1, 2007; 21(10): 2320 - 2333. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. Pradillo, E. Lopez, C. Romero, E. Sanchez-Moran, N. Cunado, and J. L. Santos An Analysis of Univalent Segregation in Meiotic Mutants of Arabidopsis thaliana: A Possible Role for Synaptonemal Complex Genetics, February 1, 2007; 175(2): 505 - 511. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||

