- THIS ARTICLE
- Full Text (Rapid PDF)
-
All Versions of this Article:
genetics.105.046599v1
172/1/197 most recent - Alert me when this article is cited
- Alert me if a correction is posted
- SERVICES
- Similar articles in this journal
- Similar articles in PubMed
- Alert me to new issues of the journal
- Download to citation manager
-
Author home page(s):
Reinhard Burger
Martin Willensdorfer
Martin A Nowak
- Reprints & Permissions
- CITING ARTICLES
- Citing Articles via HighWire
- Citing Articles via Google Scholar
- GOOGLE SCHOLAR
- Articles by Burger, R.
- Articles by Nowak, M. A
- Search for Related Content
- PUBMED
- PubMed Citation
- Articles by Burger, R.
- Articles by Nowak, M. A
doi:10.1534/genetics.105.046599
A more recent version of this article appeared on January 1, 2006.
REGULAR RESEARCH PAPERS |
Why are phenotypic mutation rates much higher than genotypic mutations rates?
Reinhard Burger 1*, Martin Willensdorfer 2 and Martin A Nowak 2
1 University of Vienna
2 Harvard University
* To whom correspondence should be addressed. E-mail: reinhard.buerger{at}univie.ac.at.
Submitted on June 8, 2005
Revised on July 22, 2005
Accepted on 16 August 2005
The evolution of genotypic mutation rates has been investigated in numerous theoretical and experimental studies. Mutations, however, occur not only when copying DNA, but also when building the phenotype, especially when translating and transcribing DNA to RNA and protein. Here we study the effect of such phenotypic mutations. We find a maximum phenotypic mutation rate, u_max, that is compatible with maintaining a certain function of the organism. This may be called a phenotypic error threshold. In particular, we find a minimum phenotypic mutation rate, u_min, with the property that there is (nearly) no selection pressure to reduce the rate of phenotypic mutations below this value. If there is a cost for lowering the phenotypic mutation rate, then u_min is close to the optimum phenotypic mutation rate which maximizes the fitness of the organism. In our model, selection minimizes the rate of genotypic mutations as far as possible, but the rate of phenotypic mutations only to a certain value. Despite its simplicity, our model can explain part of the huge difference between genotypic and phenotypic mutation rates that is observed in nature. The relevant data are summarized.
Key Words: error threshold, evolution, mutation rate, transcritpion, translation
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
N. Stoletzki and A. Eyre-Walker Synonymous Codon Usage in Escherichia coli: Selection for Translational Accuracy Mol. Biol. Evol., February 1, 2007; 24(2): 374 - 381. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
C. O. Wilke and D. A. Drummond Population Genetics of Translational Robustness Genetics, May 1, 2006; 173(1): 473 - 481. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||

