Widespread Correlations between Dominance and Homozygous Effects of Mutations: Implications for Theories of Dominance

The dominance of deleterious mutations has important consequences for phenomena such as inbreeding depression, the evolution of diploidy, and levels of natural genetic variation. Kacser and Burns' metabolic theory provides a paradigmatic explanation for why most large-effect mutations are recessive. According to the metabolic theory, the recessivity of large-effect mutations is a consequence of a diminishing-returns relationship between flux through a metabolic pathway and enzymatic activity at any step in the pathway, which in turn is an inevitable consequence of long metabolic pathways. A major line of support for this theory was the demonstration of a negative correlation between homozygous effects and dominance of mutations in Drosophila, consistent with a central prediction of the metabolic theory. Using data on gene deletions in yeast, we show that a negative correlation between homozygous effects and dominance of mutations exists for all major categories of genes analyzed, not just those encoding enzymes. The relationship between dominance and homozygous effects is similar for duplicated and single-copy genes, and for genes whose products are members of protein complexes and those that are not. A complete explanation of dominance will therefore require either a generalization of Kacser and Burns' theory to non-enzyme genes, or a new theory.

Key Words: Deleterious mutation, Gene Dosage Balance Hypothesis, Metabolic flux, Saccharomyces cerevisiae

This article has been cited by other articles:

				S. Glemin Mating Systems and the Efficacy of Selection at the Molecular Level Genetics, October 1, 2007; 177(2): 905 - 916. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Online ISS 1091-6490
Copyright 2008 by the Genetics Society of America
phone: 412-268-1812   fax: 412-268-1813   email: genetics-gsa{at}andrew.cmu.edu