- THIS ARTICLE
- Full Text (Rapid PDF)
-
All Versions of this Article:
genetics.104.031666v1
168/4/2395 most recent - Alert me when this article is cited
- Alert me if a correction is posted
- SERVICES
- Email this article to a friend
- Similar articles in this journal
- Similar articles in PubMed
- Alert me to new issues of the journal
- Download to citation manager
- Reprints & Permissions
- CITING ARTICLES
- Citing Articles via Google Scholar
- GOOGLE SCHOLAR
- Articles by Lu, Y.
- Articles by Deng, H.-W.
- Search for Related Content
- PUBMED
- PubMed Citation
- Articles by Lu, Y.
- Articles by Deng, H.-W.
doi:10.1534/genetics.104.031666
A more recent version of this article appeared on December 1, 2004.
Regular Research Papers |
Quantifying the relationship between gene expressions and trait values in general pedigrees
Yan Lu 1, Pengyuan Liu 1, Yongjun Liu 1, Fuhua Xu 1 and Hong-Wen Deng 2*
1 Creighton Univ.
2 Creighton University
* To whom correspondence should be addressed. E-mail: deng{at}creighton.edu.
Submitted on May 25, 2004
Revised on September 8, 2004
Accepted on 8 September 2004
Treating mRNA transcript abundances as quantitative traits and examining their relationships with clinical traits have been pursued by using analytical approach of quantitative genetics. Recently, Kraft et al. presented a family expression association test (FEXAT) for correlation between gene expressions and trait values with a family-based (sibships) design. This statistic did not account for biological relationships of related subjects, which may inflate type I error rate and/or decrease power of statistical tests. In this article, we propose two new test statistics based on a variance-components approach for analyses of microarray data obtained from general pedigrees. Our methods accommodate covariance between relatives for unmeasured genetic effects and directly model covariates of clinical importance. The efficacy and validity of our methods are investigated by using simulated data under different sample sizes, family sizes and family structures. The proposed method LR has correct type I error rate with moderate to large sample sizes regardless of family structure and family sizes. It has higher power with complex pedigrees and similar power to the FEXAT with sibships. The other proposed method FEXAT(R) is favorable with large family sizes, regardless of sample sizes and family structure. Our methods, robust to population stratification, are complementary to the FEXAT in expression-trait association studies.
Key Words: gene expressions, relationship, trait values, variance components