Originally published as Genetics Published Articles Ahead of Print on September 2, 2005.

Genetics, Vol. 171, 1963-1976, December 2005, Copyright © 2005
doi:10.1534/genetics.105.048215

Comprehensive Molecular Cytogenetic Analysis of Sorghum Genome Architecture: Distribution of Euchromatin, Heterochromatin, Genes and Recombination in Comparison to Rice

* Department of Horticultural Sciences, {dagger} Institute for Plant Genomics and Biotechnology and {ddagger} Department of Soil and Crop Sciences, Texas A&M University, College Station, Texas 77843, § USDA-ARS, Southern Plains Agricultural Research Center, College Station, Texas 77845 and ** Department of Biochemistry and Biophysics, Texas A&M University, College Station, Texas 77843

2 Corresponding author: Department of Biochemistry and Biophysics, Texas A&M University, College Station, TX 77843-2128.
E-mail: jmullet{at}tamu.edu

Cytogenetic maps of sorghum chromosomes 3–7, 9, and 10 were constructed on the basis of the fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) of ~18–30 BAC probes mapped across each of these chromosomes. Distal regions of euchromatin and pericentromeric regions of heterochromatin were delimited for all 10 sorghum chromosomes and their DNA content quantified. Euchromatic DNA spans ~50% of the sorghum genome, ranging from ~60% of chromosome 1 (SBI-01) to ~33% of chromosome 7 (SBI-07). This portion of the sorghum genome is predicted to encode ~70% of the sorghum genes (~1 gene model/12.3 kbp), assuming that rice and sorghum encode a similar number of genes. Heterochromatin spans ~411 Mbp of the sorghum genome, a region characterized by a ~34-fold lower rate of recombination and ~3-fold lower gene density compared to euchromatic DNA. The sorghum and rice genomes exhibit a high degree of macrocolinearity; however, the sorghum genome is ~2-fold larger than the rice genome. The distal euchromatic regions of sorghum chromosomes 3–7 and 10 are ~1.8-fold larger overall and exhibit an ~1.5-fold lower average rate of recombination than the colinear regions of the homeologous rice chromosomes. By contrast, the pericentromeric heterochromatic regions of these chromosomes are on average ~3.6-fold larger in sorghum and recombination is suppressed ~15-fold compared to the colinear regions of rice chromosomes.




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Crop Sci.Home page
A. M. Casa, G. Pressoir, P. J. Brown, S. E. Mitchell, W. L. Rooney, M. R. Tuinstra, C. D. Franks, and S. Kresovich
Community Resources and Strategies for Association Mapping in Sorghum
Crop Sci., January 16, 2008; 48(1): 30 - 40.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
GeneticsHome page
F. I. E. Amarillo and H. W. Bass
A Transgenomic Cytogenetic Sorghum (Sorghum propinquum) Bacterial Artificial Chromosome Fluorescence in Situ Hybridization Map of Maize (Zea mays L.) Pachytene Chromosome 9, Evidence for Regions of Genome Hyperexpansion
Genetics, November 1, 2007; 177(3): 1509 - 1526.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
GeneticsHome page
J. King, I. P. Armstead, S. I. Donnison, L. A. Roberts, J. A. Harper, K. Skot, K. Elborough, and I. P. King
Comparative Analyses Between Lolium/Festuca Introgression Lines and Rice Reveal the Major Fraction of Functionally Annotated Gene Models Is Located in Recombination-Poor/Very Recombination-Poor Regions of the Genome
Genetics, September 1, 2007; 177(1): 597 - 606.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
GeneticsHome page
Y. Ji, X. Zhao, A. H. Paterson, H. J. Price, and D. M. Stelly
Integrative Mapping of Gossypium hirsutum L. by Meiotic Fluorescent in Situ Hybridization of a Tandemly Repetitive Sequence (B77)
Genetics, May 1, 2007; 176(1): 115 - 123.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
GeneticsHome page
J. C. Lamb, T. Danilova, M. J. Bauer, J. M. Meyer, J. J. Holland, M. D. Jensen, and J. A. Birchler
Single-Gene Detection and Karyotyping Using Small-Target Fluorescence in Situ Hybridization on Maize Somatic Chromosomes
Genetics, March 1, 2007; 175(3): 1047 - 1058.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J Exp BotHome page
K. Harris, P. Subudhi, A. Borrell, D. Jordan, D. Rosenow, H. Nguyen, P. Klein, R. Klein, and J. Mullet
Sorghum stay-green QTL individually reduce post-flowering drought-induced leaf senescence
J. Exp. Bot., January 1, 2007; 58(2): 327 - 338.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Crop Sci.Home page
A. M. Casa, S. E. Mitchell, J. D. Jensen, M. T. Hamblin, A. H. Paterson, C. F. Aquadro, and S. Kresovich
Evidence for a Selective Sweep on Chromosome 1 of Cultivated Sorghum
Crop Sci., November 1, 2006; 46(Supplement_1): S-27 - S-40.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
GeneticsHome page
M. T. Hamblin, A. M. Casa, H. Sun, S. C. Murray, A. H. Paterson, C. F. Aquadro, and S. Kresovich
Challenges of Detecting Directional Selection After a Bottleneck: Lessons From Sorghum bicolor
Genetics, June 1, 2006; 173(2): 953 - 964.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]