Originally published as Genetics Published Articles Ahead of Print on September 9, 2008.

Genetics, Vol. 180, 835-843, October 2008, Copyright © 2008
doi:10.1534/genetics.108.093492

{gamma}Tub23C Interacts Genetically With Brahma Chromatin-Remodeling Complexes in Drosophila melanogaster

* Departamento de Fisiología Molecular y Genética del Desarrollo, Instituto de Biotecnología, Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México, Cuernavaca, Morelos 62250, México and {dagger} Laboratory of Molecular Genetics, Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Maryland 20892

1 Corresponding author: Departamento de Fisiología Molecular y Genética del Desarrollo, Instituto de Biotecnología, UNAM, Av. Universidad 2001, Cuernavaca, Morelos 62250, México.
E-mail: mvazquez{at}ibt.unam.mx

Manuscript received July 3, 2008. Accepted for publication August 8, 2008.

ABSTRACT

The brahma gene encodes the catalytic subunit of the Drosophila melanogaster BRM chromatin-remodeling complexes. Screening for mutations that interact with brahma, we isolated the dominant-negative Pearl-2 allele of {gamma}Tub23C. {gamma}Tub23C encodes one of the two {gamma}-tubulin isoforms in Drosophila and is essential for zygotic viability and normal adult patterning. {gamma}-Tubulin is a subunit of microtubule organizer complexes. We show that mutations in lethal (1) discs degenerate 4, which encodes the Grip91 subunit of microtubule organizer complexes, suppress the recessive lethality and the imaginal phenotypes caused by {gamma}Tub23C mutations. The genetic interactions between {gamma}Tub23C and chromatin-remodeling mutations suggest that {gamma}-tubulin might have a role in regulating gene expression.


THE trithorax and Polycomb group genes encode positive and negative factors required for the proper function of homeotic genes. KENNISON and TAMKUN (1988) identified brahma (brm) as a trithorax group gene required for the maintenance of homeotic gene expression, but brm also regulates the expression of many developmental regulators and facilitates global transcription from RNA polymerase II (ARMSTRONG et al. 2002). The Brm protein is a SWI2/SNF2 family ATPase and is the catalytic subunit of BRM chromatin-remodeling complexes. These complexes modify nucleosome structure; they can also act to generate Z-DNA structures (reviewed in FLAUS and OWEN-HUGHES 2004).

Drosophila BRM complexes and related mouse and human SWI/SNF complexes have roles in a variety of processes, including cell proliferation, differentiation, viral infection, and cancer (reviewed by ROBERTS and ORKIN 2004). Targeting of the BRM complexes for transcriptional regulation involves contact with members of the basal transcription machinery and gene-specific transcriptional activators (for examples, see SHARMA et al. 2003; ARMSTRONG et al. 2005). To identify proteins that are required for proper function of homeotic genes, we screened for mutations that showed genetic interactions with brm mutations to cause a held-out-wings phenotype. This approach allowed us to isolate mutations in the trithorax group genes osa, tonalli, and taranis (VÁZQUEZ et al. 1999; GUTIÉRREZ et al. 2003). In this work, we describe the characterization of another mutation isolated in this genetic screen, the Pearl-2 allele of {gamma}Tub23C. Some {gamma}Tub23C mutant phenotypes are modified (enhanced or suppressed) by mutations in genes encoding subunits of the BRM complexes and by mutations in Grip91, a {gamma}-tubulin ring complex subunit. These data suggest a role for {gamma}-tubulin in transcription.


MATERIALS AND METHODS

Fly strains:

Flies were raised at 25° on a yeast–sucrose–agar medium with either Nipagin or propionic acid or on a cornmeal–molasses–yeast–agar medium with Tegosept. Unless otherwise noted, all mutations and chromosome aberrations are described in LINDSLEY and ZIMM (1992). Mutant stocks carrying l(1)dd4G0122, l(1)dd42, l(2)23CeA6-2, l(2)23CeA14-9, l(2)23CeA15-2, and {gamma}Tub23Cbmps1 were provided by the Bloomington stock center.

Mutant phenotypes:

The viability (in percentage) of homozygous or heteroallelic combinations of alleles was determined by dividing the observed number of flies by the expected number and multiplying by 100%. The expected numbers were calculated by counting the numbers of progeny in the crosses that received the balancer chromosomes and dividing by half.

Genetic mapping:

The {gamma}Tub23CPl-2 mutant was first mapped meiotically between the visible markers al and dp.

The dd4su(Pl) mutation was first mapped by meiotic recombination using visible markers. Individual recombinant sons from females heterozygous for dd4su(Pl) and a y2 wa ct6 g2 f mutant chromosome were recovered and tested for the survival of {gamma}Tub23Cbmps1/{gamma}Tub23CA6-2 trans-heterozygotes. After the initial mapping, 28 recombinants between ct6 and g2 and 13 recombinants between g2 and f were recovered and tested. None of these recombinants separated the suppressor from g+.

P-induced male recombination mapping of {gamma}Tub23CPl-2:

Females with the P-element insertions shown in Table 1 were crossed with males of the genotype al {gamma}Tub23CPl-2 KrIf/+; TMS, P{ry+t7.2=Delta2-3}99B/+. Sons that were P{X}/al {gamma}Tub23CPl-2 KrIf; TMS/+ were crossed to al dp b pr c px sp females and the progeny scored for recombinants between al and KrIf. Recombinants were recovered and balanced for further testing. To determine which recombinants carried flanking deletions that removed essential genes, each recombinant chromosome was crossed to deletions in 23CD and to known mutants in 23C [lilli, l(2)23Cb, l(2)23Cd, {gamma}Tub23CA6-2, and okra]. Although l(2)23Cb has been renamed l(2)23Dd by FlyBase, our deletion mapping places the gene between Rpb9 and {gamma}Tub23C, consistent with the original mapping to 23C and the original gene name.


View this table:
In this window
In a new window

 
TABLE 1

P-induced male recombination

 

Molecular analyses:

After {gamma}Tub23CPl-2 was mapped between P{EP}Rrp11020 and P{EPgy2}CG9643EY07345, the DNA sequences of the open reading frames of all four predicted genes in the region (CG9641, CG3165, CG9643, and {gamma}Tub23C) were determined from DNA isolated from homozygotes of {gamma}Tub23CPl-2 (and the parental w;red e strain in which it was induced) and of {gamma}Tub23CA6-2 (and the parental cn bw chromosome in which it was induced). As the only nonsynonomous changes found between the two mutants and their parental chromosomes were in the {gamma}Tub23C open reading frame (Figure 2C), we then determined the DNA sequence of {gamma}Tub23C from {gamma}Tub23CA14-9 and {gamma}Tub23CA15-2 homozygotes. Sequencing was done from PCR-amplified genomic fragments. Mutant homozygotes were identified using a GFP-expressing balancer chromosome [CyO, P{w+mC=ActGFP}JMR1].


Figure 2
View larger version (47K):
In this window
In a new window
Download PPT slide
 
FIGURE 2.—

Genetic and molecular characterization of the Pearl region in 23C. (A) Deficiency mapping of the Pearl region. (B) Genomic map of region 23C. Predicted transcriptional units in the region are shown by arrows indicating their transcriptional direction. P-element transposons in the region are indicated by inverted triangles. EP1020 is P{EP}Rrp11020, KG01159 is P{SUPor-P}Rrp1KG01159, and EY07345 is P{EPgy2}CG9643EY07345. The thickest line marks the 7-kbp region where {gamma}Tub23CPl-2 was localized by P-induced male recombination. (C) The amino acid sequences for the two {gamma}-tubulin proteins (labeled 23C and 37C) in Drosophila (WILSON et al. 1997) and the changes found in the {gamma}Tub23C mutant alleles. The arrows indicate the changes in the {gamma}Tub23C mutant alleles. At the top of each arrow are the allele name and the amino acid substitution. The numbered areas indicate peptides with known or presumed functions (taken from BURNS 1995 and references therein): 1 is a peptide implicated in the autoregulation of β-tubulin translation; peptides 2–10 are implicated in the binding or the hydrolysis of GTP by β-tubulin. Peptide 10 is also implicated in the release of {alpha}-, β-, and {gamma}-tubulin from the TCP1{alpha} chaperonine. Note that none of the {gamma}Tub23C mutations are in any of the peptides with known or presumed functions and that all the changed residues in the {gamma}Tub23C mutants are identical in both {gamma}Tub23C and {gamma}Tub37C wild-type genes.

 


RESULTS

The {gamma}Tub23CPl-2 mutation enhances brahma mutants:

Flies heterozygous for some combinations of mutations in trithorax group genes have held-out wings (VÁZQUEZ et al. 1999). On the basis of this phenotype we isolated several dominant enhancers of brm, including alleles of the trithorax group genes osa (osa), tonalli (tna), and taranis (tara) (VÁZQUEZ et al. 1999; GUTIÉRREZ et al. 2003). From that same genetic screen, we also isolated the {gamma}Tub23CPl-2 mutation. In addition to its dominant enhancement of brm (Table 2 and Figure 1C), {gamma}Tub23CPl-2 has additional dominant phenotypes in the wing blade (Figure 1B), including pearl-like structures [predominantly in the second (L2) and/or third (L3) wing vein(s)], blisters in the wing blade, and notches or gaps in the ventral and dorsal margins in one or both wings (Figure 1B). {gamma}Tub23CPl-2 heterozygotes also have small round eyes. We mapped {gamma}Tub23CPl-2 to the same chromosomal region as Pearl (Pl) (ROSIN 1951, 1952), a dominant mutation that had the same unique combination of phenotypes. The original Pl mutant is no longer extant. We originally called our mutation Pl2, but since it is allelic to {gamma}Tub23C (see below), we have renamed it {gamma}Tub23CPl-2.


View this table:
In this window
In a new window

 
TABLE 2

{gamma}Tub23CPl-2 interactions with general transcription machinery and trithorax-group mutants

 

Figure 1
View larger version (65K):
In this window
In a new window
Download PPT slide
 
FIGURE 1.—

{gamma}Tub23CPl-2-dependent phenotypes. (A) Wild-type fly with the wings held back parallel to the body axis. (B) {gamma}Tub23CPl-2/+ flies; note the notches and the pearl-like structures in the wings (indicated by arrows, one of them pointing to the area shown in the inset). (C) {gamma}Tub23CPl-2/+; brm2/+ (shown in C) and {gamma}Tub23CPl-2/+; osa1/+ double heterozygous flies have held-out wings in addition to the wing notches and pearl-like structures. (D) {gamma}Tub23CPl-2/+; brm2/osa1 triple heterozygous fly with twisted wings (in addition to held-out and notched wings with pearl-like structures). (E) Wild-type wing from Oregon-R stock. (F) Wing from {gamma}Tub23CPl-2/+; osa1/+ double heterozygous fly. The arrow indicates a pearl-like structure along the third wing vein shown in the inset (G).

 

Mapping of {gamma}Tub23CPl-2:

We first mapped {gamma}Tub23CPl-2 by meiotic recombination and then by complementation with available chromosome deletions to polytene chromosome subdivisions 23CD (Figure 2A). We next used the P-element insertion lines in the 23CD region to map {gamma}Tub23CPl-2 by P-induced male recombination (CHEN et al. 1998). Of 63 recombinants recovered, all except 1 appear to have resulted from recombination at the P-element insertion site. These 62 recombinants all place {gamma}Tub23CPl-2 in the 7-kbp region between P{EP}Rrp11020 and P{EPgy2} CG9643EY07345 (Figure 2B). Inverse PCR with recombinants that still retained the P insertion and genetic complementation with mutants in the region were both used to identify recombinants with flanking deletions and duplications in the 23BD region. The flanking deletions were useful for determining the order of the essential genes in the region. One of the flanking deletions recovered by P-induced male recombination from P{EPgy2}CG9643EY07345 is Df(2L)3G, which behaves as a deletion of {gamma}Tub23CPl-2 (Table 3), but does not delete any of the other essential genes in 23C that have been identified [lilli, Rpb9, or l(2)23Cb].


View this table:
In this window
In a new window

 
TABLE 3

Survival to eclosion (%) of {gamma}Tub23C mutant trans-heterozygotes with dd4+ or dd4su(Pl)

 

l(2)23Ce is allelic to {gamma}Tub23CPl-2:

We mapped all of the phenotypes associated with {gamma}Tub23CPl-2 (the held-out-wings phenotype in the presence of brm alleles and the dominant phenotypes in the wing blade) to polytene chromosome band 23CD. We then tested mutants previously mapped to 23CD. We found that all alleles of l(2)23Ce that we tested [l(2)23CeA6-2, l(2)23CeA14-9, and l(2)23CeA15-2] failed to complement {gamma}Tub23CPl-2 for viability (Table 3). We have renamed the l(2)23Ce alleles as {gamma}Tub23C A6-2, {gamma}Tub23CA14-9, and {gamma}Tub23CA15-2. When trans-heterozygous to other alleles, {gamma}Tub23CA15-2 is similar to the two deficiencies tested [Df(2L)JS17 and Df(2L)3G] and is probably a null allele. The {gamma}Tub23CA14-9 allele behaves as a hypomorph, often eclosing when heterozygous to the deficiencies and most other alleles. All of the eclosing mutant flies (regardless of which combination of alleles) have the same phenotypes observed for {gamma}Tub23CPl-2 heterozygotes (small round eyes and held-out and blistered wings with pearl-like structures), but with far fewer notches in the wing margins. While flies hemizygous for {gamma}Tub23CA14-9 eclosed at 70–83% of the expected numbers, no {gamma}Tub23CA14-9/{gamma}Tub23CPl-2 flies eclosed. {gamma}Tub23CPl-2 is an antimorphic, or dominant-negative, allele and the phenotypes observed in {gamma}Tub23CPl-2 heterozygotes are loss-of-function phenotypes for {gamma}Tub23C caused by interference of the {gamma}Tub23CPl-2 mutant protein with the wild-type {gamma}Tub23C protein. Consistent with this interpretation is the suppression of the dominant phenotypes of {gamma}Tub23CPl-2 by an additional wild-type copy of {gamma}Tub23C [observed with both Dp(2;1)JS13 and with tandem duplications recovered from the P-induced male recombination]. These tests allowed us to establish a {gamma}Tub23C allelic series in order of decreasing activity: {gamma}Tub23CA14-9>{gamma}Tub23CA6-2>{gamma}Tub23CA15-2=Df(2L)JS17=Df(2L)3G>{gamma}Tub23CPl-2.

Molecular characterizations:

We mapped the {gamma}Tub23CPl-2 mutation to a 7-kbp genomic region that includes four predicted genes, {gamma}Tub23C, CG9641, CG3165, and CG9643 (Figure 2B). Our analyses showed changes in the {gamma}Tub23C open reading frame for all four alleles that we sequenced (Figure 2C). The {gamma}Tub23C gene encodes a protein of 475 residues. The {gamma}Tub23CA15-2 mutation changes tryptophan 104 to a stop codon, predicting the formation of a truncated protein. This is in agreement with our complementation analyses that suggested that {gamma}Tub23CA15-2 behaves as a null mutation. {gamma}Tub23CA14-9 changes arginine 217 to histidine (R217H), {gamma}Tub23CA6-2 changes serine 233 to phenylalanine (S233F), and {gamma}Tub23CPl-2 changes methionine 382 to isoleucine (M382I).

Differential suppression of {gamma}Tub23C lethality by an X-linked suppressor:

Subsequent to our molecular analyses, we obtained the {gamma}Tub23Cbmps1 mutant (MAHONEY et al. 2006). While both {gamma}Tub23Cbmps1 and {gamma}Tub23CPl-2 change the same methionine to isoleucine (M382I), the description of {gamma}Tub23Cbmps1 differed from our observations for {gamma}Tub23CPl-2 in two important aspects. The first difference was the much lower penetrance of the dominant phenotypes for {gamma}Tub23Cbmps1. The second important difference was the eclosion of many {gamma}Tub23Cbmps1 hemizygotes. We observed these same differences when we began experiments with {gamma}Tub23Cbmps1, but noted striking differences in the results of the reciprocal crosses with the {gamma}Tub23Cbmps1 mutant flies. For example, when {gamma}Tub23CA6-2 heterozygous females were mated to {gamma}Tub23Cbmps1 heterozygous males, no {gamma}Tub23Cbmps1/{gamma}Tub23CA6-2 mutant progeny eclosed. In the reciprocal cross in which {gamma}Tub23Cbmps1 heterozygous females were mated to {gamma}Tub23CA6-2 heterozygous males, 73% of the expected {gamma}Tub23Cbmps1/{gamma}Tub23CA6-2 sons eclosed (Tables 3 and 4), while <2% of the expected {gamma}Tub23Cbmps1/{gamma}Tub23CA6-2 daughters eclosed (Table 4). The eclosion of mutant sons only when the mothers were from the {gamma}Tub23Cbmps1 stock suggested the presence of an X-linked suppressor in this stock. We replaced the X chromosome in the {gamma}Tub23Cbmps1 stock with an X chromosome marked with w1 and repeated the crosses. The penetrance of the dominant phenotypes in {gamma}Tub23Cbmps1 heterozygotes was much greater and the differential eclosion of mutant sons in reciprocal crosses disappeared. When we replaced the X chromosomes in the other {gamma}Tub23C mutant and deficiency stocks with the X chromosome from the original {gamma}Tub23Cbmps1 stock, we found that more mutant flies eclosed. The {gamma}Tub23Cbmps1 stock contains a recessive X-linked suppressor that we named l(1)dd4su(Pl) [see the following section for a discussion of the allelism to l(1)dd4]. We will refer to the suppressor as dd4su(Pl) for the remainder of this work. The survival of {gamma}Tub23C mutant genotypes with the suppressor [dd4su(Pl)] and without [dd4+] are given in Table 3.


View this table:
In this window
In a new window

 
TABLE 4

Suppression of {gamma}Tub23Cbmps1/{gamma}Tub23CA6-2 lethality by dd4 mutations

 
While most heteroallelic {gamma}Tub23C combinations were lethal, dd4su(Pl) rescued some genotypes to eclosion (Table 3). On the basis of the ability to be rescued by dd4su(Pl), we separated heteroallelic {gamma}Tub23C combinations into two classes (class I and class II, Table 3). For example, for the class I genotype {gamma}Tub23Cbmps1/{gamma}Tub23CA6-2, no flies eclosed when they were dd4+ but 73% eclosed when they were dd4su(Pl). The same effect was observed for {gamma}Tub23CPl-2/{gamma}Tub23CA6-2 and {gamma}Tub23CA14-9/{gamma}Tub23CA15-2 flies, where 6 and 25% eclosed, respectively, with dd4+, but 74 and 94% eclosed, respectively, with dd4su(Pl). For class II genotypes, there were almost no differences in the eclosion rates between dd4+ and dd4su(Pl).

The class I genotypes include one, and only one, of the following alleles: {gamma}Tub23CA14-9, {gamma}Tub23CPl-2, and {gamma}Tub23Cbmps1. Genotypes that do not include one of these three suppressible alleles (or which include two of the suppressible alleles) are class II. The failure of suppression in flies with two suppressible alleles is interesting. For example, dd4+ flies heterozygous for one of the suppressible alleles, {gamma}Tub23CPl-2 or {gamma}Tub23Cbmps1, do not eclose when also heterozygous for a deficiency or for the weak hypomorphic allele {gamma}Tub23CA14-9. The dd4su(Pl) flies that are heterozygous for {gamma}Tub23CPl-2 or {gamma}Tub23Cbmps1, however, eclose at 16–24% of the expected frequencies if also heterozygous for one of the deficiencies, but at only 1–2% of the expected frequency if also heterozygous for the hypomorphic (and suppressible) {gamma}Tub23CA14-9 allele.

The X-linked suppressor of {gamma}Tub23C lethality is in the gene encoding the Grip91 {gamma}-tubulin-interacting protein:

We used meiotic recombination to map the X-linked suppressor in the {gamma}Tub23Cbmps1 stock to a region that includes the garnet gene. Because we recovered no recombinants between the suppressor and garnet in our mapping experiments, the suppressor is very close to garnet. The gene next to garnet in the genome is lethal (1) discs degenerate 4 [l(1)dd4], which we refer to as dd4. dd4 encodes the Grip91 protein, a subunit of the {gamma}-tubulin {gamma}TuSC and {gamma}TuRC complexes (BARBOSA et al. 2000). Some dd4 mutant alleles cause zygotic lethality, while flies with other mutant alleles survive in dry media and have held-up wings, absence of some bristles, defects in abdominal segments, and male sterility (BARBOSA et al. 2000). Although the suppressor had no mutant phenotype in either sex, we decided to test for allelism to dd4 because of the biochemical data. We used two lethal alleles, dd42 and dd4G0122, and the test genotype {gamma}Tub23Cbmps1/{gamma}Tub23CA6-2 (see Table 4). Rescue of {gamma}Tub23Cbmps1/{gamma}Tub23CA6-2 lethality by the suppressor is almost completely recessive (only 2% of the expected flies eclosed if heterozygous for the suppressor, while 77% survived if homozygous for the suppressor). Both lethal alleles of dd4 (dd42 and dd4G0122) complemented the suppressor [dd4su(Pl)] for viability, with the mutant females eclosing at the expected numbers. However, neither of the lethal alleles complemented dd4su(Pl) for the suppression of {gamma}Tub23Cbmps1/{gamma}Tub23CA6-2 lethality; i.e., both lethal alleles of dd4 also suppressed the {gamma}Tub23C lethality. We conclude that the suppressor dd4su(Pl) is an allele of dd4. The suppression is a loss-of-function phenotype, but the suppressor must retain some functions necessary for zygotic viability and fertility.

{gamma}Tub23CPl-2 genetically interacts with BRM complex mutations and with tna and tara:

{gamma}Tub23CPl-2 was isolated because it interacts with brm2 to cause a held-out wings phenotype (Table 2). Since several trithorax group mutants were isolated in this same genetic screen, we tested {gamma}Tub23CPl-2 for genetic interactions with a collection of trithorax group mutants and with mutants in some general transcription factors. From the general transcription factors, we chose to test Taf1, Taf4, and Taf6 and the Mediator complex subunits Med12 and Med13 encoded by the trithorax-group genes kohtalo (kto) and skuld (skd), respectively. We tested mutants in subunits of nucleosome-remodeling or histone-modification complexes, including brm, mor, snr1, osa, kismet, ash1, ash2, and trithorax. We also tested the trithorax group genes Trithorax-like (Trl), tna, tara, verthandi (vtd), sallimus (sls), devenir (dev), Vha55, and urdur (urd). The mutations tested and the results are summarized in Table 2. We found that only alleles of brm, osa, and tna showed strong genetic interactions with {gamma}Tub23CPl-2 to cause the held-out wings phenotype. The genetic interactions between osa1 and {gamma}Tub23CPl-2 (Table 2 and Figure 1, F and G) are even stronger than the genetic interactions between brm2 and {gamma}Tub23CPl-2 (Table 2 and Figure 1C). Flies heterozygous for all three mutations ({gamma}Tub23CPl-2, brm2, and osa1) have poor survival and twisted and blistered wings even more severe than the phenotypes of the {gamma}Tub23CPl-2/+; osa1/+ double heterozygotes (Figure 1, C and D). Other mutations that showed weaker but significant interactions with {gamma}Tub23CPl-2 included brm1, osa2, mor1, mor2, mor6, tna1, tara2, and tara20 (Table 2). We did not find significant interactions with any of the other mutations tested. We considered the possibility that the interactions between the BRM complex mutations and {gamma}Tub23CPl-2 could be explained by reduced transcription of {gamma}Tub23C. If heterozygous brm mutants have reduced transcription of {gamma}Tub23C, then all loss-of-function {gamma}Tub23C phenotypes should be enhanced in all mutant genotypes. To test this prediction, we chose several combinations of hypomorphic {gamma}Tub23C alleles to examine in brm2 heterozygotes. CyO/{gamma}Tub23CA14-9;TM6C/brm2 females were crossed to males with mutations or deletions of {gamma}Tub23C. A reduction in transcription would be expected to reduce viability and enhance all of the {gamma}Tub23C mutant phenotypes in progeny that receive the brm2 mutant when compared to their TM6C siblings. While {gamma}Tub23CA14-9/{gamma}Tub23CA6-2, {gamma}Tub23CA14-9/{gamma}Tub23CA15-2, and {gamma}Tub23CA14-9/ Df(2L)3G trans-heterozygous flies all have reduced viability, the viability was not further reduced in brm2 heterozygous flies. As expected, the held-out wings phenotype of {gamma}Tub23CA14-9/Df(2L)3G flies was enhanced in brm2 heterozygotes, but the expressivity of pearl-like structures in the wings was not enhanced. Finally, we examined interactions among brm2, dd4su(Pl), and {gamma}Tub23C. The rescue of {gamma}Tub23CPl-2/{gamma}Tub23CA6-2 by dd4su(Pl) was reduced by about half in brm2 heterozygotes. The enhancement of the held-out-wings phenotype in {gamma}Tub23CPl-2/+; brm2/+ double heterozygotes was reduced from 76 to 14% in dd4su(Pl) males.


DISCUSSION
Proteins identified as part of the eukaryotic cytoskeleton may have more direct roles in transcriptional regulation than originally thought (reviewed in OLAVE et al. 2002). Actin and actin-related proteins (ARPs) are found in BRM complexes from yeast to humans, including the BRM complexes in Drosophila (PAPOULAS et al. 1998). The function of actin and ARPs in these complexes is not well understood. Some ARPs interact with DNA-bending proteins and with histones and it was proposed that they facilitate chromatin architecture and interactions between complexes or function as histone chaperones (SHEN et al. 2003; SZERLONG et al. 2003). Actin is also part of preinitiation complexes and is necessary for transcription by RNA polymerases I, II, and III (HOFMANN et al. 2004; HU et al. 2004; PHILIMONENKO et al. 2004). The {alpha}- and/or β-tubulins are also found with a subset of trithorax-group proteins in the mammalian ASCOM complex (Activating signal cointegrator 2, Asc2 complex), which is required for transactivation by nuclear receptors (GOO et al. 2003; LEE et al. 2006), and in a histone H2A deubiquitinase complex (ZHU et al. 2007). {gamma}-Tubulin is essential for microtubule function, but unlike {alpha}- and β-tubulin, it is not a component of microtubules. Rather, it is located at microtubule-organizing centers (MTOCs) and functions in the initiation of microtubule nucleation and in the establishment of microtubule polarity (OAKLEY 1992; LUDERS and STEARNS 2007). {gamma}-Tubulin contributes to the proper formation of mitotic spindles and cytoplasmic microtubular arrays. There are critical cytoskeletal and nuclear envelope connections, linking, for example, MTOCs to the nuclear lamina (reviewed in TADDEI et al. 2004). In addtion, {gamma}-tubulin has been proposed to have microtubule- and/or centrosome-independent function(s) in mitosis (PRIGOZHINA et al. 2004) or spindle assembly checkpoints (MULLER et al. 2006).

Drosophila embryonic {gamma}-tubulin exists in two related complexes: a large complex similar to the Xenopus {gamma}TuRC ({gamma}-tubulin ring complex) (36.9S, ~2000 kDa) and a small soluble complex called {gamma}TuSC ({gamma}-tubulin small complex) (8.5S ~240 kDa) (OEGEMA et al. 1999). The Drosophila {gamma}TuRC consists of approximately eight polypeptides, including {gamma}-tubulin, Grip163, Grip128, Grip91, Grip84, Grip75, and GP71WD (OEGEMA et al. 1999; GUNAWARDANE et al. 2000, 2003). The {gamma}TuRC has a lockwasher-like structure and a cap at one of the ends of the complex. The Drosophila {gamma}TuSC is a tetramer of two {gamma}-tubulin molecules and one molecule each of Grip91 and Grip84. Several {gamma}TuSCs form the {gamma}TuRC lockwasher region. The other Grips (Grip163, 128, and 75) form the cap (MORITZ et al. 2000).

Drosophila is the only metazoan in which the genes encoding subunits of the {gamma}TuSC and {gamma}TuRC complexes have been functionally studied using genetic approaches (for recent examples, see BARBOSA et al. 2003; GUNAWARDANE et al. 2003; COLOMBIÉ et al. 2006; VOGT et al. 2006). Null mutations in dd4 (which encodes Grip91) and in Grip84 are lethal and display defects in spindle assembly (BARBOSA et al. 2003; COLOMBIÉ et al. 2006), while null mutations in Grip128 and Grip75 are viable, but sterile (SCHNORRER et al. 2002; VOGT et al. 2006).

In Drosophila there are two {gamma}-tubulin genes, {gamma}Tub23C and {gamma}Tub37C. They encode very similar (but not identical) proteins, but they have different expression patterns and mutant phenotypes. {gamma}Tub37C is largely restricted to the female germline and early stages of embryogenesis. It is required for bicoid (bcd) mRNA localization at mid-oogenesis (SCHNORRER et al. 2002), female meiosis, and nuclear proliferation (TAVOSANIS et al. 1997; WILSON et al. 1997). In syncytial embryos, {gamma}Tub23C is in the soluble small {gamma}TuSC fraction (RAYNAUD-MESSINA et al. 2001) and is absent at the centrosome (WILSON et al. 1997). At this stage, {gamma}Tub37C is found in both {gamma}TuSC and {gamma}TuRC fractions (RAYNAUD-MESSINA et al. 2001). It is localized at the centrosome (TAVOSANIS et al. 1997; WILSON et al. 1997) and over the spindle regions (TAVOSANIS et al. 1997). {gamma}Tub37C mutants are female sterile (TAVOSANIS et al. 1997; TAVOSANIS and GONZÁLEZ 2003).

The {gamma}Tub23C isoform is expressed in a variety of tissues in both sexes (WILSON et al. 1997), including larval brains and imaginal discs, and it is required for somatic mitotic divisions. It is also expressed in ovaries and is the only isoform expressed in testes. {gamma}Tub23C is required for meiosis in males and for spermatogenesis (SAMPAIO et al. 2001).

{gamma}Tub23C is essential for zygotic viability and for development of imaginal tissues:

We isolated the {gamma}Tub23CPl-2 mutation in a mutant screen designed to identify genes that interact with brm in wing development. In addition to showing genetic interactions with brm, {gamma}Tub23CPl-2 mutants are homozygous lethal, while the heterozygotes have defects in imaginal eye and wing development. We showed that {gamma}Tub23CPl-2 is a dominant-negative mutation and that l(2)23Ce alleles are loss-of-function mutations in {gamma}Tub23C with recessive phenotypes similar to the dominant phenotypes of {gamma}Tub23CPl-2. {gamma}Tub23C has 30% identity to {alpha}- and β-tubulins, which are structural components of microtubules. It is known which parts of the β-tubulin protein are involved in autoregulation for translation and for binding and hydrolysis of GTP. The {gamma}-tubulin protein shares some of these regions with β-tubulin. The {gamma}Tub23C mutations characterized in this work do not map to any of these known regions, with the exception of the truncated form in the {gamma}Tub23CA15-2 allele (Figure 2C). This suggests that the proteins synthesized from the {gamma}Tub23CA14-9, {gamma}Tub23CA6-2, {gamma}Tub23CPl-2, and {gamma}Tub23Cbmps1 alleles might affect other {gamma}-tubulin functions (see below).

We were surprised during the course of this work to identify a dd4 allele with no discernible phenotype except the suppression of some {gamma}Tub23C mutant phenotypes (including zygotic lethality). Since dd4 encodes Grip91, a protein that physically interacts with {gamma}-tubulin, we believe that the genetic interactions have important implications.

Implications of the genetic interactions between {gamma}Tub23C and dd4 (Grip91) mutations on current structural models of {gamma}TuRC and {gamma}TuSC complexes:

Grip91, Grip84, and {gamma}-tubulin form the lockwasher region of {gamma}TuRC and {gamma}TuSC complexes (MORITZ et al. 2000). Grip91 and Grip84 (or their orthologs in yeast and humans) interact with each other and with {gamma}-tubulin (MORITZ et al. 2000; ALDAZ et al. 2005; WIESE 2008). The interactions between Grip91 and {gamma}-tubulin facilitate binding of GTP to {gamma}-tubulin (GUNAWARDANE et al. 2003). Grip91 is required for correct bipolar spindle assembly during mitosis and male meiosis and it helps to locate {gamma}-tubulin to the centrosome (BARBOSA et al. 2000, 2003).

Grip91 is an essential protein encoded by the dd4 gene (BARBOSA et al. 2000, 2003). Semilethal alleles have held-up wings and other imaginal defects and are male sterile (BARBOSA et al. 2000, 2003). The dd4su(Pl) allele that we identified is unusual in that it has no defects in viability, fertility, or developmental patterning. Its only phenotype is the suppression of class I (but not class II) genotypes of {gamma}Tub23C.

What is the significance of the two types of {gamma}Tub23C alleles from the functional point of view? The defects produced by suppressible alleles may involve {gamma}TuSC and/or {gamma}TuRC functions, while the defects produced by nonsuppressible alleles may involve {gamma}Tub23C functions independent of the {gamma}TuSC and {gamma}TuRC complexes. It is also possible that different mutant proteins, although in some cases retaining partial activity, may affect other different functions of {gamma}Tub23C. Some of these other functions may require Grip91 (and possibly the integrity of {gamma}TuRC and/or {gamma}TuSC complexes) and some may not. Such functions could affect the assembly of the {gamma}TuSC and/or {gamma}TuRC complexes, the transport of the complex(es) to subcellular compartments, and/or the relationships of {gamma}Tub23C with other proteins involved in microtubule-independent processes. We believe that the new alleles of {gamma}Tub23C and dd4 that we have characterized can help to test the current structural models of {gamma}TuRC and {gamma}TuSC complexes proposed in biochemical and crystallographic studies (ERICKSON 2000; MORITZ et al. 2000).

Recent work shows that {gamma}-tubulin has a microtubule-independent role in establishing or maintaining a mitotic checkpoint block (PRIGOZHINA et al. 2004) and that {gamma}TuRCs proteins may have a centrosome-independent role in the spindle assembly checkpoint. For this latter function, {gamma}-tubulin is probably in a complex associated with Cdc20 and BubR1 kinases (MULLER et al. 2006). We have found that the genetic interactions between {gamma}Tub23C and Brm are caused not by reduced {gamma}Tub23C transcription, but more probably by the presence of defective {gamma}-tubulin proteins. This suggests roles for {gamma}-tubulin in transcription and/or chromatin remodeling. This is further supported by the recent description of interactions between Pericentrin (an integral centrosomal component) and CHD3, a Brm-related protein in the NuRD chromatin-remodeling complex (SILLIBOURNE et al. 2007).


ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS
This work was supported by grants from the Consejo Nacional de Ciencia y Technológia (M.V.), the Programa de Apoyo a Proyectos de Investigación e Innovación Tecnológica–Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México (M.V. and M.Z.), and the Howard Hughes Medical Institute (M.Z.). This research was supported in part by the Intramural Research Program of the National Institute of Child Health and Human Development of the National Institutes of Health.


LITERATURE CITED

ALDAZ, H., L. M. RICE, T. STEARNS and D. A. AGARD, 2005 Insights into microtubule nucleation from the crystal structure of human {gamma}-tubulin. Nature 435: 523–527.[CrossRef][Medline]

ARMSTRONG, J. A., O. PAPOULAS, G. DAUBRESSE, A. S. SPERLING, J. T. LIS et al., 2002 The Drosophila BRM complex facilitates global transcription by RNA polymerase II. EMBO J. 21: 5245–5254.[CrossRef][Medline]

ARMSTRONG, J. A., A. S. SPERLING, R. DEURING, L. MANNING, S. L. MOSELEY et al., 2005 Genetic screens for enhancers of brahma reveal functional interactions between the BRM chromatin-remodeling complex and the Delta-Notch signal transduction pathway in Drosophila. Genetics 170: 1761–1774.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

BARBOSA, V., R. R. YAMAMOTO, D. S. HENDERSON and D. GLOVER, 2000 Mutation of a Drosophila {gamma}-tubulin ring complex subunit encoded by discs degenerate-4 differentially disrupts centrosomal protein localization. Genes Dev. 14: 3126–3139.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

BARBOSA, V., M. GATT, E. REBOLLO, C. GONZÁLEZ and D. GLOVER, 2003 Drosophila dd4 mutants reveal that {gamma}TuRC is required to maintain juxtaposed half spindles in spermatocytes. J. Cell Sci. 116: 929–941.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

BURNS, R. G., 1995 Analysis of the {gamma}-tubulin sequences: implications for the functional properties of {gamma}-tubulin. J. Cell Sci. 108: 2123–2130.[Medline]

CHEN, B., T. CHU, E. HARMS, J. P. GERGEN and S. STRICKLAND, 1998 Mapping of Drosophila mutations using site-specific male recombination. Genetics 149: 157–163.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

COLOMBIÉ, N., C. VÉROLLET, P. SAMPAIO, A. MOISAND, C. E. SUNKEL et al., 2006 The Drosophila {gamma}-tubulin small complex subunit Dgrip84 is required for structural and functional integrity of the spindle apparatus. Mol. Biol. Cell 17: 272–282.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

ERICKSON, H. P., 2000 {gamma}-Tubulin nucleation: Template or protofilament? Nat. Cell Biol. 2: E93–E96.[CrossRef][Medline]

FLAUS, A., and T. OWEN-HUGHES, 2004 Mechanisms for ATP-dependent chromatin remodelling: Farewell to the tuna-can octamer? Curr. Opin. Genet. Dev. 14: 165–173.[CrossRef][Medline]

GOO, Y. H., Y. C. SOHN, D. H. KIM, S. W. KIM, M. J. KANG et al., 2003 Activating signal cointegrator 2 belongs to a novel steady-state complex that contains a subset of trithorax group proteins. Mol. Cell. Biol. 23: 140–149.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

GUNAWARDANE, R. N., O. C. MARTIN, K. CAO, L. ZHANG, K. DEJ et al., 2000 Characterization and reconstitution of Drosophila {gamma}-tubulin ring complex subunits. J. Cell Biol. 151: 1513–1523.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

GUNAWARDANE, R. N., O. C. MARTIN and Y. ZHENG, 2003 Characterization of a new {gamma}TuRC subunit with WD repeats. Mol. Biol. Cell 14: 1017–1026.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

GUTIÉRREZ, L., M. ZURITA, J. A. KENNISON and M. VÁZQUEZ, 2003 The Drosophila trithorax group gene tonalli (tna) interacts genetically with the Brahma remodeling complex and encodes an SP-RING finger protein. Development 130: 343–354.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

HOFMANN, W. A., L. STOJILJKOVIC, B. FUCHSOVA, G. M. VARGAS, E. MAVROMMATIS et al., 2004 Actin is part of pre-initiation complexes and is necessary for transcription by RNA polymerase II. Nat. Cell Biol. 6: 1094–1101.[CrossRef][Medline]

HU, P., S. WU and N. HERNÁNDEZ, 2004 A role for β-actin in RNA polymerase III transcription. Genes Dev. 18: 3010–3015.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

KENNISON, J. A., and J. W. TAMKUN, 1988 Dosage-dependent modifiers of Polycomb and Antennapedia mutations in Drosophila. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 85: 8136–8140.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

LEE, S., D. K. LEE, Y. DOU, J. LEE, B. LEE et al., 2006 Coactivator as a target gene specificity determinant for histone H3 lysine 4 methyltransferases. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 103: 15392–15397.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

LINDSLEY, D. L., and G. G. ZIMM, 1992 The Genome of Drosophila melanogaster. Academic Press, San Diego.

LUDERS, J., and T. STEARNS, 2007 Microtubule-organizing centers: a re-evaluation. Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell Biol. 8: 161–167.[CrossRef][Medline]

MAHONEY, M. B., A. L. PARKS, D. A. RUDDY, S. Y. K. TIONG, H. ESENGIL et al., 2006 Presenilin-based genetic screens in Drosophila melanogaster identify novel Notch pathway modifiers. Genetics 172: 2309–2324.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

MORITZ, M., M. B. BRAUNFELD, V. GUÉNEBAUT, J. HEUSER and D. A. AGARD, 2000 Structure of the {gamma}-tubulin ring complex: a template for microtubule nucleation. Nat. Cell Biol. 2: 365–370.[CrossRef][Medline]

MULLER, H., M. L. FOGERON, V. LEHMANN, H. LEHRACH and B. M. H. LANGE, 2006 A centrosome-independent role for {gamma}-TuRC proteins in the spindle assembly checkpoint. Science 314: 654–657.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

OAKLEY, B. R., 1992 {gamma}-tubulin: The microtubule organizer? Trends Cell Biol. 2: 1–5.[CrossRef][Medline]

OEGEMA, K., C. WIESE, O. C. MARTIN, R. A. MILLIGAN, A. IWAMATSU et al., 1999 Characterization of two related Drosophila {gamma}-tubulin complexes that differ in their ability to nucleate microtubules. J. Cell Biol. 144: 721–733.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

OLAVE, I. A., G. R. RECK-PETERSON and G. R. CRABTREE, 2002 Nuclear actin and actin-related proteins in chromatin remodeling. Annu. Rev. Biochem. 71: 755–781.[CrossRef][Medline]

PAPOULAS, O., S. J. BEEK, S. L. MOSELEY, C. M. MCCALLUM, M. SARTE et al., 1998 The Drosophila trithorax group proteins BRM, ASH1 and ASH2 are subunits of distinct protein complexes. Development 125: 3955–3966.[Abstract]

PHILIMONENKO, V. V., J. ZHAO, S. IBEN, H. DINGOVA, K. KYSELA et al., 2004 Nuclear actin and myosin I are required for RNA polymerase I transcription. Nat. Cell Biol. 6: 1165–1172.[CrossRef][Medline]

PRIGOZHINA, N. L., C. E. OAKLEY, A. M. LEWIS, T. NAYAK, S. A. OSMANI et al., 2004 {gamma}-Tubulin plays an essential role in the coordination of mitotic events. Mol. Biol. Cell 15: 1374–1386.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

RAYNAUD-MESSINA, B., A. DEBEC, TOLLON, M. GARES and M. WRIGHT, 2001 Differential properties of the two Drosophila {gamma}-tubulin isotypes. Eur. J. Cell Biol. 80: 643–649.[CrossRef][Medline]

ROBERTS, C. W., and S. H. ORKIN, 2004 The SWI/SNF complex-chromatin and cancer. Nat. Rev. Cancer 4: 133–142.[Medline]

ROSIN, S., 1951 Zur Entwicklungsphysiologie der mutante Pearl (Pl) von Drosophila melanogaster. Developmental physiology of the mutant Pearl (Pl) of Drosophila melanogaster. Rev. Suisse Zool. 58: 398–403.[Medline]

ROSIN, S., 1952 Veränderungen des borstenmusters bei der mutante Pearl von Drosophila melanogaster. Alterations of bristle patterns in the Pearl mutant of Drosophila melanogaster. Rev. Suisse Zool. 59: 261–268.

SAMPAIO, P., E. REBOLLO, H. VARMARK, C. E. SUNKEL and C. GONZÁLEZ, 2001 Organized microtubule arrays in {gamma}-tubulin-depleted Drosophila spermatocytes. Curr. Biol. 11: 1788–1793.[CrossRef][Medline]

SCHNORRER, F., S. LUSCHNIG, I. KOCH and C. NÜSSLEIN-VOLHARD, 2002 {gamma}-Tubulin37C and {gamma}-tubulin ring complex protein 75 are essential for bicoid RNA localization during Drosophila oogenesis. Dev. Cell 3: 685–696.[CrossRef][Medline]

SHARMA, V. M., B. LI and J. C. REESE, 2003 SWI/SNF-dependent chromatin remodeling of RNR3 requires TAF(II) and the general transcription machinery. Genes Dev. 17: 502–515.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

SHEN, X., H. XIAO, R. RANALLO, W. H. WU and C. WU, 2003 Modulation of ATP-dependent chromatin-remodeling complexes by inositol polyphosphates. Science 299: 112–114.

SILLIBOURNE, J. E., B. DELAVAL, S. REDICK, M. SINHA and S. J. DOXSEY, 2007 Chromatin remodeling proteins interact with pericentrin to regulate centrosome integrity. Mol. Biol. Cell 18: 3667–3680.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

SZERLONG, H., A. SAHA and B. R. CAIRNS, 2003 The nuclear actin-related proteins Arp7 and Arp9: a dimeric module that cooperates with architectural proteins for chromatin remodeling. EMBO J. 22: 3175–3187.[CrossRef][Medline]

TADDEI, A., F. HEDIGER, F. R. NEUMANN and S. M. GASSER, 2004 The function of nuclear architecture: a genetic approach. Annu. Rev. Genet. 38: 305–345.[CrossRef][Medline]

TAVOSANIS, G., and C. GONZÁLEZ, 2003 {gamma}-Tubulin function during female germ cell development and oogenesis in Drosophila. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 100: 10263–10268.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

TAVOSANIS, G., S. LLAMAZARES, G. GOULIELMOS and C. GONZÁLEZ, 1997 Essential role for {gamma}-tubulin in the acentriolar female meiotic spindle of Drosophila. EMBO J. 16: 1809–1819.[CrossRef][Medline]

VÁZQUEZ, M., L. MOORE and J. A. KENNISON, 1999 The trithorax-group gene osa encodes an ARID-domain protein that interacts with the Brahma chromatin-remodeling factor to regulate transcription. Development 126: 733–742.[Abstract]

VOGT, N., I. KOCH, H. SCHWARZ, F. SCHNORRER and C. NÜSSLEIN-VOLHARD, 2006 The {gamma}TuRC components Grip75 and Grip128 have an essential microtubule-anchoring function in the Drosophila germline. Development 133: 3963–3972.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

WIESE, C., 2008 Distinct Dgrip84 isoforms correlate with distinct {gamma}-tubulins in Drosophila. Mol. Biol. Cell 19: 368–377.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

WILSON, P. G., Y. ZHENG, C. E. OAKLEY, B. R. OAKLEY, G. G. BORISY et al., 1997 Differential expression of two {gamma}-tubulin isoforms during gametogenesis and development in Drosophila. Dev. Biol. 184: 207–221.[CrossRef][Medline]

ZHU, P., W. ZHOU, J. WANG, J. PUC, K. A. OHGI et al., 2007 A histone H2A deubiquitinase complex coordinating histone acetylation and H1 dissociation in transcriptional regulation. Mol. Cell 27: 609–621.[CrossRef][Medline]

Communicating editor: J. TAMKUN


Related articles in Genetics:

ISSUE HIGHLIGHTS

Genetics 2008 180: NP. [Full Text]