| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |

* Departamento de Genética, Facultad de Biología, Universidad de Sevilla, Sevilla, Spain and
Department of Biological Sciences, Stanford University, Stanford, California 94305
1 Corresponding author: Departamento de Genética, Facultad de Biología, Universidad de Sevilla, Avenida Reina Mercedes 6, Apartado 1095, E-41080 Sevilla, Spain.
E-mail: corrochano{at}us.es
| ABSTRACT |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Organisms that sense a wide range of light intensities require mechanisms of range adjustment that allow them to adapt to the changing light intensities in their environment (GALLAND 1991). Light activation of transcription of some genes of N. crassa is transient, transcription of these responding genes ceases after the illumination time has been extended, and further incubation in the dark is required before they are again transcribed in response to light (LAUTER and YANOFSKY 1993; ARPAIA et al. 1999; SCHWERDTFEGER and LINDEN 2001, 2003). This behavioral feature, named "transcriptional adaptation to light" or "photoadaptation," requires the product of the gene vivid, a small photoreceptor with a flavin-binding domain similar to that found in WC-1 (HEINTZEN et al. 2001; SCHWERDTFEGER and LINDEN 2001, 2003; SHRODE et al. 2001; ZOLTOWSKI et al. 2007). Photoadaptation might allow a quick transcriptional response after environmental changes in light intensities, like those observed at dawn or sunset in nature, or to allow the precise orientation of reproductive or photosynthetic organs toward a source of bright light in a shaded environment. The response to changes in light intensities, and the absence of a response in an environment with constant light may have an evolutionary advantage for organisms using light as a source of energy or as a source of environmental information. Photoadaptation has been shown to be modified by mutations or inhibitors of protein kinase C (ARPAIA et al. 1999; FRANCHI et al. 2005). In addition, photoadaptation correlates with the phosphorylation status of the photoreceptor WC-1 (HE and LIU 2005). Thus, light-dependent activation of gene transcription is observed in mycelia that have been exposed to light for 5 min, but the transient light-dependent phosphorylation of WC-1 is only observed following 10–30 min of light exposure (HE and LIU 2005). Since phosphorylation of the WCC reduces its capacity to bind to light-inducible promoters, it has been proposed that light-dependent phosphorylation may play a critical role in photoadaptation (HE and LIU 2005). The lack of transcriptional response during adaptation to light can be reversed by increasing the light intensity (ARPAIA et al. 1999; SCHWERDTFEGER and LINDEN 2001, 2003), suggesting that adaptation to light is probably a consequence of photoreceptor desensitization.
Light regulation of transcription of the N. crassa gene con-10 has been investigated in detail. The gene con-10 is highly expressed during development of conidia, the asexual spores produced by N. crassa during vegetative reproduction (ROBERTS et al. 1988; SACHS and YANOFSKY 1991; SPRINGER and YANOFSKY 1992; SPRINGER et al. 1992). Messenger RNA from con-10 accumulates in vegetative mycelia upon light exposure (LAUTER and RUSSO 1991; LAUTER and YANOFSKY 1993; CORROCHANO et al. 1995), and con-10's promoter has been shown to contain several developmental, light, and clock-controlled DNA elements (CORROCHANO et al. 1995; LEE and EBBOLE 1998a). The activation of con-10 transcription by light is transient; maximum con-10 mRNA accumulation is observed after 0.5–1 hr of light exposure, whereas con-10 mRNA accumulation is reduced upon longer light exposures (LAUTER and YANOFSKY 1993). Thus, mycelia exposed to light for
4 hr do not have detectable levels of con-10 mRNA, a clear indication of photoadaptation (LAUTER and YANOFSKY 1993). The function of CON-10 is unknown, and a strain with a deletion in con-10 doesn't show any clear phenotype (SPRINGER et al. 1992). However, con-10 homologs have been described in other fungi and in Escherichia coli (CORROCHANO et al. 1995; LEE and EBBOLE 1998b), suggesting that this protein should have a relevant role in the biology of Neurospora and other microbes.
Photoadaptation has been investigated in the zygomycete fungus Phycomyces blakesleeanus. The transient photoactivation of gene transcription observed for the gene encoding the heat-shock protein HSP100 in P. blakesleeanus is not the result of photoreceptor desensitization, as shown by the absence of light-dependent mRNA accumulation after changes in light intensities. Rather, photoadaptation for the HSP100 gene in P. blakesleeanus seems to be a consequence of a reduction in the level of mRNA for the photoreceptor MADA, a WC-1 homolog, after long light exposures (RODRÍGUEZ-ROMERO and CORROCHANO 2006). Photoadaptation has also been described for some plant genes (MOCHIZUKI et al. 2004). Thus transient light-dependent activation of gene transcription appears to be a general feature of light perception in many organisms.
Identification of the proteins involved in photoadaptation will aid in our understanding of how light serves as an environmental signal for fungal development and behavior. Isolation of mutants altered in photoadaptation should also help in identifying the proteins involved in regulation of fungal photoreception. In addition, studies with light adaptation mutants may aid in determining the mechanism(s) responsible for transient light activation of gene transcription.
In this report we describe a strategy for the isolation of N. crassa mutants altered in their adaptation of gene transcription to light. By determining its mechanism of regulation we hope to learn more about CON-10 and its functions. We used a strain carrying a translational fusion of the regulatory sequence from the gene con-10 to the hygromycin resistance gene hph, and selected for mutants resistance to hygromycin when cultured with this drug under constant light. These new mutants show altered adaptation to light for only a group of light regulated genes, suggesting the existence of several gene-specific mechanisms for adaptation to light in N. crassa. The phenotypic characterization of these new mutants suggests that they have lost the function of a mechanism that blocks specific gene transcription upon prolonged illumination.
| MATERIALS AND METHODS |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Mutagenesis and selection of hygromycin-resistant mutants exposed to continuous light:
Cells of CHZ10 do not grow on minimal agar supplemented with 2 mg/ml hygromycin in the presence or absence of light. Mutants altered in their photoadaptation should grow in illuminated plates containing hygromycin if their con-10::hph fusion is capable of being continuously expressed. To perform this mutagenesis/selection procedure, freshly harvested conidia from strain CHZ10 (1–5 x 106) were exposed to UV light to reduce survival to 60–70%. Mutagenized conidia (about 106 per plate) were mixed with 15 ml of sorbose agar containing 2 mg/ml hygromycin and poured into a standard petri dish. Once the agar solidified, an additional 15 ml of the same hygromycin agar medium mixture were added and the plates incubated overnight at 34° in the dark to prevent photoreactivation. The two layers of agar ensured that germinated conidia were not exposed to air, an environmental signal that promotes conidiation and would result in constitutive transcription of con-10 (SPRINGER 1993). The plates with the mutagenized conidia were then incubated under continuous light at room temperature (22°–29°). Continuous white light was provided by a set of white fluorescent bulbs (10 W/m2 blue light). Colonies (
5 of 106 conidia per plate) that reached the surface of the top agar after 7 days of growth, were picked for purification and characterization.
Light induction experiments:
Cultures of isolated mutants were grown and mycelia were illuminated for the times indicated to measure regulation of gene expression by light and to detect changes in the phosphorylation status of the WC-1 protein. Cultures were prepared by inoculating
106–107 viable conidia into 25 ml of liquid Vogel's minimal medium containing 0.2% Tween 80 as a wetting agent. Liquid medium was used to prevent conidiation and to allow the growth of N. crassa as submerged vegetative hyphae. The plates were incubated in the dark for 24 hr (34°) inside a dark box and were then exposed to white light provided by a set of fluorescent bulbs (10 W/m2 of blue light). Light exposure with different intensities was obtained using an illumination chamber that allowed the simultaneous irradiation of three plates for 30 min in a temperature-controlled room set at 22°. The illumination chamber was a black wooden box with plate holders placed at the bottom. Light from a quartz halogen lamp installed in a slide projector passed through an upper window carrying a filter holder with two heat filters and neutral-density filters, as required to obtain the desired light intensity. After light exposure, mycelia were collected with the help of a tweezer, dried on filter paper, wrapped in aluminum foil, frozen in liquid nitrogen, and stored at –80°, unless otherwise indicated. Control cultures were kept in the dark prior to collection. All the manipulations in the dark were performed under red light. Light intensities were measured with a calibrated photodiode.
RNA isolation and hybridizations:
Neurospora mycelia were disrupted by two 0.5-min pulses in a minibeadbeater (BioSpec, Bartlesville, OK), in an RNA extraction buffer, with 1.5 g of zirconium beads (0.5 mm diameter) in 1.9-ml screw-cap tubes. The samples were cooled on ice for 4 min after the first pulse of the minibeadbeater. The extracts in screw-cap tubes were clarified by centrifugation in a microcentrifuge (13,000 rpm) for 5 min prior to RNA purification. Total RNA from mycelia was obtained using the perfect RNA eukaryotic mini kit (Eppendorf, Westbury, NY). RNA hybridizations were performed following standard procedures (SAMBROOK and RUSSELL 2001). Ten micrograms of each RNA sample were separated by electrophoresis on an agarose gel (12 g/liter agarose), transferred to a nylon membrane, and probed with DNA segments from genes hph, con-10, con-6, al-2, wc-1, wc-2, and vvd labeled with [32P]dCTP. The DNA probes were prepared by PCR or after restriction-enzyme digestion of plasmid DNAs prepared in our laboratory. For mRNA normalization and loading controls the filters were stripped of radioactivity and reprobed with a segment of the β-tubulin gene (tub-2) labeled with [32P]dCTP. The hybridization signal was quantified using a phosphor imaging plate in a fluorescent image analyzer (FLA-3000, Fujifilm) and the program Image Gauge (Fujifilm) or by scanning the exposed film and quantification of the hybridization signal with the program ImageJ (http://rsb.info.nih.gov/ij/). Each hybridization signal was normalized to the corresponding tub-2 signal to correct for loading errors. Then, the hybridization signal for each filter was normalized to the RNA sample from mycelia exposed for 30 min to light, unless otherwise indicated.
Quantitative PCR:
Quantitative PCR experiments were performed to determine relative mRNA abundance using one-step RT–PCR, using 25 µl 1x power SYBR green PCR master mix (Applied Biosystems, Foster City, CA), 6.25 units MultiScribe reverse transcriptase (Applied Biosystems), 1.25 units RNase inhibitor (Applied Biosystems), 0.2 µM of each primer (al-1F, 5'-TCCAATGTTTCCCCAACTACAAC-3'; al-1R, 5'-CGGTGGTGGGCGAGAA-3'; al-2F, 5'-CGCTATCGCCTACCCCATT-3'; al-2R, 5'-CGACGAGGAAGCCTGTTTG-3'; al-3F, 5'-CATCTCTTCCGCCGGTCTAG-3'; al-3R, 5'-ACCGAGGCCTTGCGTTTAC-3'; tub-2F, 5'-CCCGCGGTCTCAAGATGT-3'; and tub-2R, 5'-CGCTTGAAGAGCTCCTGGAT-3'), and 100 ng of RNA. Quantitative PCR analyses were performed using a 7500 real time PCR system (Applied Biosystems). The reaction included retrotranscription (30 min at 48°), denaturation (10 min at 95°), and 40 PCR cycles (15 sec at 95° and 1 min at 60°). The results for each gene were normalized to the corresponding results obtained with tub-2 to correct for sampling errors. Then, the results obtained with each sample were normalized to the RNA sample from CHZ10 exposed to light for 30 min.
Protein isolation and hybridizations:
Proteins were extracted from mycelia by previously described methods (GARCEAU et al. 1997) using a modified lysis buffer (50 mM HEPES pH 7.4, 137 mM NaCl, 10% glycerol, 5 mM EDTA, 29.3 µM phenylmethyl-sulphonylfluoride (PMSF), 6.3 µM leupeptin, 4.4 µM pepstatin A) at a ratio of 0.5 ml of buffer to 0.1 g of mycelia. Total protein (200 µg per lane) was subjected to SDS–PAGE on 5% gels and transferred to hybridization membranes. Equal loading was confirmed by staining the hybridization membrane with Pounceau solution. Proteins on membranes were hybridized with a monoclonal antibody against WC-1 (
-WC-1-1m4H4) (GÖRL et al. 2001). Horseradish peroxidase-conjugated anti-mouse IgG was used as a secondary antibody (Bio-Rad, Hercules, CA). Antibody binding was observed using chemiluminescence (Roche, Indianapolis).
Carotenoid analysis:
Approximately 106–107 viable conidia of CHZ10, SN strains, and the carotenoid overproducer strain vivid, and the wild-type strain as a control were inoculated into 25 ml of Vogel's liquid minimal medium with 0.2% Tween 80 as wetting agent, and placed in sterile petri dishes. Liquid medium was used to prevent conidiation and to allow the growth of N. crassa as submerged vegetative hyphae. The suspensions were grown in the dark for 1 day at 34° and then exposed to light under a set of fluorescent bulbs (10 W/m2 blue light) at 22° for 1 day. After light exposure, mycelia were collected, frozen in liquid nitrogen, and lyophilized. Carotenoids were extracted from 0.1 g dry weight samples as described (ARRACH et al. 2002). Total carotenoids were estimated from measurements of the maximal absorption spectra in hexane, assuming an average maximal E (1 mg/liter, 1 cm) = 200.
DNA sequencing:
The DNA sequence of the con-10 segment attached to hph in CHZ10 and the SN mutants was determined after amplification by PCR using primers T7 (5'-GTAATACGACTCACTATAGGGC-3') and HPH (5'-CGATCAGAAACTTCTCGACA-3'). The primers bound to the sequences in the plasmid polylinker located upstream of con-10 and to the hph ORF (nucleotides 30– 49, GeneBank accession no. K01193). This pairing should ensure that the PCR reactions only amplified con-10 DNA attached to hph and not DNA corresponding to the endogenous con-10 gene. The amplified DNA was cloned into pGEM-T (pGEM-T Easy Vector system I; Promega, Madison, WI) and sequenced by the chain-termination method. The DNA sequence of the gene vivid in CHZ10 and the SN mutants was determined after amplification by PCR using primers VVD-1F (5'-CATCTCGATCGACGGCATTC-3) and VVD-1R (5'-CCCTTGTTTGTCGATGTTGA-3) and sequencing of the 1233-bp PCR product. The amplified DNA included 694 bp of the vivid ORF and two introns, 384 bp upstream of the vivid ORF, and 155 bp downstream of the vivid ORF.
| RESULTS |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Expression of the gene con-10 of N. crassa is induced by light. However, upon prolonged light exposure, transcription is reduced due to adaptation to light (LAUTER and YANOFSKY 1993). As shown in Figure 1, the accumulation of con-10 mRNA is high in mycelia exposed to light for 2 hr. Adaptation to light is revealed by the reduced accumulation of con-10 mRNA in mycelia exposed to light for
3 hr (Figure 1).
|
10 times less conidia than CHZ10. In addition, SN1 and SN4 grew more slowly than CHZ10 in minimal agar, and SN4 did not develop aerial hyphae. SN1 formed large colonies in sorbose agar, suggesting that it was less sensitive to the restriction on mycelial growth promoted by the components of the sorbose agar. Strains SN2, SN4, and SN5 formed protoperithecia, but no ascospores were observed following attempted mating using these strains as female or male partners. In some instances we isolated a few ascospores, but these failed to germinate, thus preventing further genetic characterization. We amplified and sequenced the con-10 DNA attached to hph in CHZ10 and the five SN strains using primers that specifically prevented amplification of the endogenous con-10 DNA. None of the hygromycin-resistant mutants had mutations in the con-10 DNA sequence attached to hph, an indication that they had mutations in regulatory genes. DNA from the hygromycin-resistant strains, when transformed into CHZ10, did not confer resistance to hygromycin, suggesting that the new mutations are recessive.
|
Two different groups of hygromycin-resistant mutants are defined by the photoactivation of the con-10::hph fusion:
To assay the status of the mechanism of photoadaptation in our isolated hygromycin-resistant mutants we exposed mycelia from CHZ10 and the five mutant strains to light for different periods. Total RNA was extracted from each mycelium. The RNAs were then separated by electrophoresis, and hybridized with gene-specific probes to detect the presence of specific mRNAs. As expected, the mRNAs corresponding to the con-10::hph fusion and the endogenous con-10 gene were observed in CHZ10 mycelia after 30 min of light, but the amounts of these mRNAs were reduced after exposure to light for
2 hr (Figure 3). Similar experiments were performed with hygromycin-resistant strains, and the results suggested that the strains could be grouped by the transcriptional behavior of their con-10::hph fusion after light exposure, as observed for the two representative strains examined in Figure 3. Mycelia from strains SN1 and SN3 had elevated levels of con-10::hph mRNA after 30 min of light exposure compared to the con-10::hph mRNA level in CHZ10. However, the amount of con-10::hph mRNA accumulated in mycelia was reduced after several hours of light, suggesting that the mechanism of photoadaptation was still functional, although it was weaker. The reduction in the amount of con-10::hph mRNA in SN1 and SN3 after light exposures lasting several hours was not as pronounced as in CHZ10, and allowed the growth of mutant mycelia in hygromycin agar plates under continuous light (Figure 2). The amount of the endogenous con-10 mRNA was not significantly increased in these strains after light exposure.
|
Mutations in strains SN2, SN4, and SN5 modify the mechanism of photoadaptation of some, but not all, of the light-regulated genes of N. crassa:
We next examined light regulation of other light-regulated N. crassa genes. These include another conidiation gene, con-6 (WHITE and YANOFSKY 1993), the gene for carotenoid biosynthesis, al-2 (SCHMIDHAUSER et al. 1994), and the photoreceptor genes, wc-1 (BALLARIO et al. 1996) and vivid (HEINTZEN et al. 2001). In addition, we assayed the mRNA levels for the wc-2 gene after light exposure, since the WC-2 protein forms a complex with WC-1 (LINDEN and MACINO 1997) (Figure 4 and supplemental Table 1 at http://www.genetics.org/supplemental/). Regulation of con-10 and con-6 by light was similarly altered in strains SN2, SN4, and SN5 (Figure 4 and supplemental Table 1). Following light exposure these three strains accumulated large amounts of con-10 and con-6 mRNAs, and the accumulation remained constant even after exposures to light lasting up to five hours (Figure 4 and supplemental Table 1). In addition, mycelia from strain SN4 exposed to light accumulated more al-2 mRNA than CHZ10 (Figure 4 and supplemental Table 1). To the contrary, photoactivation of other well characterized light-inducible genes like vivid and wc-1 were not significantly altered in these or the other hygromycin-resistant mutants (Figure 4 and supplemental Table 1). This suggests that the altered proteins of the presumed regulatory genes are specific in which genes they activate. We did not observe any change in the accumulation of wc-2 mRNA in our adaptation mutant strains (supplemental Table 1).
|
|
|
|
|
|
| DISCUSSION |
|---|
|
|
|---|
We isolated five mutant strains that grew in hygromycin agar plates exposed to continuous light. Three of these hygromycin-resistant strains, SN2, SN4, and SN5, accumulated high amounts of the con-10::hph mRNA after light exposure, and this mRNA accumulation remained constant after exposure to light for extended periods of up to 5 hr. These findings suggest that the mutational changes in these strains have inactivated a repression mechanism, or activated an activation mechanism, that is involved in photoadaptation. The mutations also altered photoadaptation of the endogenous con-10 gene and the conidiation gene con-6, however other light-regulated genes (al-2, wc-1, and vivid) were not affected (with the exception of al-2 in SN4), suggesting the existence of rather specific mechanisms causing photoadaptation in N. crassa. In addition, we observed a two- to threefold increase in the light-dependent accumulation of al-1, al-2, and al-3 mRNAs in strains SN2, SN4, and SN5, suggesting that the mutations can also modify the initial transcriptional response to light. In two other hygromycin-resistant mutants, SN1 and SN3, we observed that con-10::hph mRNA accumulation was reduced after long exposures to light, an indication that photoadaptation in these strains remained functional. However, after long light exposures, con-10::hph mRNA was still detected in these strains, explaining their hygromycin-resistance phenotype. The absence of a clear change in the photoregulation of the endogenous con-10 gene in these mutant strains may indicate that they have suffered mutations in the con-10 regulatory sequence attached to hph. However since we did not detect any change in the con-10 regulatory sequence fused to hph in any of our hygromycin-resistant mutants we concluded that the genetic changes in mutants SN1 and SN3 were not present in this region.
Our characterization of light-dependent gene transcription in the three adaptation mutants SN2, SN4, and SN5 showed that they did not suffer major changes in the mechanism governing activation of transcription by light exposure. The threshold for light activation of transcription, and mRNA production and stability did not appear to be grossly altered in these adaptation mutants. Light-dependent phosphorylation of the photoresponsive White Collar complex (WCC) resulting in its release from light-regulated promoters, has been proposed as a major event leading to photoadaptation (HE and LIU 2005). Our characterization of the phosphorylation status of WC-1 has shown that the WCC continues to be transiently phosphorylated after light exposure in our adaptation mutants and in CHZ10, although we cannot rule out minor changes in the light-dependent phosphorylation of the WCC in the adaptation mutants. Our results suggest that major alterations in the light-dependent phosphorylation of the WCC are unlikely to be responsible for the adaptation mutant phenotype.
It is conceivable that our adaptation mutants have alterations in genes for proteins that are required for the release of the WCC from the con-10 and con-6 promoters after light-dependent phosphorylation. If the WCC remains bound to promoters throughout light exposure, then a high and sustained accumulation of mRNAs would be produced resulting in the high and constant light-dependent mRNA accumulation that we have observed. Characterization of WCC binding to the promoters of con-10 and con-6 during exposure to light in the adaptation mutants should allow us to examine this possibility.
In the three adaptation mutants, SN2, SN4, and SN5, the amount of carotenoids accumulated after light exposure increased threefold, probably as a result of their two- to threefold increase in the light-dependent accumulation of al-1, al-2, and al-3 mRNAs. Only strain SN3 had a clear increase in the amount of carotenoids accumulated after light exposure without a corresponding increase in the light-dependent accumulation of al-1, al-2, and al-3 mRNAs. These findings suggest that enhanced light-dependent carotenoid accumulation may occur by other regulatory mechanisms. However, in the absence of a detailed genetic characterization of the adaptation mutants we cannot rule out the possibility that the alteration in the biosynthesis of carotenoids in these strains may have been caused by the presence of additional mutations in their genomes in addition to those altering photoadaptation.
Mutants altered in the gene vivid accumulate five times more carotenoids than the wild type after light exposure. This is believed to be a consequence of a defect in the mechanism of photoadaptation, allowing the accumulation of light-dependent mRNAs after long-light exposures, as is seen for con-10, con-6, and al-1 (HEINTZEN et al. 2001; SCHWERDTFEGER and LINDEN 2001, 2003; SHRODE et al. 2001). The VIVID protein is a small polypeptide with a flavin-binding domain similar to that found in WC-1, suggesting that VIVID may function as a photoreceptor involved in the mechanism of photoadaptation (HEINTZEN et al. 2001; SCHWERDTFEGER and LINDEN 2003; ZOLTOWSKI et al. 2007). None of the hygromycin-resistant strains that we have isolated had the carotenoid accumulation observed in vivid. The absence of nucleotide changes in the vivid gene from each hygromycin-resistant strain allowed us to conclude that we have isolated mutants in novel genes involved in the regulation of photoadaptation.
The increased accumulation of carotenoids after light exposure observed in most of the hygromycin-resistant strains suggests that our genetic selection strategy could be used to identify carotenoid-overproducing strains that may be of interest to the biotechnology industry. A strain carrying a fusion of hph to the regulatory region from any of the al genes may also allow the isolation of novel mutants specifically altered in the photoadaptation of al genes. This may lead to the accumulation of even higher levels of carotenoids after light exposure. These experiments may lead to new N. crassa strains optimized for carotenoid production.
We have described here a strategy for the isolation of novel mutants with defects in the mechanism of photoadaptation. Unfortunately, our attempts to use the photoadaptation mutant strains in genetic crosses failed, thus preventing a detailed genetic characterization of the mutant genes. It is possible that heterokaryons containing a photoadaptation mutant nuclei and a helper wild-type nuclei would be able to participate in crosses, normally. The use of the appropriate genetic markers in each nucleus should allow us to map the photoadaptation mutations and proceed to identify the mutant genes on the Neurospora genetic map. Since proteins similar to WC-1 and WC-2 have been described in ascomycete, basidiomycete, and zygomycete fungi (PURSCHWITZ et al. 2006; CORROCHANO 2007; HERRERA-ESTRELLA and HORWITZ 2007), we expect that the same regulatory proteins that participate in the mechanism of photoadaptation in N. crassa will play similar roles in other fungi.
| ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS |
|---|
|
|
|---|
| LITERATURE CITED |
|---|
|
|
|---|
ARPAIA, G., F. CERRI, S. BAIMA and G. MACINO, 1999 Involvement of protein kinase C in the response of Neurospora crassa to blue light. Mol. Gen. Genet. 262: 314–322.[CrossRef][Medline]
ARRACH, N., T. J. SCHMIDHAUSER and J. AVALOS, 2002 Mutants of the carotene cyclase domain of al-2 from Neurospora crassa. Mol. Genet. Genomics 266: 914–921.[CrossRef][Medline]
BALLARIO, P., P. VITTORIOSO, A. MAGRELLI, C. TALORA, A. CABIBBO et al., 1996 White collar-1, a central regulator of blue light responses in Neurospora, is a zinc finger protein. EMBO J. 15: 1650–1657.[Medline]
BELDEN, W. J., J. J. LOROS and J. C. DUNLAP, 2007 Execution of the circadian negative feedback loop in Neurospora requires the ATP-dependent chromatin-remodeling enzyme CLOCKSWITCH. Mol. Cell 25: 587–600.[CrossRef][Medline]
CARATTOLI, A., E. KATO, M. RODRÍGUEZ-FRANCO, W. D. STUART and G. MACINO, 1995 A chimeric light-regulated amino acid transport system allows the isolation of blue light regulator (blr) mutants of Neurospora crassa. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 92: 6612–6616.
COLLETT, M. A., N. GARCEAU, J. C. DUNLAP and J. J. LOROS, 2002 Light and clock expression of the Neurospora clock gene frequency is differentially driven by but dependent on WHITE COLLAR-2. Genetics 160: 149–158.
CORROCHANO, L. M., 2007 Fungal photoreceptors: sensory molecules for fungal development and behaviour. Photochem. Photobiol. Sci. 6: 725–736.[CrossRef][Medline]
CORROCHANO, L. M., and P. GALLAND, 2006 Photomorphogenesis and gravitropism in fungi, pp. 233–259 in The Mycota I. Growth, Differentiation and Sexuality, edited by U. KÜES and R. FISCHER. Springer-Verlag, Berlin.
CORROCHANO, L. M., F. R. LAUTER, D. J. EBBOLE and C. YANOFSKY, 1995 Light and developmental regulation of the gene con-10 of Neurospora crassa. Dev. Biol. 167: 190–200.[CrossRef][Medline]
CROSTHWAITE, S. K., J. C. DUNLAP and J. J. LOROS, 1997 Neurospora wc-1 and wc-2: transcription, photoresponses, and the origins of circadian rhythmicity. Science 276: 763–769.
DAVIS, R. H., 2000 Neurospora. Contributions of a Model Organism. Oxford University Press, Oxford.
DUNLAP, J. C., and J. J. LOROS, 2005 Neurospora photoreceptors, pp. 371–389 in Handbook of Photosensory Receptors, edited by W. R. BRIGGS and J. L. SPUDICH. Wiley-VCH, Weinheim, Germany.
FRANCHI, L., V. FULCI and G. MACINO, 2005 Protein kinase C modulates light responses in Neurospora by regulating the blue light photoreceptor WC-1. Mol. Microbiol. 56: 334–345.[CrossRef][Medline]
FROEHLICH, A. C., Y. LIU, J. J. LOROS and J. C. DUNLAP, 2002 White Collar-1, a circadian blue light photoreceptor, binding to the frequency promoter. Science 297: 815–819.
GALLAND, P., 1991 Photosensory adaptation in aneural organisms. Photochem. Photobiol. 54: 1119–1134.[CrossRef]
GARCEAU, N. Y., Y. LIU, J. J. LOROS and J. C. DUNLAP, 1997 Alternative initiation of translation and time-specific phosphorylation yield multiple forms of the essential clock protein FREQUENCY. Cell 89: 469–476.[CrossRef][Medline]
GÖRL, M., M. MERROW, B. HUTTNER, J. JOHNSON, T. ROENNEBERG et al., 2001 A PEST-like element in FREQUENCY determines the length of the circadian period in Neurospora crassa. EMBO J. 20: 7074–7084.[CrossRef][Medline]
HE, Q., and Y. LIU, 2005 Molecular mechanism of light responses in Neurospora: from light-induced transcription to photoadaptation. Genes Dev. 19: 2888–2899.
HE, Q., P. CHENG, Y. YANG, L. WANG, K. H. GARDNER et al., 2002 White collar-1, a DNA binding transcription factor and a light sensor. Science 297: 840–843.
HEINTZEN, C., J. J. LOROS and J. C. DUNLAP, 2001 The PAS protein VIVID defines a clock-associated feedback loop that represses light input, modulates gating, and regulates clock resetting. Cell 104: 453–464.[CrossRef][Medline]
HERRERA-ESTRELLA, A., and B. A. HORWITZ, 2007 Looking through the eyes of fungi: molecular genetics of photoreception. Mol. Microbiol. 64: 5–15.[CrossRef][Medline]
LAUTER, F. R., and V. E. A. RUSSO, 1991 Blue light induction of conidiation-specific genes in Neurospora crassa. Nucleic Acids Res. 19: 6883–6886.
LAUTER, F. R., and C. YANOFSKY, 1993 Day/night and circadian rhythm control of con gene expression in Neurospora. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 90: 8249–8253.
LEE, K., and D. J. EBBOLE, 1998a Analysis of two transcription activation elements in the promoter of the developmentally regulated con-10 gene of Neurospora crassa. Fungal Genet. Biol. 23: 259–268.[CrossRef][Medline]
LEE, K., and D. J. EBBOLE, 1998b Tissue-specific repression of starvation and stress responses of the Neurospora crassa con-10 gene is mediated by RCO1. Fungal Genet. Biol. 23: 269–278.[CrossRef][Medline]
LEE, K., J. C. DUNLAP and J. J. LOROS, 2003 Roles for WHITE COLLAR-1 in circadian and general photoperception in Neurospora crassa. Genetics 163: 103–114.
LINDEN, H., and G. MACINO, 1997 White collar 2, a partner in blue-light signal transduction, controlling expression of light-regulated genes in Neurospora crassa. EMBO J. 16: 98–109.[CrossRef][Medline]
LINDEN, H., P. BALLARIO and G. MACINO, 1997a Blue light regulation in Neurospora crassa. Fungal Genet. Biol. 22: 141–150.[CrossRef][Medline]
LINDEN, H., M. RODRÍGUEZ-FRANCO and G. MACINO, 1997b Mutants of Neurospora crassa defective in regulation of blue light perception. Mol. Gen. Genet. 254: 111–118.[CrossRef][Medline]
LIU, Y., Q. HE and P. CHENG, 2003 Photoreception in Neurospora: a tale of two White Collar proteins. Cell. Mol. Life Sci. 60: 2131–2138.[CrossRef][Medline]
MADI, L., D. J. EBBOLE, B. T. WHITE and C. YANOFSKY, 1994 Mutants of Neurospora crassa that alter gene expression and conidia development. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 91: 6226–6230.
MOCHIZUKI, T., Y. ONDA, E. FUJIWARA, M. WADA and Y. TOYOSHIMA, 2004 Two independent light signals cooperate in the activation of the plastid psbD blue light-responsive promoter in Arabidopsis. FEBS Lett. 571: 26–30.[CrossRef][Medline]
NELSON, M. A., G. MORELLI, A. CARATTOLI, N. ROMANO and G. MACINO, 1989 Molecular cloning of a Neurospora crassa carotenoid biosynthetic gene (albino-3) regulated by blue light and the products of the white collar genes. Mol. Cell. Biol. 9: 1271–1276.
PURSCHWITZ, J., S. MULLER, C. KASTNER and R. FISCHER, 2006 Seeing the rainbow: light sensing in fungi. Curr. Opin. Microbiol. 9: 566–571.[CrossRef][Medline]
ROBERTS, A. N., V. BERLIN, K. M. HAGER and C. YANOFSKY, 1988 Molecular analysis of a Neurospora crassa gene expressed during conidiation. Mol. Cell. Biol. 8: 2411–2418.
RODRÍGUEZ-ROMERO, J., and L. M. CORROCHANO, 2006 Regulation by blue light and heat shock of gene transcription in the fungus Phycomyces: proteins required for photoinduction and mechanism for adaptation to light. Mol. Microbiol. 61: 1049–1059.[CrossRef][Medline]
SACHS, M. S., and C. YANOFSKY, 1991 Developmental expression of genes involved in conidiation and amino acid biosynthesis in Neurospora crassa. Dev. Biol. 148: 117–128.[CrossRef][Medline]
SAMBROOK, J., and D. W. RUSSELL, 2001 Molecular Cloning. A Laboratory Manual. Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press, Cold Spring Harbor, NY.
SCHMIDHAUSER, T. J., F. R. LAUTER, V. E. RUSSO and C. YANOFSKY, 1990 Cloning, sequence, and photoregulation of al-1, a carotenoid biosynthetic gene of Neurospora crassa. Mol. Cell. Biol. 10: 5064–5070.
SCHMIDHAUSER, T. J., F. R. LAUTER, M. SCHUMACHER, W. ZHOU, V. E. A. RUSSO et al., 1994 Characterization of al-2, the phytoene synthase gene of Neurospora crassa. Cloning, sequence analysis, and photoregulation. J. Biol. Chem. 269: 12060–12066.
SCHWERDTFEGER, C., and H. LINDEN, 2001 Blue light adaptation and desensitization of light signal transduction in Neurospora crassa. Mol. Microbiol. 39: 1080–1087.[CrossRef][Medline]
SCHWERDTFEGER, C., and H. LINDEN, 2003 VIVID is a flavoprotein and serves as a fungal blue light photoreceptor for photoadaptation. EMBO J. 22: 4846–4855.[CrossRef][Medline]
SHRODE, L. B., Z. A. LEWIS, L. D. WHITE, D. BELL-PEDERSEN and D. J. EBBOLE, 2001 vvd is required for light adaptation of conidiation-specific genes of Neurospora crassa, but not circadian conidiation. Fungal Genet. Biol. 32: 169–181.[CrossRef][Medline]
SPRINGER, M. L., 1993 Genetic control of fungal differentiation: the three sporulation pathways of Neurospora crassa. Bioessays 15: 365–374.[CrossRef]