| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
Genetics, Vol. 176, 1957-1966, August 2007, Copyright © 2007
doi:10.1534/genetics.106.066670
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Department of Genetics, Cell Biology, and Development, University of Minnesota, St. Paul, Minnesota 55108-1095
1 Corresponding author: Department of Genetics, Cell Biology and Development, 250 BioScience Center, University of Minnesota, 1445 Gortner Ave., St. Paul, MN 55108-1095.
E-mail: simmo004{at}umn.edu
 |
ABSTRACT |
|---|
 TOP ABSTRACT MATERIALS AND METHODSRESULTSDISCUSSIONACKNOWLEDGEMENTSLITERATURE CITED |
|---|
P-element movement is catalyzed by an 87-kDa polypeptide, the P transposase, which is encoded by structurally complete members of the P-element family (KARESS and RUBIN 1984; RIO et al. 1986); these elements are 2907 bp long. Many different types of incomplete P elements are also found in D. melanogaster genomes. Incomplete P elements cannot produce the transposase, but they can be mobilized by it as long as they have transposase target sequences in both their left and right ends (RIO 1990).
P-element movement is restricted to the germline because the introns present in the transposase gene are fully removed from P transcripts only in germline cells (LASKI et al. 1986). In somatic cells, the last P intron remains in the P RNA and prevents the synthesis of the catalytically active transposase. In its place, a shorter polypeptide is produced. This 66-kDa polypeptide is also made in germline cells, where it partially represses P-element activity (MISRA and RIO 1990; GLOOR et al. 1993; SIMMONS et al. 2002a). Polypeptides encoded by some incomplete P elements—in particular, the protein product of a 1.2-kb P element called KP—also function as partial repressors of hybrid dysgenesis (BLACK et al. 1987; ANDREWS and GLOOR 1995; SIMMONS et al. 2002b).
For 3 decades, D. melanogaster strains have been classified into two broad categories, M and P, according to whether or not they yield dysgenic hybrids when they are crossed (KIDWELL et al. 1977). Crosses between M females and P males produce dysgenic hybrids, whereas the reciprocal crosses, P females x M males, usually do not and neither do crosses between two different M strains or between two different P strains. These observations imply that P strains possess an ability to induce hybrid dysgenesis when they contribute paternally to crosses with M strains and that they also possess an ability to repress hybrid dysgenesis when they contribute maternally in crosses to other P strains (or to themselves). P–M hybrid dysgenesis is most easily detected by noting the occurrence of sterility in females (ENGELS and PRESTON 1979; KIDWELL and NOVY 1979). This sterility is due to the failure of the germline tissues to develop. Females with this defect, called gonadal dysgenesis (GD), cannot produce eggs—a trait that can be readily scored in each individual examined.
The classification of D. melanogaster strains on the basis of the results of crosses roughly coincides with a classification based on the presence or absence of P elements in genomes—that is, P strains possess P elements and M strains lack them (BINGHAM et al. 1982). Furthermore, P strains possess a state called the P cytotype, which strongly represses P-element movement, and M strains have a complementary state called the M cytotype, which permits it (ENGELS 1979a, 1989). Genetic analyses have indicated that the ability to repress hybrid dysgenesis (i.e., the P cytotype) depends on the presence of P elements in the genome (ENGELS 1979a; KIDWELL 1981; SVED 1987). The P-element family is therefore autoregulated.
There are, however, many exceptions to the simple classification of strains as P or M. Some strains with P elements in their genomes do not induce hybrid dysgenesis, or induce it very weakly, when they contribute paternally in crosses to M strains; however, they do repress hybrid dysgenesis when they contribute maternally in crosses to P strains—that is, they have the P cytotype. These strains have therefore been considered to be versions of P strains that do not induce hybrid dysgenesis effectively. They have been termed Q strains (SIMMONS et al. 1980; ENGELS and PRESTON 1981; KIDWELL 1981; BINGHAM et al. 1982). Other strains have P elements in their genomes but they do not repress hybrid dysgenesis effectively when they contribute maternally in crosses to P strains, and neither do they induce hybrid dysgenesis when they contribute paternally in crosses to M strains (BINGHAM et al. 1982). Because these strains behave somewhat like M strains, they have been termed M' or pseudo-M (KIDWELL 1985; SIMMONS and BUCHOLZ 1985). Both Q and M' types are prevalent in surveys of strains derived within the past few decades from natural populations; see, for example, ANXOLABÉHÈRE et al. (1985).
The history of genetics is replete with examples in which exceptions to a rule have provided key insights into biological phenomena. In this article, we use the Q and M' exceptions to the simple P–M dichotomy to investigate the nature of cytotype regulation. In previous work, single P elements with the ability to repress hybrid dysgenesis were isolated from the genomes of two Q strains, 
6 and Mt. Carmel (STUART et al. 2002). These elements are inserted in the telomere-associated sequences (TASs) at the left end of the X chromosome. A large body of work by Stéphane Ronsseray, Dominique Anxolabéhère, and colleagues has shown that strains carrying only P elements inserted in the X-linked TAS repress hybrid dysgenesis, sometimes strongly (RONSSERAY et al. 1991, 1993, 1996, 1998; MARIN et al. 2000). The telomeric P elements isolated from 6 and Mt. Carmel repress hybrid dysgenesis only when they are transmitted maternally in crosses (SIMMONS et al. 2004). Because maternal transmission is a key feature of the P cytotype, these (and other) telomeric P elements may play an important role in establishing this powerful system of P-element regulation. Two M' strains, Sexi and Muller-5 Birmingham, have also been shown to repress hybrid dysgenesis, albeit weakly (KIDWELL 1985; SIMMONS and BUCHOLZ 1985; SIMMONS et al. 1987, 1990). These strains may have an incipient or latent version of the P cytotype, or they may have some other feature that enables them to repress P-element activity.
In this article, we report the effect of combining the isolated telomeric P elements (TPs) from 6 and Mt. Carmel with the plethora of P elements from the M' strains Sexi and Muller-5 Birmingham. Our study was motivated by the work of RONSSERAY et al. (1998), who discovered interactions between telomeric P elements, telomeric P transgenes, and P elements from different P strains. However, one important difference between our study and theirs is that none of the interacting strains, either TP or M', in our experiments carried complete P elements. Thus, there was no possibility for the synthesis of either the P transposase or the 66-kDa repressor polypeptide.
We find that hybrid dysgenesis is repressed much more strongly by the TP–M' combinations than by the TP or M' P elements themselves—that is, telomeric P elements interact with other P elements to create the strong system of repression that we call the P cytotype. At a mechanistic level, these interactions might reflect physical contact between the TP and M' P elements so that a repressive factor—perhaps an imprint of telomeric heterochromatin—is transferred from the telomere to P elements scattered throughout the genome, or they might reflect the interplay of molecules produced separately by the TP and M' P elements. On this latter hypothesis, the TP and M' P elements might encode different polypeptides that work together to repress P-element activity, or they might generate P RNAs that trigger and sustain an RNA interference (RNAi) response. The evidence that we report here and in the accompanying article in this issue (SIMMONS et al. 2007) is consistent with the latter idea.
|
MATERIALS AND METHODS |
|---|
|
TOPABSTRACTMATERIALS AND METHODSRESULTSDISCUSSIONACKNOWLEDGEMENTSLITERATURE CITED |
|---|
6 Q strain, is 1.8 kb long and the TP6 element, originally isolated from the Mt. Carmel Q strain, is 1.9 kb long (STUART et al. 2002). These are the only P elements present in these stocks. Sexi.4 and Sexi.7 (RASMUSSON et al. 1990) are highly inbred stocks derived from the M' strain Sexi (KIDWELL 1985). Neither of these stocks contains any complete P elements, although both do contain KP elements (SIMMONS et al. 1990). M5B#1 (SIMMONS et al. 1987) is a highly inbred stock derived from the M' strain Muller-5 Birmingham (BINGHAM et al. 1982). Like Sexi.4 and Sexi.7, M5B#1 does not contain any complete P elements; however, unlike the Sexi stocks, it also does not carry KP elements (SIMMONS et al. 1990). The presence of KP elements in the Sexi.4 and Sexi.7 strains and their absence in the M5B#1 strain was confirmed by PCR with a KP-specific primer; see RASMUSSON et al. (1993) for the procedures used to carry out this confirming PCR. The autosomes in M5B#1 are denoted simply as Birm. Stocks containing either the C(1)DX, y f or C(1)DX, y w f attached-X chromosomes and Birm autosomes were synthesized by backcrossing attached-X females to M5B#1 males for 11 generations. The males in these stocks carried an M5 balancer X chromosome derived from the M5B#1 stock. X chromosomes from M or TP stocks were substituted for this chromosome by backcrossing M or TP males to attached-X; Birm females for six generations. Strains homozygous for these M or TP X chromosomes were synthesized by crossing M; Birm or TP; Birm males from the attached-X stocks to M5B#1 females to obtain daughters heterozygous for either the M or the TP X chromosome and the M5 balancer chromosome. These daughters were then crossed to M; Birm or TP; Birm males to obtain homozygous and hemizygous flies, which were used to establish stocks. Experimental cultures were reared at 25° on a cornmeal–molasses–yeast medium unless stated otherwise.
Gonadal dysgenesis assay for P-element activity:
Females were mass mated at 21° to males from the strong P strain Harwich (KIDWELL et al. 1977), which is marked with a null mutation in the X-linked white gene. After 3 days, each mated female was transferred to a fresh culture, which was incubated at 29°, a temperature that brings out high frequencies of gonadal dysgenesis (ENGELS and PRESTON 1979). On day 11, the progeny from each culture were transferred to a holding vial, and 2 days later, the females among them were scored for the presence or absence of eggs. The procedure was to squash the females between two glass slides in the presence of diluted food coloring, which helps to visualize the eggs. Females without any eggs were scored as having GD; females with one or more eggs were scored as normal. When different genotypes segregated from a cross, they were scored separately. Ideally, 20 females representing each genotype were scored from each culture; however, the actual numbers often fell short of this goal. Schemes to produce females for the GD assay are described in the RESULTS.
Statistical analysis:
Differences among experimental groups were assessed by performing z-tests. The standard errors for these tests were obtained by using variances calculated empirically from independent replicate cultures.
|
RESULTS |
|---|
|
TOPABSTRACTMATERIALS AND METHODSRESULTSDISCUSSIONACKNOWLEDGEMENTSLITERATURE CITED |
|---|
|
|
1.5% recombination), and the X chromosomes from the M and M' strains were marked with either w+ or wa. Thus, we could distinguish which of the F2 females from the testcrosses to Harwich males (which are hemizygous for a w null mutation) carried a telomeric P element (phenotypically w F2 females) and which did not (phenotypically w+ or wa F2 females). Table 2 summarizes the results of these experiments. First, we consider the results with the controls, which involved hybrids between the TP strains and the M strain Samarkand ("Control crosses with TP," Table 2). For TP5, the daughters of these hybrids showed high frequencies of GD (>95%), regardless of which way the hybrids were produced. Thus, this strain does not transmit its moderate ability to repress GD (see Table 1) through two generations, even when TP5 females are used in the first cross. For TP6, the daughters of the hybrids from cross II showed high frequencies of GD; however, those from cross I showed moderate frequencies. Thus, TP6 does transmit its ability to repress GD through two generations, providing that TP6 females are used in the first cross. Furthermore, both classes of the F2 females derived from this cross had reduced frequencies of GD—65% for the females that carried the TP6 element and 77% for those that did not; these values are significantly less than the 97–100% GD seen with tests of different M strains, but significantly greater than the 10% GD seen with tests of the TP6 stock itself (see Table 1). Thus, the TP6/+ hybrids from cross I transmit the ability to repress GD to their daughters, and they do so independently of the inheritance of the TP6 element itself. This observation provides evidence for the existence of a maternally transmitted component of cytotype regulation that is separable from the telomeric P element—that is, it shows that there is a bona fide "cytoplasmic" component in this system of regulation. Additional tests with the TP6 strain have confirmed this finding (M. SIMMONS and R. WOLFF, unpublished results). A cytoplasmic component of repression has also been seen in the analysis of Lk-P(1A), a strain with two P elements inserted in the X-linked TAS (RONSSERAY et al. 1993).
Next we consider the results from the hybrids between TP5 and the three different M' strains ("M' crosses with TP5," Table 2). Moderate frequencies of GD (35–46%) were seen in the offspring of the cross I hybrids, regardless of which M' strain was involved and whether or not the TP5 element was present in the F2 genotype. These results indicate that GD is repressed significantly, and more or less uniformly, in the offspring of these hybrids and that the TP5 element need not be present for this repression to occur. Note that the frequencies of GD seen here are significantly less than those seen in the cross I controls (95–97% GD) and that they are also significantly less than the frequencies seen in the tests with any of the M' strains (>84% GD; see Table 1). The TP5 and M' P elements therefore seem to interact in the cross I hybrid females to create a regulatory state with an enhanced ability to repress GD in the next generation, even when the F2 flies do not inherit the TP5 element.
For the offspring of the TP5 x M' hybrids from cross II, the GD frequencies were higher than those seen in the offspring from cross I, and they also varied among the M' strains tested: 97% for Sexi.4, 87% for M5B#1, and 68% for Sexi.7. Furthermore, for each of the M' strains, the F2 flies that carried the TP5 element had about the same GD frequency as the flies that did not. These results indicate that GD is repressed unevenly in the offspring of these hybrids—moderately with Sexi.7, weakly with M5B#1, and negligibly with Sexi.4—but that when repression does occur, the TP5 element need not be present. The level of repression seen in the offspring of the Sexi.7 hybrids suggests an interaction between the TP5 and Sexi.7 P elements. However, this interaction is evidently not as strong as the one that occurs in the corresponding cross I hybrids, whose offspring showed much less GD (40–45%). For Sexi.7, and for the two other M' strains as well, maternal inheritance of the TP5 element by the F1 hybrid females leads to significantly stronger repression of GD in the next generation.
Now we consider the results from the various TP6 x M' hybrids ("M' crosses with TP6," Table 2). Very strong repression of GD was seen in the offspring of cross I (<4% GD), regardless of which M' strain was involved. By contrast, the offspring of cross II showed either strong (7–13% GD) or moderate repression (71–76% GD), depending on the M' strain. In all cases, however, the level of repression was about the same in the F2 flies that inherited the TP6 element as in those that did not. Thus, the TP6 element need not be present in the F2 for repression to occur.
The data from the TP6 x M' hybrids indicate strong interactions between the TP6 and M' P elements. The control data from the TP6 x Samarkand cross I hybrids show that by itself the TP6 element brings about moderate repression (65–77% GD). As already mentioned, the M' strains are, at best, weak repressors of GD. However, the offspring of all the TP6 x M' cross I hybrids showed very strong repression of GD, similar to a P strain such as Harwich. Thus, when inherited maternally, the TP6 element interacts with P elements inherited paternally from the M' strains to establish a highly effective regulatory state, which is then passed on to the next generation. Note that F2 flies that do not inherit TP6 repress GD as strongly as their TP6-carrying sibs. Thus, this regulatory state is transmitted independently of the TP6 element itself. A less effective regulatory state is established through an interaction between the paternally contributed TP6 element and the M' P elements in the cross II F1 females. However, once established, this state is also transmitted independently of the TP6 element.
To assess whether or not the repression seen in the offspring of the TP x M' hybrids is due to the simple addition of the repression ability of the P elements from an M' strain to that of a telomeric P element, we need to know the repression ability of the M' P elements by themselves. Furthermore, we need to know this ability in hybrid flies, not in the inbred M' strains shown in Table 1. Accordingly, we tested reciprocal hybrids from crosses in which an M strain (w m f) replaced the TP strains in the mating schemes described above. These hybrids carry the same complement of P elements from the M' strains as the TP x M' hybrids, but they do not carry a telomeric P element. Thus, they permit an assessment of the ability of the M' P elements to repress GD in a context comparable to that of the TP x M' hybrids, but in the absence of either TP5 or TP6. The results of these tests are shown in Table 2, "M' crosses with w m f (M strain)." In the hybrid context, the repression ability of the P elements from each of the M' strains is nil. Thus, the repression seen in the offspring of the TP x M' hybrids, which in all cases but one (TP5 x Sexi.4, cross II) is significantly greater than that seen in the offspring of the TP x M controls, cannot be explained by a simple additive model. Rather, it must be due to a synergistic interaction between the M' P elements and the telomeric P elements.
Synergistic repression of gonadal dysgenesis requires the coexistence of the telomeric P elements and M' P elements in females:
The data showing that TP and M' P elements interact synergistically to repress dysgenesis were obtained from crosses in which the TP and M' P elements had coexisted in hybrid females. To see if this coexistence in females was necessary for synergistic repression to occur, we performed an analysis using TP–M' stocks in which the TP element was present in males but not in females.
The stocks for this analysis were constructed by crossing the autosomes from the M5#1 strain—hereafter referred to as the Birm autosomes—into M strains with attached-X chromosomes. The X chromosome in the males of these stocks—the "free" X chromosome—was derived from either the TP5 or the TP6 strain or from an M strain marked with w. Females from all these stocks were tested for their ability to repress GD by crossing them to Harwich males. As controls, we tested females from similar attached-X stocks that did not carry the Birm autosomes. We also tested females from an attached-X stock that had been developed from the P strain 
2 (ENGELS 1979b). The results of all these tests are shown on the left side of Table 3.
|
2 P strain, and it did so very effectively (2% GD). Thus, stocks that carry autosomal P elements from the M5B#1 strain in both sexes and an X-linked telomeric P element in males do not develop the synergistic interaction between these components that brings about repression of GD in their offspring. To show that a synergistic interaction can develop if the Birm autosomes and an X-linked telomeric P element are brought together in females, we derived homozygous free X stocks from each of the Birm attached-X strains and then tested their abilities to repress GD by crossing females from these stocks to Harwich males. As shown by the data in the right columns of Table 3, the Birm stocks homozygous for an X chromosome that carried either TP5 or TP6 strongly repressed GD (for TP5, 1–18% GD and for TP6, 1–2% GD), whereas the Birm stocks homozygous for the w chromosome that came from an M strain completely failed to repress it. As controls, we also tested the w, TP5, TP6, and M5B#1 stocks that were used to construct the attached-X and homozygous X stocks analyzed in this experiment. The results of these controls are shown in Table 3. As expected, the w stock did not repress GD and the M5B#1 stock did so very slightly (95% GD). TP5 was a weak repressor (85% GD) and TP6 was a moderate repressor (32% GD). Clearly, the TP5 and TP6 root stocks were not nearly as effective in repressing GD as the TP5; Birm and TP6; Birm stocks. Thus, the telomeric and Birm P elements interact to repress GD, but only if they have coexisted in females.
Persistence of synergistic repression of gonadal dysgenesis after removing a telomeric P element from a TP; Birm stock:
To see if the strong repression characteristic of the homozygous TP5; Birm and TP6; Birm stocks could persist in the absence of the telomeric P elements, we used a two-generation scheme to remove these elements from the stocks. TP; Birm females were crossed to +; Birm males, which carried a wild-type X chromosome devoid of P elements, to obtain TP/+; Birm F1 females. One sample of these females was mated to Harwich males to test for repression of GD, and another sample was mated to w; Birm males to obtain TP/w; Birm and +/w; Birm F2 females, which were then crossed to Harwich males to test for repression of GD. This crossing scheme allowed us to see if a diploid complement of Birm autosomes, once synergized by a telomeric P element, could retain the ability to repress GD after that element was removed from the genotype (in the +/w; Birm F2 females).
The results of the tests with the F1 hybrid females from four different TP; Birm stocks indicated that GD was repressed strongly (<2% GD) in their daughters regardless of whether or not the daughters inherited a telomeric P element (supplemental Table S1 at http://www.genetic.org/supplemental/). The strong synergism between the TP and M' P elements is therefore maintained in these F1 females, which have a diploid complement of Birm autosomes but are heterozygous for the TP.
The more complex results of the tests with the two types of F2 females—those carrying and those not carrying a TP—are summarized in Table 4. For the F2 females that carried a TP, we could not determine which of their daughters inherited the TP. However, as with the data from the F1 females, the presence or absence of a TP did not seem to matter. GD was repressed strongly in the daughters of these F2 females: 7% GD when TP5 was segregating and <1% GD when TP6 was segregating. Thus, the strong repression seen with the TP; Birm stocks was maintained in these F2 females that carried a TP.
|
|
DISCUSSION |
|---|
|
TOPABSTRACTMATERIALS AND METHODSRESULTSDISCUSSIONACKNOWLEDGEMENTSLITERATURE CITED |
|---|
Experiments with attached-X strains indicated that telomeric P elements and M' P elements need to coexist in females for synergistic repression of GD to occur. This observation is consistent with previous findings that the P cytotype is established in females but not in males and that patroclinous transmission of a telomeric P element abolishes its ability to repress hybrid dysgenesis (NIEMI et al. 2004). Stocks that carried M' P elements on their autosomes and that were homozygous for an X-linked telomeric P element proved to be strong repressors of GD—stronger if they carried TP6 rather than TP5. Genetic analysis of these stocks suggested that the ability to repress GD could persist, albeit much diminished, even after the telomeric P element was removed from the genotype.
Repression of GD in the offspring of TP–M' hybrids was more effective when the TP strain contributed maternally to the hybrids. This observation underscores the importance of a maternal contribution from the TP strain seen in previous studies that used a different assay (STUART et al. 2002; SIMMONS et al. 2004). However, unlike the previous studies, the results reported here show that flies need not actually inherit a telomeric P element from their hybrid mothers to repress GD. This phenomenon was even seen in the offspring of the TP6 x M hybrids, in which no M' P elements were present, and was noted for another strain, Lk-P(1A), in one of the first genetic analyses of cytotype regulation by telomeric P elements (RONSSERAY et al. 1993). Thus, this system of repression involves a factor that can be transmitted through the egg independently of the telomeric P element itself. This "cytoplasmic" factor, which RONSSERAY et al. (1993) called the "pre-P cytotype," is likely to be a product of the telomeric P element—either an RNA or a protein.
Some repression was also observed in the offspring of hybrids from crosses between TP males and M' females. In one case (the offspring of hybrids from TP6 males and M5B#1 females), this repression was strong (only 7–13% GD). Thus, maternal inheritance of a telomeric P element by TP–M' hybrids is not an absolute prerequisite for repression to occur in the offspring. Evidently, a paternally inherited telomeric P element can interact with maternally inherited M' P elements to establish a state that will repress GD in the next generation. The coexistence of these elements in hybrid females is therefore sufficient to initiate the development of regulatory ability; that is, it appears to initiate the development of the P cytotype.
All three M' strains tested provided evidence of interactions with the telomeric P elements. Among the offspring of the cross I hybrids (TP female x M' male), the interactions were equivalently strong for all three M' strains, although the actual level of repression was determined by whichever TP strain was involved: 35–45% GD for the offspring of the TP5 hybrids and <4% GD for the offspring of the TP6 hybrids. Among the offspring of the cross II hybrids (TP male x M' female), Sexi.7 was the best interactor with TP5, and M5B#1 was the best interactor with TP6. These observations indicate that as long as the TP–M' hybrids inherit a telomeric P element maternally, the attributes of the M' P elements—their number, structure, and genomic positions—do not seem to matter. However, when the sexes are reversed and the telomeric P element is inherited paternally by the hybrids, these attributes may make a difference.
One possibility is that a telomeric P element might be present in a particular M' strain, and the maternal inheritance of this P element might facilitate the establishment of the P cytotype. Among the three M' strains tested, only Sexi.4 has P elements in telomeric regions (1A on the X chromosome and 100F on chromosome 3R). This information comes from the in situ hybridizations of P probes to larval salivary glands that were used to localize P elements in the M' chromosomes; see RASMUSSON et al. (1990). However, this strain was the poorest interactor in cross II with either TP5 or TP6. Another possibility is that the number of P elements in the M' strains—ascertained by counting sites on polytene chromosomes that had been labeled by P-element probes—accounts for the differences seen with the cross II hybrids. However, for the TP5 hybrids, those with the fewest M' P elements (from Sexi.7) were the best repressors of GD in the next generation, whereas for the TP6 hybrids, those with the most M' P elements (from M5B#1) were the best repressors. Another hypothesis is that the strength of the interaction in the cross II hybrids depends on the presence of P elements that encode repressor polypeptides. For instance, both Sexi.4 and Sexi.7 contain KP elements whereas M5B#1 does not. However, this hypothesis does not explain why Sexi.4 and Sexi.7 are much less effective interactors than M5B#1 in crosses with the TP6 strain. Thus, from these considerations, it is not clear what attributes of the M' P elements are important for interactions with the telomeric P elements in the cross II hybrids. It may be that these interactions depend on the genomic locations of the M' P elements or on their levels of expression.
Of the two telomeric P elements used in this study, TP6 has consistently been the better repressor of GD. By contrast, TP5 has been the better repressor of P-element excisions from the X-linked singed gene (STUART et al. 2002; SIMMONS et al. 2004; NIEMI et al. 2004). These differences are somewhat surprising because the two elements are similar in size and are inserted in the same position in one of the TAS repeats at the left end of the X chromosome. The different properties of these elements may therefore be a consequence of their particular DNA sequences or of a peculiarity of the particular telomere in which they are inserted.
What do the interactions between telomeric and M' P elements imply for a mechanistic understanding of the P cytotype? One possibility is that these elements interact physically; that is, telomeric P elements pair ectopically with other P elements, and this pairing somehow enhances the development of the P cytotype, perhaps by transferring an imprint of telomeric heterochromatin to other P elements. This idea was suggested by RONSSERAY et al. (1998), who observed strong interactions between telomeric P elements and P elements from different P strains. They also found strong interactions between telomeric P elements and P transgenes inserted in TAS on chromosomes X and 3R. From these results and from evidence that the silencing of P transgenes by telomeric P elements is homology dependent (ROCHE and RIO 1998; MARIN et al. 2000), STUART et al. (2002) hypothesized that physical interactions between the telomeric P elements TP5 and TP6 and other P elements might play an important role in establishing and maintaining the P cytotype.
There is, however, a more likely possibility. The synergistic repression seen in TP–M' combinations might be due to interactions between the products of telomeric and M' P elements. These elements might, for example, encode different polypeptides that assemble into a complex that represses P-element movement; however, there is little indication that the intrinsic repression abilities of TP5 and TP6 are due to repressor polypeptides (STUART et al. 2002; P. JENSEN, J. STUART, M. GOODPASTER, K. NEWMAN, J. GOODMAN and M. SIMMONS, unpublished results). A more plausible scenario is that the strong repression created by combining the TP and M' P elements is due to an RNA interference mechanism triggered by transcripts from the telomeric P element and amplified by transcripts from the M' P elements. This mechanism could repress hybrid dysgenesis by targeting the RNA interference machinery to P-element mRNA, thereby preventing the synthesis of the P transposase, which is needed to mobilize P elements in the genome. The finding that repression of hybrid dysgenesis by telomeric P elements is profoundly disrupted by mutations in a gene involved in RNA interference gives credence to this hypothesis (REISS et al. 2004; SIMMONS et al. 2007, accompanying article in this issue). Furthermore, BRENNECKE et al. (2007) have implicated the TAS near the left end of the X chromosome in the production of small RNAs associated with the proteins involved in the RNAi response. They have also outlined a process whereby this response can be amplified by RNAs from different sources and have suggested how the amplified response might persist after the triggering agent—in this case, a P element inserted in the TAS—is removed from the genotype. Some of our data (Table 4) suggest this sort of persistence. The synergistic repression of hybrid dysgenesis by TP and M' P elements may therefore be one example of how an RNAi response is amplified to regulate the activity of a family of transposable elements.
|
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS |
|---|
|
TOPABSTRACTMATERIALS AND METHODSRESULTSDISCUSSIONACKNOWLEDGEMENTSLITERATURE CITED |
|---|
|
LITERATURE CITED |
|---|
|
TOPABSTRACTMATERIALS AND METHODSRESULTSDISCUSSIONACKNOWLEDGEMENTSLITERATURE CITED |
|---|
ANDREWS, J. D., and G. B. GLOOR, 1995 A role for the KP leucine zipper in regulating P element transposition in Drosophila melanogaster. Genetics 141: 587–594.[Abstract]
ANXOLABÉHÈRE, D., D. NOUAUD, G. PERIQUET and P. TCHEN, 1985 P-element distribution in Eurasian populations of Drosophila melanogaster: a genetic and molecular analysis. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 82: 5418–5422.
BINGHAM, P. M., M. G. KIDWELL and G. M. RUBIN, 1982 The molecular basis of P-M hybrid dysgenesis: the role of the P element, a P strain-specific transposon family. Cell 29: 995–1004.[CrossRef][Medline]
BLACK, D. M., M. S. JACKSON, M. G. KIDWELL and G. A. DOVER, 1987 KP elements repress P-induced hybrid dysgenesis in Drosophila melanogaster. EMBO J. 6: 4125–4135.[Medline]
BREGLIANO, J. C., and M. G. KIDWELL, 1983 Hybrid dysgenesis determinants, pp. 363–410 in Mobile Genetic Elements, edited by J. A. SHAPIRO. Academic Press, London.
BRENNECKE, J., A. A. ARAVIN, A. STARK, M. DUS, M. KELLIS et al., 2007 Discrete small RNA-generating loci as master regulators of transposon activity in Drosophila. Cell 128: 1089–1103.[CrossRef][Medline]
ENGELS, W. R., 1979a Hybrid dysgenesis in Drosophila melanogaster: rules of inheritance of female sterility. Genet. Res. 33: 219–236.
ENGELS, W. R., 1979b Extrachromosomal control of mutability in Drosophila melanogaster. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 76: 4011–4015.
ENGELS, W. R., 1989 P elements in Drosophila melanogaster, pp. 437–484 in Mobile DNA, edited by D. E. BERG and M. M. HOWE. American Society for Microbiology, Washington, DC.
ENGELS, W. R., and C. R. PRESTON, 1979 Hybrid dysgenesis in Drosophila melanogaster: the biology of male and female sterility. Genetics 92: 161–175.
ENGELS, W. R., and C. R. PRESTON, 1981 Characteristics of a "neutral" strain in the P-M system of hybrid dysgenesis. Dros. Inf. Serv. 56: 35–37.
GLOOR, G. B., C. R. PRESTON, D. M. JOHNSON-SCHLITZ, N. A. NASSIF, R. W. PHILLIS et al., 1993 Type I repressors of P element mobility. Genetics 135: 81–95.[Abstract]
KARESS, R., and G. M. RUBIN, 1984 Analysis of P transposable element function in Drosophila. Cell 38: 135–146.[CrossRef][Medline]
KIDWELL, M. G., 1981 Hybrid dysgenesis in Drosophila melanogaster: the genetics of cytotype determination in a neutral strain. Genetics 98: 275–290.
KIDWELL, M. G., 1985 Hybrid dysgenesis in Drosophila melanogaster: nature and inheritance of P element regulation. Genetics 111: 337–350.
KIDWELL, M. G., and J. B. NOVY, 1979 Hybrid dysgenesis in Drosophila melanogaster: sterility resulting from gonadal dysgenesis in the P-M system. Genetics 92: 1127–1140.
KIDWELL, M. G., J. F. KIDWELL and J. A. SVED, 1977 Hybrid dysgenesis in Drosophila melanogaster: a syndrome of aberrant traits including mutation, sterility and male recombination. Genetics 86: 813–833.
LASKI, F. A., D. C. RIO and G. M. RUBIN, 1986 Tissue specificity of Drosophila P element transposition is regulated at the level of mRNA splicing. Cell 44: 7–19.[CrossRef][Medline]
LINDSLEY, D. L., and G. ZIMM, 1992 The Genome of Drosophila melanogaster. Academic Press, New York.
MARIN, L., M. LEHMANN, D. NOUAUD, H. IZAABEL, D. ANXOLABÉHÈRE et al., 2000 P-element repression in Drosophila melanogaster by a naturally occurring defective telomeric P copy. Genetics 155: 1841–1854.
MISRA, S., and D. C. RIO, 1990 Cytotype control of Drosophila P element transposition: the 66 kD protein is a repressor of transposase activity. Cell 62: 269–284.[CrossRef][Medline]
NIEMI, J. B., J. D. RAYMOND, R. PATREK and M. J. SIMMONS, 2004 Establishment and maintenance of the P cytotype associated with telomeric P elements in Drosophila melanogaster. Genetics 166: 255–264.
RASMUSSON, K. E., M. J. SIMMONS, J. D. RAYMOND and C. F. MCLARNON, 1990 Quantitative effects of P elements on hybrid dysgenesis in Drosophila melanogaster. Genetics 124: 647–662.[Abstract]
RASMUSSON, K. E., J. D. RAYMOND and M. J. SIMMONS, 1993 Repression of hybrid dysgenesis in Drosophila melanogaster by individually naturally occurring P elements. Genetics 133: 605–622.[Abstract]
REISS, D., T. JOSSE, D. ANXOLABÉHÈRE and S. RONSSERAY, 2004 aubergine mutations in Drosophila melanogaster impair P cytotype determination by telomeric P elements inserted in heterochromatin. Mol. Gen. Genomics 272: 336–343.[CrossRef][Medline]
RIO, D. C., 1990 Molecular mechanisms regulating Drosophila P element transposition. Annu. Rev. Genet. 24: 543–578.[CrossRef][Medline]
RIO, D. C., F. A. LASKI and G. M. RUBIN, 1986 Identification and immunochemical analysis of biologically active Drosophila P element transposase. Cell 44: 21–32.[CrossRef][Medline]
ROCHE, S., and D. C. RIO, 1998 Trans-silencing by P elements inserted in subtelomeric heterochromatin involves the Drosophila Polycomb group gene, Enhancer of zeste. Genetics 149: 1839–1855.
RONSSERAY, S., M. LEHMANN and D. ANXOLABÉHÈRE, 1991 The maternally inherited regulation of P elements in Drosophila melanogaster can be elicited by two P copies at cytological site 1A on the X chromosome. Genetics 129: 501–512.[Abstract]
RONSSERAY, S., B. LEMAITRE and D. COEN, 1993 Maternal inheritance of P cytotype in Drosophila melanogaster: a "pre-P cytotype" is strictly extra-chromosomally transmitted. Mol. Gen. Genet. 241: 115–123.[CrossRef][Medline]
RONSSERAY, S., M. LEHMANN, D. NOUAUD and D. ANXOLABÉHÈRE, 1996 The regulatory properties of autonomous subtelomeric P elements are sensitive to a Suppressor of variegation in Drosophila melanogaster. Genetics 143: 1665–1674.
RONSSERAY, S., L. MARIN, M. LEHMANN and D. ANXOLABÉHÈRE, 1998 Repression of hybrid dysgenesis in Drosophila melanogaster by combinations of telomeric P-element reporters and naturally occurring P elements. Genetics 149: 1857–1866.
SIMMONS, M. J., and L. M. BUCHOLZ, 1985 Transposase titration in Drosophila melanogaster: a model of cytotype in the P-M system of hybrid dysgenesis. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 82: 8119–8123.
SIMMONS, M. J., N. A. JOHNSON, T. M. FAHEY, S. M. NELLETT and J. D. RAYMOND, 1980 High mutability in male hybrids of Drosophila melanogaster. Genetics 96: 479–490.
SIMMONS, M. J., J. D. RAYMOND, M. J. BOEDIGHEIMER and J. R. ZUNT, 1987 The influence of nonautonomous P elements on hybrid dysgenesis in Drosophila melanogaster. Genetics 117: 671–685.
SIMMONS, M. J., J. D. RAYMOND, K. E. RASMUSSON, L. M. MILLER, C. F. MCLARNON et al., 1990 Repression of P element-mediated hybrid dysgenesis in Drosophila melanogaster. Genetics 124: 663–676.[Abstract]
SIMMONS, M. J., K. J. HALEY, C. D. GRIMES, J. D. RAYMOND and J. B. NIEMI, 2002a A hobo transgene that encodes the P-element transposase in Drosophila melanogaster: autoregulation and cytotype control of transposase activity. Genetics 161: 195–204.
SIMMONS, M. J., K. J. HALEY, C. D. GRIMES, J. D. RAYMOND and J. C. L. FONG, 2002b Regulation of P-element transposase activity in Drosophila melanogaster by hobo transgenes that contain KP elements. Genetics 161: 205–215.
SIMMONS, M. J., J. D. RAYMOND, J. B. NIEMI, J. R. STUART and P. J. MERRIMAN, 2004 The P cytotype in Drosophila melanogaster: a maternally transmitted regulatory state of the germ line associated with telomeric P elements. Genetics 166: 243–254.
SIMMONS, M. J., D-F. RYZEK, C. LAMOUR, J. W. GOODMAN, N. E. KUMMER et al., 2007 Cytotype regulation by telomeric P elements in Drosophila melanogaster: evidence for involvement of an RNA interference gene. Genetics 176: 1945–1955.
STUART, J. R., K. J. HALEY, D. SWEDZINSKI, S. LOCKNER, P. E. KOCIAN et al., 2002 Telomeric P elements associated with cytotype regulation of the P transposon family in Drosophila melanogaster. Genetics 162: 1641–1654.
SVED, J. A., 1987 Hybrid dysgenesis in Drosophila melanogaster: evidence from sterility and Southern hybridization tests that P cytotype is not maintained in the absence of chromosomal P factors. Genetics 115: 121–127.
Related articles in Genetics:
This article has been cited by other articles:
 |
|
 |
|
  M. J. Simmons, D.-F. Ryzek, C. Lamour, J. W. Goodman, N. E. Kummer, and P. J. Merriman Cytotype Regulation by Telomeric P Elements in Drosophila melanogaster: Evidence for Involvement of an RNA Interference Gene Genetics, August 1, 2007; 176(4): 1945 - 1955. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
