| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
Genetics, Vol. 176, 1945-1955, August 2007, Copyright © 2007
doi:10.1534/genetics.106.066746
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Department of Genetics, Cell Biology, and Development, University of Minnesota, St. Paul, Minnesota 55108-1095
1 Corresponding author: Department of Genetics, Cell Biology, and Development, 250 BioScience Center, University of Minnesota, 1445 Gortner Ave., St. Paul, MN 55108-1095.
E-mail: simmo004{at}umn.edu
 |
ABSTRACT |
|---|
 TOP ABSTRACT MATERIALS AND METHODSRESULTSDISCUSSIONACKNOWLEDGEMENTSLITERATURE CITED |
|---|
Our study focuses on three RNAi genes: aubergine (aub), piwi, and homeless (hls, also known as spindle-E). The genes aub and piwi encode Argonaute-type proteins that are integral parts of an RNAi pathway in Drosophila. Evidence suggests that they bind small interfering RNAs and guide them to target RNAs, which may then be destroyed (VAGIN et al. 2006). The hls gene encodes a putative helicase that also appears to play an important role in RNAi (KENNERDELL et al. 2002). Mutations in all three genes have been shown to affect the levels of RNA produced by several different retrotransposons, including I, gypsy, and HeT-A (VAGIN et al. 2006), and mutations in aub and hls have been shown to enhance transposition of the retrotransposon TART, which is a component of Drosophila telomeres (SAVITSKY et al. 2006). Mutations in aub, piwi, and hls also seem to alter the distribution of certain proteins on chromosomes (PAL-BHADRA et al. 2004), which suggests that their products influence chromatin organization as well as mRNA levels. More to the point, REISS et al. (2004) have reported that mutations in aub disrupt an aspect of P-element regulation in the germline.
Our study includes one other gene, Enhancer of zeste [E(z)], whose product is a chromosomal protein involved in chromatin organization and the control of gene expression. This gene was implicated in P-element regulation by ROCHE and RIO (1998), although reservations about some of their results have been expressed (RIO 1999).
P-element regulation is complex, and disentangling the mechanisms that are involved in it has been difficult. In the soma, P activity is regulated by a mechanism that prevents the removal of the last of the three introns in primary P transcripts (RIO 1990). In the germline, all three introns are removed to create an mRNA that encodes an 87-kDa polypeptide, the P transposase, which catalyzes the excision and insertion of P elements. Because this transposase is produced only in the germline, P-element activity is restricted to that tissue (LASKI et al. 1986; RIO et al. 1986).
P activity is further regulated by a state called the P cytotype (ENGELS 1989). This state is characteristic of most strains that have P elements in their genomes. Because the P cytotype is repressive, the P elements in these strains are quiescent. However, they can be mobilized if males from a P strain are crossed to females from a strain that lacks P elements. Such females pass on to their offspring a condition called the M cytotype, which permits P-element movement. When P elements are brought into the M cytotype by this type of cross, they cause a syndrome of germline abnormalities called hybrid dysgenesis. This syndrome is characterized by sterility, chromosome breakage, and high mutation rates (KIDWELL et al. 1977). Hybrid dysgenesis does not occur, or occurs infrequently, in offspring from the reciprocal cross, P female x M male, because P females transmit the repressive P cytotype through their eggs. The conspicuous difference between the genetically identical offspring of these reciprocal crosses was the primary evidence that cytotype regulation involves a maternal component. Early studies indicated that the P cytotype is determined by the P elements themselves (ENGELS 1979a; KIDWELL 1981). More recent analyses have shown that it can be established and maintained by P elements in special genomic locations (RONSSERAY et al. 1991; MARIN et al. 2000; NIEMI et al. 2004; SIMMONS et al. 2004).
For many years cytotype regulation has been thought to involve P-element-encoded polypeptides, for instance, a 66-kDa polypeptide encoded by complete P elements when the last P intron is retained in the mRNA (RIO 1990). Experiments have shown that this polypeptide does function as a repressor of P activity (MISRA and RIO 1990) and that polypeptides encoded by some incomplete P elements are also repressors (BLACK et al. 1987; ANDREWS and GLOOR 1995). However, because these types of polypeptides do not appear to be produced in some strains that clearly do have the P cytotype, the hypothesis of cytotype regulation by P polypeptides has been questioned (STUART et al. 2002; SIMMONS et al. 2004; P. JENSEN, J. STUART, M. GOODPASTER, K. NEWMAN, J. GOODMAN and M. SIMMONS, unpublished results).
Key insights into the nature of cytotype regulation have been obtained by studying strains that have P elements inserted into the telomere-associated sequences (TASs) at the left end of the X chromosome. Extensive analyses by Stéphane Ronsseray, Dominique Anxolabéhère, and colleagues have shown that these elements can confer the P cytotype on their carriers (RONSSERAY et al. 1991, 1996, 1998; MARIN et al. 2000). STUART et al. (2002) added to this evidence by analyzing the regulatory abilities of two incomplete P elements, TP5 and TP6, inserted in the TAS at the left end of the X chromosome. Further study of these elements has shown that they regulate P activity in the germline but not in the soma, that their regulatory abilities are established and maintained in the female germline, that these abilities are passed on to offspring of either sex, and that, in at least some cases, they are transmitted to offspring independently of the telomeric P elements themselves (NIEMI et al. 2004; SIMMONS et al. 2004, 2007, accompanying article in this issue). However, neither TP5 nor TP6 appears to encode a polypeptide with any significant repressor function (STUART et al. 2002; P. JENSEN, J. STUART, M. GOODPASTER, K. NEWMAN, J. GOODMAN and M. SIMMONS, unpublished results). Thus, their ability to repress hybrid dysgenesis has been hypothesized to involve an RNA, which raises the possibility that cytotype regulation of P elements is mediated by an RNA interference mechanism.
To explore this idea, we incorporated RNAi mutations into stocks carrying TP5 or TP6 and then tested these stocks for repression of P activity. Because the RNAi mutations are either homozygous lethal or sterile, we were able to test only for heterozygous effects. Despite this limitation, however, we have obtained evidence that at least one of three RNAi genes—aubergine—is required for cytotype regulation of the P-element family.
|
MATERIALS AND METHODS |
|---|
|
TOPABSTRACTMATERIALS AND METHODSRESULTSDISCUSSIONACKNOWLEDGEMENTSLITERATURE CITED |
|---|
Assay for P-element excision:
The basic M and P cytotype strains, and all the mutant strains derived from them, carried a hypermutable allele of the X-linked singed gene (snw, singed weak). In hemizygous males, this allele causes a moderate malformation of the bristles. In homozygous females, it has little or no phenotypic effect; however, when snw is heterozygous with an extreme allele of the singed gene, such as sn3 or snx2, the bristle phenotype is similar to that of hemizygous snw males.
The snw allele is due to the insertion of two incomplete P elements in the 5' untranslated portion of the singed gene. In the presence of the P transposase, either of these P elements can be excised. However, because these excisions occur in the germline, their phenotypic effects are not visible until the next generation. If the upstream P element is excised, the resulting flies have extremely malformed bristles (sne); if the downstream P element is excised, they have wild-type bristles (sn+). The frequency of these altered phenotypes therefore indicates the rate of P-element excision in the parental germline. For males, this quantity was assessed by crossing individual snw males that carried a source of the P transposase to three C(1)DX females. Because these females have attached-X chromosomes, their sons inherit snw or its derivatives patroclinously. Thus, the combined frequency of the wild type and extreme singed sons among all the sons counted was used to estimate the P-element excision rate. For females, the excision rate was assessed by crossing individual snw/sn+ females that carried a source of the P transposase to three sn3 males. Because the tested females carried a preexisting sn+ allele, only their extreme singed progeny provided information about P-element excisions occurring in the germline. Consequently, the P excision rate was estimated by calculating the frequency of the sne flies among all the snw and sne flies of both sexes.
In addition to the telomeric P elements TP5 and TP6, the only other P element present in the stocks that were analyzed for excision events was a 0.6-kb-long element tightly linked to the snw allele. This element is situated in a different cytological position than singed (band 7D5-6 vs. band 7D1-2 for singed) and is referred to as the "unsinged" element (ROIHA et al. 1988).
All the experiments to measure the frequency of P-element excisions were carried out with replicate cultures, and the offspring in these cultures were scored on days 14 and 17 after the cultures were established. All the data from different groups within an experiment were obtained within a 1- or 2-week period. The average excision frequency for each experimental group was calculated by treating all replicates equally—that is, with the unweighted average—and the associated variance was calculated empirically among the replicates. This procedure, which encompasses secular variation, sampling variation, and variation due to P-element excisions in premeiotic cells, is considered a conservative approach to the analysis of mutation rate data (ENGELS 1979b). Statistical differences between groups within experiments were evaluated by t- or z-tests using standard errors of the unweighted sample means.
|
RESULTS |
|---|
|
TOPABSTRACTMATERIALS AND METHODSRESULTSDISCUSSIONACKNOWLEDGEMENTSLITERATURE CITED |
|---|
These tests were initiated by crossing snw; E(z)28/TM3, Sb Ser females to males homozygous for H(hsp/CP)2, a transgene inserted on chromosome 2 that encodes the P transposase (SIMMONS et al. 2002). In these crosses, one group of females was homozygous for the TP5 element and another group was homozygous for the TP6 element. Previous studies have indicated that both of these telomeric P elements bring about the P cytotype (STUART et al. 2002). A third group of females carried neither TP5 nor TP6. The snw; H(hsp/CP)2/+; E(z)28/+ sons from these three types of females were then crossed to females with attached-X chromosomes and their progeny were scored to assess the frequency of P-element excisions from snw that had occurred in the paternal germline. Control tests were carried out with snw; H(hsp/CP)2/+ males derived from stocks that did not carry the E(z)28 mutation.
The results of all these tests are shown in Table 1. Flies that did not carry a telomeric P element had P excision rates of 0.536 [in the absence of the E(z)28 mutation] and 0.473 (in the presence of this mutation). The similarity of these numbers indicates that the E(z)28 mutation did not affect the frequency of P-element excision per se. In flies that carried TP5, the respective excision rates were 0 and 0.003, and in flies that carried TP6, they were 0.055 and 0.058. These data indicate that both TP5 and TP6 strongly repressed P excisions from snw in the presence of E(z)28 as well as in its absence. Thus, the E(z)28 mutation does not impair cytotype-mediated repression of P-element excision.
|
|
Among the aub, hls, and piwi mutations tested, only the aub alleles impaired TP5- and TP6-mediated repression of P excision. The excision frequencies for the flies that carried these alleles were similar to the frequency for the flies that did not carry either telomeric P element—that is, they were similar to the excision frequency of the M cytotype control. Thus, each of the aub alleles utterly abolished repression of P-element excision by the P cytotype. The other mutations that were tested—three alleles of hls and two alleles of piwi—did not impair this repression, at least in heterozygous condition. Unfortunately, the sterility and lethality associated with these mutations prevents an assessment of their homozygous effects on cytotype-mediated repression.
Disruption of cytotype-mediated repression in mutant aub stocks:
The abolition of cytotype-mediated repression of P excisions by the aub mutations was investigated more fully in two additional experiments. One experiment assessed P-excision frequencies in the male germline and the other assessed these frequencies in the female germline. Both experiments were initiated by crossing TP snw; aub/Cy Roi females to H(hsp/CP)2 males. In the first experiment, the TP snw; aub/H(hsp/CP)2 sons were crossed to attached-X females and, in the second experiment, the TP snw/+; aub/H(hsp/CP)2 daughters were crossed to sn3 males. The offspring from these two types of crosses provided data on the occurrence of P excisions in the parental germlines. For the females, only excisions leading to extreme singed offspring could be detected, whereas for the males, excisions producing either extreme singed or wild-type offspring were identifiable. In each experiment, flies that inherited the Cy Roi balancer chromosome instead of the mutant aub chromosome were also tested. Data from these flies made it possible to ascertain if the aub mutations exerted a maternal effect on repression of P-element excisions. In addition, to test if the aub mutations affected the frequency of P excisions per se, flies from mutant stocks that did not carry a telomeric P element were analyzed in both experiments.
Table 3 presents the results of the experiment to study P-excision frequencies in males. In the absence of either a telomeric P element or an aub mutation, the P-excision frequency was 0.459, which is similar to the excision frequency of the M cytotype control in Table 2. Among flies that carried TP5, this frequency was reduced to 0.020, and among flies that carried TP6, it was reduced to 0.154. Thus, as expected, both telomeric P elements repressed P excisions from snw significantly. However, this repression was profoundly disrupted by each of the aub mutations. TP5 and TP6 males that carried either of these mutations had excision frequencies similar to or greater than the control excision frequency of 0.459. Furthermore, their brothers, which carried the Cy Roi balancer chromosome instead of the mutant aub chromosome, also showed high excision frequencies. Thus, disruption of cytotype-mediated repression of P excisions by the aub mutations appears to involve a maternal effect; TP5 or TP6 males whose mothers were heterozygous for an aub mutation could not repress P excisions, even when they did not inherit the aub mutation itself.
|
P-3a allele, which was associated with a 30% increase in the frequency of P excisions. As a check on the possibility that mutations in the hls and piwi genes might also increase the P-excision frequency, we tested snw males that were heterozygous for these mutations and the H(hsp/CP)2 transgene, but that did not carry a telomeric P element—that is, that had the M cytotype. The data, shown in supplemental Table S1 (http://www.genetics.org/supplemental/), indicate that none of the tested mutations had a significant effect on the frequency of P excisions from snw.
Table 4 presents the results of the experiment used in studying the effect of the aub mutations on cytotype-mediated repression of P excisions in females. These excision frequencies are not comparable to those obtained from males because only one class of P excisions could be detected. Furthermore, only one telomeric P element (TP5) was studied in this experiment. The results show that TP5 strongly repressed P excisions in the female germline and that each of the aub mutations disrupted this repression profoundly. Moreover, as in the experiment with males, the aub mutations disrupted TP5-mediated repression through a maternal effect. Also, as in the experiment with males, the aubP-3a allele was associated with a dramatic increase in the frequency of P excisions from snw. Three of the four groups of flies involving this allele had excision frequencies significantly greater—in fact, nearly two times greater—than the control frequency of 0.122.
|
|
|
These results imply that the aub mutations require more than one generation to disrupt TP5-mediated regulation of P excisions. To see if this disruption could occur within two generations, we tested the effects of aub mutations on repression of P excisions in the grandsons of P cytotype TP5 w snw females. Flies carrying the piwi1 mutation, which does not disrupt the P cytotype, were used as controls in this experiment. The test males were the sons of F1 females that were contrived to be heterozygous for the TP5 w snw X chromosome, which was maternally inherited, and the piwi1 or aub mutation, which was paternally inherited. These females, which also carried a maternally inherited Cy Roi balancer chromosome, were crossed to males homozygous for the H(hsp/CP)2 transgene to obtain the males for the excision tests. For comparison, we also measured the frequency of P excisions in males derived in a similar way from M cytotype w snw grandmothers. The results of all these tests are presented in Table 7 along with details of the genetic manipulations.
|
0.50. Their siblings, which carried the Cy Roi balancer chromosome instead of the piwi1 or aub mutant chromosome, had higher excision frequencies of 0.58. Thus, in the M cytotype, the balancer chromosome appears to elevate the P-excision rate somewhat. The P-cytotype-derived flies that carried the piwi1 mutation had an excision frequency of 0.216, and their Cy Roi siblings had a frequency of 0.287. These frequencies indicate some repression of P excision, albeit not as much as in the sons (rather than the grandsons) of P cytotype females (excision frequency = 0.02–0.04; see Table 5). In a two-generation experiment, however, some repression ability is expected to be lost because the TP5 element is not homozygous in the mothers of the tested males (NIEMI et al. 2004). Other data in Table 7 indicate that the aub mutations exacerbate this loss significantly. The P-cytotype-derived flies that carried the aub mutations had P-excision frequencies of 0.60 (aubP-3a) and 0.46 (aubQC42), and their Cy Roi siblings had excision frequencies of 0.51 and 0.40, respectively. These high excision frequencies—similar to those observed in the M cytotype controls—indicate that cytotype regulation by a telomeric P element is profoundly disrupted by aub mutations through a maternal effect.
Assessing the persistence of cytotype disruption by aub mutations:
Mutations in the Su(var)205 gene disrupt the P cytotype for several generations after they have been removed from the genotype of a stock homozygous for the TP5 element. The persistence of this disruption is thought to involve the elongation of telomeres in stocks heterozygous for a Su(var)205 mutation (HALEY et al. 2005). To see if aub mutations might have a similar effect, we extracted X chromosomes from TP5 snw; aub/Cy Roi stocks and made them homozygous in the absence of the aub mutation. Each of the resulting homozygous TP5 snw lines was then assayed for P excisions by crossing females from them to H(hsp/CP)2 males and then crossing the TP5 snw; H(hsp/CP)2/+ sons to attached-X females. As controls, we carried out a parallel analysis of X chromosomes extracted from a TP5 snw; piwi1/Cy Roi stock in which cytotype regulation is intact. The results of all these tests are shown in Table 8.
|
Eight lines were derived independently from each of the TP5 snw; aubP-3a/Cy Roi, TP5 snw; aubQC42/Cy Roi, and TP5 snw; piwi1/Cy Roi stocks. Among these 24 lines, only 2 showed marked impairment of cytotype-mediated repression of P excisions from snw. The excision rate for line 5 from the TP5 snw; aubP-3a/Cy Roi stock was 0.444—similar to that of the M cytotype control—and the rate for line 6 from the TP5 snw; piwi1/Cy Roi stock was 0.172. All the other excision rates were <0.08. Thus, in the vast majority of the lines, including 15 of the 16 lines derived from the mutant aub stocks, cytotype regulation was intact. These results indicate that, unlike Su(var)205 mutations, aub mutations do not generally disrupt cytotype regulation several generations after they have been purged from the genotype.
To see if the TP5 element was still present in the two anomalous lines, we used the polymerase chain reaction. For each line, DNA was obtained separately from five males that had been reserved from the testcrosses. These DNA samples were then used to seed a PCR that specifically amplifies the TP5 element; see STUART et al. (2002) for a description of the TP5-specific primer and the PCR procedure. The results indicated that TP5 was present in each of the testcross males. Thus, the high excision rates of the two anomalous lines were not due to the loss of TP5 during the genetic manipulations that led to the lines. Rather, some other phenomenon must account for their inability to repress P excisions effectively.
|
DISCUSSION |
|---|
|
TOPABSTRACTMATERIALS AND METHODSRESULTSDISCUSSIONACKNOWLEDGEMENTSLITERATURE CITED |
|---|
Disruption of cytotype regulation by heterozygous aub mutations suggests that in the germline P elements are controlled by an RNAi mechanism. Other investigations have shown that cytotype regulation is associated with P elements inserted in the TAS at the left end of the X chromosome (RONSSERAY et al. 1991; MARIN et al. 2000; STUART et al. 2002) and that these elements interact synergistically with P elements scattered throughout the genome to bring about strong repression of the P-element family (SIMMONS et al. 2007, accompanying article in this issue). Moreover, this repression appears to be mediated by products of the telomeric P elements—presumably RNAs, because neither of the telomeric P elements studied here seems to encode a polypeptide with significant repression ability (STUART et al. 2002; P. JENSEN, J. STUART, M. GOODPASTER, K. NEWMAN, J. GOODMAN and M. SIMMONS, unpublished results). MARIN et al. (2000) also documented repression by a P element unlikely to produce a repressor polypeptide.
A plausible model is that telomeric P elements are transcribed in both directions to produce double-stranded RNA, which then induces RNAi to silence P elements throughout the genome. The RNAi response may be intensified if other nontelomeric P elements also contribute to the formation of double-stranded RNA. For TP5 and TP6, sense transcripts could be produced by transcription from the P-element promoter or, because both of these elements are oriented toward the interior of the chromosome, by readthrough transcription from the retrotransposon array at the chromosome's end. Antisense transcripts of these elements could be produced by transcription from an outward-directed promoter located on the 3' side of the telomeric P element, possibly somewhere in the TAS. The amount of double-stranded P RNA that could form would therefore depend on the relative strengths of these opposing transcriptional efforts. Once formed, double-stranded P RNA could be diced into small interfering RNAs, which could repress P-element activity either by inducing the degradation of transposase mRNA or by altering chromatin structure around P elements throughout the genome. These small interfering RNAs could also be transmitted through eggs to silence P activity in the next generation. Experiments using molecular techniques are needed to test these ideas.
There are, however, reasons to believe that this model is correct in its broad outline. SAVITSKY et al. (2006) have reported that the retrotransposons at the tips of Drosophila chromosomes are under the control of an RNAi mechanism. Insertion of these retrotransposons at the ends of chromosomes normally replenishes sequences lost by the asymmetry of DNA replication there (BIESSMANN et al. 1990; MASON and BIESSMANN 1995). However, mutations in aub and hls allow the retrotransposons to insert more frequently than they otherwise would, ultimately producing longer telomeres (SAVITSKY et al. 2006). This process of telomere elongation is germline specific and appears to be mediated by sense transcripts of the telomeric retrotransposons, which accumulate in the germlines of aub and hls mutant females, evidently because the aub and hls mutations impair a regulatory system that is based on RNAi. Cytotype regulation by telomeric P elements may use the same RNAi system. In fact, this regulation may simply be an inadvertent consequence of P elements having inserted into a region whose overall structure is controlled by an RNAi mechanism. Disruption of this mechanism would, therefore, remove a constraint on P-element activity in the germline.
In another vein, VAGIN et al. (2006) have studied the involvement of RNAi in the regulation of the X-linked Stellate genes by the Y-linked Suppressor of Stellate locus and the expression of several different retrotransposons, including HeT-A, which is telomere specific. All these genomic elements appear to be controlled by an RNAi system that is mediated by repeat-associated small interfering RNAs (rasiRNAs), 24–29 nucleotides long. It is significant that the rasiRNAs appear to bind to the Piwi and Aub proteins in ovaries. Small interfering P RNAs might therefore be conveyed from mother to offspring by being bound to either or both of these proteins in eggs.
Cytotype regulation can also be disrupted by mutations in the Su(var)205 gene (RONSSERAY et al. 1996), which encodes HP1, a protein involved in chromatin organization (EISSENBERG et al. 1990). This protein also appears to provide a capping function at the very ends of chromosomes (FANTI et al. 1998; PERRINI et al. 2004). The depletion of HP1 that occurs in stocks heterozygous for a Su(var)205 mutation allows retrotransposons to attach frequently to chromosome ends (SAVITSKY et al. 2002). When this high level of attachment occurs, the telomeres become elongated. Telomere elongation also occurs in stocks carrying the Tel mutation (SIRIACO et al. 2001); however, the underlying mechanism is unknown. Stocks in which the telomeres have been elongated because Su(var)205 or Tel mutations have been present show impaired cytotype regulation (RONSSERAY et al. 1996; HALEY et al. 2005). HALEY et al. (2005) speculated that this impairment is due to affinities among elongated telomeres that prevent pairing between telomeric P elements and other P elements in the genome. However, given the evidence for a bona fide "cytoplasmic" component of cytotype regulation (SIMMONS et al. 2007, accompanying article in this issue), physical contact between telomeric and other P elements is not needed to repress P activity. The impaired cytotype that is characteristic of mutant Su(var)205 and Tel stocks may therefore be a consequence of the altered expression of telomeric P elements caused by elongated telomeres in these stocks. Additional retrotransposons at chromosome ends enhance transcription of P transgenes inserted in the TAS (GOLUBOVSKY et al. 2001). They may also enhance the transcription of P elements inserted in these regions. If the enhanced transcription strongly favors the production of one type of P RNA—sense, for example—then the formation of double-stranded RNA could be impaired and the RNAi mechanism it normally induces would be weakened.
One important difference between the effects of aub and Su(var)205 mutations is that aub mutations generally seem to impair cytotype regulation only in the short term, whereas Su(var)205 mutations impair it many generations after they have been purged from the genotype (HALEY et al. 2005). At first glance, this difference seems difficult to explain because both types of mutations cause telomere elongation, which is a genetic change that might persist for several generations. However, SAVITSKY et al. (2006) noted that the telomeres were not detectably elongated in the mutant aub stock that they studied. Thus, telomere elongation may be less effective in mutant aub stocks than in mutant Su(var)205 stocks, and the impairment of cytotype by aub mutations may have more to do with a dysfunctional system for transporting rasiRNAs through oocytes than with a failure to produce these RNAs because the expression of a telomeric P element has been altered by adding retrotransposons to the end of the chromosome.
Telomeric P elements seem to be common in natural populations (AJIOKA and EANES 1989), possibly because selection has favored their abilities to repress hybrid dysgenesis. These elements can interact with other P elements, probably at the level of their products, to repress dysgenesis strongly. Whether nontelomeric P elements have the ability to bring about the P cytotype is, at this time, an open question. However, RONSSERAY et al. (2001) have observed cytotype-like repression associated with clusters of nontelomeric P transgenes. Thus, a telomeric P element may not be absolutely essential for the P cytotype to develop.
One indication that nontelomeric P elements might be capable of initiating regulation by an RNAi mechanism is that aub mutations, in particular aubP-3a, appear to enhance the mutability of snw in flies that do not carry a telomeric P element (see Tables 3 and 4). This finding could be a result of mutational disruption of an RNAi response initiated by double-stranded P RNA transcribed from the two P elements inserted in the snw allele. These P elements are inserted in a head-to-head orientation 8 bp apart in the 5' region of the singed gene. Furthermore, because their sequences are included within some singed transcripts (PATERSON et al. 2007), they could possibly generate double-stranded P RNA, which in turn could stimulate an RNAi response to other P RNAs, including the P transposase mRNA. By impairing this response, aub mutations might increase the likelihood that P mRNA will be translated into the P transposase in snw flies, leading to an increased frequency of P-element excisions from snw. Other double-P insertions in the singed gene have been identified (EGGLESTON 1990). If double-P insertions are common in natural populations, and if they are transcribed, they might trigger RNAi-based mechanisms that regulate P-element activity.
|
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS |
|---|
|
TOPABSTRACTMATERIALS AND METHODSRESULTSDISCUSSIONACKNOWLEDGEMENTSLITERATURE CITED |
|---|
|
LITERATURE CITED |
|---|
|
TOPABSTRACTMATERIALS AND METHODSRESULTSDISCUSSIONACKNOWLEDGEMENTSLITERATURE CITED |
|---|
AJIOKA, J. W., and W. F. EANES, 1989 The accumulation of P-elements on the tip of the X chromosome in populations of Drosophila melanogaster. Genet. Res. 53: 1–6.[Medline]
ANDREWS, J. D., and G. B. GLOOR, 1995 A role for the KP leucine zipper in regulating P element transposition. Genetics 141: 587–594.[Abstract]
BIESSMANN, H., J. M. MASON, K. FERRY, M. D'HULST, K. VALGEIRSDOTTIR et al., 1990 Addition of telomere-associated HeT DNA sequences ‘heals’ broken chromosome ends in Drosophila. Cell 61: 663–673.[CrossRef][Medline]
BLACK, D. M., M. S. JACKSON, M. G. KIDWELL and G. A. DOVER, 1987 KP elements repress P-induced hybrid dysgenesis in Drosophila melanogaster. EMBO J. 6: 4125–4135.[Medline]
BLUMENSTIEL, J. P., and D. L. HARTL, 2005 Evidence for maternally transmitted small interfering RNA in the repression of transposition in Drosophila virilis. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 102: 15965–15970.
EGGLESTON, W. B., 1990 P element transposition and excision in Drosophila: interactions between elements. Ph.D. Thesis, University of Wisconsin, Madison, WI.
EISSENBERG, J. D., T. C. JAMES, D. M. FOSTER-HARTNETT, T. HARTNETT, V. NGAN et al., 1990 Mutation in a heterochromatin-specific chromosomal protein is associated with suppression of position-effect variegation in Drosophila melanogaster. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 87: 9923–9927.
ENGELS, W. R., 1979a Hybrid dysgenesis in Drosophila melanogaster: rules of inheritance of female sterility. Genet. Res. 33: 219–236.
ENGELS, W. R., 1979b The estimation of mutation rates when premeiotic events are involved. Environ. Mutagen. 1: 37–43.[Medline]
ENGELS, W. R., 1989 P elements in Drosophila melanogaster, pp. 437–484 in Mobile DNA, edited by D. E. BERG and M. M. HOWE. American Society for Microbiology, Washington, DC.
FANTI, L., G. GIOVINAZZO, M. BERLOCO and S. PIMPINELLI, 1998 The heterochromatin protein 1 prevents telomere fusions in Drosophila. Mol. Cell 2: 527–538.[CrossRef][Medline]
FIRE, A., S. XU, M. K. MONTGOMERY, S. A. KOSTAS, S. E. DRIVER et al., 1998 Potent and specific genetic interference by double-stranded RNA in Caenorhabditis elegans. Nature 391: 806–811.[CrossRef][Medline]
GOLUBOVSKY, M., A. Y. KONEV, M. F. WALTER, H. BIESSMANN and J. M. MASON, 2001 Terminal retrotransposons activate a subtelomeric white transgene at the 2L telomere in Drosophila. Genetics 158: 1111–1123.
HALEY, K. J., J. R. STUART, J. D. RAYMOND, J. B. NIEMI and M. J. SIMMONS, 2005 Impairment of cytotype regulation of P-element activity in Drosophila melanogaster by mutations in the Su(var)205 gene. Genetics 171: 583–595.
KENNERDELL, J. R., S. YAMAGUCHI and R. W. CARTHEW, 2002 RNAi is activated during Drosophila oocyte maturation in a manner dependent on aubergine and spindle-E. Genes Dev. 16: 1884–1889.
KIDWELL, M. G., 1981 Hybrid dysgenesis in Drosophila melanogaster: the genetics of cytotype determination in a neutral strain. Genetics 98: 275–290.
KIDWELL, M. G., J. F. KIDWELL and J. A. SVED, 1977 Hybrid dysgenesis in Drosophila melanogaster: a syndrome of aberrant traits including mutation, sterility, and male recombination. Genetics 86: 813–833.
LASKI, F. A., D. C. RIO and G. M. RUBIN, 1986 Tissue specificity of Drosophila P element transposition is regulated at the level of mRNA splicing. Cell 44: 7–19.[CrossRef][Medline]
LINDSLEY, D. L., and G. ZIMM, 1992 The Genome of Drosophila melanogaster. Academic Press, New York.
MARIN, L., M. LEHMANN, D. NOUAUD, H. IZAABEL, D. ANXOLABÉHÈRE et al., 2000 P-element repression in Drosophila melanogaster by a naturally occurring defective telomeric P copy. Genetics 155: 1841–1854.
MASON, J. M., and H. BIESSMANN, 1995 The unusual telomeres of Drosophila. Trends Genet. 11: 58–62.[CrossRef][Medline]
MISRA, S., and D. C. RIO, 1990 Cytotype control of Drosophila P element transposition: the 66 kD protein is a repressor of transposase activity. Cell 62: 269–284.[CrossRef][Medline]
NIEMI, J. B., J. D. RAYMOND, R. PATREK and M. J. SIMMONS, 2004 Establishment and maintenance of the P cytotype associated with telomeric P elements in Drosophila melanogaster. Genetics 166: 255–264.
PAL-BHADRA, M., B. A. LEIBOVITCH, S. G. GANDHI, M. RAO, U. BHADRA et al., 2004 Heterochromatic silencing and HP1 localization in Drosophila are dependent on the RNAi machinery. Science 303: 669–672.
PATERSON, J., K. O'HARE and M. J. SIMMONS, 2007 Transcription of the singed-weak mutation of Drosophila melanogaster: elimination of P-element sequences by RNA splicing and repression of singed transcription in a P genetic background. Mol. Gen. Genomics 274: 53–64.
PERRINI, B., L. PIACENTINI, L. FANTI, F. ALTIERI, S. CHICHIARELLI et al., 2004 HP1 controls telomere capping, telomere elongation, and telomere silencing by two different mechanisms in Drosophila. Mol. Cell 15: 467–476.[CrossRef][Medline]
REISS, D., T. JOSSE, D. ANXOLABEHERE and S. RONSSERAY, 2004 aubergine mutations in Drosophila melanogaster impair P cytotype determination by telomeric P elements inserted in heterochromatin. Mol. Gen. Genomics 272: 336–343.[CrossRef][Medline]
RIO, D. C., 1990 Molecular mechanisms regulating Drosophila P element transposition. Annu. Rev. Genet. 24: 543–578.[CrossRef][Medline]
RIO, D. C., 1999 Trans-silencing by P elements inserted in subtelomeric heterochromatin involves the Drosophila polycomb group gene, Enhancer of zeste. Genetics 153: 507.
RIO, D. C., F. A. LASKI and G. M. RUBIN, 1986 Identification and immunochemical analysis of biologically active Drosophila P element transposase. Cell 44: 21–32.[CrossRef][Medline]
ROCHE, S., and D. C. RIO, 1998 Trans-silencing by P elements inserted in subtelomeric heterochromatin involves the Drosophila polycomb group gene, Enhancer of zeste. Genetics 149: 1839–1855.
ROIHA, H., G. M. RUBIN and K. O'HARE, 1988 P element insertions and rearrangements at the singed locus of Drosophila melanogaster. Genetics 119: 75–83.
RONSSERAY, S., M. LEHMANN and D. ANXOLABÉHÈRE, 1991 The maternally inherited regulation of P elements in Drosophila melanogaster can be elicited by two P copies at cytological site 1A on the X chromosome. Genetics 129: 501–512.[Abstract]
RONSSERAY, S., M. LEHMANN, D. NOUAUD and D. ANXOLABÉHÈRE, 1996 The regulatory properties of autonomous subtelomeric P elements are sensitive to a Suppressor of variegation in Drosophila melanogaster. Genetics 143: 1665–1674.
RONSSERAY, S., L. MARIN, M. LEHMANN and D. ANXOLABÉHÈRE, 1998 Repression of hybrid dysgenesis in Drosophila melanogaster by combinations of telomeric P-element reporters and naturally occurring P elements. Genetics 149: 1857–1866.
SAVITSKY, M., O. KRAVCHUK, L. MELNIKOVA and P. GEORGIEV, 2002 Heterochromatin protein 1 is involved in control of telomere elongation in Drosophila melanogaster. Mol. Cell. Biol. 22: 3204–3218.
SAVITSKY, M., D. KWON, P. GEORGIEV, A. KALMYKOVA and V. GVOZDEV, 2006 Telomere elongation is under the control of the RNAi-based mechanism in the Drosophila germline. Genes Dev. 20: 345–354.
SIMMONS, M. J., K. J. HALEY, C. D. GRIMES, J. D. RAYMOND and J. B. NIEMI, 2002 A hobo transgene that encodes the P element transposase in Drosophila melanogaster: autoregulation and cytotype control of transposase activity. Genetics 161: 195–204.
SIMMONS, M. J., J. D. RAYMOND, J. B. NIEMI, J. R. STUART and P. J. MERRIMAN, 2004 The P cytotype in Drosophila melanogaster: a maternally transmitted regulatory state of the germline associated with telomeric P elements. Genetics 166: 243–254.
SIMMONS, M. J., J. B. NIEMI, D-F. RYZEK, C. LAMOUR, J. W. GOODMAN et al., 2007 Cytotype regulation by telomeric P elements in Drosophila melanogaster: interactions with P elements from M' strains. Genetics 176: 1957–1966.
SIRIACO, G. M., G. CENCI, A. HAOUDI, L. E. CHAMPION, C. ZHOU et al., 2001 Telomere elongation (Tel), a new mutation in Drosophila melanogaster that produces long telomeres. Genetics 160: 235–245.
STUART, J. R., K. J. HALEY, D. SWEDZINSKI, S. LOCKNER, P. E. KOCIAN et al., 2002 Telomeric P elements associated with cytotype regulation of the P transposon family in Drosophila melanogaster. Genetics 162: 1641–1654.
VAGIN, V. V., A. SIGOVA, C. LI, H. SEITZ, V. GVOZDEV et al., 2006 A distinct small RNA pathway silences selfish genetic elements in the germline. Science 313: 320–324.
Related articles in Genetics:
This article has been cited by other articles:
 |
|
 |
|
  M. J. Simmons, J. B. Niemi, D.-F. Ryzek, C. Lamour, J. W. Goodman, W. Kraszkiewicz, and R. Wolff Cytotype Regulation by Telomeric P Elements in Drosophila melanogaster: Interactions With P Elements From M' Strains Genetics, August 1, 2007; 176(4): 1957 - 1966. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
