- THIS ARTICLE
-
Abstract
- Full Text (PDF)
-
All Versions of this Article:
genetics.105.051375v1
174/3/1115 most recent - Alert me when this article is cited
- Alert me if a correction is posted
- SERVICES
- Related articles in Genetics
- Similar articles in this journal
- Similar articles in PubMed
- Alert me to new issues of the journal
- Download to citation manager
- Reprints & Permissions
- CITING ARTICLES
- Citing Articles via HighWire
- Citing Articles via Google Scholar
- GOOGLE SCHOLAR
- Articles by Diaz-Perez, S. V.
- Articles by Marahrens, Y.
- Search for Related Content
- PUBMED
- PubMed Citation
- Articles by Diaz-Perez, S. V.
- Articles by Marahrens, Y.
Originally published as Genetics Published Articles Ahead of Print on September 15, 2006.
Genetics, Vol. 174, 1115-1133, November 2006, Copyright © 2006
doi:10.1534/genetics.105.051375
A Deletion at the Mouse Xist Gene Exposes Trans-effects That Alter the Heterochromatin of the Inactive X Chromosome and the Replication Time and DNA Stability of Both X Chromosomes
Silvia V. Diaz-Perez*,
David O. Ferguson
,
Chen Wang
,
Gyorgyi Csankovszki
,
Chengming Wang**,
Shih-Chang Tsai*,
Devkanya Dutta
,
Vanessa Perez*,
SunMin Kim*,
C. Daniel Eller*,
Jennifer Salstrom*,
Yan Ouyang*,
Michael A. Teitell
,
Bernhard Kaltenboeck**,
Andrew Chess
,
Sui Huang
and
York Marahrens*,1
* Department of Human Genetics and 
Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, University of California, Los Angeles, California 90095,
Department of Pathology and
Department of Molecular, Cellular, and Developmental Biology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan 48109,
Department of Cell and Molecular Biology, Northwestern University, Chicago, Illinois 60611, ** Department of Pathobiology, Auburn University, Auburn, Alabama 36849 and 
Center for Human Genetic Research, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts 02114
1 Corresponding author: Department of Human Genetics, UCLA, Gonda Center, 695 Charles E. Young Dr., South Los Angeles, CA 90095-7088.
E-mail: ymarahrens{at}mednet.ucla.edu
The inactive X chromosome of female mammals displays several properties of heterochromatin including late replication, histone H4 hypoacetylation, histone H3 hypomethylation at lysine-4, and methylated CpG islands. We show that cre-Lox-mediated excision of 21 kb from both Xist alleles in female mouse fibroblasts led to the appearance of two histone modifications throughout the inactive X chromosome usually associated with euchromatin: histone H4 acetylation and histone H3 lysine-4 methylation. Despite these euchromatic properties, the inactive X chromosome was replicated even later in S phase than in wild-type female cells. Homozygosity for the deletion also caused regions of the active X chromosome that are associated with very high concentrations of LINE-1 elements to be replicated very late in S phase. Extreme late replication is a property of fragile sites and the 21-kb deletions destabilized the DNA of both X chromosomes, leading to deletions and translocations. This was accompanied by the phosphorylation of p53 at serine-15, an event that occurs in response to DNA damage, and the accumulation of
-H2AX, a histone involved in DNA repair, on the X chromosome. The Xist locus therefore maintains the DNA stability of both X chromosomes.
X-INACTIVATION in female mammals is the formation of heterochromatin throughout one of two X chromosomes early in development (GARTLER and RIGGS 1983). X-inactivation requires a region called the X-inactivation center (Xic) (LYON 1996). Physical homologous association of the two copies of the Xic has been proposed to trigger X-inactivation (MARAHRENS 1999) and such an association has recently been shown to mark the onset of X-inactivation (BACHER et al. 2006; XU et al. 2006). The X-linked Xist gene, which resides in the Xic (BROWN et al. 1991), plays a central role in the subsequent heterochromatin formation (PENNY et al. 1996) and Xist knockout mice die early in embryogenesis due to a failure to undergo X-inactivation (MARAHRENS et al. 1997). Xist encodes an untranslated RNA that is expressed from the inactive X chromosome (Xi) but not from the active X chromosome (Xa) (BROCKDORFF et al. 1991; BROWN et al. 1991). The Xist RNA is quite stable and colocalizes exclusively with the Xi (BROWN et al. 1992; CLEMSON et al. 1996). In addition to the role of Xist, the spread of X-inactivation correlates with high concentrations of LINE-1 elements on the X chromosome (LYON 1998). Accordingly, X-linked genes that escape X-inactivation are found in regions with reduced concentrations of LINE-1 sequence (BAILEY et al. 2000). In cells deficient for the DNA methyltransferase Dnmt3b, the DNA of LINE-1 elements on the Xi, but not on the Xa, is hypomethylated (HANSEN 2003) and X-inactivation is either incomplete or not fully maintained (HANSEN et al. 2000).
Another feature that distinguishes the Xi from the Xa and from autosomes is that it is replicated later in S phase (TAYLOR 1968; TAYLOR and MINER 1968). The replication timing of the Xi reflects a general trend where later replication times are associated with gene repression and early replication with transcriptional competence (GILBERT 2002). The available evidence indicates that the same replication origins are utilized on the active and inactive X chromosomes (COHEN et al. 2003; GOMEZ and BROCKDORFF 2004), thus suggesting that the replication timing differences between the two X chromosomes stem from the times in S phase that their origins are activated. While in female human cells the Xi is replicated much later in S phase than the Xa (PRIEST et al. 1967), the Xi is not replicated nearly as late in S phase in female mouse cells as in human cells (EVANS et al. 1965; GALTON and HOLT 1965; TIEPOLO et al. 1967). This has led to the Xi in mouse cells being distinguished by its absence of label incorporation in early S phase rather than by its being disproportionately replicated late in S phase (NESBITT and GARTLER 1970). Nevertheless, there is always a consistent trend of the mouse Xi displaying more label incorporation late in S phase than the Xa in both primary and transformed female fibroblasts (DIAZ-PEREZ et al. 2005).
The protein composition of the Xi also distinguishes it from other chromosomes. The histone H2A homolog, macrohistone H2A, is present along the length of the Xi but not the Xa (COSTANZI and PEHRSON 1998). In addition, nearly all of the nucleosomes of the Xi are hypoacetylated at the N-terminal tail of histone H4 (JEPPESEN and TURNER 1993). Histone tail acetylation is a widespread characteristic of euchromatin and histone deacetylation is a general characteristic of heterochromatin (JENUWEIN and ALLIS 2001). Furthermore the nucleosomes of the Xi are methylated at histone H3 lysine-9 (PETERS et al. 2001; CHADWICK and WILLARD 2004) or lysine-27 (PLATH et al. 2003; CHADWICK and WILLARD 2004), and both are histone modifications associated with heterochromatin. Methylation at H3 lysine-4, a euchromatic histone modification that appears to be mutually exclusive to lysine-9 methylation, is conspicuously absent from the Xi (BOGGS et al. 2001). Yet another feature that distinguishes the Xi from other chromosomes is that it is associated with high concentrations of the BRCA1 protein that associates with XIST RNA (GANESAN et al. 2002). In BRCA1-deficient cells, XIST RNA, macroH2A, and H3 lysine-9 methylation all failed to concentrate on the Xi (GANESAN et al. 2002, 2004).
In addition to its role in X-inactivation, BRCA1 functions as a tumor suppressor that plays a role in cell cycle checkpoints, in multiple types of DNA repair, and in the maintenance of genome stability (SCULLY and LIVINGSTON 2000; WELCSH et al. 2000; NAROD and FOULKES 2004). Stalled DNA replication forks as well as various types of DNA damage, including UV damage, cause the ataxia-telangiectasia-mutated and Rad3-related (ATR) kinase to phosphorylate various targets including BRCA1 (TIBBETTS et al. 2000), p53 at serine-15 (TIBBETTS et al. 1999), and H2AX (to produce
-H2AX) (WARD and CHEN 2001; WARD et al. 2004). Double-strand breaks cause the related ataxia-telangiectasia mutated (ATM) kinase to phosphorylate many of the same targets including BRCA1 (CORTEZ et al. 1999; GATEI et al. 2000), p53 at serine-15 (BANIN et al. 1998; CANMAN et al. 1998; KHANNA et al. 1998), and histone H2AX to produce
-H2AX (BURMA et al. 2001).
-H2AX associates with the Xi in the absence of experimentally incurred DNA damage, but this is restricted to late S phase (CHADWICK and LANE 2005). The phosphorylation of p53 stabilizes and activates the protein, which signals for either cell cycle arrest or apoptosis (ATTARDI 2005).
-H2AX has been proposed to recruit additional proteins to sites of DNA damage (BASSING and ALT 2004). Deficiency in either ATR or ATM disturbs the maintenance of X-inactivation (OUYANG et al. 2005).
Excision of the transcribed Xist allele from the Xi leads to the loss of the Xist RNA and absence of macroH2A from the Xi (CSANKOVSZKI et al. 1999) and to a destabilization of X chromosomal gene silencing (CSANKOVSZKI et al. 2001) but does not abolish late replication (CSANKOVSZKI et al. 1999) or result in an acetylated Xi (CSANKOVSZKI et al. 1999). The transcribed Xist allele, therefore, functions in cis to maintain a subset of the features of the Xi heterochromatin. Excision of 21 kb from the nontranscribed Xist locus of the Xa results in the Xa being replicated later in S phase (DIAZ-PEREZ et al. 2005). Both Xist alleles therefore display biological activity. Here we show that element(s) at both copies of the Xist gene control the chromatin structure of the Xi and influence the replication time of both X chromosomes. Xist deficiency furthermore destabilizes both X chromosomes, leading to deletions and translocations, the phosphorylation of p53 at serine-15, and the increased association of the DNA repair/genome maintenance protein
-H2AX with the Xi. Xist deletions therefore reveal trans-interactions that occur subsequent to the initiation of X-inactivation.
Fibroblasts and growth conditions:
All of the mice used in this study had a 129 genetic background. Mouse primary fibroblasts were obtained from wild-type 129 mice and also from crosses involving previously described mouse strains (CSANKOVSZKI et al. 1999, 2001) by trypsinization of 13-day embryos, culture, and immortalization with SV40 T-antigen (JAT et al. 1986). Three immortalized fibroblast cell lines were obtained from three E13.5 mouse embryos (one embryo per cell line), in which 21 kb of sequence at the Xist locus were flanked by Lox sites (floxed) on both the Xa and Xi (XaXist-floxXiXist-flox). Three additional immortalized fibroblast cell lines were obtained from three wild-type 129 embryos (XaXist-WTXiXist-WT). The three XaXist-floxXiXist-flox cell lines (XaXist-floxXiXist-flox-1, -2, and -3) and three XaXist-WTXiXist-WT cell lines (XaXist-WTXiXist-WT-1, -2, and -3) were infected with adenovirus expressing cre recombinase and GFP (TAN et al. 1999) and plated out in 24-well plates at less than one cell per well (limiting dilution) to recover clonal cell lines from each progenitor line. GFP expression was used to identify infected cells. Starting from the fibroblasts that arise during the limiting dilution procedure, each clonal cell line was passaged five times. During this passaging, lines that were homozygous for the 21-kb deletion (XaXist-
21-kbXiXist-
21-kb-1.1, -2.1, and -3.1) and one line that was heterozygous for the floxed Xist allele were identified using PCR. RNA FISH for Xist transcript was used to determine that, in the heterozygous line, the deletion was on the Xi (XaXist-floxXiXist-
21-kb-1.1) (not shown). After the aforementioned five passages, the three clonal XaXist-
21-kbXiXist-
21-kb cell lines and the three clonal XaXist-WTXiXist-WT cell lines (from six different embryos) were each subjected to a BrdU pulse (see below) and metaphase spread chromosomes were prepared. These spreads were analyzed for evidence of chromosomal deletions and translocations using chromosome paint, BrdU immunostaining, and spectral karyotyping (see below). Note that the three XaXist-
21-kbXiXist-
21-kb (-1.1, -2.1, and -3.1) and three XaXist-WTXiXist-WT (-1.1, -2.1, and -3.1) cell lines used in the analysis for deletions and translocations were generated using identical procedures. Primary XaXist-
21-kbXiXist-
21-kb did not grow well enough to perform immunostaining or replication timing experiments; we are exploring approaches to remedy this.
In addition, cell lines XaXist-floxXiXist-flox-1, -2, and -3 were infected with adenovirus expressing only GFP and limiting dilution was used to recover clonal cell lines XaXist-floxXiXist-flox-1.1, -2.1, and -3.1 using the same procedure and the same number of passages as was used to obtain lines XaXist-
21-kbXiXist-
21-kb-1.1, -2.1, and -3.1. Two additional cell lines used in this study were obtained by infecting fibroblasts that were heterozygous for the Xist-flox allele with adenovirus expressing cre recombinase and GFP and using limiting dilution, PCR, and RNA FISH to recover and identify clonal cell lines that carried the 21-kb deletion on the Xi (XaXist-WTXiXist-
21-kb-1.1 and XaXist-WTXiXist-
21-kb-2.1). Finally, three XaXist-flox,Hprt-
XiXist-flox,Hprt-WT cell lines and derivative XaXist-
21-kb,Hprt-
XiXist-
21-kb,Hprt-WT cells were obtained using the same procedure, except that a series of additional mouse matings were first performed to enable the production of fibroblasts that also included a published Hprt deletion (HOOPER et al. 1987) on the Xa. The generation of the Hprt-heterozygous cell lines is described in detail elsewhere (J. L. SALSTROM, C. WANG, C. WANG, D. DUTTA, S. ZEITLIN, G. CSANKOVSZKI, C. D. ELLER, S. DIAZ-PEREZ, J. WANG, A. CHESS, S. HUANG, B. KALTENBOECK and Y. MARAHRENS, unpublished data).
A large proportion of the immortalized cells in each culture contained either three or four X chromosomes. Limiting dilution was also used to obtain clonal cell lines containing predominantly two X chromosomes and an approximately diploid number of chromosomes. To this end, the same three immortalized XaXist-floxXiXist-flox (-1, -2, and -3) cell lines described in the previous paragraph were infected with adenovirus expressing cre recombinase and/or GFP (TAN et al. 1999), and limiting dilution was used to recover numerous clonal cell lines from each progenitor line. PCR was used to identify XaXist-
21-kbXiXist-
21-kb cell lines and metaphase spread chromosomes and flow cytometry was used to identify XaXist-
21-kbXiXist-
21-kb and XaXist-floxXiXist-flox lines that were derived from diploid cells. A number of these diploid cell lines were subjected to X chromosome paint to confirm the presence of two X chromosomes. We chose six approximately diploid cell lines containing two X chromosomes each that were derived from three embryos, with lines XaXist-
21-kbXiXist-
21-kb-1.2 and XaXist-floxXiXist-flox-1.2 from the same embryo, XaXist-
21-kbXiXist-
21-kb-2.2 and XaXist-floxXiXist-flox-2.2 from the same embryo, and XaXist-
21-kbXiXist-
21-kb-3.2 and XaXist-flox XiXist-flox-3.2 from the same embryo. Using the identical procedure, approximately diploid cell lines containing two X chromosomes each were also derived from the XaXist-WTXiXist-
21-kb and XaXist-floxXiXist-
21-kb cells (XaXist-WTXiXist-
21-kb-1.2 and XaXist-floxXiXist-
21-kb-1.2). The diploid lines thus established were all used at equally low passage numbers because they all became increasingly tetraploid with extended passaging. Diploid XaXist-flox,Hprt-
XiXist-flox,Hprt-WT and XaXist-
21-kb,Hprt-
XiXist-
21-kb,Hprt-WT cells were also obtained.
Infection of fibroblasts with adenovirus expressing cre recombinase and/or adenovirus expressing GFP (TAN et al. 1999) was performed at 50 multiplicities of infection (MOI) in 6-cm-diameter dishes with 106 cells with virus in 200 µl of Dulbecco modified Eagle's minimum essential medium (DMEM) with 5% fetal bovine serum (FBS) at 37° for 1 hr followed by the addition of 3.0 ml of DMEM with10% FBS. Primary and transformed mouse fibroblast cell lines were grown in DMEM supplemented with 10% fetal bovine serum (GIBCO, Grand Island, NY), penicillin (100 µg/ml), and streptomycin (100 µg/ml). The PCR primers 5' LoxF (5'-TTT CTG GTC TTT GAG GGC AC-3'), 5' LoxR (5'-ACC CTT GCC TTT TCC ATT TT-3'), and Xint3R (5'-CAC TGG CAA GGT GAA TAG CA-3') were used to identify the Xist-flox (612-bp PCR product), Xist-
21kb (513 bp), and Xist-WT (427 bp) alleles. XaXist-
21kbXiWT fibroblasts were distinguished from XaWTXiXist-
21kb fibroblasts using RNA FISH against the Xist RNA (see below).
RNA FISH:
Fibroblasts were grown on coverslips for 24 hr and then fixed in 4% formaldehyde for 15 min at room temperature (RT). The cells were permeabilized in PBS containing 0.5% Triton-X for 5 min on ice and washed in PBS and 2x SSC. RNA FISH hybridization was carried out as previously described (SPECTOR and GOLDMAN 1998.). The Xist probe was labeled by nick translation with biotin-21-dUTP. After overnight hybridization at 37° posthybridization washes were done as previously described (SPECTOR and GOLDMAN 1998). The probe was detected with a 500-fold dilution of avidin-FITC (Jackson ImmunoResearch, Westgrove, PA) at RT for 1 hr. The nuclei were counterstained with 4',6-diamidino-2-phenylindole (DAPI).
Two-color DNA FISH:
A combination probe, composed of a mixture of seven different small probes, was used to identify the inactive X chromosome. This combination probe, henceforth referred to as 6.8-kb probe, contains PCR products of sizes (in base pairs) 412, 605, 609, 850, 1011, 1560, and 1755. Each of these PCR products was amplified separately using Taq Polymerase (Promega, Madison, WI) from a region extending up to 14.7 kb upstream of the 5' end of exon 2 of the Hprt gene and that is deleted in the Hprt-
allele used in this study (THOMPSON et al. 1989). The mouse BAC RP23-412J16 [purchased from Invitrogen (Carlsbad, CA)] served as template for the PCR reactions. The sequences of primers are: GCA AGC ATA AGG ACC AGA GC (412R), TTC CAC AAG AAA TAT TAC ACA AAA CA (412L), CCT AAC CAT TGA GCC GTC TT (605R), GGT CTC TGA ACT ACC AAT TGC AC (605L), GCA ATG ACA AAT GTT TTG TGG (609R), TGC TTA TTA GCA CAA GAC CTC AAG (609L), ATC ACC CTA TTC CCA GTG GA (850R), GCA GAT GAT AAG CTA TCC TTG AGA (850L), CAT CAC TGA GTC TTG CTG GTT T (1011R), CAA TTT AGG GGA AGG AAG CA (1011L), TGG TAG CTG GGC ATA AAA GC (1560R), AAT GGG AGA AAA GGC AGG AT (1560L), CAG GAA AGG GTG TGT GTG TG (1755R), and TAC GCT CTG GCA GTT TTC AA (1755L). The PCR products were gel extracted using the Wizard PCR Preps DNA purification system (Promega). To mark both the active and the inactive X chromosomes, mouse BAC RP23-298N24 (obtained from Invitrogen) was used to obtain a second probe. For fluorescent probe preparations, 1 mg of DNA was direct labeled with either FluorX-dCTP (for the whole BAC probe) or Cy3-dCTP (for the Xi-specific 6.8-kb combination probe), using the Nick Translation kit (Amersham Biosciences, Arlington Heights, IL). To prepare the 6.8-kb probe, equimolar concentrations of the seven different probes were mixed together, to a total DNA content of 1 mg, for labeling. Labeled probes were purified using NucAway Spin columns (Ambion, Austin, TX) and precipitated with 40 µg mouse Cot-1 DNA, 100 µg salmon sperm, and 100 µg tRNA; washed in 75% ethanol followed by 100% ethanol; and resuspended in 100 µl hybridization buffer (50% formamide, 10% dextran sulfate, 1x SSC). Cells were treated for FISH as described previously (SINGH et al. 2003). Briefly, cells were fixed with 3:1 methanol–acetic acid, dropped on poly-L-lysine-coated slides (Sigma, St. Louis) in a humid chamber, and denatured for 2 min at 69°–72° in 70% formamide/2x SSC. An 18-ml aliquot of the two probes (12 µl of 6.8-kb probe, 6 ml of BAC probe) was prehybridized (90° for 5 min, followed by 10 min at 37°) and then hybridized overnight with cells at 37°. Next, cells were washed three times with 50% formamide/2x SSC at 42° followed by three washes with 1x SSC also at 42°. The following washes were done at room temperature: 1x SSC (10 min), 4x SSC (5 min), 4x SSC/0.1% Tween-20 (5 min), and 4x SSC (5 min). The cells were mounted in Vectashield mounting medium containing DAPI (Vector Laboratories, Burlingame, CA) to counterstain the nuclei. Cells were viewed with a Nikon E600 fluorescent microscope. Images were captured with a CCD camera using SPOT Advanced software.
Quantitative determination of Xist mRNA:
Quantitative determination of Xist mRNA was performed by one-step reverse transcription (RT) fluorescence resonance energy transfer (FRET) real-time PCR of 1:100 diluted poly(A) RNA samples in a Lightcycler modeled after the duplex PCR approach described earlier (WANG et al. 2004). Xist primers (muXISTmRNAUP, 5'-CCC TAC ATC AAA GTA GGA GAA AAG CTG CTG-3'; muXISTmRNADN, 5'-GAA GGG TAA TAT TTG GTA GAT GGC ATT GTG T-3') transversed the boundaries of exons 4 and 5 and of exons 5 and 6, respectively, and the FRET probes (muXISTFLU, 5'-CCT AGC TTC TGG AGA GAG AAC CAA ATA GAG-6-FAM-3'; muXISTBOD, 5'-Bodipy 630/650-AGA ATG GCT TCC TCG AAG GTC AGT GC-Phosphate-3') detected exon 5. Thermal cycling conditions of this PCR were 30 min reverse transcription at 55°, followed by 2 min denaturation at 95°, followed by thermal cycling: 6 times at 95°, 0 sec/68°, 12 sec/72°, 8 sec; 9 times at 95°, 0 sec/66°, 12 sec/72°, 8 sec; 3 times at 95°, 0 sec/64°, 12 sec/72°, 8 sec; 25 times at 95°, 0 sec/56°, 12 sec followed by fluorescence acqusition/72°, 10 sec. Quantitative standards were produced by PCR amplification with dTTP, gel purification, and quantification of the fragment by Pico-Green assay (Invitrogen). Reaction chemistry was as published (WANG et al. 2004). The internal autosomal reference gene transcript (porphobilinogen deaminase, PBGD) was amplified from undiluted poly(A) RNA in a separate reaction following the duplex PCR protocol as described (WANG et al. 2004). All analyte transcript concentrations are expressed as copies per PBGD reference transcripts.
Fluorescent immunostaining for BrdU in metaphase chromosome spreads:
BrdU (30 µM) was added to asynchronous actively growing fibroblasts at 80% confluence. Several BrdU pulse lengths were performed on multiple cell lines and these data were used to determine that 4.5 hr is the appropriate duration of BrdU incorporation for each replication-timing experiment (data not shown). Exponentially growing asynchronous fibroblasts were cultured for 4.5 hr in the presence of BrdU and 0.050 µg/ml Colcemid (Life Technologies, Grand Island, NY) was added 1 hr before harvesting. Cell suspensions were incubated 13–15 min in 0.4% KCl at 37° followed by fixation with 3:1 methanol:acetic acid. Metaphase spreads were prepared by dropping the BrdU-treated cells onto coverslips followed by DNA denaturation in 70% formamine/2x SSC at 73° for 2 min. Following preincubation with blocking buffer (1x PBS, 10% FBS, 0.2% Tween 20), incorporated BrdU was detected using 1:20 dilution in blocking solution of monoclonal anti-BrdU antibody (Sigma) followed by 1:150 dilution in blocking solution of Texas-Red anti-mouse antibody (Jackson ImmunoResearch) in blocking buffer. Images were captured using Quips mFISH software (Vysis, Adelphia, NJ). The individual colors of a recorded image were stored separately by the Vysis Quips mFISH software and the representation of each color in the final image was adjusted using the software setting of the gain for that color. The BrdU incorporation studies were not done simultaneously with Xist RNA FISH because the Xist RNA is lost from the Xi during mitosis. The Xist RNA signal that can be seen on the Xi in early mitotic cells is very fragile and the treatments that occur during the BrdU incorporation assay caused the Xi to lose Xist RNA signal.
Spectral karyotyping:
The spectral karyotyping (SKY) probe mixture (Applied Spectral Imaging) was applied according to the manufacturer's recommendations for metaphase chromosome spreads (MCSs) prepared as described for the BrdU incorporation assay. Chromosomal aberrations were quantified using an Olympus BX-61 microscope equipped with an Applied Spectral Imaging interferometer and 40x and 63x objectives, driven by a desktop computer with SKY acquisition and analysis software.
Quantitation of incorporated BrdU:
X chromosome paints (Cambio, Cambridge, UK) were used to identify the X chromosomes and the X chromosome displaying the higher level of BrdU incorporation within a spread was always assumed to be the inactive one. Images obtained using Quips mFISH were transferred to NIH image (http://rsb.info.nih.gov/nih-image) and the numbers of pixels occupied by the X chromosomes (DAPI) and by fluorescently labeled BrdU (Texas Red) were then calculated for each MCS. Fisher's exact test was used to compare the percentages of X chromosomes displaying BrdU incorporation between different cell lines. Box plots were used to visualize the distributions of BrdU measurements across categorical groupings. Box plots labeled "% BrdU signal" represent measurements of the number of pixels of BrdU signal on a chromosome divided by the number of pixels of DAPI signal occupied by the same chromosome multiplied by 100. NIH Image was also used to record the intensity of each pixel. "BrdU area x intensity" represents the % BrdU signal multiplied by the average intensity of the pixels representing BrdU. The statistical analyses were performed using the software package R (IHAKA and GENTLEMAN 1996), which can be downloaded from http://cran.r-project.org/. Differences in measurements were tested across categorical groupings using the Kruskal–Wallis test (KRUSKAL 1964) and the P-values obtained from this test are displayed above the corresponding box plots.
X chromosome paint:
A total of 10 µl of mouse X chromosome-specific biotinylated probe (Cambio) were used to detect the X chromosomes by fluorescent in situ hybridization (DNA FISH) to ethanol-dehydrated cells according to manufacturer's instructions. The probe was detected using streptavidin–FITC (Jackson ImmunoResearch) and anti-streptavidin FITC (Vector Laboratories) at 1:50 dilution each in blocking solution (1x PBS, 10% human serum, 0.05% Tween 20). The chromosomes were counterstained with DAPI and viewed with a Leica DMR fluorescent microscope. Images were captured with Quips mFISH software (Vysis).
Determining sequence composition across the X chromosome:
We identified the types and positions of repetitive sequences from the RepeatMasker output provided by the UCSC genome browser (http://genome.ucsc.edu). For successive 1-Mb intervals, we then obtained a value for each repeat type representing the percentage of the 1-Mb sequence occupied by that repeat type.
Histone immunolabeling and whole-chromosome paint:
Indirect immunofluorescence with anti-acetyl-histone H4 antibody (Serotec, Oxford) and histone H3 (trimethyl-K4) antibody (Abcam) was carried out on asynchronous cultures. Fibroblasts were grown at 80% confluence, Colcimid (0.05 µg/ml) was added for 1 hr, and fibroblasts were harvested and then swollen in 0.4% KCl at 37° for 13 min. Fibroblasts were dropped onto coverslips. Cell membranes were solubilized by immersion in KCM buffer [120 mM KCl, 20 mM NaCl, 10 mM Tris–HCl, pH 8, 0.5 mM EDTA, 0.1% (v/v) Triton X-100] in a petri dish (35 x 10 mm). The coverslips were transferred to blocking solution (10% FBS in KCM) at 37° for 1 hr and then incubated with 20 µl of 1:10 of anti-acetylated H4 (Serotec) or 1:20 anti-methH3-K4 (Abcam) in a humidified chamber for 2 hr at RT or overnight at 4°. The coverslips were then washed three times for 5 min in KCM and transferred to blocking solution and incubated at 37° for 1 hr. Primary antibody was detected with anti-rabbit Texas Red (Jackson ImmunoResearch) at 1:100 dilution in blocking solution and incubated for 1 hr at RT. The coverslips were washed three times with KCM buffer and fixed at RT with 4% paraformaldehyde (Electron Microscopy Sciences, Fort Washington, PA) in KCM for 20 min and washed three times with KCM at RT. To detect the X chromosomes, the coverslips were incubated two times in methanol:acetic acid (1:3 v/v) at –20° for 20 min each. DNA was denatured with 70% formamide/2x SSC at 73° for 8 min, dehydrated, and then hybridized to 10 µl of the biotinylated probe (Cambio) according to the manufacturer's instructions. The probe was detected using streptavidin–FITC (Jackson ImmunoResearch) and anti-streptavidin FITC (Vector Laboratories) at 1:50 dilution each in blocking solution (1x PBS, 10% human serum, 0.05% Tween 20). The chromosomes were counterstained with DAPI and viewed with a Leica DMR fluorescent microscope. Images were captured with Quips mFISH software (Vysis).
Western analysis of p53:
Proteins from whole-cell extracts were separated by sodium dodecyl sulfate (SDS) polyacrylimide gel electrophoresis (PAGE), transferred to a charged PVDF membrane, and blocked with 5% nonfat milk in TBST (20 mM Tris pH 7.4, 150 mM NaCl, 0.05% Tween-20). Primary and secondary antibody incubations were performed in 5% nonfat milk in TBST. Proteins were detected using the ECL Plus Western blotting detection reagent (GE Healthcare, Piscataway, NJ). Primary reagents included: rabbit anti-p53-Ser15 (Cell Signaling Technology, Beverly, MA), rabbit anti-p53(CM5) (Vector Laboratories), mouse anti-β actin (Sigma), and mouse anti-ATM-Ser1981 (Rockland, Gilbersville, PA). Donkey anti-rabbit IgG-horseradish peroxidase (HRP) (GE Healthcare) and sheep anti-goat IgG-HRP (GE Healthcare) were used as the secondary antibodies.
BRCA1,
-H2AX, and MeCP2 immunolabeling:
Fibroblasts were grown at 80% confluence and dropped onto coverslips. The cells were fixed with 2% of paraformaldehyde in PBS for 5 min and washed three times with 1x PBS. The cells were incubated in permeabilized solution (1x PBS, 0.5% Triton X-100) for 10 min at 4° and washed three times with KCM buffer [120 mM KCl, 20 mM NaCl, 10 mM Tris–HCl, pH 8, 0.5 mM EDTA, 0.1% (v/v) Triton X-100]. The cells were transferred to blocking solution (10% FBS in KCM) at 37° for 1 hr and then incubated with anti-Brca1 1:2.5 dilution at 37° for 2 hr. The coverslips were washed three times with KCM buffer and blocking again at 37° for 30 min. The Brca1 antibody was detected with anti-mouse Texas Red at 1:150 dilution and incubated at room temperature for 1 hr and then washed three times and the process repeated for histone
H2AX (Upstate Biotechnology, Charlottesville, VA) that was detected using anti-rabbit FITC. The immunodetections were also performed in the reverse order (Brca1 last) with similar results. In other experiments, the
-H2AX antibody (Upstate Biotechnology) was detected using either anti-rabbit FITC or anti-rabbit Texas Red. In yet other experiments, MeCP2 antibody (Upstate Biotechnology) was detected using anti-rabbit FITC and in a subset of experiments the process was repeated using Brca1 antibody detected with anti-mouse Texas Red. Finally, the cells were fixed with 4% paraformaldehyde in KCM for 15 min and washed three times with KCM. The nuclei were counterstained with DAPI and viewed with a Leica DMR fluorescent microscope. Images were captured with Quips mFISH software (Vysis).
Simultaneous immunolabeling of histone H3 trimethyl-lysine 4 and DNA FISH for sequence flanking the Xist gene:
We detected histone H3 (trimethyl-K4) using a rabbit antibody to H3 (Abcam), followed by a goat antibody to rabbit conjugated with Texas Red (Jackson ImmunoResearch). The immunodetection of histone was combined with DNA FISH as described (BROWN et al. 2001) with the following modifications: we labeled the P1 clone p
JL1 (LEE et al. 1999) with digoxigenin by nick translation (Dig–Nick translation mix; Roche, Indianapolis) and detected the label with sheep anti-Digoxigenin-Fluorecein (Roche) and rabbit anti-sheep Fluorecein (Vector Laboratories).
Simultaneous immunolabeling of
-H2AX and DNA FISH for sequence flanking the Xist gene:
Biotinylated dUTP-labeled DNA FISH probes were prepared by nick translation from BAC DNA and P1 DNA, both of which include the Xist gene and flanking DNA sequence. Cell lines XaXist-
21-kbXiXist-
21-kb-1.1 and XaXist-
21-kbXiXist-
21-kb-2.1 were maintained in DMEM containing 10% FBS and seeded on coverslips 1 day before the experiment. Cells on coverslips were fixed with 4% paraformaldehyde in PBS for 10 min followed by 5 min permeabilization with 0.5% Triton X-100 at room temperature. Primary antibody recognizing
-H2AX (Upstate Biotechnology) was applied for 1 hr. Cells were washed with PBS three times before incubation with secondary antibody that was conjugated with FITC (Jackson ImmunoResearch Laboratories). Cells were then fixed again with methanol:acetic acid (3:1) at –20° for 40 min followed by dehydration in 70, 90, and 100% ethanol for 3 min each. Cells were denatured in 70% formamide/2x SSC at 85° for 30 min, cooled down with cold 70% ethanol, and dehydrated with 90 and 100% ethanol. The probe derived from BAC DNA or from P1 DNA was simultaneously denatured at 75° for 10 min in a hybridization mixture (DNA probe, Cot1DNA, hybridization buffer, and 50% formamide) and prehybridized at 37° for 20 min. The prehybridized probe was applied to the pretreated coverslip and incubated at 37° overnight. After a series of stringent washes, avidin–Texas Red was added to the coverslip and incubated for 1 hr. Signal was visualized using a Nikon Eclipse E800 microscope equipped with a SenSys cooled CCD camera (Photometrics, Tucson, AZ). Images were captured using Metamorph image acquisition software (Universal Imaging, Downingtown, PA). Histone H4 acetylation and histone H3 lysine-4 methylation accumulate on the inactive X chromosome when 21 kb are excised from both copies of the Xist gene:
To examine the role of the Xist locus (Figure 1A, top) in the maintenance of chromatin structure, three female immortalized murine embryonic fibroblast (MEF) cell lines were obtained, from three different E13.5 embryos, in which 21 kb of sequence at the Xist gene were flanked by Lox sites (Figure 1A, middle) on both the Xa and the Xi (lines XaXist-floxXiXist-flox-1, XaXist-floxXiXist-flox-2, and XaXist-floxXiXist-flox-3). The three lines were treated with adenovirus expressing cre recombinase and GFP and were also infected with adenovirus expressing only GFP. Limiting dilution was used to obtain clonal cells that were homozygous for the 21-kb deletion (XaXist-
21-kbXiXist-
21-kb) (Figure 1A, bottom) or were XaXist-floxXiXist-flox (from the adeno-GFP infections). The cell lines were chosen such that each pair of cell lines with the same number was derived from the same embryo (e.g., lines XaXist-floxXiXist-flox-1.1 and XaXist-
21-kbXiXist-
21-kb-1.1 are derived from GFP-adenovirus and cre-adenovirus infections of line XaXist-floxXiXist-flox-1, respectively). Using the same procedure, MEF lines XaXist-
21-kbXiXist-WT-1.1, XaXist-WTXiXist-
21-kb-1.1, and XaXist-
21-kbXiXist-WT-1.1 were obtained. PCR (Figure 1A, right) and FISH (see below) were used to determine the genotypes of the cell lines (see MATERIALS AND METHODS).
|
We examined the state of histone acetylation in these cell lines by fluorescence immunostaining of MCSs. Similar to previously published results for wild-type female cells (JEPPESEN and TURNER 1993), the Xi was readily distinguishable from the other chromosomes due to its severe hypoacetylation of histone H4 in MCSs from cell lines XaXist-floxXiXist-flox-1, -2, and -3 (Figure 1B) and in MCSs from lines XaXist-floxXiXist-flox-1.1, -2.1, and -3.1 (not shown). The Xi was also hypoacetylated on histone H4 in MCSs from XaXist-
21-kbXiXist-WT cells (Figure 1D), XaXist-WTXiXist-
21-kb cells (Figure 1E), and XaXist-floxXiXist-
21-kb cells (not shown) in agreement with previously published results (CSANKOVSZKI et al. 1999). In contrast, in MCSs from the three XaXist-
21-kbXiXist-
21-kb cell lines (1.1, 2.1, and 3.1), an inactive X chromosome could no longer be distinguished from the other chromosomes on the basis of hypoacetylation (Figure 1C).
The Xi was also severely hypomethylated at lysine 4 of histone H3 in MCSs from the cell lines XaXist-floxXiXist-flox-1, -2, and -3 (Figure 1F) and in the cell lines XaXist-floxXiXist-flox-1.1, 2.1, and 3.1 (not shown), as was previously reported for wild-type female cells (BOGGS et al. 2001). In contrast, in MCSs from all three XaXist-
21-kbXiXist-
21-kb cell lines (1.1, 2.1, and 3.1), a Xi could not be distinguished from the other chromosomes on the basis of hypomethylation (Figure 1G). RNA FISH revealed that, in contrast to the Xist RNA seen in XaXist-WTXiXist-WT cells (Figure 1H), no XIST RNA signal whatsoever was seen in XaXist-
21-kbXiXist-
21-kb cells (Figure 1I). To determine whether the excision of 21 kb from both Xist alleles causes the Xi to be lost from cells, we examined XaXist-
21-kbXiXist-
21-kb cell lines from three embryos that carried a deletion at the Hprt locus (HOOPER et al. 1987) on the Xa, while the Hprt locus on the Xi was intact. DNA FISH for a region of the X chromosome in combination with immunofluorescence indicated that one of the two X chromosomes was hypomethylated at lysine-4 on histone H3 in XaXist-flox, Hprt-
XiXist-flox, Hprt-WT cells (Figure 1J), indicating that the Hprt deletion did not disrupt H3 lysine-4 hypomethylation on the Xi. In contrast, an X chromosome that was hypomethylated at H3 lysine-4 was absent from in the corresponding XaXist-
21-kb,Hprt-
XiXist-
21-kb,Hprt-WT cells (Figure 1K), as expected. Two-color DNA FISH was performed to verify the presence of the inactive X chromosome in the XaXist-
21-kb,Hprt-
XiXist-
21-kb,Hprt-WT cells. A Cy3-labeled (red) combination probe, comprising a mixture of seven separate probes to the deleted region of Hprt, was used to identify the inactive X chromosome (see MATERIALS AND METHODS for details). A FluorX (green)-labeled mouse BAC (RP23-298N24) was used as a probe to mark both the inactive and the active X chromosomes. Cells, hybridized with both these probes together, when examined confirmed the presence of the inactive X chromosome. For one predominantly diploid XaXist-
21-kb,Hprt-
XiXist-
21-kb,Hprt-WT cell line, 94 of 100 cells examined showed red hybridization signal in their nuclei (Figure 1L, a). Similarly, 96 of 100 cells showed a red hybridization dot in another XaXist-
21-kb,Hprt-
XiXist-
21-kb,Hprt-WT cell line derived from a different embryo (Figure 1L, b). For both cell lines, most cells had one red dot near one of the two green dots. Also, we occasionally observed cells (
5%) that were tetraploid for the X chromosome—having four green dots and two red dots near two of the green dots (not shown). We conclude that the Xi is still present in cells that have excised 21 kb of Xist sequence from both the Xa and the Xi and the homozygous deletion of Xist sequence results in the Xi acquiring H3 lysine-4 methylation and H4 acetylation along its length. Additional lines of evidence that indicate that the Xi is retained in XaXist-
21-kbXiXist-
21-kb cells are presented below.
The dramatic chromatin changes observed on the inactive X chromosome in XaXist-
21-kbXiXist-
21-kb cells raised the question of whether Xist RNA was expressed from the 3' undeleted portion of the Xist gene of either X chromosome in XaXist-
21-kbXiXist-
21-kb cells. To determine whether a truncated Xist RNA was expressed, quantitative determination of Xist mRNA was performed by RT–FRET real-time PCR using PCR primers that transversed the boundaries of exons 4, 5, and 6, respectively, and a FRET probe that recognized exon 5. The internal autosomal reference gene transcript used was PBGD (WANG et al. 2004). In two XaXist-WTXiXist-WT cell lines, the Xist mRNA/PBGD mRNA ratios were 720.3 and 699.1. In contrast, the Xist mRNA/PBGD mRNA ratios in two XaXist-
21-kbXiXist-
21-kb cell lines were 0.0 and 0.0 because only PBGD mRNA, but no Xist RNA, was detected in these samples. A comprehensive and detailed analysis of Xist RNA levels in cells bearing various Xist genotypes will be published elsewhere (J. L. SALSTROM, C. WANG, C. WANG, A. DATTA, S. ZEITLIN, G. CSANKOVSZKI, C. D. ELLER, S. DIAZ-PEREZ, J. WANG, A. CHESS, S. HUANG, B. KALTENBOECK and Y. MARAHRENS, unpublished data).
Altered replication time on the inactive X chromosome in response to 21-kb deletions:
Since the Xi had acquired two euchromatic properties (H4 acetylation and H3 lysine-4 methylation) in XaXist-
21-kbXiXist-
21-kb cells we predicted that the deletions would also cause the Xi to replicate earlier in S phase since euchromatin generally replicates earlier in S phase than heterochromatin (GILBERT 2002). To determine if this was the case, we purified approximately diploid lines XaXist-
21-kbXiXist-
21-kb-1.2, -2.2, and -3.2 from cre-adenovirus-infected XaXist-floxXiXist-flox progenitor lines (1, 2, and 3) using limiting dilution. We also purified predominantly diploid lines XaXist-floxXiXist-flox-1.2, -2.2, and -3.2 from GFP-adenovirus-infected XaXist-floxXiXist-flox progenitor lines (1, 2, and 3). Each pair of diploid cell lines with the same first number was derived from the same embryo (e.g., lines XaXist-floxXiXist-flox-1.2 and XaXist-
21-kbXiXist-
21-kb-1.2 are derived from line XaXist-floxXiXist-flox-1). Using the same procedure, the predominantly diploid lines XaXist-
21-kbXiXist-WT-1.2, XaXist-WTXiXist-
21-kb-1.2, and XaXist-
21-kbXiXist-WT-1.2 MEF lines were also obtained. All diploid lines in this study were used at a low passage number (with respect to limiting dilution) in our analyses because they increasingly accumulated cells that had lost their diploid character with repeated passages.
The predominantly diploid cell lines were subjected to a replication-timing assay that uses fluorescence immunostaining to detect chromosomal regions that incorporated BrdU late in S phase. Cells were pulse labeled with BrdU for 4.5 hr and metaphase chromosome spreads were prepared. Cells that were in mid-S phase at the onset of BrdU addition (Figure 2B) incorporated BrdU in mid- and late S phase but did not reach mitosis in the 4.5-hr interval (Figure 2A) and therefore were not represented among the MCSs. Cells that were in late S phase at the onset of BrdU addition (Figure 2B) incorporated BrdU in late S phase, reached mitosis in the 4.5-hr interval, and the incorporated BrdU was detected in the MCSs (Figure 2C). Identification of X chromosomes using X chromosome paint (Figure 2D) revealed that one of the two X chromosomes in female cells consistently displayed more BrdU signal than the other X chromosome and more signal than most or all autosomes. Although the mouse Xi does not replicate nearly as late in S phase in mouse cells as in human cells, it nevertheless replicates later in S phase than the active X chromosome (EVANS et al. 1965; GALTON and HOLT 1965; TIEPOLO et al. 1967). We consequently inferred that the later replicating X chromosome in our female cultures was the Xi and that the earlier replicating X chromosome was the Xa. The level of BrdU signal that was recorded in a photograph of an X chromosome in a MCS depended, in part, on the gain setting of the red channel of the mQuips Vysis software that was used to display the BrdU signal. At low gain, only the fluorescent signal representing incorporated BrdU that exceeds a high intensity threshold is recorded in the image of an X chromosome (Figure 2E, top). At intermediate gain, the fluorescent BrdU signal exceeding an intermediate intensity threshold is recorded in the image (Figure 2E, middle). At high gain, even small amounts of incorporated BrdU will be displayed among the pixels representing the BrdU signal (Figure 2E, bottom). To normalize the BrdU signal, all photographs of metaphase chromosome spreads were taken at a standardized "low-gain" setting where only five autosomes display BrdU signal and one of these five autosomes displays only one pixel of BrdU. This method of normalizing the gain using BrdU signal on autosomes was previously used to show that portions of the Xa replicate later in S phase if 21 kb are deleted from the Xist locus of the Xa and the method is described in more detail in this earlier study (DIAZ-PEREZ et al. 2005). In addition, only MCSs displaying two X chromosomes were considered. At the measurements taken at low gain, all three clonal XaXist-flox XiXist-flox fibroblast lines (1.2, 2.2, and 3.2) displayed modest BrdU signal on one X chromosome and either very little (Figure 2, C and D) or no (Figure 2, F and G) BrdU signal on the other X chromosome and therefore closely resembled the signal levels seen in XaXist-WTXiXist-WT MCSs (DIAZ-PEREZ et al. 2005). Contrary to expectation, more BrdU signal (late replication) was observed on the inactive X chromosome in XaXist-WTXiXist-
21-kb-1.2 cells (Figure 2, H–K) and XaXist-floxXiXist-
21-kb-1.2 cells (not shown) than in the XaXist-floxXiXist-flox cells. Quantitation of the BrdU signal on the Xi in 40 XaXist-WTXiXist-
21-kb spreads and 40 XaXist-floxXiXist-flox spreads using NIH IMAGE software revealed significantly more BrdU signal on the XiXist-
21-kb than on the XiXist-flox by percentage of area displaying BrdU signal (P = 5.45 x 10–7) (Figure 2L) or when multiplying this area by the average intensity of the signal (P = 5.30 x 10–8) (Figure 2M). In contrast, no significant difference was detected on the Xa in the same spreads regardless of whether percentage of area occupied by BrdU signal (P = 0.655) or area times intensity (P = 0.377) was considered (box plots not shown). However, this quantitation was from a single XaXist-WTXiXist-
21-kb cell line and should therefore be considered preliminary. No significant difference in BrdU incorporation levels on the inactive X chromosome was seen when comparing XaXist-floxXiXist-flox cells to XaXist-WTXiXist-WT cells (P = 0.407) (Figure 2N), indicating that the presence of the Lox sites in the absence of the 21-kb deletion did not have a measurable effect on replication time. The Xi therefore may replicate overall later in S phase when it is harboring the 21-kb deletion. Furthermore, heterozygosity for the Xist deletion causes the X chromosome harboring the deletion to be replicated later than normal in S phase but does not affect the replication time of the wild-type X chromosome, regardless of whether the mutation is on the Xa (DIAZ-PEREZ et al. 2005) or on the Xi.
|
The effect of deleting the 21 kb from both Xist alleles was next investigated using the same assay. The earlier replicating Xa displayed more BrdU signal in spreads from the three XaXist-
21-kbXiXist-
21-kb lines (Figure 2, O–R) than in the XaXist-floxXiXist-flox cell lines (Figure 2, C, D, F, and G), in agreement with earlier results obtained using XaXist-
21-kbXiXist-WT cells (DIAZ-PEREZ et al. 2005). In XaXist-
21-kbXiXist-
21-kb MCSs the Xi also displayed higher levels of BrdU incorporation (Figure 2, O–R) than in XaXist-floxXiXist-flox cell lines (Figure 2, C, D, F, and G). This difference was readily apparent when 40 inactive X chromosomes were quantitated from each cell line (Figure 2, S and T). We conclude that excision of 21 kb from the Xist gene of the Xi causes the Xi to be replicated later in S phase. Finally, preliminary data indicated that the Xi displayed a significantly higher proportion of incorporated BrdU when 21 kb was deleted from both Xist alleles (Figure 2, O–R and U) than when the deletion was exclusively on the Xi in XaXist-WTXiXist-
21-kb-1.2 (Figure 2, H–K and U) and XaXist-floxXiXist-
21-kb-1.2 cells (not shown). This suggested that elements at both Xist alleles may influence the extent of BrdU signal on the Xi in the assay for late replication.
Relationship between the pattern of late S-phase BrdU incorporation and the concentration of LINE-1 sequence on the XaXist-
21-kb of XaXist-
21-kbXiXist-
21-kb cells:
When the XaXist-
21-kbXiXist-
21-kb MCSs were examined at a higher gain than in Figure 2, the Xi displayed BrdU signal throughout its length (Figure 3, A and B) while the Xa displayed four to six regions of concentrated BrdU signal in 33 of the 40 XaXist-
21-kbXiXist-
21-kb-2.2 MCSs examined (Figure 3, A–C). This pattern was also prevalent on the Xa in XaXist-
21-kbXiXist-
21-kb -1.2 and -3.2 cells (not shown). Four of the five regions displaying late replication on the Xa were found to correspond to the four regions along the Xa that are most heavily enriched for LINE-1 elements (Figure 3D). The fifth region on the Xa that displayed late replication was the pericentromeric region for which the genome sequence was unavailable. In contrast to this reproducible pattern of BrdU signal seen on the Xa in XaXist-
21-kbXiXist-
21-kb cells, a consistent pattern was not readily apparent on the Xa in wild-type cells or when 21 kb was deleted only from one Xist allele (not shown) (DIAZ-PEREZ et al. 2005). Therefore, although deletion of 21 kb exclusively from the Xist allele on the Xa causes the Xa to be replicated later in S phase (DIAZ-PEREZ et al. 2005), the excision of 21 kb from both Xist copies further altered the replication timing in a manner that resulted in the regions with the highest concentrations of LINE-1 elements on the Xa being replicated later in S phase.
|
Evidence that the 21-kb Xist deletions destabilize the DNA of both X chromosomes:
During our preliminary analyses we had encountered numerous XaXist-
21-kbXiXist-
21-kb MCSs displaying evidence of deletions or translocations involving the X chromosome. Such spreads were excluded from subsequent analyses of histone modifications and BrdU incorporation. To investigate the influence of the 21-kb deletion in the Xist gene on the incidence of deletions and translocations, it was necessary to prepare three XaXist-WTXiXist-WT MEF cell lines using the identical procedure as was used to produce XaXist-
21-kbXiXist-
21-kb cell lines. To this end, three XaXist-WTXiXist-WT MEF cell lines were obtained from three E13.5 129 embryos using the same procedure as was used to produce the three XaXist-floxXiXist-flox lines. All six lines were infected with adenovirus expressing cre recombinase and GFP and subjected to limiting dilution, and derivative cell lines were expanded from infected (GFP-expressing) cells using equal numbers of passages (see MATERIALS AND METHODS). The cell lines were subjected to the replication-timing assay used for Figure 2 to distinguish the active and inactive X chromosomes. Inspection of MCSs from three XaXist-WTXiXist-WT cell lines derived from cre-adenovirus-infected cells revealed evidence for X chromosome deletions or translocations in 0 of 60 MCSs. Similarly, 0 of 68 MCSs from XaXist-floxXiXist-flox cells showed signs of aberrations in the X chromosome. In contrast, we saw evidence for deletions or translocations in 14 of 84 spreads (16.6%) from cultures of the three XaXist-
21-kbXiXist-
21-kb cell lines (1.1, 2.1, and 3.1). One of the most common abnormalities was a small fragment of the X chromosome (Figure 4, A and B). We also saw evidence of a ring X chromosome (Figure 4, C and D) and small portions of the X chromosome integrated into autosomes (Figure 4, E and F) but were not confident of the latter findings because the signal could be due to X chromosome paint hybridizing to autosomal material. By reducing the gain, the X chromosome paint was seen to display a characteristic pattern along the X chromosome that was highly reproducible among wild-type spreads (Figure 4G). Using this pattern as a guide, we observed that a frequent abnormality was the truncation of a Xi (not shown) or a Xa (Figure 4H) due to the loss of the centromere-distal tip of the X chromosome. We also observed a chromosome that appeared to be a duplication of the X chromosome (Figure 4I), an X chromosome that seemed to be linked to an autosome (Figure 4J), and what appeared to be dicentric chromosomes where a portion (Figure 4K) or all (not shown) of the chromosome was derived from the X chromosome.
|
To confirm these findings and to determine whether autosomes in the XaXist-
21-kbXiXist-
21-kb cell lines also displayed abnormalities, SKY (LIYANAGE et al. 1996) was performed on spreads from cell lines XaXist-
21-kbXiXist-
21-kb-1.1 and XaXist-
21-kbXiXist-
21-kb-1.3. In agreement with the X chromosome paint, the size of the X chromosome varied within spreads, reflecting deletions or rearrangements of the X chromosome (Figure 4, L and M). In some metaphases structural rearrangements involving the X were identified. These included a simple nonreciprocal translocation involving chromosomes X and 13 (Figure 4N) and a dicentric structure resulting from fusion between two X chromosomes (Figure 4P, arrowhead). Involvement of the X in more complex rearrangements was also suggested by SKY. These included a dicentric chromosome involving segments of chromosomes 3 and 9 flanking two or more small segments of X (Figure 4O) and a translocation linking portions of chromosomes 1 and 6 with a small segment of X chromosome material at the junction (Figure 4P, arrow). Because the MCSs displaying specific chromosomal anomalies were not examined as clonal cell lines, no material exists to allow confirmation of the complex rearrangements, so it is a formal possibility that the X signal arose from intermixing between two SKY colors at the junction. A tally of the definitive simple rearrangements and deletions provided clear evidence of X chromosome instability in XaXist-
21-kbXiXist-
21-kb MCSs: in total, 13/80 karyotypes (16%) analyzed by SKY displayed structural abnormalities involving the X chromosome. In the same spreads, 0/80, 1/80, and 1/80 karyotypes displayed abnormalities involving chromosomes 3, 4, and 5, respectively, and did not involve the X chromosome. The abnormal chromosome 4 was a small fragment and the abnormal chromosome 5 was slightly shorter than normal and not a definitive abnormality.
Phosphorylation of p53 and H2AX and localization of
-H2AX to the Xi in cells carrying the 21-kb deletion:
The frequent rearrangements suggested the presence of DNA damage on the X chromosome that might have arisen from replication stress. DNA damage would cause the ATR (TIBBETTS et al. 1999) and/or ATM (BANIN et al. 1998; CANMAN et al. 1998; KHANNA et al. 1998) protein kinases to phosphorylate the p53 protein at serine-15. To determine whether the 21-kb deletion is associated with the phosphorylation of the p53, extracts were prepared from independent cell lines of each of the following genotypes: XaXist-WTXiXist-WT, XaXist-
21-kbXiXist-WT, XaXist-WTXiXist-
21-kb, and XaXist-
21-kbXiXist-
21-kb. Western blots using these extracts revealed elevated levels of serine-15 phosphorylated p53 protein in all cell lines that carried the XiXist-
21-kb compared to XaXist-WTXiXist-WT cells (Figure 5A) while overall levels of p53 remained approximately the same (Figure 5A). Although the simplest explanation is that p53 is phosphorylated by ATR, we acknowledge that ATM (PAULL et al. 2000; BURMA et al. 2001; STIFF et al. 2004) or another kinase might play a role.
|




