Recombination of red gam phage in recD mutants is unaffected by inactivation of RecJ exonuclease. Since nucleases play redundant roles in E. coli, we inactivated several exonucleases in a recD mutant and discovered that 5'–3' exonuclease activity of RecJ and exonuclease VII is essential for -recombination, whereas exonucleases of 3'–5' polarity are dispensable. The implications of the presented data on current models for recombination initiation in E. coli are discussed.

---

MOST of homologous recombination in wild-type Escherichia coli is initiated by a heterotrimeric RecBCD enzyme, which binds to blunt-ended DNA duplex, unwinds it, and concomitantly degrades both unwound strands. In vitro, RecBCD enzyme activities are regulated by its interaction with a -sequence, upon which the modified enzyme loses most of its nuclease activities (preserving only a weak 5'–3' exonuclease activity), but gains the ability to facilitate RecA protein loading onto a thus created 3'-ending tail (reviewed in KUZMINOV 1999). In this way a nucleoprotein filament, the central recombination intermediate, is created.

When the enzyme lacks its RecD subunit, as in recD mutants, the resulting RecBC enzyme is devoid of any detectable nuclease activity (ExoV^–) and also of the ability to interact with sites, whereas its helicase and RecA loading activities are preserved (the latter being constitutive, focusing recombination exchanges to DNA ends) (reviewed in KUZMINOV 1999). Although ExoV^–, recD mutants are recombination and DNA repair proficient (CHAUDHURY and SMITH 1984; LOVETT et al. 1988). This proficiency was shown to rely (to a varying extent) on a single-strand-specific 5'–3' exonuclease activity of RecJ nuclease (LOVETT and KOLODNER 1989) in most recombination assays (e.g., UV survival, Hfr conjugation, and P1 transduction) (LLOYD et al. 1988; LOVETT et al. 1988). There is, however, a marked exception in RecJ requirement in recD mutants. Recombination of freely replicating red gam phages, which normally depends on host RecBC(D) functions (since 's own recombination system is disabled), is unaffected by RecJ nuclease inactivation in recD mutants (THALER et al. 1989). This finding [together with the one of the independence of -recombination on (THALER et al. 1989)] had a great influence on the understanding of regulation of RecBCD enzyme functions in a cell as it led to a long-standing model according to which a -modified RecBCD is equivalent to the RecBC enzyme (suggesting that upon interaction with a site a RecD subunit is lost or inactivated) (THALER et al. 1988, 1989). Yet, later biochemical studies showed that the 5'–3' exonuclease activity of the -modified enzyme is absent in RecBC enzyme (ANDERSON et al. 1997). The paradoxical RecJ independence of red gam crosses in recD mutants has puzzled researchers for years, leading to several hypotheses. For instance, AMUNDSEN and SMITH (2003) proposed that recombination proficiency of a recJ recD mutant is due to single-stranded (ss)DNA substrates produced during -replication, i.e., that 5'–3' exonuclease activity is not required for -recombination.

However, a recent report (ÐERMI 2006) has shown that a phenotype of the recJ recD mutant does not reflect a need for a 5'–3' exonuclease activity in a particular reaction; it rather represents a measure of the efficiency with which the lack of RecJ function is replaced by a function of exonuclease VII (ExoVII), another exonuclease with a processive 5'–3' (and also 3'–5') exonuclease activity on ssDNA (ssExo) (CHASE and RICHARDSON 1974). As that report also showed that the 5'–3' exonuclease activity is essential for all events tested in recD mutants (UV and -survival, recombination in Hfr and P1 crosses, cell viability), it is conceivable that unaffected -recombination in the recJ recD mutant is due to activity of ExoVII. To test this hypothesis, we performed red gam ⁺-lytic crosses in recD mutants devoid of activities of various exonucleases (Table 1 ).

View this table: In this window In a new window   TABLE 1 Bacterial and phage strains used

 
As shown in Table 2 , RecJ inactivation left -recombination in the recD mutant background mostly unaffected, confirming earlier reports (THALER et al. 1989; JOCKOVICH and MYERS 2001). This proficiency was indeed dependent on ExoVII since the triple RecD^– RecJ^– ExoVII^– mutant was recombination deficient, even more so than the recB null mutant. As the RecJ^– ExoVII^– derivative of the wild-type strain exhibited unaffected recombination proficiency, we may conclude that -recombination requires a 5'–3' exonuclease activity either of -modified RecBCD in wild-type cells or of RecJ and ExoVII nucleases in recD mutants. This process therefore does not differ from the other DNA end-dependent recombination processes in E. coli and other organisms, which rely on resection of a 5'-ending tail (discussed in ÐERMI 2006). The indispensability of the 5'–3' exonuclease activity argues against models that posit that a helicase activity is sufficient for initiation of recombination [i.e., "split-end" models (ROSENBERG and HASTINGS 1991), proposing that either of the unwound strands (RAZAVY et al. 1996) or both of them (reviewed in MYERS and STAHL 1994; SMITH 2001) invade the homologous DNA duplex; also a concept of RecBCD enzyme unwinding and rewinding DNA duplex, with just a nick at a site being required for recombination initiation (reviewed in SMITH 2001)].

View this table: In this window In a new window   TABLE 2 red gam lytic crosses in recD mutants lacking activities of various exonucleases

 
In contrast, inactivation of exonucleases of the opposite, 3'–5' polarity [exonuclease I (ExoI), ExoVII, exonuclease X (ExoX), and SbcCD] did not reduce -recombination markedly, suggesting that it is largely independent of that activity. This is in accord with earlier studies that found that 5'–3' exonucleases are more important than 3'–5' ones in DNA repair reactions in both the wild-type (VISWANATHAN and LOVETT 1998) and the recD backgrounds (ÐERMI 2006). The strongest requirement for a 3'–5' exonuclease was for ExoI (the strongest ssExo acting on a 3'-ending strand; LEHMAN and NUSSBAUM 1964) in the recJ recD mutant. Since the main role of exonucleases in recD mutants is apparently in preventing reannealing of the strands unwound by the RecBC enzyme (ÐERMI 2006), it seems, therefore, that ExoVII resects a 5'-ending tail less efficiently than RecJ does, thereby increasing the requirement for degradation of the complementary strand. Moreover, inactivation of ExoI in the recJ recD mutant might further reduce the efficiency of ExoVII-catalyzed resection of the 5'-ending strand as it might enable the 3'-ending strand to compete for the ExoVII binding. Finally, the observed synergism between ExoI and RecJ ssExos (this study; ÐERMI 2006) should not come as a surprise, considering that these two proteins interact (form a complex) in a cell (BUTLAND et al. 2005), which may provide an additional function for both of them.

Overall exonuclease requirements for -phage recombination in recD mutants resemble those for P1 transduction in that background (ÐERMI 2006), which is likely due to the similarity of DNA substrates delivered by the two phages [i.e., linear DNA duplex lacking substantial heterologous regions (discussed in ÐERMI 2006)].

Total yield of -phage (MMS754) was in correlation with the recombination efficiency in most crosses (Table 2), which was expected since recombination is thought to be required for an efficient replication and packaging of -progeny (reviewed in KUZMINOV 1999). An exception was a low total yield of crosses done in recombination-proficient mutants defective in multiple exonucleases of a 3'–5' polarity (RecD^– ExoI^– ExoVII^– ExoX^– and RecD^– ExoI^– ExoVII^– SbcD^–), which suggested that these exonucleases have a role in the -phage life cycle other than the recombinational one. They may participate in replication, as shown for some exonucleases in yeast (TISHKOFF et al. 1997). A very low total yield in crosses involving the RecD^– RecJ^– ExoVII^– mutant may be due to its recombination deficiency (Table 2). But, as this mutant has an extremely low viability (<1%, ÐERMI 2006), a low yield may also result from titration of infecting phage on cells that are unable to support its growth. Thus, a simple method was used to determine a fraction of RecD^– RecJ^– ExoVII^– mutant cells that enable phage- growth (ÐERMI and TRGOVEVI 1999). Bacteria were lysogenized with a thermoinducible cI857 phage and its recombination-deficient red3 derivative (ARBER et al. 1983). Cells were grown as for -crosses (except for a lower temperature: 31.5°) and, upon reaching an OD₆₀₀ of 0.25, they were serially diluted and mixed with indicator bacteria in soft tryptone agar, poured on tryptone plates, and incubated at 42° (to determine their plaque-forming ability). Compared to the RecD^– mutant, RecD^– RecJ^– ExoVII^– mutant cells produced just 31% less infective centers of cI857 phage, suggesting that although mostly incapable of giving rise to a colony, a majority of them were metabolically active and thus supported phage growth. However, this growth required recombination activity since only 15% of RecD^– RecJ^– ExoVII^– mutant cells developed cI857 red3 infective centers. This showed that recombination deficiency (of both bacteria and phages) is indeed the main reason for a low yield of -progeny in that mutant.

We are grateful to Susan T. Lovett and Richard S. Myers for providing bacterial and phage strains and also to W. L. Ragland for correction of the English text. This work was supported by the Croatian Ministry of Science, Education and Sports, grants 0098070 and 0098071.

AMUNDSEN, S. K., and G. R. SMITH, 2003 Interchangeable parts of the Escherichia coli recombination machinery. Cell 112: 741–744.[CrossRef][Medline]

ANDERSON, D. G., J. J. CHURCHILL and S. C. KOWALCZYKOWSKI, 1997 Chi-activated RecBCD enzyme possesses 5'-3' nucleolytic activity, but RecBC enzyme does not: evidence suggesting that the alteration induced by Chi is not simply the ejection of the RecD subunit. Genes Cells 2: 117–128.[Abstract]

ARBER, W., L. ENQUIST, B. HOHN, N. MURRAY and K. MURRAY, 1983 Experimental methods for use with lambda, pp. 433–466 in Lambda II, edited by R. W. HENDRIX, J. W. ROBERTS, F. W. STAHL and R. A. WEISBERG. Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press, Plainview, NY.

BACHMANN, B. J., 1996 Derivations and genotypes of some mutant derivatives of Escherichia coli K-12, pp. 2460–2488 in Escherichia coli and Salmonella: Cellular and Molecular Biology, edited by F. C. NEIDHARDT, R. CURTISS III, J. L. INGRAHAM, E. C. C. LIN, K. B. LOW et al.. American Society of Microbiology, Washington, DC.

BUTLAND, G., J. M. PEREGRÍN-ALVAREZ, J. LI, W. YANG, X. YANG et al., 2005 Interaction network containing conserved and essential protein complexes in Escherichia coli. Nature 433: 531–537.[CrossRef][Medline]

CHASE, J. W., and C. C. RICHARDSON, 1974 Exonuclease VII of Escherichia coli: mechanism of action. J. Biol. Chem. 249: 4553–4561.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

CHAUDHURY, A. M., and G. R. SMITH, 1984 A new class of Escherichia coli recBC mutants: implications for the role of RecBC enzyme in homologous recombination. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 81: 7850–7854.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

ÐERMI, D., 2006 Functions of multiple exonucleases are essential for cell viability, DNA repair and homologous recombination in recD mutants of Escherichia coli. Genetics 172: 2057–2069.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

ÐERMI, D., and . TRGOVEVI, 1999 Specific effects of a recB mutation on the HfrH strain of Escherichia coli. J. Bacteriol. 181: 1334–1337.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

ÐERMI, D., E. HALUPECKI, D. ZAHRADKA and M. PETRANOVI, 2005 RecBCD enzyme overproduction impairs DNA repair and homologous recombination in Escherichia coli. Res. Microbiol. 156: 304–311.[Medline]

ÐERMI, D., E. ÐERMI, D. ZAHRADKA, M. PETRANOVI and N. LER, 2006 Gamma-irradiated RecD overproducers become permanent recB^–/C^– phenocopies for extrachromosomal DNA processing due to prolonged titration of RecBCD enzyme on damaged Escherichia coli chromosome. Biochimie 88: 379–386.[Medline]

JOCKOVICH, M. E., and R. S. MYERS, 2001 Nuclease activity is essential for RecBCD recombination in Escherichia coli. Mol. Microbiol. 41: 949–962.[CrossRef][Medline]

KUZMINOV, A., 1999 Recombinational repair of DNA damage in Escherichia coli and bacteriophage . Microbiol. Mol. Biol. Rev. 63: 751–813.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

LEHMAN, I. R., and A. L. NUSSBAUM, 1964 The deoxyribonucleases of Escherichia coli: V. On the specificity of exonuclease I (phosphodiesterase). J. Biol. Chem. 239: 2628–2636.[Free Full Text]

LLOYD, R. G., M. C. PORTON and C. BUCKMAN, 1988 Effect of recF, recJ, recN, recO and ruv mutations on ultraviolet survival and genetic recombination in a recD strain of Escherichia coli K12. Mol. Gen. Genet. 212: 317–324.[CrossRef][Medline]

LOVETT, S. T., and R. D. KOLODNER, 1989 Identification and purification of a single-strand-specific exonuclease encoded by the recJ gene of Escherichia coli. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 86: 2627–2631.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

LOVETT, S. T., C. LUISI-DELUCA and R. D. KOLODNER, 1988 The genetic dependence of recombination in recD mutants of Escherichia coli. Genetics 120: 37–45.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

MYERS, R. S., and F. W. STAHL, 1994 and the RecBCD enzyme of Escherichia coli. Annu. Rev. Genet. 28: 49–70.[Medline]

RAZAVY, H., S. K. SZIGETY and S. M. ROSENBERG, 1996 Evidence for both 3' and 5' single-strand DNA ends in intermediates in chi-stimulated recombination in vivo. Genetics 142: 333–339.[Abstract]

ROSENBERG, S. M., and P. J. HASTINGS, 1991 The split-end model for homologous recombination at double-strand breaks and at Chi. Biochimie 73: 385–397.[Medline]

SMITH, G. R., 2001 Homologous recombination near and far from DNA breaks: alternative roles and contrasting views. Annu. Rev. Genet. 35: 243–274.[CrossRef][Medline]

THALER, D. S., E. SAMPSON, I. SIDDIQI, S. M. ROSENBERG, F. W. STAHL et al., 1988 A hypothesis: Chi-activation of RecBCD enzyme involves removal of the RecD subunit, pp. 413–422 in Mechanisms and Consequences of DNA Damage Processing, edited by E. FRIEDBERG and P. HANAWALT. Alan R. Liss, New York.

THALER, D. S., E. SAMPSON, I. SIDDIQI, S. M. ROSENBERG, L. C. THOMASON et al., 1989 Recombination of bacteriophage lambda in recD mutants of Escherichia coli. Genome 31: 53–67.[Medline]

TISHKOFF, D. X., A. L. BOERGER, P. BERTRAND, N. FILOSI, G. M. GAIDA et al., 1997 Identification and characterization of Saccharomyces cerevisiae EXO1, a gene encoding an exonuclease that interacts with MSH2. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 94: 7487–7492.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

VISWANATHAN, M., and S. T. LOVETT, 1998 Single-strand DNA exonucleases in Escherichia coli: roles in repair and mutation avoidance. Genetics 149: 7–16.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Communicating editor: S. T. LOVETT

International Access Link

Online ISS 1091-6490
Copyright 2008 by the Genetics Society of America
phone: 412-268-1812   fax: 412-268-1813   email: genetics-gsa{at}andrew.cmu.edu