| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
Genetics, Vol. 171, 1583-1595, December 2005, Copyright © 2005
doi:10.1534/genetics.105.048298
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||




* Department of Genetics, Institute of Molecular Biology and Physiology, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen 1353K, Denmark and
Gene Regulation and Chromosome Biology Laboratory, National Cancer Institute, Frederick, Maryland 21702
1 Corresponding author: Department of Genetics, Institute of Molecular Biology and Physiology, University of Copenhagen, Øster Farimasgade 2A, Copenhagen K, DK-1353, Denmark.
E-mail: gen{at}my.molbio.ku.dk
| ABSTRACT |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Directionality of switching depends on the chromosomal location of the silent mating-type information (THON and KLAR 1993). mat1, mat2-P, and mat3-M are linked in an
30-kb region of chromosome 2 (Figure 1). The wild-type mating-type region is denoted as h90. Cells in which the contents of the silent cassettes are experimentally swapped to mat2-M mat3-P (h09 genotype) switch their mating type inefficiently in contrast to h90 cells, indicating that the location of the silent cassettes, rather than their content, determines donor choice (THON and KLAR 1993). The differential switching ability of h90 and h09 cells suggests that mat1-mat2 interactions are favored in M cells and mat1-mat3 interactions are favored in P cells perhaps due to alternative chromosome foldings taking place in the two cell types or to alternative chromatin structures facilitating recombination with one of the silent donors or the other.
|
Heterochromatin participates in different processes in the various chromosomal locations at which it is formed. In centromeric regions, heterochromatin promotes kinetochore assembly and cohesion (reviewed by PIDOUX and ALLSHIRE 2004). Mutants lacking heterochromatin components display lagging chromosomes and increased rates of chromosome loss in mitosis most likely due to defects in their centromeres. In telomeric and subtelomeric regions, heterochromatin plays both structural and regulatory roles; it facilitates the association of telomeres with the spindle pole body in meiotic prophase (TUZON et al. 2004) and represses the transcription of clusters of subtelomeric genes regulated by nitrogen starvation (HANSEN et al. 2005). In the mating-type region, heterochromatin mediates the transcriptional silencing of the mat2-P and mat3-M cassettes. This is a crucial role since cells expressing mat2-P and mat3-M tend to undergo meiosis, a generally lethal event when initiated in the haploid stage. In addition, mutations in Swi6, Clr4, or Rik1 impair donor choice (THON and KLAR 1993; IVANOVA et al. 1998; TUZON et al. 2004). Consistent with the mating-type region attaining different structures in the two cell types, transcriptional silencing of reporter genes artificially introduced in the region is more stringent in M than in P cells (AYOUB et al. 1999; THON et al. 1999) and the association of Swi6 with the mating-type region differs between the two cell types (NOMA et al. 2001). Furthermore, the Swi6-interacting protein Swi2 associates with a DNA element centromere distal to the mat3-M cassette in both P and M cells in a Swi6-independent manner and spreads to the entire region in M cells in a Swi6-dependent manner (JIA et al. 2004b). This differential distribution and the switching defects of cells lacking Swi2 suggest that Swi2 has a role in donor selection. Unlike mutations in Rik1 or Clr4 that impair the directionality of switching by affecting heterochromatin formation, lack of Swi2 does not prevent heterochromatin formation, nor does it influence transcriptional silencing. Rather, Swi2 appears to play a role specific to mating-type switching possibly by recruiting the recombination protein Rhp51 to the mating-type region (AKAMATSU et al. 2003).
Heterochromatin near centromeres, telomeres, or in the mating-type region is strickingly related in composition and properties. Several differences have been documented as well, ranging from the mode of heterochromatin establishment to the nature of physically associated factors. For example, the RNA interference (RNAi) pathway is crucial to centromeric heterochromatin formation (VOLPE et al. 2002) while its role in the mating-type region is obscured by a parallel recruitment mechanism involving the transcription factor Atf1 (THON and VERHEIN-HANSEN 2000; JIA et al. 2004a; KIM et al. 2004) and by a silencing mechanism independent of Clr4 and Swi6 (THON et al. 1994; THON and VERHEIN-HANSEN 2000). Similarly, the three chromodomain proteins Swi6, Chp1, and Chp2 are associated with the mating-type region and the centromeric and telomeric regions, but the requirements for their association with each of these regions differ as do their contributions to transcriptional silencing (THON and VERHEIN-HANSEN 2000; SADAIE et al. 2004; PETRIE et al. 2005). Such differences are not surprising, given the various nuclear components with which heterochromatin can be expected to interact, and they indicate that characterizing heterochromatin-dependent processes will lead to the identification of core components acting at all known heterochromatic locations as well as components more specific to the particular region examined.
We conducted a genetic screen for factors affecting the directionality of mating-type switching. We present here the characterization of two factors that had not been identified in previous studies, Clr7 and Clr8. These factors act early in heterochromatin formation at all known heterochromatic regions of S. pombe.
| MATERIALS AND METHODS |
|---|
|
|
|---|
|
::kanR. Similarly, clr8 was identified as SPCC613.12c.
Two-hybrid screens:
The clr7 and clr8 ORFs amplified by PCR with GTO-239 (GCGGATCCTTAATTTATGTTGTACATTATGTGTTCAAG) and GTO-240 (GAGGCCATGGAGGCCATGCCGCCCGTACGTGCTGAAAAAAAGC) in the case of clr7 or GTO-250 (GAGGCCATGGAGGCCATGACTAATAGTTCACCACGGGTG) and GTO-251 (GCGGATCCTCAGGTTAAAAGTCGATTTTCTATAATACG) in the case of clr8 were cloned between the SfiI and BamHI sites of pGBKT7 (CLONTECH, Palo Alto, CA), creating pSPA6 (clr7) and pGT402 (clr8). The inserts in pSPA6 and pGT402 were entirely sequenced to verify that the PCR had not introduced any nucleotide change altering the protein sequence. pSPA6 and pGT402 were transformed separately into the Saccharomyces cerevisiae strain PJ69-4A (MATa trp1-901 leu2-3,112 ura3-52 his3-200 gal4
gal80
LYS2::GAL1-HIS3 GAL2-ADE2 met2::GAL7-lacZ; JAMES et al. 1996). Large-scale transformations were performed using an S. pombe cDNA library in the vector pGAD-GH (CLONTECH). Plasmids in this library express S. pombe ORFs fused to the S. cerevisiae GAL4-transcription-activating domain. Transformants expressing the HIS3 reporter gene were selected on SC-leu-trp-his containing either 1.5 or 3 mM 3-AT. Approximately 0.5 x 106 Leu+Trp+ transformants were plated for each bait. Among those,
500 formed colonies on the 3-AT-containing selective plates within 1 week at 30°. A total of 213 (clr7) or 99 (clr8) of these Leu+Trp+His+ transformants were streaked onto SC-leu-trp plates and replicated onto SC-leu-trp-ade plates. Five Ade+ transformants were obtained with the Clr7 bait and 78 were obtained in the case of Clr8. Plasmids were extracted from the His+Ade+ transformants as well as from 20 His+Ade transformants obtained with the Clr7 bait. These were retransformed into PJ69-4A with either pSPA6 or pGT402. Leu+Trp+ transformants were selected. Most failed to express HIS3 or ADE2 with the exception of two clones in the case of Clr7, both encoding Pcu4 (SPAC3A11.08; O14122), and one in the case of Clr8, encoding a truncated version of Nup189 (SPAC1486.05; Q9UTK4) starting at amino acid 446. Two other plasmids extracted from Leu+Trp+His+Ade+ transformants could activate transcription of the reporter PJ69-4A genes in the absence of Clr7 and Clr8 and were discarded.
Chromosome-loss assay:
Mitotic chromosome loss was assayed as previously described (ALLSHIRE et al. 1994) using cells containing the ade6-M210 allele on chromosome 3 and the ade6-M216 allele on the nonessential minichromosome Ch16m23::ura4+-Tel[72] (NIMMO et al. 1994). Cells with this genotype are phenotypically Ade+ due to the interallelic complementation between ade6-M210 and ade6-M216. They form white colonies on media containing low concentrations of adenine and red sectors or colonies following loss of Ch16m23::ura4+-Tel[72]. FY520 (+), SPA14 (clr7
), PG3408 (clr8
), and PG3420 (clr4
) cultures were propagated in all additions (AA)-ade, plated on AA containing 15 mg/liter adenine, and incubated at 33°. White and sectored colonies were counted. The rate of minichromosome loss was determined as the number of colonies with a red sector equal to or greater than half the colony size (that is, the number of cells having lost their minichromosome at the first division after plating) divided by the number of white or sectored colonies (that is, the number of cells containing the minichromosome when plated).
Swi6 tagging and fluorescence microscopy:
The swi6+ ORF was amplified from pAL2 (LORENTZ et al. 1994) with native Pfu polymerase (Stratagene, La Jolla, CA) using the two primers ACGCGTCGACAATGAAGAAAGGAGGTGTTCG and CGGGATCCTTATTCATTTTCACGGAAC. The amplification product was cloned between the SalI and BamHI sites of pREP42/enhanced green fluorescent protein (EGFP)-N (CRAVEN et al. 1998) to create an N-terminal fusion with EGFP. pREP42-EGFP-Swi6 was linearized at a unique MluI site within ars1 and integrated at ars1 in SP837 to produce PI213. This construct is similar to the construct made by PIDOUX et al. (2000). Cells were thinly patched on AA-thiamine medium and allowed to grow at 33° for 15 hr prior to microscopic examination. Localization images were obtained using a Zeiss Axio Imager fluorescence microscope equiped with a Hamamatsu Orca-ER digital camera and Volocity 3.5.1 software.
RT-PCR analyses:
RNA extractions and RT-PCR were performed as in HANSEN et al. (2005). The oligonucleotides GTO-232 (CATTGGCTTACGACGGTCGTGG) and GTO-233 (CCACATATGGCCCGTAAGTGAGC) were used to amplify ade6+ and ade6-DN/N; GTO-265 (GCTATTCAGCTAGAGCTGAGGG) and GTO-266 (CTTCGACAACAGGATTACGACC) to amplify ura4+ and ura4-DS/E; GTO-223 (GAAAACACATCGTTGTCTTCAGAG) and GTO-226 (TCGTCTTGTAGCTGCATGTGA) to amplify RNA originating from centromeric repeats or mating-type region; OKR-40 (TCGTCTTGTAGCAGCATGTGA) and OKR-41 (GAGATGAACGTATCTCTATCGAC) to amplify telomeric sequences that are part of subtelomeric helicases (tlh) ORFs; OKR70 (GGCATCACACTTTCTACAACG) and OKR71(GAGTCCAAGACGATACCAGTG) to amplify actin mRNA. Strand-specific RT-PCR was achieved by using GTO-226 to prime reverse transcription on centromeric forward transcripts, GTO-223 on centromeric reverse transcripts, OKR-41 on forward tlh transcripts, and OKR-40 on reverse tlh transcripts.
Chromatin immunoprecipitations:
Chromatin immunoprecipitations (ChIP) were performed as described (EKWALL and PARTRIDGE 1999). Yeast cells were grown in rich medium to midlog phase and fixed in 2% formaldehyde for 30 min. Crosslinked chromatin was sonicated to an average size of 600 bp and immunoprecipitated with antibodies directed against dimethyl histone H3 lysine 9 (Upstate, Lake Placid, NY), dimethyl histone H3 lysine 4 (Upstate), or the c-myc epitope (Roche). The immunoprecipitated DNA was analyzed by PCR. PCR products were labeled by including [
-32P]dCTP (Amersham Pharmacia) as a tracer in the reactions. The primer set used for amplifying the K-region was GTATGTGGAACAAGAGAAG and CTCGCCTGCTTACATTTTAAGG, and for act1 GAAGTACCCCATTGAGCACGG and CAATTTCACGTTCGGCGGTAG. Amplified products were resolved on a 6% nondenaturing polyacrylamide gel and quantified using a phosphorimager (Typhoon 8600, Amersham Pharmacia).
| RESULTS |
|---|
|
|
|---|
The trans-acting mutations defining potential directionality factors were placed into linkage groups by genetic crosses. One group was mapped to the clr1 locus (THON and KLAR 1992), one to clr4 (clr4-113 and -141 alleles), and one to rik1 (rik1-127, -128, -121, and -161 alleles); one was mapped both to swi6-mod, a locus modifying the phenotype of swi6-115 cells (THON and KLAR 1993), and to swi2 (swi2-152 allele). This latter result is surprising in the view of a recently published study proposing that swi2 and swi6-mod are unlinked genes (JIA et al. 2004b). However, we were unable to separate swi6-mod from swi2 mutant alleles in crosses; both genes displayed centromere linkage and tight linkage to lys1 as expected for swi2.
The other mutations isolated in our screen were not in previously characterized silencing or directionality factors. We chose to characterize genes acting early in the process of heterochromatin formation. Mutations in these genes would affect not only the directionality of switching, but also transcriptional silencing. As expected, mutations belonging to the clr1, clr4, or rik1 group alleviated transcriptional silencing in the mating-type region, centromeres, and telomeres. Mutations at two other loci behaved similarly, revealing that these two loci are also involved in heterochromatin formation. Because the phenotypes of the newly obtained mutations are similar to those in previously characterized clr genes, we called the two newly defined loci clr7 and clr8.
Identification of clr7 and clr8:
clr7 and clr8 were cloned by complementation of the mutant phenotypes of, respectively, h09 mat3-P (EcoRV)::ura4+ clr7-116 and h90 mat2-P (XbaI)::ura4+ clr8-109 cells using a library of S. pombe genomic DNA. The complementation studies identified two ORFs annotated in the S. pombe genome sequence, SPCC970.07c, complementing clr7-116, and SPCC613.12c, complementing clr8-109. The chromosomal replacement of SPCC970.07c or SPCC613.12c with kanR produced phenotypes similar to those conferred by the point mutations in clr7 or clr8. Furthermore, SPCC970.07c::kanR displayed perfect linkage with clr7-116 and SPCC613.12c::kanR displayed perfect linkage with clr8-109, demonstrating that the mutated genes had been cloned.
clr7 (SPCC970.07c) encodes a 636-aa protein with no clear sequence homolog in other organisms and with no recognizable domains except for a possible zinc-finger close to its carboxyl-terminal end. clr8 (SPCC613.12c) encodes a conserved 638-aa protein with four WD repeats.
Clr7 and Clr8 mediate transcriptional silencing near centromeres, telomeres, and in the mating-type region:
Euchromatic S. pombe genes such as ura4+ or ade6+ are repressed when placed within centromeric repeats (ALLSHIRE et al. 1994, 1995), close to the telomeric repeats of a minichromosome (NIMMO et al. 1994), or in the mating-type region (THON and KLAR 1992; THON et al. 1994, 1999, 2002). Consequently, cells with the ura4+ or ade6+ gene at one of these locations are uracil or adenine auxotrophs. In addition, cells with a silenced ura4+ gene are able to form colonies in the presence of 5-FOA, a toxigenic substrate of the orotidine 5'-phosphate decarboxylase encoded by ura4+, while cells with a silenced ade6+ gene form red colonies on limiting concentrations of adenine. Deletion of clr7 or clr8 altered these phenotypes, derepressing the ura4+ and ade6+ reporter genes placed in heterochromatic regions (Figure 2). The derepression resulted in uracil or adenine prototrophy, FOA sensitivity in the case of ura4+, or formation of white colonies in the case of ade6+. Some FOA-resistant colonies formed by the mutant strains are most likely due to occasional loss of the ura4+ gene by recombination in centromeric regions (Figure 2A) or to loss of the minichromosome used to assay telomeric silencing (Figure 2B). ura4+ or ade6+ transcripts originating from centromeric, telomeric, or mating-type region could be easily detected in the mutant cells whereas they are in low abundance in wild-type cells (Figure 2). Furthermore, transcripts originating from the centromeric repeats per se or from genes that are naturally telomere linked were in greater abundance in the clr7 or clr8 mutant cells than in the wild-type cells, indicating that Clr7 and Clr8 have a role in the repression of these endogenous transcripts as well (see below).
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
, clr8
, and pcu4
mutants compared with wild-type cells. The residual association of the histone H3 lysine 9 methyl mark with the mating-type region was no greater than its association with the euchromatic and actively transcribed act1 gene, revealing that Clr4 fails to operate in the three mutants. An increase in histone H3 lysine 4 methylation occurred concomitantly with the decrease in lysine 9 methylation (Figure 8C). Such an increase is commonly observed in mutants failing to methylate histone H3 lysine 9, possibly reflecting an increased accessibility of the region to the histone methyltransferase Set1. The increase in histone H3 lysine 4 methylation further demonstrates the fundamental role of Clr7, Clr8, and Pcu4 in heterochromatin formation.
|
, clr8
, and pcu4
mutant cells, we detected a physical association between Clr7 and the mating-type region in wild-type cells using a myc-tagged version of Clr7 (Figure 8D). This association supports the notion that Clr7 and Pcu4 mediate histone H3 lysine 9 methylation in a very direct manner. | DISCUSSION |
|---|
|
|
|---|
The involvement of a cullin in heterochromatin formation indicates that a ubiquitination step is essential in the process. Ubiquitination can regulate gene expression or DNA repair in several well-documented ways by affecting the stability of chromatin-associated factors or by modifying their properties as well as those of histones. For instance, in S. cerevisiae ubiquitination of histone H2B lysine 123 by Rad6 promotes methylation of histone H3 lysine 4 and lysine 79 as part of a transcriptional activation mechanism (SUN and ALLIS 2002; KAO et al. 2004). Ubiquitination of the proliferating cell nuclear antigen influences the choice of DNA repair pathway (STELTER and ULRICH 2003). In S. pombe, overexpression of the Rad6 homolog Rhp6 or of other putative ubiquitin-conjugating enzymes disrupts transcriptional silencing and Swi6 localization (NIELSEN et al. 2002; I. S. NIELSEN-NØRBY and G. THON, unpublished observations) and a specific mutant allele of rhp6, sng1, impairs the silencing of mat2-P and mat3-M following mating-type switching (SINGH et al. 1998). While many examples of chromatin regulation by ubiquitination involve Rad6 or other E2 ubiquitin ligases, other observations demonstrate the role of cullin-RING complexes in similar regulatory pathways. Cullin-RING complexes constitute a large class of ubiquitin-conjugating enzymes in which cullins function as scaffolds bridging RING ubiquitin ligases with their substrates (for review, see PETROSKI and DESHAIES 2005). The substrate specificity of cullin-RING complexes is determined by adaptor proteins making contacts with both the N-terminal part of the cullin and the substrate. Structural differences residing in the cullins N-terminal parts are believed to account for specific interactions with various adaptor proteins. Our results suggest that Clr7 functions as an adaptor for Pcu4 to mediate the effects of Pcu4 on heterochromatin formation. Furthermore, the physical association of Clr7 with heterochromatin suggests that Pcu4 does not affect chromatin structure in an indirect manner, but rather catalyzes the ubiquitination of a chromatin component. Pcu4 was found by others in a protein complex containing the Rik1 paralog Ddb1, the ribonucleotide-reductase inhibitor Spd1, and subunits of the COP9 signalosome, the purified complex being thought to regulate ribonucleotide reductase by degrading Spd1 (LIU et al. 2003; BONDAR et al. 2004; HOLMBERG et al. 2005). Similarly, human Ddb1 associates with Cul4 (SHIYANOV et al. 1999). In addition, human Ddb1 can form a dimer with the WD repeat protein Ddb2, integrating Ddb2 into the cullin-RING complex and allowing interaction of the complex with chromatin following UV irradiation (GROISMAN et al. 2003). Although Ddb2 and Clr8 are not closely related in sequence, they are both WD repeat proteins, suggesting that they might occupy similar positions in distinct cullin-RING complexes. These observations together with the phenotypic similarities of pcu4, clr7, clr8, and rik1 mutants suggest that Pcu4, Clr7, Clr8, and Rik1 form a complex. Ubiquitination by this complex might lead to the removal of proteins or modifed histones whose properties are incompatible with heterochromatin formation. Alternatively, it might create an epigenetic mark allowing methylation by Clr4.
Transcriptional regulation by Cullin-RING complexes is not without precedent in S. pombe. For instance, the F box protein Pof1 forms a complex with Pcu1 and Skp1 mediating the degradation of the transcription factor Zip1 (HARRISON et al. 2005). Possibly more closely related to our observations, the S. pombe F box protein Pof3 complexed with Pcu1 and Skp1 is required for telomeric gene silencing (KATAYAMA et al. 2002).
The lack of histone H3 lysine 9 methylation in cells lacking Clr7, Clr8, or Pcu4 reveals that the three proteins act early in the process of heterochromatin formation. In addition to altered histone methylation patterns, we could detect RNA molecules originating from both strands of all heterochromatic regions in the mutant strains, indicating that these RNAs are not processed by the RNAi machinery as normally occurs in wild-type cells. The possibility that Clr7, Clr8, and Pcu4 act in the RNAi pathway in a manner similar to the prototypic components Dcr1, Ago1, or Rdp1 (VOLPE et al. 2002) appears unlikely, however, since the heterochromatic defects in clr7, clr8, or pcu4 deletion strains differ in several respects from the defects in RNAi mutants. In particular, clr7, clr8, or pcu4 deletions have a much greater influence on the mating-type region and telomeres than mutations in the RNAi pathway (HALL et al. 2002; SADAIE et al. 2004; this study). Mutations in the RNAi pathway do not lead to a loss of heterochromatin or transcriptional silencing in the mating-type region due to the existence of a redundant pathway of heterochromatin establishment (JIA et al. 2004a; KIM et al. 2004; SADAIE et al. 2004). Similarly, heterochromatin and transcriptional silencing persist at telomeres in RNAi mutants (SADAIE et al. 2004; K. R. HANSEN and G. THON, unpublished observations). In contrast, mutations in clr7, clr8, or pcu4 strongly affect transcriptional silencing and chromatin structure in the mating-type and telomeric regions, in addition to their effects at centromeres, which are similar to the effects of deleting rik1 or clr4 (EKWALL and RUUSALA 1994; THON et al. 1994; NAKAYAMA et al. 2001; NOMA et al. 2001; SADAIE et al. 2004; this study). Increased levels of centromeric and telomeric transcripts in the absence of Clr7, Clr8, or Pcu4 might result, on one hand, from increased transcription permitted by weakened heterochromatin, and, on the other hand, from a lack of processing caused by a mislocalization of the RNAi machinery. Histone H3 lysine 9 methylation tethers RNAi components complexed with the Chp1 chromodomain protein to heterochromatin, and hence mutations affecting histone H3 lysine 9 methylation reduce the ability of RNAi to act upon heterochromatic transcripts (MOTAMEDI et al. 2004; NOMA et al. 2004; CAM et al. 2005). More generally, all phenotypes ascribed here to the deletion of clr7, clr8, or pcu4, such as effects on the directionality of mating-type switching, localization of Swi6, transcriptional silencing, or spore viability, are likely to result from the failure in methylating histone H3 lysine 9 in these mutants. Rik1 and Clr4 associate with each other and interact with chromatin in an interdependent manner (SADAIE et al. 2004). Our results strongly suggest that they do so in conjunction with Clr7, Clr8, and Pcu4.
Correlations between gene expression levels and positioning within the nucleus have been documented in several systems. In budding yeast, tethering genes to the nuclear envelope leads to their transcriptional repression (ANDRULIS et al. 1998) and mutants with aberrant nuclear architecture are deficient in transcriptional silencing (TEIXEIRA et al. 2002). The nuclear porin Nup189 that we identified by its interaction with the silencing factor Clr8 is the homolog of budding-yeast Nup145 and mammalian Nup98. Nup145 has been proposed to help localize budding-yeast telomeres to the nuclear periphery by docking Mlp2, which in turn interacts with the telomere-binding protein Yku70 (GALY et al. 2000). Similarly, Nup98 is associated with a protein network formed by the Mlp2 homolog TPR (FONTOURA et al. 2001). Consistent with their being tethered to the nuclear membrane, fission yeast heterochromatic regions are close to the nuclear periphery (PIDOUX et al. 2000; KNIOLA et al. 2001; APPELGREN et al. 2003). In the case of centromeres, this localization is partly brought about by an interaction between central cores and the spindle pole body, involving the kinetochore protein Ndc80 (KNIOLA et al. 2001; APPELGREN et al. 2003). However, centromeres do not relocalize to the central part of the nucleus even when the central core-spindle pole body interaction is genetically ablated (APPELGREN et al. 2003), which is consistent with the existence of other types of tethering, possibly via Nup189. Localization of heterochromatin at the inner nuclear membrane near nuclear pore complexes would place it in close proximity to the proteasome (WILKINSON et al. 1998), conceivably facilitating the degradation of ubiquitinated substrates.
While this work was under review, two related articles appeared in the literature (HORN et al. 2005; LI et al. 2005). SPCC970.07c (clr7+) and SPCC613.12c (clr8+) were identified in a screen for factors essential to the localization of Swi6 and they were called, respectively, dos2+ and dos1+ (delocalization of Swi6; LI et al. 2005). SPCC970.07c, SPCC613.12c, and Pcu4 were identified in a complex copurifying with Rik1 by HORN et al. (2005), who named SPCC970.07c and SPCC613.12c, respectively, raf2+ and raf1+ (Rik1-interacting factor). While the results reported in the two articles are generally in excellent agreement with our own observations, HORN et al. (2005) suggested that Pcu4 might not be required for histone H3 lysine 9 methylation. This conclusion was based on the phenotype of a pcu4+ strain expressing a Pcu4 protein mutated in its neddylation site (Pcu4-K680R) from a plasmid. The differential phenotypes of the plasmid-borne pcu4-K680R gene expressed in a pcu4+ background (HORN et al. 2005) and the pcu4
allele (this study) might reflect the fact that pcu4-K680R is not truly dominant negative or, possibly, a weak requirement for neddylation in the heterochromatin-building function of Pcu4. Regardless of the cause of the phenotypic differences, this study establishes that Pcu4 mediates histone H3 lysine 9 methylation in fission yeast. Considering that the pathways of heterochromatin formation are tightly conserved between fission yeast and higher eukaryotes, Cullin 4-containing complexes homologous to the fission yeast complex are likely to operate in other organisms to mediate the action of histone H3 lysine 9 methyltransferases.
| ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS |
|---|
|
|
|---|
| LITERATURE CITED |
|---|
|
|
|---|
AKAMATSU, Y., D. DZIADKOWIEC, M. IKEGUCHI, H. SHINAGAWA and H. IWASAKI, 2003 Two different Swi5-containing protein complexes are involved in mating-type switching and recombination repair in fission yeast. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 100: 1577015775.
ALLSHIRE, R. C., J. P. JAVERZAT, N. J. REDHEAD and G. CRANSTON, 1994 Position effect variegation at fission yeast centromeres. Cell 76: 157169.[CrossRef][Medline]
ALLSHIRE, R. C., E. R. NIMMO, K. EKWALL, J. P. JAVERZAT and G. CRANSTON, 1995 Mutations derepressing silent centromeric domains in fission yeast disrupt chromosome segregation. Genes Dev. 9: 218233.
ANDRULIS, E. D., A. M. NEIMAN, D. C. ZAPPULLA and R. STERNGLANZ, 1998 Perinuclear localization of chromatin facilitates transcriptional silencing. Nature 394: 592595.[CrossRef][Medline]
APPELGREN, H., B. KNIOLA and K. EKWALL, 2003 Distinct centromere domain structures with separate functions demonstrated in live fission yeast cells. J. Cell Sci. 116: 40354042.
ARCANGIOLI, B., and G. THON, 2004 Mating-type cassettes: structure, switching and silencing, pp. 129147 in The Molecular Biology of Schizosaccharomyces pombe: Genetics, Genomics and Beyond, edited by R. EGEL. Springer-Verlag, Berlin/Heidelberg, Germany/New York.
AYOUB, N., I. GOLDSHMIDT and A. COHEN, 1999 Position effect variegation at the mating-type locus of fission yeast: a cis-acting element inhibits covariegated expression of genes in the silent and expressed domains. Genetics 152: 495508.
BAHLER, J., J. Q. WU, M. S. LONGTINE, N. G. SHAH, A. MCKENZIE, III et al., 1998 Heterologous modules for efficient and versatile PCR-based gene targeting in Schizosaccharomyces pombe. Yeast 14: 943951.[CrossRef][Medline]
BANNISTER, A. J., P. ZEGERMAN, J. F. PARTRIDGE, E. A. MISKA, J. O. THOMAS et al., 2001 Selective recognition of methylated lysine 9 on histone H3 by the HP1 chromodomain. Nature 410: 120124.[CrossRef][Medline]
BONDAR, T., A. PONOMAREV and P. RAYCHAUDHURI, 2004 Ddb1 is required for the proteolysis of the Schizosaccharomyces pombe replication inhibitor Spd1 during S phase and after DNA damage. J. Biol. Chem. 279: 99379943.
CAM, H., T. SUGIYAMA, E. S. CHEN, X. CHEN, P. FITZGERALD et al., 2005 Comprehensive analysis of heterochromatin- and RNAi-mediated epigenetic control of the fission yeast genome. Nat. Genet. 37: 809819.[CrossRef][Medline]
CRAVEN, R. A., D. J. GRIFFITHS, K. S. SHELDRICK, R. E. RANDALL, I. M. HAGAN et al., 1998 Vectors for the expression of tagged proteins in Schizosaccharomyces pombe. Gene 221: 5968.[CrossRef][Medline]
EKWALL, K., and J. F. PARTRIDGE, 1999 Fission yeast chromosome analysis: fluorescence in-situ hybridization (FISH) and chromatin immunoprecipitation (CHIP), pp. 4757 in Chromosome Structural Analysis: A Practical Approach, edited by W. BICKMORE. Oxford University Press, Oxford.
EKWALL, K., and T. RUUSALA, 1994 Mutations in rik1, clr2, clr3 and clr4 genes asymmetrically derepress the silent mating-type loci in fission yeast. Genetics 136: 5364.[Abstract]
EKWALL, K., J. P. JAVERZAT, A. LORENTZ, H. SCHMIDT, G. CRANSTON et al., 1995 The chromodomain protein Swi6: a key component at fission yeast centromeres. Science 269: 14291431.
EKWALL, K., E. R. NIMMO, J. P. JAVERZAT, B. BORGSTROM, R. EGEL et al., 1996 Mutations in the fission yeast silencing factors clr4+ and rik1+ disrupt the localisation of the chromo domain protein Swi6p and impair centromere function. J. Cell Sci. 109: 26372648.[Abstract]
FONTOURA, B. M., S. DALES, G. BLOBEL and H. ZHONG, 2001 The nucleoporin Nup98 associates with the intranuclear filamentous protein network of TPR. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 98: 32083213.
GALY, V., J. C. OLIVO-MARIN, H. SCHERTHAN, V. DOYE, N. RASCALOU et al., 2000 Nuclear pore complexes in the organization of silent telomeric chromatin. Nature 403: 108112.[CrossRef][Medline]
GREWAL, S. I., and A. J. KLAR, 1996 Chromosomal inheritance of epigenetic states in fission yeast during mitosis and meiosis. Cell 86: 95101.[CrossRef][Medline]
GREWAL, S. I., and A. J. KLAR, 1997 A recombinationally repressed region between mat2 and mat3 loci shares homology to centromeric repeats and regulates directionality of mating-type switching in fission yeast. Genetics 146: 12211238.[Abstract]
GROISMAN, R., J. POLANOWSKA, I. KURAOKA, J. SAWADA, M. SAIJO et al., 2003 The ubiquitin ligase activity in the DDB2 and CSA complexes is differentially regulated by the COP9 signalosome in response to DNA damage. Cell 113: 357367.[CrossRef][Medline]
HALL, I. M., G. D. SHANKARANARAYANA, K. NOMA, N. AYOUB, A. COHEN et al., 2002 Establishment and maintenance of a heterochromatin domain. Science 297: 22322237.
HANSEN, K. R., G. BURNS, J. MATA, T. A. VOLPE, R. A. MARTIENSSEN et al., 2005 Global effects on gene expression in fission yeast by silencing and RNA interference machineries. Mol. Cell. Biol. 25: 590601.
HARRISON, C., S. KATAYAMA, S. DHUT, D. CHEN, N. JONES et al., 2005 SCF(Pof1)-ubiquitin and its target Zip1 transcription factor mediate cadmium response in fission yeast. EMBO J. 24: 599610.[CrossRef][Medline]
HOLMBERG, C., O. FLECK, H. A. HANSEN, C. LIU, R. SLAABY et al., 2005 Ddb1 controls genome stability and meiosis in fission yeast. Genes Dev. 19: 853862.
HORN, P. J., J. N. BASTIE and C. L. PETERSON, 2005 A Rik1-associated, cullin-dependent E3 ubiquitin ligase is essential for heterochromatin formation. Genes Dev. 19: 17051714.
IVANOVA, A. V., M. J. BONADUCE, S. V. IVANOV and A. J. KLAR, 1998 The chromo and SET domains of the Clr4 protein are essential for silencing in fission yeast. Nat. Genet. 19: 192195.[CrossRef][Medline]
JAMES, P., J. HALLADAY and E. A. CRAIG, 1996 Genomic libraries and a host strain designed for highly efficient two-hybrid selection in yeast. Genetics 144: 14251436.[Abstract]
JIA, S., K. NOMA and S. I. GREWAL, 2004a RNAi-independent heterochromatin nucleation by the stress-activated ATF/CREB family proteins. Science 304: 19711976.
JIA, S., T. YAMADA and S. I. GREWAL, 2004b Heterochromatin regulates cell type-specific long-range chromatin interactions essential for directed recombination. Cell 119: 469480.[CrossRef][Medline]
KAO, C. F., C. HILLYER, T. TSUKUDA, K. HENRY, S. BERGER et al., 2004 Rad6 plays a role in transcriptional activation through ubiquitylation of histone H2B. Genes Dev. 18: 184195.
KATAYAMA, S., K. KITAMURA, A. LEHMANN, O. NIKAIDO and T. TODA, 2002 Fission yeast F-box protein Pof3 is required for genome integrity and telomere function. Mol. Biol. Cell 13: 211224.
KIM, H. S., E. S. CHOI, J. A. SHIN, Y. K. JANG and S. D. PARK, 2004 Regulation of Swi6/HP1-dependent heterochromatin assembly by cooperation of components of the mitogene-activated protein kinase pathway and a histone deacetylase Clr6. J. Biol. Chem. 279: 4285042859.
KNIOLA, B., E. O'TOOLE, J. R. MCINTOSH, B. MELLONE, R. ALLSHIRE et al., 2001 The domain structure of centromeres is conserved from fission yeast to humans. Mol. Biol. Cell 12: 27672775.
LI, F., D. B. GOTO, M. ZARATIEGUI, X. TANG, R. MARTIENSSEN et al., 2005 Two novel proteins, Dos1 and Dos2, interact with Rik1 to regulate heterochromatic RNA interference and histone modification. Curr. Biol. 15: 14481457.[CrossRef][Medline]
LIU, C., K. A. POWELL, K. MUNDT, L. WU, A. M. CARR et al., 2003 Cop9/signalosome subunits and Pcu4 regulate ribonucleotide reductase by both checkpoint-dependent and -independent mechanisms. Genes Dev. 17: 11301140.
LORENTZ, A., K. OSTERMANN, O. FLECK and H. SCHMIDT, 1994 Switching gene swi6, involved in repression of silent mating-type loci in fission yeast, encodes a homologue of chromatin-associated proteins from Drosophila and mammals. Gene 143: 139143.[CrossRef][Medline]
MOTAMEDI, M. R., A. VERDEL, S. U. COLMENARES, S. A. GERBER, S. P. GYGI et al., 2004 Two RNAi complexes, RITS and RDRC, physically interact and localize to noncoding centromeric RNAs. Cell 119: 789802.[CrossRef][Medline]
NAKAYAMA, J., J. C. RICE, B. D. STRAHL, C. D. ALLIS and S. I. GREWAL, 2001 Role of histone H3 lysine 9 methylation in epigenetic control of heterochromatin assembly. Science 292: 110113.
NEUWALD, A. F., and A. POLEKSIC, 2000 PSI-BLAST searches using hidden Markov models of structural repeats: prediction of an unusual sliding DNA clamp and of beta-propellers in UV-damaged DNA-binding protein. Nucleic Acids Res. 28: 35703580.
NIELSEN, I. S., O. NIELSEN, J. M. MURRAY and G. THON, 2002 The fission yeast ubiquitin-conjugating enzymes UbcP3, Ubc15, and Rhp6 affect transcriptional silencing of the mating-type region. Eukaryot. Cell 1: 613625.
NIMMO, E. R., G. CRANSTON and R. C. ALLSHIRE, 1994 Telomere-associated chromosome breakage in fission yeast results in variegated expression of adjacent genes. EMBO J. 13: 38013811.[Medline]
NOMA, K., C. D. ALLIS and S. I. GREWAL, 2001 Transitions in distinct histone H3 methylation patterns at the heterochromatin domain boundaries. Science 293: 11501155.
NOMA, K., T. SUGIYAMA, H. CAM, A. VERDEL, M. ZOFALL et al., 2004 RITS acts in cis to promote RNA interference-mediated transcriptional and post-transcriptional silencing. Nat. Genet. 36: 11741180.[CrossRef][Medline]
PARTRIDGE, J. F., K. S. SCOTT, A. J. BANNISTER, T. KOUZARIDES and R. C. ALLSHIRE, 2002 cis-acting DNA from fission yeast centromeres mediates histone H3 methylation and recruitment of silencing factors and cohesin to an ectopic site. Curr. Biol. 12: 16521660.[CrossRef]