- THIS ARTICLE
-
Abstract
- Full Text (PDF)
-
All Versions of this Article:
genetics.105.040444v1
170/3/1431 most recent - Alert me when this article is cited
- Alert me if a correction is posted
- SERVICES
- Email this article to a friend
- Similar articles in this journal
- Similar articles in PubMed
- Alert me to new issues of the journal
- Download to citation manager
- Reprints & Permissions
- CITING ARTICLES
- Citing Articles via HighWire
- Citing Articles via Google Scholar
- GOOGLE SCHOLAR
- Articles by Zluvova, J.
- Articles by Vyskot, B.
- Search for Related Content
- PUBMED
- PubMed Citation
- Articles by Zluvova, J.
- Articles by Vyskot, B.
Originally published as Genetics Published Articles Ahead of Print on May 6, 2005.
Genetics, Vol. 170, 1431-1434, July 2005, Copyright © 2005
doi:10.1534/genetics.105.040444
Comparison of the X and Y Chromosome Organization in Silene latifolia
Jitka Zluvova*,
,1,
Bohuslav Janousek*,
Ioan Negrutiu
and
Boris Vyskot*
* Laboratory of Plant Developmental Genetics, Institute of Biophysics, Academy of Sciences of the Czech Republic, 612 65 Brno, Czech Republic
Laboratoire RDP, ENS Lyon, IFR128 BioSciences Lyon-Gerland, 69364 Lyon, France
1 Corresponding author: Laboratory of Plant Developmental Genetics, Institute of Biophysics, Academy of Sciences of the Czech Republic, Kralovopolska 135, 612 65 Brno, Czech Republic.
E-mail: jitka{at}ibp.cz
Here we compare gene orders on the Silene latifolia sex chromosomes. On the basis of the deletion mapping results (11 markers and 23 independent Y chromosome deletion lines used), we conclude that a part of the Y chromosome (covering a region corresponding to at least 23.9 cM on the X chromosome) has been inverted. The gradient in silent-site divergence suggests that this inversion took place after the recombination arrest in this region. Because recombination arrest events followed by Y chromosome rearrangements also have been found in the human Y chromosome, this process seems to be a general evolutionary pathway.
CHROMOSOMAL rearrangements are thought to have played a central role in the evolution of human sex chromosomes (LAHN and PAGE 1999). Inversion events have contributed to the genetic isolation and subsequent deterioration of the human Y chromosome (LAHN et al. 2001). Because the human Y chromosome is highly degenerated, dioecious plants with evolutionary young sex chromosomes (Silene latifolia, VYSKOT and HOBZA 2004; Carica papaya, LIU et al. 2004) are much more convenient for studying the early stages of the Y chromosome evolution. In S. latifolia, the presence of putative evolutionary strata (NICOLAS et al. 2005), and also the data supporting the Y chromosome rearrangement in comparison with the X chromosome (MOORE et al. 2003), have been reported recently. However, in the previous research, a low number of both X- and Y-linked genes were available, and a lack of an X chromosome map did not enable us to analyze the process of structural differentiation of the sex chromosomes in detail.
LEBEL-HARDENACK et al. (2002) have characterized Y chromosome deletions in a collection of X-ray-induced sexual phenotype mutants. They used AFLP markers that cosegregated with the wild-type Y chromosome to determine the extent of deletions in the Y chromosome of each mutant and built up a deletion map of the Y chromosome. MOORE et al. (2003) improved this map by adding three Y-linked genes possessing copies on the X chromosome: SlY1 (DELICHERE et al. 1999), SlY4 (ATANASSOV et al. 2001), and DD44Y (MOORE et al. 2003). The map consisted of several groups of DNA markers and an isolated key marker, L26. Group A markers were shown to be linked to the gynoecium suppressor, and the male plant lacking key group A markers was hermaphroditic. On the other hand, the marker L26 was shown to be closely linked to the stamen-promoting function, as it was absent in nearly all Y chromosome deletion mutants with early and intermediate stamen arrest, but was present in all other mutants examined. Loss of the group C markers was shown to be linked to the late stamen developmental arrest and thus connected with the loss of male fertility function(s).
In this study, we used previously described Y-linked genes (SlAP3Y, MATSUNAGA et al. 2003; SlY3, NICOLAS et al. 2005; SlssY, FILATOV 2005a,b) and Y-linked PCR markers (Bam37 and Bgl10, DONNISON et al. 1996; ScD05, ScQ14, ScX11, and ScK02, ZHANG et al. 1998; ORF285, NAKAO et al. 2002; MS4, OBARA et al. 2002) to refine the Y chromosome map using the Y chromosome deletion mutants described by LEBEL-HARDENACK et al. (2002). We performed PCR on genomic DNA samples isolated from the set of Y-deletion mutants using primers designed to amplify the Y-linked allele of each gene or Y-linked marker. The results of deletion mapping are summarized in supplementary Table S1 at http://www.genetics.org/supplemental/. The results were first evaluated by Fisher's exact tests (supplementary Table S2 at http://www.genetics.org/supplemental/) and logarithm of the odds (LOD) of linkage scores.
The gene SlY4 (ATANASSOV et al. 2001) was found to be significantly associated with gene(s) responsible for late stamen development (MOORE et al. 2003). The genes DD44Y (MOORE et al. 2003) and SlssY (FILATOV 2005a,b) are significantly associated with gene(s) responsible for gynoecium suppression (MOORE et al. 2003; this study). We have found an association of SlY3 with group A (supplementary Table S2 at http://www.genetics.org/supplemental/). The marker ordering using a combination of the maximum-likelihood algorithm with the equal retention probability model and the minimal break criterion also confirms this interpretation (Figure 1).
|
The marker ScQ14 is closely linked to the stamen-promoting function, as it was absent in all Y chromosome deletion mutants with early and intermediate stamen arrest and was present in all other mutants examined. This linkage was proven statistically significant by Fisher's exact test (supplementary Table S1 at http://www.genetics.org/supplemental/). This marker is also closely linked to the marker L26 (LOD >3). The markers L26, ScQ14, and the stamen-promoting function form a group in which markers are associated with LOD >3 but <4. To maintain the names of the linkage groups published before (LEBEL-HARDENACK et al. 2002), we named the linkage group formed of L26, ScQ14, and the stamen-promoting function group D.
The combination of the maximum-likelihood algorithm with the equal retention probability model and the minimal break criterion enabled us to correct the map by MOORE et al. (2003) and to put together the male-fertility function, the markers from groups B and C, and the genes SlY1 and SlY4 with LOD >3 but <4. In the schematic of the Y chromosome deletion map (Figure 1), the newly formed group is named group BC.
Because the deletions cannot continuously cover the whole Y chromosome (due to the need for an intact centromere to transmit the chromosome to daughter cells), it is not possible to construct a whole-chromosome deletion map. Moreover, the marker Bam37 was present in all 22 mutants examined (DONNISON et al. 1996; this article), and LEBEL-HARDENACK et al. (2002) also found one marker present in all the mutants examined. To identify which markers and marker groups are present on a respective Y chromosome arm, we performed PCR on genomic DNA isolated from a male hairy-root culture with a complete deletion of the q arm of the Y chromosome (the cell line MD151). PCR analysis using DD44-specific primers confirmed the presence of the p arm, and nonamplification of the SlY4 and SlY1 confirmed the absence of the opposite q arm (MOORE et al. 2003). In our experiments on this cell line, specific primers amplified the genes SlssY, SlY3, and SlAP3Y, which are parts of group A, where DD44Y is also present. The results are summarized as supplementary Table S1 at http://www.genetics.org/supplemental/).
So far, the positions (in respect to the centromere) of only two (gynoecium-suppressing function and male-fertility function) of three sex determination functions are known (WESTERGAARD 1958; MOORE et al. 2003). Mapping of the marker ScQ14 (which is closely linked to the stamen-promoting function) on the hairy-root mutant lacking the q arm enabled the localization of this third sex determination function on the p arm. We conclude that both the stamen-promoting function and the gynoecium-suppressing function are located on the p arm, whereas the male-fertility function is present on the q arm.
The gynoecium-suppressing function is located at the subtelomeric region of the p arm as deduced from the distribution of deletions in the hermaphroditic mutants (LEBEL-HARDENACK et al. 2002). The male-fertility function is probably located near the pseudoautosomal region (PAR), because the male-fertility function is a part of group BC, which also includes the gene SlY1. The gene SlY1 stopped recombination with its X-linked copy, SlX1 (DELICHERE et al. 1999), very recently (NICOLAS et al. 2005), and SlX1 is closely linked to the PAR (NICOLAS et al. 2005). Moreover, the FISH pattern of three repetitive sequences used as markers at the subtelomeric part of the Y chromosome q arm is similar to the corresponding part of the X chromosome (LENGEROVA et al. 2004). A prominent rearrangement of the most recently evolved nonrecombining part of the Y chromosome is thus unlikely.
The deletion mapping approach enabled us to compare the positions of several Y-linked genes with their X-linked copies. The genetic mapping data revealed the order of the X-linked copies: PAR, SlX1, (D44X + SlssX), SlX3, and SlX4 (FILATOV 2005a,b; NICOLAS et al. 2005). However, the order of their Y-linked copies is rather different. The most likely order on the q arm is PAR, SlY1, and SlY4, and the gene order on the p arm most probably is centromere, SlY3, DD44, and SlssY (Figure 2). This difference is apparently caused by a chromosomal rearrangement on the Y chromosome. The gene order observed on the Y chromosome could arise as a single chromosomal inversion covering the large region from SlY4 to SlssY. The corresponding region on the X chromosome (from SlssX and DD44X to SlX4) covers
23.9 cM (NICOLAS et al. 2005). Because the genes DD44X/Y, SlX/Y3, and SlX/Y4 fall into several evolutionary strata, as revealed by silent nucleotide substitution divergences (NICOLAS et al. 2005), the considered inversion event occurred after the recombination arrest in the whole region between the genes DD44X/Y and SlX/Y4. Another possible explanation is that several independent Y chromosome rearrangements were involved in the Y chromosome rearrangement, but it is less likely.
|
As processes of successive recombination arrest (envisaged by the strata model in LAHN and PAGE 1999) associated with large chromosome rearrangements resulted in formation of the current human Y chromosome (SKALETSKY et al. 2003), this might be a general evolutionary pathway common to both animals and plants, which evolved sex chromosomes independently. The S. latifolia sex chromosome system appears to support the view that the inversion was a consequence of recombination arrest and not the cause.
ATANASSOV, I., C. DELICHERE, D. A. FILATOV, D. CHARLESWORTH, I. NEGRUTIU et al., 2001 Analysis and evolution of two functional Y-linked loci in a plant sex chromosome system. Mol. Biol. Evol. 18: 21622168.
DELICHERE, C., J. VEUSKENS, M. HERNOULD, N. BARBACAR, A. MOURAS et al., 1999 SlY1, the first active gene cloned from a plant Y chromosome, encodes a WD-repeat protein. EMBO J. 18: 41694179.[CrossRef][Medline]
DONNISON, I. S., J. SIROKY, B. VYSKOT, H. SAEDLER and S. R. GRANT, 1996 Isolation of Y chromosome-specific sequences from Silene latifolia and mapping of male sex-determining genes using representational difference analysis. Genetics 144: 18931901.[Abstract]
FILATOV, D. A., 2005a Evolutionary history of Silene latifolia sex chromosomes revealed by genetic mapping of four genes. Genetics 170: 975979.
FILATOV, D. A., 2005b Substitution rates in a new Silene latifolia sex-linked gene, SlssX/Y. Mol. Biol. Evol. 22: 402408.
LAHN, B. T., and D. C. PAGE, 1999 Four evolutionary strata on the human X chromosome. Science 286: 964967.
LAHN, B. T., N. M. PEARSON and K. JEGALIAN, 2001 The human Y chromosome, in the light of evolution. Nat. Rev. Genet. 2: 207216.[CrossRef][Medline]
LEBEL-HARDENACK, S., E. HAUSER, T. F. LAW, J. SCHMID and S. R. GRANT, 2002 Mapping of sex determination loci on the white campion (Silene latifolia) Y chromosome using amplified fragment length polymorphism. Genetics 160: 717725.
LENGEROVA, M., E. KEJNOVSKY, R. HOBZA, J. MACAS, S. R. GRANT et al., 2004 Multicolor FISH mapping of the dioecious model plant, Silene latifolia. Theor. Appl. Genet. 108: 11931199.[CrossRef][Medline]
LIU, Z., P. H. MOORE, H. MA, C. M. ACKERMAN, M. RAGIBA et al., 2004 A primitive Y chromosome in papaya marks incipient sex chromosome evolution. Nature 427: 348352.[CrossRef][Medline]
MATSUNAGA, S., E. ISONO, E. KEJNOVSKY, B. VYSKOT, J. DOLEZEL et al., 2003 Duplicative transfer of a MADS box gene to a plant Y chromosome. Mol. Biol. Evol. 20: 10621069.
MOORE, R. C., O. KOZYREVA, S. LEBEL-HARDENACK, J. SIROKY, R. HOBZA et al., 2003 Genetic and functional analysis of DD44, a sex-linked gene from the dioecious plant Silene latifolia, provides clues to early events in sex chromosome evolution. Genetics 163: 321334.
NAKAO, S., S. MATSUNAGA, A. SAKAI, T. KUROIWA and S. KAWANO, 2002 RAPD isolation of a Y chromosome specific ORF in a dioecious plant, Silene latifolia. Genome 45: 413420.[Medline]
NICOLAS, M., G. MARAIS, V. HYKELOVA, B. JANOUSEK, V. LAPORTE et al., 2005 A gradual and ongoing process of recombination restriction in the evolutionary history of the sex chromosomes in dioecius plants. PloS Biol. 3: 4756.[CrossRef]
OBARA, M., S. MATSUNAGA, S. NAKAO and S. KAWANO, 2002 A plant Y chromosome-STS marker encoding a degenerate retrotransposon. Genes Genet. Syst. 77: 393398.[CrossRef][Medline]
SKALETSKY, H., T. KURODA-KAWAGUCHI, P. J. MINX, H. S. CORDUM, L. HILLIER et al., 2003 The male-specific region of the human Y chromosome is a mosaic of discrete sequence classes. Nature 423: 825837.[CrossRef][Medline]
VYSKOT, B., and R. HOBZA, 2004 Gender in plants: sex chromosomes are emerging from the fog. Trends Genet. 20: 432438.[CrossRef][Medline]
WESTERGAARD, M., 1958 The mechanism of sex determination in dioecious flowering plants. Adv. Genet. 9: 217281.[Medline]
ZHANG, Y. H., V. S. DI STILIO, F. REHMAN, A. AVERY, D. MULCAHY et al., 1998 Y chromosome specific markers and the evolution of dioecy in the genus Silene. Genome 41: 141147.
Communicating editor: D. WEIGEL
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
K. Nam and H. Ellegren The Chicken (Gallus gallus) Z Chromosome Contains at Least Three Nonlinear Evolutionary Strata Genetics, October 1, 2008; 180(2): 1131 - 1136. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
R. Bergero, D. Charlesworth, D. A. Filatov, and R. C. Moore Defining Regions and Rearrangements of the Silene latifolia Y Chromosome Genetics, April 1, 2008; 178(4): 2045 - 2053. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A. Koizumi, Y. Amanai, K. Ishii, K. Nishihara, Y. Kazama, W. Uchida, and S. Kawano Floral Development of an Asexual and Female-Like Mutant Carrying Two Deletions in Gynoecium-Suppressing and Stamen-Promoting Functional Regions on the Y Chromosome of the Dioecious Plant Silene latifolia Plant Cell Physiol., October 1, 2007; 48(10): 1450 - 1461. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. Zluvova, S. Georgiev, B. Janousek, D. Charlesworth, B. Vyskot, and I. Negrutiu Early Events in the Evolution of the Silene latifolia Y Chromosome: Male Specialization and Recombination Arrest Genetics, September 1, 2007; 177(1): 375 - 386. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
R. Bergero, A. Forrest, E. Kamau, and D. Charlesworth Evolutionary Strata on the X Chromosomes of the Dioecious Plant Silene latifolia: Evidence From New Sex-Linked Genes Genetics, April 1, 2007; 175(4): 1945 - 1954. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. Zluvova, M. Nicolas, A. Berger, I. Negrutiu, and F. Moneger Premature arrest of the male flower meristem precedes sexual dimorphism in the dioecious plant Silene latifolia PNAS, December 5, 2006; 103(49): 18854 - 18859. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
- THIS ARTICLE
-
Abstract
- Full Text (PDF)
-
All Versions of this Article:
genetics.105.040444v1
170/3/1431 most recent - Alert me when this article is cited
- Alert me if a correction is posted
- SERVICES
- Email this article to a friend
- Similar articles in this journal
- Similar articles in PubMed
- Alert me to new issues of the journal
- Download to citation manager
- Reprints & Permissions
- CITING ARTICLES
- Citing Articles via HighWire
- Citing Articles via Google Scholar
- GOOGLE SCHOLAR
- Articles by Zluvova, J.
- Articles by Vyskot, B.
- Search for Related Content
- PUBMED
- PubMed Citation
- Articles by Zluvova, J.
- Articles by Vyskot, B.




