- THIS ARTICLE
-
Abstract
- Full Text (PDF)
- Supplemental Material
-
All Versions of this Article:
genetics.104.031286v1
169/2/651 most recent - Alert me when this article is cited
- Alert me if a correction is posted
- SERVICES
- Similar articles in this journal
- Similar articles in PubMed
- Alert me to new issues of the journal
- Download to citation manager
- Reprints & Permissions
- CITING ARTICLES
- Citing Articles via HighWire
- Citing Articles via Google Scholar
- GOOGLE SCHOLAR
- Articles by Reynolds, N. K.
- Articles by Miller, K. G.
- Search for Related Content
- PUBMED
- PubMed Citation
- Articles by Reynolds, N. K.
- Articles by Miller, K. G.
Originally published as Genetics Published Articles Ahead of Print on October 16, 2004.
Genetics, Vol. 169, 651-670, February 2005, Copyright © 2005
doi:10.1534/genetics.104.031286
Convergent, RIC-8-Dependent G
Signaling Pathways in the Caenorhabditis elegans Synaptic Signaling Network
Nicole K. Reynolds, Michael A. Schade and Kenneth G. Miller1
Program in Molecular, Cell and Developmental Biology, Oklahoma Medical Research Foundation, Oklahoma City, Oklahoma 73104
1 Corresponding author: Program in Molecular and Cell Biology, Oklahoma Medical Research Foundation, 825 NE 13th St., Oklahoma City, OK 73104.
E-mail: millerk{at}omrf.ouhsc.edu
We used gain-of-function and null synaptic signaling network mutants to investigate the relationship of the G
q and G
s pathways to synaptic vesicle priming and to each other. Genetic epistasis studies using G
q gain-of-function and null mutations, along with a mutation that blocks synaptic vesicle priming and the synaptic vesicle priming stimulator phorbol ester, suggest that the G
q pathway generates the core, obligatory signals for synaptic vesicle priming. In contrast, the G
s pathway is not required for the core priming function, because steady-state levels of neurotransmitter release are not significantly altered in animals lacking a neuronal G
s pathway, even though these animals are strongly paralyzed as a result of functional (nondevelopmental) defects. However, our genetic analysis indicates that these two functionally distinct pathways converge and that they do so downstream of DAG production. Further linking the two pathways, our epistasis analysis of a ric-8 null mutant suggests that RIC-8 (a receptor-independent G
guanine nucleotide exchange factor) is required to maintain both the G
q vesicle priming pathway and the neuronal G
s pathway in a functional state. We propose that the neuronal G
s pathway transduces critical positional information onto the core G
q pathway to stabilize the priming of selected synapses that are optimal for locomotion.
ONE proposed mechanism for establishing and modifying behaviors or memories involves presynaptic changes in synaptic strength, and regulating the amount of synaptic-vesicle-mediated neurotransmitter release at synapses is thought to be critical for changing presynaptic strength (KANDEL and PITTENGER 1999; LIN and SCHELLER 2000; SUDHOF 2000). Electrophysiological studies have defined a "readily releasable," or "primed," pool of synaptic vesicles, the size of which determines release probability and, therefore, presynaptic strength (SUDHOF 2000). The term "primed" can be applied either to an individual synaptic vesicle or to a synapse (i.e., a primed synapse is one containing a relatively large pool of primed synaptic vesicles). A major challenge is to understand the layout and logic of the network of signaling pathways that controls synaptic vesicle and synapse priming.
The G
q and the G
s pathways are two major signaling pathways that have been implicated in positively regulating synaptic vesicle and/or synapse priming; however, the relationship of the G
q and the G
s pathways to each other is poorly understood. Both pathways have been reported to increase the pool of readily releasable, primed synaptic vesicles (TRUDEAU et al. 1996; CHEN and REGEHR 1997; STEVENS and SULLIVAN 1998; KUROMI and KIDOKORO 2000; WATERS and SMITH 2000). These electrophysiological studies thus show that both pathways can positively affect priming, but they do not reveal how the two pathways interact and why they both exist. Highlighting this point, two recent studies showed that the G
s pathway is not even required for synaptic vesicle priming, because evoked release remains normal, or even increases, when G
s null synapses are subjected to low frequency stimulation (HOU et al. 2003; RENDEN and BROADIE 2003).
Providing important insights and yet further adding to the puzzlement about the relative roles of the G
q and G
s pathways, recent research suggests that both pathways, directly or indirectly, affect the synaptic abundance of UNC-13, a large, conserved protein that binds diacylglycerol (DAG) (MARUYAMA and BRENNER 1991), interacts with the synaptic vesicle fusion machinery (BETZ et al. 1997; SASSA et al. 1999), and is required for synaptic vesicle priming (ARAVAMUDAN et al. 1999; AUGUSTIN et al. 1999; RICHMOND et al. 1999, 2001). Intriguing studies by ARAVAMUDAN and BROADIE (2003) and SPEESE et al. (2003) suggest that both DAG (produced by the G
q pathway) and cAMP (produced by the G
s pathway) increase the abundance of Drosophila UNC-13 at synapses via a proteasome-dependent mechanism, and earlier studies had already implicated the G
q and G
o pathways in the regulation of UNC-13 abundance at synapses (LACKNER et al. 1999; NURRISH et al. 1999).
The above physiological and molecular studies show that altering the intracellular concentration of components of the G
q and the G
s pathways can alter synaptic vesicle and/or synapse priming and can also alter the synaptic abundance of the UNC-13 priming protein; however, questions of fundamental importance remain unanswered. Most importantly, studies focusing on each pathway as a single entity have not revealed the relationship of these two major pathways to each other. A major obstacle has been the lack of experiments that examine the consequences of knocking out the G
q pathway, with respect to both synaptic vesicle priming and how such a manipulation affects G
s pathway function.
Investigating the relationship of the G
q and G
s pathways to each other in intact animals requires epistasis analysis, a powerful method in which, by carefully analyzing the phenotype of strategically constructed double mutants, one can often infer the upstream/downstream order of proteins in a signaling pathway or network (AVERY and WASSERMAN 1992; HUANG and STERNBERG 1995). However, signaling pathway epistasis analysis has strict requirements, including the availability of null mutants, the availability of mutations that turn on as well as completely block the pathway, and the ability to demonstrate that the single and double mutants used for the analysis do not have secondary effects that interfere with the measured output.
Genetic studies of the Caenorhabditis elegans synaptic signaling network have produced a remarkable set of genetic mutations and tools, unique among model organisms in their scope, that are appropriate for use in epistasis studies of the G
o, G
q, and G
s synaptic signaling pathways. These include mutations that completely knock out each of these three major pathways, mutations that knock out the UNC-13 synaptic vesicle priming protein, transgenic strains and native gain-of-function mutants in which each pathway is strongly hyperactivated, a variety of mutations in negative regulatory components that indirectly lead to hyperactivation of each pathway, and transgenic and pharmacological manipulations that allow each pathway to be acutely activated in whole animals (see Table 1 and references therein). Adding to these tools, and facilitating their use in epistasis analysis is the amazing ability of C. elegans mutants lacking these pathways in neurons to remain alive for long periods of time and in some cases even to reproduce as homozygotes under standard or specially controlled laboratory conditions.
|
Previous epistasis studies revealed that the G
o pathway is strongly dependent on the G
q pathway to exert its strong inhibitory effects on locomotion and neurotransmitter release (HAJDU-CRONIN et al. 1999; MILLER et al. 1999). In a prelude to the current study, a pair of high-resolution forward genetic screens revealed an apparent link between the G
s pathway and the G
o/G
q signaling network (SCHADE et al. 2005, accompanying article in this issue); however, that study did not directly address the relationship of the G
q and G
s pathways to each other.
In this study, we use gain-of-function and null synaptic signaling network mutants to investigate the relationship of G
q and G
s pathways to synaptic vesicle priming and to each other. Genetic epistasis studies using G
q gain-of-function and null mutations, along with a mutation that blocks synaptic vesicle priming and the synaptic vesicle priming stimulator phorbol ester, suggest that the G
q pathway generates the core, obligatory signals for synaptic vesicle priming. In contrast, the G
s pathway is not required for the core priming function, because steady-state levels of neurotransmitter release are not significantly altered in animals lacking a neuronal G
s pathway, even though these animals are strongly paralyzed as a result of functional (nondevelopmental) defects. However, our genetic analysis indicates that these two functionally distinct pathways converge and that they do so downstream of DAG production. Further linking the two pathways, our epistasis analysis of a ric-8 null mutant suggests that RIC-8 (a receptor-independent G
guanine nucleotide exchange factor, GEF) is required to maintain both the G
q vesicle priming pathway and the neuronal G
s pathway in a functional state. We propose that the neuronal G
s pathway transduces critical positional information onto the G
q priming pathway to stabilize the priming of selected synapses that are optimal for locomotion.
Worm culture and observation:
Unless otherwise specified, wild-type worms were C. elegans variety Bristol, strain N2. All culture media were made with Sigma A-7002 agar. All other worm cultures were based on previously described methods (BRENNER 1974). Worms were observed and manipulated using Olympus SZX-12 stereomicroscopes equipped with x1.2, 0.13 numerical aperture plan apochromatic objectives.
Strains:
Alleles used in genetic analysis and for double-mutant strain construction are described and referenced in Table 1, except for egl-30(ad805) (BRUNDAGE et al. 1996) and eat-16(ce71), which we describe here for the first time. eat-16(ce71), which we isolated in a screen for hyperactive mutants (SCHADE et al. 2005), contains a Q333stop mutation and is our best candidate for an eat-16 null mutant, because it is predicted to block production of the C-terminal 30% of the protein, including
75% of the RGS domain that is required for EAT-16's function (HAJDU-CRONIN et al. 1999). All mutants used in this study have been outcrossed at least three times to reduce secondary mutations.
The mutations goa-1(sa734) and egl-30(tg26) were maintained at 20° or room temperature, because they were found to not grow at the standard long-term storage temperature of 14°. The larval lethal mutations egl-30(ad810) and acy-1(pk1279) were maintained as heterozygotes. egl-30(ad810) was outcrossed from DA1096 egl-30(ad810)/szT1 [lon-2(e678) I; +/szT1 X] and maintained as egl-30(ad810)/+ with no special balancing mutations. Since the mutation is semidominant (as a result of haplo-insufficiency), we identified ad810/+ heterozygotes on the basis of their larger than normal size and their significant Egl phenotype. Stock cultures were produced by picking
10 large Egl ad810/+ animals to each of two culture plates and allowing the plates to starve at 14° for long-term storage. Chunks from this plate were transferred to fresh culture plates as needed and grown for 2 days at room temperature; ad810/+ animals were chosen on the basis of their phenotype and used to generate homozygotes. acy-1(pk1279) was maintained over the closely linked mutation dpy-17(e164). These animals were maintained semiweekly in continuous culture for injections and double-mutant strain construction by cloning 610 wild larvae to individual culture plates, growing them 3 days at room temperature or 4 days at 20°, and saving plates that segregated paralyzed larvae and Dpy-17 animals. The ric-8(ok98) null mutation was initially maintained in a heterozygous state by selecting animals that segregated straight paralyzed larvae and subsequently balanced under the flanking genetic markers lin-1(e1275) unc-33(e204) and outcrossed three times.
Long PCR products and plasmids:
All long PCR products were produced via Expand 20 Kb+ (Roche) amplification of purified N2 genomic DNA, according to the manufacturer's instructions. The boundaries of the 10.0-kb ric-8 gene rescuing PCR product KG372/373 and the 9.88-kb fusion PCR product KG430/431 are shown in Figure 6A. The fusion PCR product was produced using the method of HOBERT (2002) and excludes the small upstream gene that is in an operon with ric-8. To construct KG#80 [myo-3::acy-1(+) cDNA], we applied reverse transcriptase to purified C. elegans mRNA and synthesized the 1155-bp 5' part of the acy-1 cDNA. This fragment was then fused to the partial cDNA clone yk35d9, using an internal SphI site and a 5' site that had been engineered into the 5' primer. The 3.8-kb acy-1 coding region was then amplified using Pfu Ultra polymerase and primers engineered with restriction sites and cloned into AgeI/XhoI-cut pPD96.52, a C. elegans muscle expression vector. The acy-1 coding region of this construct was sequenced and a clone was chosen that contained no mutations. To make KG#62 [rab-3::acy-1(+)], the acy-1 coding region was cloned into the KG#59 rab-3 expression vector (SCHADE et al. 2005), again using AgeI/XhoI. To make KG#82 [hsp-16-2::acy-1(gf)], the acy-1 (P260S) gain-of-function cDNA (SCHADE et al. 2005) was cloned, using AgeI/XhoI, into the heat-shock-inducible expression vector KG#45, which is the same as pPD96.52, except that the myo-3 promoter is replaced with the hsp-16-2 promoter (taken from pPD49.78). KG#81 [myo-3::acy-1(gf) cDNA] and KG#83 [rab-3::acy-1(gf) cDNA] have been described (SCHADE et al. 2005). To make KG#87 [myo-3::unc-18(+) cDNA] and KG#88 [rab-3::unc-18(+) cDNA], we applied reverse transcriptase to purified C. elegans mRNA and synthesized the full-length unc-18 coding region cDNA and then amplified this fragment using Accuprime Pfx (Invitrogen, San Diego) and primers engineered with AgeI/XhoI restriction sites. This fragment was then cloned into like-digested pPD96.52 (a body-wall muscle expression vector) to make KG#87 [myo-3::unc-18(+) cDNA]. After sequencing the unc-18 coding region in KG#87 to confirm the absence of PCR-introduced mutations in the chosen clone, we used AgeI/XhoI to transfer the unc-18 cDNA into the rab-3 expression vector KG#59 to make KG#88 [rab-3::unc-18(+) cDNA].
|
Production of transgenes:
Transgenic strains bearing extrachromosomal arrays were produced by the method of MELLO et al. (1991). pBluescript carrier DNA was used, if necessary, to bring the final concentration of DNA in the injection mixture to 175 ng/µl. ceEx2 and ceEx9 were produced by injecting lin-1(e1275) unc-33(e204)/ric-8(ok98) animals with the KG372/373 and KG430/431 PCR products, respectively, at 10 and 60 ng/µl, respectively, and using pPD118.20 [myo-3::GFP] as a co-injection marker. Putative rescued ric-8(ok98) homozgyotes were cloned as green adult F2 progeny of green F1's that segregated Lin-1 and Unc-33. Lines whose only nongreen progeny were paralyzed larvae were saved and tested by PCR for ric-8(ok98) homozygosity. All remaining experimental DNAs in this study, with the exception of the unc-18 cDNAs, were injected into the acy-1 null heterozygous strain NL1999 acy-1(pk1279)/dpy-17(e164) (MOORMAN and PLASTERK 2002), which was maintained in a continuous growing culture as described above. All experimental DNAs were co-injected with a GFP-bearing plasmid driven by the same promoter as that driving the experimental DNA. For injections involving rab-3-promoted coding regions, KG#68 [rab-3::GFP] and KG#67 ttx-3::GFP (gift of Oliver Hobert) were mixed at 50 and 25 ng/µl, respectively, to reduce nonspecific intestinal expression. F1 progeny of injected animals were screened, and GFP-positive adult animals were selected from plates segregating Dpy-17, pk1279 homozygotes, and wild type, and these animals were cloned to separate plates. In the next generation, lines segregating green F2's, no Dpy-17, and whose only nongreen progeny were paralyzed larvae (that had lost the transgene) were kept as candidate-rescued pk1279 homozygotes (in all cases the larval lethality was rescued to some extent). A total of 12 GFP-positive adults from each of these lines were cloned, and a line with good expression and transmittance was saved to establish a stock. ceEx67 [myo-3::acy-1(+) high copy #] and ceEx108 [myo-3::acy-1(+) low copy #] were produced by injecting NL1999's with KG#80 at 15 and 5 ng/µl, respectively. To make ceEx87 [myo-3::acy-1(gf)], we injected NL1999 with KG#81 at 15 ng/µl. To make ceEX76 [myo-3::acy-1(+) HS::acy-1(gf)], we injected NL1999 with a mixture of KG#80 (15 ng/µl) and KG#82 (10 ng/µl). To make ceEx100, we injected unc-18(e81) mutants with KG#87 (15 ng/µl) and selected GFP-positive F2's. All of these injections included pPD118.20 [myo-3::GFP] (15 ng/µl) as the cotransformation marker. To make ceEx97 [rab-3::acy-1(+)], we injected NL1999 with KG#62 (50 ng/µl). To make ceEx98 [rab-3::acy-1(gf)], we injected NL1999 with KG#83 (25 ng/µl). To make ceEx102, we injected unc-18(e81) mutants with KG#88 (25 ng/µl) and selected GFP-positive F2's. The latter three transgenes all included KG#68 [rab-3::GFP] and KG#67 ttx-3::GFP (gift of Oliver Hobert), mixed at 50 and 25 ng/µl, respectively, as the cotransformation markers.
Double-mutant strain construction and verification:
Unless otherwise specified, double mutants were constructed using standard genetic methods without additional marker mutations, and homozygosity of mutations, where necessary, was confirmed by PCR and/or sequencing. We constructed egl-30(ad810); acy-1(md1756) double mutants by crossing md1756/+ males to ad810/+ hermaphrodites. L4 progeny of this cross were then cloned and, from plates segregating both mutant phenotypes, 30 putative ad810/+; md1756 animals were cloned. From this group, plates that segregated ad810 larval homozygotes were tested for md1756 homozygosity by PCR and sequencing of the region containing the md1756 sequence change, testing lysates derived from multiple animals from each plate. Cultures found to be homozygous for md1756 and segregating ad810; md1756 double-mutant larvae were then expanded and maintained by cloning more putative ad810/+; md1756 animals and by checking for proper segregation. After collecting double mutants for documentation and assays (see below), a portion of the population was used to confirm homozygosity of both mutations by double amplification PCR using nested primers, followed by sequence analysis. We constructed egl-30(ad810); kin-2(ce179) and all of the acy-1(pk1279)-containing double mutants using similar methods. To make the egl-30(tg26); acy-1(pk1279); ceEx108 [myo-3::acy-1(+) myo-3::GFP] strain, tg26/+ males were crossed to pk1279; ceEx108 hermaphrodites, and 20 GFP-positive, hyperactive L4 hermaphrodite cross progeny were cloned and grown 4 days at room temperature. From the progeny of these animals, 42 GFP-positive putative tg26 homozygotes were cloned to 24-well culture plates and grown 45 days at room temperature. Wells containing no wild-type animals and segregating nongreen pk1279 larval lethals (from loss of the transgenic array) were identified and, from these wells, 25 GFP-positive putative tg26; ceEx108; pk1279/+ animals were cloned to individual culture plates. Properly segregating plates were used to maintain and expand the population for documentation and assays. The homozygous presence of the pk1279 deletion in all acy-1(pk1279)-containing strains was verified (using a portion of each population) by duplicate reactions of double-amplification PCR using nested primers, with both sets of primers completely internal to the deletion and completely derived from introns that would not be present in the cDNA rescued strains. These amplifications were done in parallel with control strains without the deletion, and all reactions contained the same number and same stage of animals in each tube. ric-8(ok98) double mutants were constructed by crossing mut-x/+ males (where mut-x is a generic mutation) to the heterozygous balanced strain lin-1(e1275) unc-33(e204)/ ric-8(ok98) and then cloning putative mut-x/mut-x; ric-8(ok98)/+ animals from the grand-progeny of this cross. From plates homozygous for mut-x, we chose staged mut-x; ric-8(ok98) double mutants (which were always paralyzed or near-paralyzed and sterile) for confirmation by PCR and sequencing and for the assays described herein.
Locomotion assays:
Standard locomotion assays were performed as previously described, using standardized plates and a standardized definition of a body bend (MILLER et al. 1999). Exaggerated movements in which the animal doubles back on itself during reversal such that the tail touches the anterior of the body in a figure-eight pattern were scored as three body bends [this became relevant in some strains containing the egl-30 gain-of-function mutation, double mutants containing the acy-1(pk1279) mutation in combination with mutations that activate the egl-30 pathway (i.e., Figure 5B), and some strains treated with phorbol esters]. For coiling movements, a body bend was counted every 90° around the circle. To assay egl-30(ad810) and acy-1(pk1279)-containing strains, synchronized, larval-arrested, homozygous animals were collected by plating 1420 heterozygous parental gravid adult animals on each of 710 culture plates seeded with a 1-cm-diameter lawn of OP-50 bacteria. These animals were plated in late afternoon and allowed to lay eggs for 24 hr before killing the parents. The eggs were then allowed to hatch overnight, producing a population of 6- to 30-hr-old larvae. Animals homozygous for egl-30(ad810) or acy-1(pk1279) were chosen from this population on the basis of their paralyzed phenotype and transferred to a standard locomotion assay plate (MILLER et al. 1999) using a worm pick laden with a moist dab of bacteria. Approximately 60100 animals were collected in this way for each strain to have enough animals for video and photo documentation, locomotion assays, genotype confirmation by PCR and sequencing, and population half-life studies (Table 2; see below). For locomotion assays, 10 animals were transferred in moist bacteria to a fresh, room-temperature equilibrated locomotion assay plate. After a 30-min stabilization period, body bends were counted for 6 min for each of the 10 animals. Identically staged N2 (wild type) and single-mutant control animals were produced and assayed in the same manner. egl-30(ad810) single mutants and egl-30(ad810); kin-2(ce179) double mutants were also assayed by a track locomotion assay, in which 3070 animals were plated on a locomotion plate and allowed to sit at room temperature for 160 min, after which the body bends produced by each animal during this time were counted by following the short track that each animal made during that period.
|
|
The heat-shock locomotion assays in this study were performed as described (SCHADE et al. 2005) and the heat shock and recovery times are specified in Figure 3. For phorbol ester locomotion assays, culture plates containing 5 µM phorbol myristate acetate (PMA; CalBiochem 52440; a 5 mg/ml stock solution was prepared in ethanol and stored at 35°) were prepared by adding the phorbol ester stock solution or ethanol carrier for control plates directly to 60° equilibrated molten media in a disposable flask with stirring. Plates were poured by hand in a chemical fume hood, allowed to solidify for 4 hr, and then spread with OP-50 culture. Plates were stored upright for
40 hr in covered plastic containers (separate containers for control and phorbol ester plates) before using for the assays. At this point, if plates were not immediately used for assays, they were inverted and sealed in plastic wrap for up to 3 days, with no detectable change in the response of wild-type animals. To assay, five animals were loaded on each of eight plates at 7-min intervals. After the elapsed time (usually 2.53 hr for adults), one of the five animals was chosen to count body bends for 6 min, and the remaining plates were assayed at staggered 7-min intervals. Control plates were loaded and assayed in parallel with the phorbol ester plates. All assays performed on larval-stage animals were done using 2.5 µM phorbol myristate acetate (instead of the 5.0-µM concentration used for adults), and larval animals were assayed 22.5 hr after plating (instead of 2.53 hr for adult assays). Synchronized larval animals for this assay were collected as described above.
|
Video production and imaging:
Videos of worms on agar plates containing OP-50 bacterial lawns were captured and converted as described (SCHADE et al. 2005). Still images of mutants were collected using an Olympus C3040 digital camera mounted on an Olympus SZX-12 stereomicroscope. High-magnification larval images were obtained using a high resolution x2, 0.275 NA plan apochromatic objective.
Drug sensitivity assays:
Aldicarb sensitivity assays using the population growth rate method were performed as described (MILLER et al. 1999). Only larvae that were uniformly GFP positive in body-wall muscle cells were chosen for the acy-1(pk1279); ceEx76 and acy-1(pk1279); ceEx108 aldicarb sensitivity assays (Figure 4). Aldicarb acute paralysis assays on solid media were performed as previously described (LACKNER et al. 1999; NURRISH et al. 1999). Aldicarb was added to a final concentration of 1 mM from a 10-mM stock solution in ddH2O (allowing
23 hr for dissolving before adding to the 55° cooled molten media), and media was made with 10% less water than normal to compensate for the large drug volume. Aldicarb-containing plates were seeded with OP-50 on the day that they were poured and stored at room temperature for 2 days, lid side up, before using. Animals designated for plates containing PMA + aldicarb were preincubated with 2.5 µM PMA to allow the PMA time course to maximize before beginning the aldicarb + PMA time course. These phorbol ester plates were produced as described (SCHADE et al. 2005). Preexposure time for N2 (wild type) was 1 hr and for egl-30(ad810) was 2.5 hr (on the basis of past experience of maximal response). Three such preincubation plates were produced at staggered times, so they would be available for each of the three independent trials of the aldicarb paralysis assay. Twenty animals were used for each strain/condition per trial. Six- to 30-hr-old N2 (wild type) and egl-30(ad810) homozygous larvae were collected for this assay as described in Locomotion assays.
|
To measure body-wall muscle contraction in response to levamisole, 24-well culture plates were prepared containing standard media in the first and third rows and standard media containing various concentrations of levamisole in the remaining rows (six identical wells containing the same drug concentration in each row). Levamisole (dispensed from a 100-mM aqueous stock) was added to a beaker of 55° molten media and dispensed into the wells using a 25-ml pipette rinsed with hot water between sets of wells. Wells were completely filled with media. Within 2 hr of solidifying, the media in the wells was spotted with 10 µl of an OP-50 bacterial culture. Plates were dried
1 hr in a 37° room with their lids off and then returned to room temperature and used for the assay
40 hr later. To assay contraction, mature adults from growing cultures (not previously starved) were singly placed in the rows containing no drug and, after a 10-min equilibration, were photographed at x60 using an Olymplus C3040 digital camera attached to the stereomicroscope. Animals were then transferred at 20-sec intervals to their intended wells containing levamisole, which were in the rows immediately below the no-drug wells, such that each drug concentration had an "N" of six. Twenty minutes after loading the first animal on its levamisole well, each animal was photographed at 20-sec intervals. Images were cropped with Paintshop Pro to reduce size and then imported into Canvas 9.0. The curve tool was used to trace the center line of each animal along its entire length, and the length of the line was determined using the object specifications "tool."
Measurements of population half-lives and percentage reaching adulthood:
To measure population half-lives of various larval lethal strains,
2560 homozygous mutant or double-mutant animals were collected as described in Locomotion assays and transferred to a locomotion assay plate in a dab of moist bacteria. The starting age of the animals in each population ranged from 6 to 30 hr. Populations were monitored daily or every other day for the indicated number of days (Table 2), and dead animals were counted and removed. Living animals and the number of adults were also counted. "Dead" was considered to be a total lack of any observable movement or response to the touch of a pick. In most cases, death by this definition was also accompanied by an obvious change in the appearance of the animal. To assay the percentage reaching adulthood of the acy-1(pk1279) transgenic strains in Table 3, the indicated number of uniformly GFP positive 6- to 30-hr-old larvae from each strain was transferred to a locomotion assay plate. The plate was checked twice daily for the indicated number of days, and L3 and later-stage animals were transferred to a fresh plate for further observation. The number of adults on each plate was counted, and the counted animals were removed and killed.
|
The presynaptic G
q pathway is the core synaptic vesicle priming pathway:
Hyperactivating the G
q pathway through the egl-30(tg26) gain-of-function mutation causes strongly hyperactive locomotion (Figure 1B). A model of the C. elegans EGL-30 (G
q) pathway predicts that this is caused by increased synaptic vesicle priming, in part via DAG-mediated activation of the UNC-13 synaptic vesicle priming protein (Figure 1A); however, a prior study suggests that UNC-13-mediated synaptic vesicle priming is not dependent on DAG binding to UNC-13, because eliminating the ability of UNC-13 to bind DAG does not significantly affect neurotransmitter release (RHEE et al. 2002). Nevertheless, if the neuronal G
q pathway ultimately exerts its effects through UNC-13 or through an UNC-13-dependent mechanism, then a strong egl-30 (G
q) gain-of-function mutation should have little or no effect on the phenotype conferred by a strong reduction of mutation in UNC-13, and this indeed is the case. egl-30(tg26) unc-13(s69) double mutants are just as paralyzed as unc-13(s69) single mutants, which move at
1 body bend per 3 min (
1.7% of the wild-type rate; Figure 1B).
|
The above experiment shows that the neuronal G
q pathway is completely dependent on the UNC-13 priming protein to exert its effects on locomotion, but it does not address whether or not the G
q pathway is required for synaptic vesicle priming. If the main function of the presynaptic EGL-30 (G
q) pathway is to activate synaptic vesicle priming via UNC-13 and other proteins, then knocking out the EGL-30 (G
q) pathway should cause paralysis at least as severe as that seen in unc-13(s69) mutants, and that indeed is the case. The egl-30(ad810) mutation, a putative null nonsense mutation that results in strong paralysis and larval arrest (BRUNDAGE et al. 1996), reduces locomotion rate to
1 body bend per 42 min, a level that is
900-fold less than that of wild type (Figure 1B).
We next considered the possibility that the paralysis of egl-30 null mutants is largely or entirely caused by an inability to prime synaptic vesicles, which would block neurotransmitter release and thus block locomotion. Indeed, in unc-13(s69) mutants, which are significantly less paralyzed than egl-30 null mutants, evoked neurotransmitter release is essentially not detectable and spontaneous release is reduced
300-fold (RICHMOND et al. 1999). To test whether the paralysis of egl-30 null mutants is caused by a lack of primed synaptic vesicles, we incubated egl-30 null mutants on plates containing phorbol esters, which are DAG analogs known to prime synaptic vesicles (STEVENS and SULLIVAN 1998; WATERS and SMITH 2000). Remarkably, we found that incubating egl-30 null mutants for only
2 hr on plates containing phorbol esters increased their locomotion rates
800-fold, to levels slightly greater than those seen with wild-type animals on the drug-free control plates (Figure 1C and Figure 1 supplemental movies at http://www.genetics.org/supplemental/). These results demonstrate that neither muscle nor permanent developmental defects contribute substantially to the paralysis of egl-30 null mutants. Remarkably, we also found that continuous culture on phorbol ester plates can rescue the larval arrest phenotype of egl-30 null mutants, because we were able to maintain a culture of egl-30 nulls for at least three generations on a plate containing phorbol esters. In addition, incubation on phorbol ester plates induced significantly hyperactive locomotion in adult animals carrying the strong reduction-of-function mutation egl-30(ad805) (Figure 1C and Figure 1 supplemental movies at http://www.genetics.org/supplemental/). The effects of phorbol ester on locomotion rate were strongly dependent on the synaptic vesicle priming protein UNC-13, because phorbol ester had only a small effect on the paralysis caused by the near-null unc-13(s69) mutation (Figure 1C), mutants of which contain appropriately docked but unprimed vesicles (RICHMOND et al. 1999, 2001).
To explain these results, we hypothesized that phorbol esters, by mimicking the signaling molecule DAG that is produced by the G
q pathway, bypass the requirement for EGL-30 by restoring neurotransmitter release and thus rescuing the paralysis. Since acetylcholine (ACh) is the major excitatory neurotransmitter controlling locomotion rate in C. elegans, we tested this idea by placing phorbol-ester-treated egl-30 nulls on plates containing the acetylcholinesterase inhibitor aldicarb. Since the secreted ACh that accumulates in the presence of aldicarb is toxic, mutations that decrease or increase the steady-state rate of ACh release confer resistance or hypersensitivity, respectively, to aldicarb (RAND and NONET 1997). The results of plating phorbol-ester-treated egl-30 nulls on plates containing aldicarb are shown in Figure 1D, which plots the percentage of animals that are paralyzed, over a time course, on plates containing various combinations of phorbol esters and/or aldicarb. On plates with phorbol esters only, neither wild-type animals nor egl-30 null mutants are paralyzed at any time point. On plates containing aldicarb only, wild-type worms gradually become paralyzed as the drug is adsorbed and takes effect. The egl-30 null mutant is paralyzed even in the absence of aldicarb, and aldicarb causes only a slight rescue of the paralysis, which is consistent with these animals releasing only a small amount of neurotransmitter. In contrast, both phorbol-ester-treated wild-type and phorbol-ester-treated egl-30 null mutants are strongly and equally hypersensitive to the paralytic effects of aldicarb. This suggests that phorbol esters completely bypass the steady-state neurotransmitter release defect of egl-30 nulls. From the results in this section we conclude that the presynaptic G
q pathway and the core synaptic vesicle priming pathway are one and the same.
Both muscle and nervous system defects contribute to the larval lethality of mutants with a blocked G
s pathway:
To prepare for investigating the relationship of the G
q pathway to the G
s pathway, we next analyzed mutants in which the G
s pathway is blocked. A previous study produced the acy-1(pk1279) mutation and showed that it deletes the acy-1 gene and causes larval arrest and paralysis that can be rescued with the wild-type acy-1 gene (MOORMAN and PLASTERK 2002). Interestingly, the acy-1(pk1279) null mutation actually increases life span; the larval arrest results from a failure to grow (MOORMAN and PLASTERK 2002). In C. elegans, control of locomotion rate by the G
s pathway is completely dependent on adenylyl cyclase (ACY-1) (SCHADE et al. 2005). Since the G
s pathway (including acy-1) is expressed in both the muscle and the nervous system (KORSWAGEN et al. 1997; MOORMAN and PLASTERK 2002), we used a full-length acy-1 cDNA driven by ectopic promoters to investigate the extent to which the muscle and/or nervous system G
s pathways contribute to the larval arrest and paralysis phenotypes of acy-1 nulls. Surprisingly, we found that the larval arrest of acy-1 nulls could be partially rescued by expressing the acy-1 cDNA in either the muscle or the nervous system, using the myo-3 or rab-3 promoters, respectively (Table 3). Muscle-specific acy-1 expression seemed to give the most robust rescue of larval arrest: one-half to two-thirds of acy-1 nulls expressing the myo-3::acy-1 transgene reached adulthood, although the percentage reaching adulthood did not increase significantly when we upped the gene dosage or used the acy-1(ce2) gain-of-function mutation (Table 3). The muscle-rescued acy-1 nulls that did reach adulthood seemed to exhibit near-normal growth rate and size (data not shown). In contrast, acy-1 nulls that expressed the acy-1(+) cDNA only in their nervous systems were slower growing and smaller than their muscle-rescued counterparts (data not shown). Nevertheless, about one-third of acy-1 nulls expressing rab-3::acy-1(+) from transgenes reached adulthood; however, upping rab-3::acy-1 doseage via the acy-1(ce2) gain-of-function mutation increased, rather than decreased, larval arrest (Table 3). These results suggest that both the muscle and the neuronal G
s pathways promote progression from larval to adult stages by an unknown mechanism.
Lack of a neuronal G
s pathway causes strong paralysis, but the muscle G
s pathway also seems to contribute significantly to normal locomotion:
To determine the relative contributions of muscle and nervous system G
s pathways to the paralysis of acy-1 nulls, we assayed the locomotion rates of transgenic strains in which acy-1 nulls were selectively rescued in the muscle or the nervous system. acy-1(pk1279) null mutants without any transgene moved at a rate of 0.75 body bends per minute, which is
34% of the wild-type rate (Figure 2A). However, acy-1 null strains that selectively expressed the acy-1(+) cDNA transgene in muscle had significantly slower locomotion rates than acy-1 null single mutants (<1% of wild type in three independent strains), even when the acy-1(+) cDNA transgene was expressed at relatively high levels, although overexpression of the acy-1 gain-of-function mutation in muscle did slightly improve locomotion rate (Figure 2A). In contrast, acy-1 null strains that selectively expressed either the acy-1(+) or the acy-1 gain-of-function cDNAs in the nervous system (using the rab-3 promoter) both had significantly higher locomotion rates than acy-1 null single mutants. For example, the neuronally expressed acy-1(gf) transgene improved the locomotion rate of the acy-1 null to
50% of wild type (Figure 2A). The inability of selective nervous system acy-1 expression to fully rescue the paralysis of the acy-1 null is unlikely to be due to insufficient expression from the rab-3 promoter, because this promoter drives strong GFP expression in all neurons (data not shown) and, when hooked to an unc-18 cDNA, fully rescues the paralysis of an unc-18 null mutant (Figure 2B); however, the lack of full rescue could still be due to inappropriate control of expression by the rab-3 promoter.
|
In summary, the paralysis of muscle-rescued acy-1 null mutants demonstrates that lack of acy-1 in the nervous system causes strong paralysis that sufficiently accounts for the paralysis of acy-1(pk1279) null mutants; however, the muscle G
s pathway also seems to contribute significantly to normal locomotion.
Functional defects, rather than permanent developmental defects, cause paralysis in mutants lacking a neuronal G
s pathway:
To determine whether the paralysis of the muscle-rescued acy-1 null mutant is due to functional or developmental defects, we transformed acy-1(pk1279) null mutants with a myo-3::acy-1(+) cDNA (to selectively rescue acy-1 in muscle) plus an acy-1 gain-of-function cDNA driven by a heat-shock-inducible promoter (to allow us to use a heat-shock treatment to induce acy-1 expression in the adult nervous system). Animals carrying transgenes with this mixture of cDNAs were often able to develop to adults of normal size and, in the absence of heat-shock treatment, were generally indistinguishable from the muscle-rescued acy-1 nulls described earlier, exhibiting locomotion rates
0.4% of wild type (Figure 3). However, when we subjected this strain to a 1-hr heat-shock treatment, followed by a 2-hr recovery period, its mean locomotion rate improved remarkably (almost 300-fold) to a level not significantly different from that of wild type (Figure 3 and Figure 3 supplemental movies at http://www.genetics.org/supplemental/). In contrast, heat-shock treatment of wild-type or muscle-rescued acy-1 null transgenic animals that did not have the heat-shock-promoted acy-1 cDNA did not significantly affect the locomotion rate of these strains at the 2-hr recovery time point. This suggests that the paralysis of acy-1 null mutants is largely due to neurons that cannot drive locomotion to any substantial extent without an intact G
s pathway.
Knocking out the neuronal G
s pathway appears to not significantly affect overall levels of neurotransmitter release:
Since the paralysis of mutants lacking a neuronal G
s pathway is caused by neurons that cannot function properly, and since activating the C. elegans G
s pathway increases overall steady-state levels of neurotransmitter release and causes hyperactive locomotion (SCHADE et al. 2005), we logically expected that knocking out the G
s pathway in neurons might severely disrupt neurotransmitter release. To test this, we determined the aldicarb sensitivity of animals lacking a neuronal G
s pathway (muscle-rescued acy-1 nulls). Surprisingly, we found that they exhibited approximately wild-type aldicarb sensitivity (Figure 4A). This is in striking contrast to the strong aldicarb resistance of similarly paralyzed G
q reduction of function mutants (Figure 4A). Could the near-normal aldicarb sensitivity of animals lacking a neuronal G
s pathway be caused by defective ACh receptor responses masking or compensating for a neurotransmitter release defect? This is unlikely because the neuronal G
s pathway mutants showed a near-normal response to the ACh receptor agonist levamisole (Figure 4B). We conclude that knocking out the neuronal G
s pathway via the acy-1 null mutation does not significantly affect steady-state levels of neurotransmitter release, despite the ostensibly incongruous fact that these mutants are strongly paralyzed for functional, nondevelopmental reasons. Furthermore, since synaptic vesicle priming is required for neurotransmitter release (ARAVAMUDAN et al. 1999; AUGUSTIN et al. 1999; RICHMOND et al. 1999, 2001), this result suggests that the G
s pathway is not required for synaptic vesicle priming.
The G
s pathway is largely dependent on the G
q synaptic vesicle priming pathway to exert its effects on locomotion:
Since the G
s pathway is not required for normal steady-state neurotransmitter release, why do mutants with a hyperactive G
s pathway exhibit highly coordinated hyperactive locomotion and increased steady-state neurotransmitter release, and why does G
s pathway activation suppress the paralysis and neurotransmitter release defect of a mutation that strongly reduces the function of the G
q priming pathway (SCHADE et al. 2005)? To address this question, we investigated the relationship of the G
s and G
q pathways to each other by analyzing double mutants in which one pathway is completely knocked out and the other is strongly activated and visa versa. For reference, Table 1 summarizes the mutations that we used for this genetic epistasis analysis.
We first asked to what extent the G
s pathway is dependent on the G
q priming pathway to exert its effects on locomotion. To address this question, we analyzed double mutants containing an activated G
s pathway in combination with the egl-30 (G
q) null mutation ad810. We found that a strong acy-1 gain-of-function mutation, which hyperactivates the G
s effector ACY-1 (adenylyl cyclase), caused only a small, although significant, suppression of the paralysis of the EGL-30 (G
q) null (Figure 5A). Specifically, the strongly hyperactive locomotion rate of the acy-1 gain-of-function mutant was reduced by
98% by knocking out the G
q pathway. This shows that only
2% of the effects of cAMP on locomotion occur independently of the G
q pathway and thus that the neuronal G
s pathway is largely dependent on the G
q pathway to exert its effects. Our analysis of double mutants containing hyperactivated protein kinase A in combination with the egl-30 (G
q) null again illustrated the strong dependence of the G
s pathway on the G
q pathway: the egl-30 null was completely unaffected by the strong kin-2 (regulatory subunit of protein kinase A, PKA) reduction-of-function mutation, which normally confers strongly hyperactive locomotion (Figure 5A and Figure 5 supplemental movies at http://www.genetics.org/supplemental/). This 100% block of activated protein kinase A caused by knocking out the G
q pathway was not the result of the unexpected synthetic effects of combining the two mutations, because placing these double-mutant animals on plates containing phorbol esters quickly restored wild-type levels of locomotion (Figure 5A and Figure 5 supplemental movies at http://www.genetics.org/supplemental/). These results show that the ability of protein kinase A to stimulate locomotion is completely dependent on the G
q pathway and thus that the G
s and G
q pathways must converge at some point in their joint regulation of locomotion rate.
We also found that activating the G
s pathway did not significantly affect the larval arrest phenotype of the egl-30 (G
q) null mutant. Consistent with the locomotion results described above, 100% of egl-30 null mutants arrested before reaching adulthood, regardless of whether or not they contained the strong kin-2 mutation that activates protein kinase A, and a strong acy-1 gain-of-function mutation allowed only 2 of 53 animals to reach adulthood (Table 2).
The neuronal G
s pathway is required for the G
q pathway to properly drive locomotion, and this is mediated by a pathway interaction that occurs downstream of DAG production:
As we showed earlier, animals that lack a neuronal G
s pathway are strongly paralyzed for functional, nondevelopmental reasons, and yet steady-state neurotransmitter release, which is mediated by the G
q pathway, is unimpaired in such animals. This suggests that the neuronal G
s pathway is required for the wild-type G
q priming pathway to properly drive locomotion. To further investigate the relationship of the G
q and G
s pathways to each other, we next did the complementary experiment to the one described in the last section: we knocked out the G
s pathway, via the acy-1(pk1279) null mutation, and then asked to what extent we could bypass the resulting paralysis with mutations that strongly activate the G
q pathway or with phorbol esters. The results of that experiment are shown in Figure 5, B and C. Whereas animals that lack a neuronal G
s pathway are nearly paralyzed in response to wild-type levels of G
q pathway activity, we found that hyperactivating the G
q pathway, either via native mutations or by applying phorbol esters to activate the downstream priming part of the pathway, improved the locomotion rate of these animals to levels that were about one-third of the levels of egl-30 (G
q) gain-of-function single mutants or phorbol-ester-treated control animals; however, we also observed that all of the double mutants containing a hyperactivated G
q pathway (or phorbol ester treatment) in the absence of a neuronal G
s pathway spend much of their time in a highly abnormal, tightly knotted, paralyzed posture (Figure 5, B and C, and Figure 5 supplemental movies at http://www.genetics.org/supplemental/). For example, in the absence of a neuronal G
s pathway, phorbol esters induced a slow loopy movement interspersed with long periods of knotted paralysis, whereas hyperactivating G
q in the absence of a neuronal G
s pathway induced periods of surprisingly fluid movement interspersed with the tightly knotted phenotype, which dominated about two-thirds of the time (averaging 72% ± 2.9% of each assay interval; n = 12). These results, along with our observation that steady-state neurotransmitter release occurs normally in the absence of a neuronal G
s pathway, suggest that the G
q pathway can still exert its function independently of a neuronal G
s pathway, but that these conditions do not support stable, coordinated locomotion. Furthermore, because phorbol esters confer the knotted phenotype on animals lacking a neuronal G
s pathway (and only partially rescue their paralysis), these data suggest that the G
s pathway regulates the locomotion response to DAG, and thus exerts its effects on the G
q pathway downstream of DAG production. The phorbol ester results are all the more striking when compared to the effects of phorbol esters on the egl-30 (G
q) null, which is significantly more paralyzed than animals lacking a neuronal G
s pathway. egl-30 nulls are rescued to wild-type levels of locomotion by phorbol ester treatment and such animals do not exhibit the paralyzed, knotted phenotype. The larval arrest phenotype of animals that lack the G
s pathway in both neurons and body-wall muscles was not mitigated by activating the G
q pathway or by knocking out the inhibitory G
o pathway (Table 2).
In summary of the last two sections, the first epistasis experiment (in which we knocked out the G
q pathway and hyperactivated the G
s pathway) suggests that the G
s pathway is largely dependent on the G
q pathway to exert its effects on locomotion. Therefore the G
s pathway converges with the G
q pathway and largely cannot bypass it to produce locomotion. In light of that result, the second epistasis experiment (in which we knocked out the neuronal G
s pathway and hyperactivated the G
q pathway) suggests that the G
s pathway acts on the G
q pathway to convert neurotransmitter release (a function of the G
q priming pathway) into sustained, coordinated locomotion (a combined function of the G
s and G
q pathways).
The guanine nucleotide exchange factor RIC-8 (synembryn) appears necessary to maintain both the G
q and the neuronal G
s pathway in a functional state:
The above results suggests that coordinated locomotion requires appropriately balanced coactivation of both the G
q and the G
s pathways. Previous results suggested that maintaining a functional EGL-30 (G
q) pathway requires RIC-8 (synembryn), originally identified in C. elegans as a novel, conserved protein that appears to function upstream of EGL-30 (G
q) (MILLER et al. 2000) and recently revealed by biochemical studies to be a GEF that helps monomeric G
subunits (including, but not limited to, G
q) attain the GTP-bound activated state independently of receptor stimulation (TALL et al. 2003). If RIC-8 is indeed essential to maintain a functional G
q pathway, then, on the basis of the epistasis results in Figure 5A, we would predict that a ric-8 null mutant should not be suppressed by activating the G
s pathway. To test this, we obtained the ric-8 null mutant ok98, a deletion mutant described in Figure 6A. About one-third of the animals homozygous for this deletion arrest as paralyzed larvae, although they can live for
1 week after hatching, while the rest eventually become paralyzed, sterile adults. The deletion also affects a second nonconserved gene of unknown function that is in an operon with ric-8; however, a fusion PCR fragment that does not contain this second gene provides nearly complete rescue of the paralysis of ric-8(ok98) mutants (Figure 6B).
The degree of paralysis of ric-8(ok98) (0.0139 ± 0.14 body bends/minute; Figure 6B) is not significantly different from that of a G
q null mutant (0.024 ± 0.003 body bends/minute; Figure 1B), a result that is consistent with ric-8(ok98) being null or near null for the EGL-30 (G
q) pathway. Consistent with our earlier results showing that the G
s pathway is strongly dependent on the G
q pathway to exert its effects, we found that the paralysis of ric-8(ok98) null mutants is not strongly suppressed by activating the G
s pathway (Figure 6C and Figure 6 supplemental QuickTime movies at http://www.genetics.org/supplemental/). Of all of the mutations that most strongly activate the G
s pathway, only the gsa-1(ce81) and gsa-1(ce94) gain-of-function mutations cause significant, albeit weak, suppression of the ric-8(ok98) null mutant; however, even the gsa-1(ce94); ric-8(ok98) double mutant has a locomotion rate that is only
2% of the gsa-1(ce94) single mutant (Figure 6C). Nevertheless, this degree of suppression, although small with respect to paralysis, was sufficient to rescue the
33% larval lethality, although these double mutants, like ric-8(ok98) single mutants, were completely sterile (data not shown).
If the only, or major, function of RIC-8 at the synapse is to mediate G
q nucleotide exchange and thereby to maintain activation of the G
q pathway, then it should be possible to bypass the paralysis of ric-8(ok98) null mutants by incubating them on plates containing phorbol esters. Recall that incubating G
q null mutants on plates containing phorbol esters for only 2 hr improves their locomotion rate
900-fold, to levels similar to that of the wild-type strain on drug-free control plates (Figure 1C). In strong contrast, we found that ric-8(ok98) mutants are only partially suppressed by incubation on phorbol ester plates (Figure 6D and Figure 6 supplemental QuickTime movies at http://www.genetics.org/supplemental/). Although the degree of suppression is highly significant, the peak locomotion rate induced by phorbol treatment of ric-8(ok98) is still only
20% of that seen in phorbol ester-treated egl-30 null mutants (compare Figure 6C to Figure 1C). This strongly suggests that G
q nucleotide exchange is not RIC-8's only function. We therefore considered the possibility that RIC-8 is also required to maintain activation of the neuronal GSA-1 (G





