Originally published as Genetics Published Articles Ahead of Print on September 30, 2004.

Genetics, Vol. 168, 1891-1898, December 2004, Copyright © 2004
doi:10.1534/genetics.104.034280

Swi5 Acts in Meiotic DNA Joint Molecule Formation in Schizosaccharomyces pombe

* Fred Hutchinson Research Cancer Center, Seattle, Washington 98109
{dagger} Institut für Genetik, University of Braunschweig, D-38106 Braunschweig, Germany

1 Corresponding author: Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center, 1100 Fairview Ave. North, P.O. Box 19024, Seattle, WA 98109.
E-mail: gsmith{at}fhcrc.org

Manuscript received August 3, 2004. Accepted for publication September 15, 2004.

ABSTRACT

Previously isolated Schizosaccharomyces pombe swi5 mutants are defective in mitotic mating-type switching and in repair of meiotic recombination-related DNA double-strand breaks. Here, we identify the swi5 gene, which encodes an 85-amino-acid polypeptide, similar to Sae3 of Saccharomyces cerevisiae, with an N-terminal predicted coiled-coil domain. A swi5 complete deletion mutant had normal mitotic growth rate but was hypersensitive to DNA-damaging agents and defective in mating-type switching. In meiosis, recombinant frequencies were reduced by a factor of ~10. The swi5 deletion strongly reduced the viable spore yields of mutants lacking Rhp55 or Rhp57, proteins thought to aid joint molecule formation. Furthermore, the swi5 deletion strongly suppressed the low viable spore yield of mutants lacking Mus81•Eme1, which resolves joint molecules such as Holliday junctions. These and previous results indicate that the small Swi5 polypeptide acts in a branched pathway of joint molecule formation to repair meiotic DNA breaks.


THE repair of DNA strand breaks is crucial for the life of cells, since unrepaired broken DNA is likely to misegregate at cell division and lead to aneuploidy and consequent sickness or death. DNA breaks can arise from accidents during replication or transcription or from exogenous DNA-damaging agents such as UV or ionizing irradiation. The faithful repair of DNA double-strand (ds) breaks appears to occur most frequently by homologous recombination, which requires the formation of joint molecules between the broken DNA and an intact homolog. In special circumstances cells use programmed DNA breaks to stimulate recombination. For example, in the fission yeast Schizosaccharomyces pombe and the budding yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae both mating-type switching and meiotic recombination are initiated by programmed DNA breaks (HABER 1998b; DAVIS and SMITH 2001; ARCANGIOLI and THON 2003). As expected, certain mutants of these species are deficient in both processes and in the repair of damaged DNA.

Ten linkage groups of mutations that reduce the frequency of mating-type switching in S. pombe have been described (GUTZ and SCHMIDT 1985). Mutants altered in one of these groups, swi5, are also hypersensitive to UV and ionizing irradiation and deficient in meiotic recombination (SCHMIDT et al. 1987, 1989). During meiosis swi5 mutants make DNA breaks but do not efficiently repair them (YOUNG et al. 2004). During mitotic growth a DNA lesion at the mat1 locus that is essential for mating-type switching is made at normal level in swi5 mutants, but this lesion only inefficiently leads to switching (EGEL et al. 1984). Thus, Swi5 is important for DNA break repair in both meiosis and mitosis.

Repair of DNA breaks by homologous recombination proceeds in steps via a joint molecule intermediate. Single-strand (ss) DNA is produced at the break via DNA unwinding by a helicase or digestion by a nuclease. The ss DNA pairs and undergoes strand exchange with an intact homologous DNA molecule to form a joint molecule, such as a D-loop or a Holliday junction. This step is promoted by bacterial RecA protein or its eukaryotic homolog Rad51; these proteins are aided by others, such as S. cerevisiae Rad52, Rad55, and Rad57 (SUNG et al. 2000). Joint molecules are resolved into separate molecules by special enzymes; for example, Holliday junctions are resolved by the bacterial RuvC protein or, in S. pombe, the Mus81·Eme1 complex (BODDY et al. 2001; GAILLARD et al. 2003; OSMAN et al. 2003). Remaining ss nicks and gaps are sealed by DNA polymerases and ligases.

We report here the identification of swi5, which encodes a remarkably small protein. AKAMATSU et al. (2003) independently identified the swi5 gene and studied its role in mitotic DNA repair. Results presented here indicate that Swi5 is involved in DNA strand exchange, i.e., before joint molecule resolution by Mus81·Eme1 during meiotic recombination.


MATERIALS AND METHODS

Strains and plasmids:

Strains and their genotypes are listed in Table 1. Plasmids pCE1 and pCE2 were constructed by inserting into the EcoRI site of plasmid pFY20 (LI et al. 1997) an EcoRI-digested product of a polymerase chain reaction (PCR). The PCR used DNA from strain GP3652 as template and primers 32 or 35 nucleotides long, with 5'-terminal EcoRI sites, designed to amplify the 1.2-kb region from bp 2699–3856 of cosmid SPBC409 (GenBank accession no. AL109822). Methods were as described in AUSUBEL et al. (2003). Plasmids were introduced into S. pombe cells by LiOAc-stimulated transformation as described by ITO et al. (1983).


View this table:
In this window
In a new window

 
TABLE 1

S. pombe strains

 

Construction of swi5-201::kanMX6:

The method of BäHLER et al. (1998) was used. Primers 100 nucleotides long and plasmid pFA6A-kanMX6 as template were used in a PCR to generate a 1.6-kb DNA fragment with the kanMX6 cassette flanked by 80 bp identical to the DNA immediately adjacent to the swi5 gene (SPBC409.03; bp 3085–3164 and 3640–3719 on cosmid SPBC409). This fragment was purified by gel electrophoresis, extraction with a QIAquick kit (QIAGEN, Chatsworth, CA), and precipitation with ethanol. Approximately 1 µg was used to transform ~4 x 107 cells of strain GP13, with selection for G418 antibiotic resistance. Colonies were purified and tested for stability of resistance, and the mutation verified by nucleotide sequencing using primers ~200 bp outside the substituted region.

Culture media and meiotic crosses:

Rich yeast extract media (liquid YEL and solid YEA), Edinburgh minimal media (liquid EMM2 and solid EMM2 agar), malt extract agar (MEA), and sporulation agar (SPA) are described by GUTZ et al. (1974). Media were supplemented with adenine and other nutrients (100 µg/ml) as required. For meiotic crosses the two parental strains were grown to saturation in YEL and 100 µl (50 µl for Table 5) of each culture were mixed. The cells were collected by centrifugation, washed twice in 1 ml of H2O, suspended in ~15 µl of H2O, and deposited on SPA (MEA for Table 2). After 2 days at 25° spores were harvested and assayed for total viable spores and recombinants as described by PONTICELLI and SMITH (1989), except that EtOH treatment was for 10–15 min and Ade+ recombinant frequencies were determined by plating on YEA with and without guanine (200 µg/ml). Crosses between strains GP814 and GP4367 (Table 3) were plated on EMM2 plus uracil with or without adenine; uracil was omitted for crosses involving a ura4+ plasmid (pCE1, pCE2, or pFY20). For the experiments in Table 5 two colonies of each strain (h+ or h) freshly grown on YEA + adenine were picked to separate tubes of YEL + adenine (5 ml) and grown to saturation; the four combinations of h+ x h matings, with control strains, were done and analyzed concurrently.


View this table:
In this window
In a new window

 
TABLE 5

swi5 interacts with mus81 and oppositely with rhp55 and rhp57

 

View this table:
In this window
In a new window

 
TABLE 2

lys1-ade4 intergenic recombination in swi5 mutants (tetrad analysis)

 

View this table:
In this window
In a new window

 
TABLE 3

ade6 intragenic recombination in swi5 mutants

 


RESULTS

Cloning the swi5 gene and sequencing swi5 mutations:

Using the iodine-positive reaction of h90 swi+ colonies (GUTZ et al. 1974), we obtained from an S. pombe genomic library (FLECK et al. 1992) three independent clones that complemented the swi5-39 mutation, initially characterized by GUTZ and SCHMIDT (1985)(data not shown). Restriction digestion and nucleotide sequencing revealed that these clones, pHE12, pHE13, and pHE16, have at least three putative genes in common; the largest of these genes is SPBC1709.19c (Figure 1). Substitution of the 1.8-kb HindIII fragment containing ura4+ (GRIMM et al. 1988) for 2.8 kb of SPBC1709.19c and its flanking DNA created an allele, designated swi5::ura4+, that conferred UV sensitivity, mating-type switching deficiency, and meiotic recombination deficiency comparable to that of swi5 mutants (Table 2 and data not shown). Unlike the previously described swi5 mutants, however, strains with the swi5::ura4+ allele grew slowly; furthermore, a subclone, designated pHE12-S1.1 and containing all of SPBC1709.19c (Figure 1), failed to complement swi5-39 (data not shown). These results indicated that the swi5 gene was on the initial clones but was not SPBC1709.19c.



View larger version (30K):
In this window
In a new window
Download PPT slide
 
FIGURE 1.—

Structure of the swi5 gene and its surroundings on chromosome II of S. pombe and a comparison of Swi5 and S. cerevisiae Sae3. The top line shows a 9-kb segment of chromosome II contained on the overlapping cosmids SPBC1709 and SPBC409; boxes with arrows indicate genes and their direction of transcription. swi5 is identical to SPBC409.03 (see RESULTS). Lines below the top line indicate the extents of five clones and one deletion (swi5::ura4+) and their ability to complement the swi5-39 mutation (left column). The expanded line in the middle of the figure represents swi5 and the two flanking genes. Open boxes indicate open reading frames (exons). Below this line are the swi5-201::kanMX6 substitution and the positions of the swi5 point mutations. At the bottom of the figure is a ClustalW alignment, with high gap penalty, of the deduced S. pombe Swi5 and S. cerevisiae Sae3 proteins (see DISCUSSION). Vertical bars indicate 14 identical amino acids, and the horizontal bar over the Swi5 sequence indicates a predicted coiled-coil structure (LUPAS 1996).

 
On the basis of the information above, we determined the nucleotide sequence of the region flanking SPBC1709.19c in the previously described swi5 mutants. The swi5-134 and swi5-147 mutations (GUTZ and SCHMIDT 1985) were identical G -> A changes 475 bp to the 5' side of SPBC1709.19c, and swi5-39 was C -> T 795 bp to the 5' side (Figure 1). We noted that these mutations were in a hypothetical small gene with two introns. A cDNA corresponding to part of the conceptual mRNA from this gene has been reported (GenBank accession no. AU013615; M. MORIMYO and K. MITO, unpublished data), supporting the notion that this hypothetical gene is active and that its RNA transcript is spliced as predicted. If so, the swi5-134 and 147 mutations would change the beginning of the 5' splice site of the first intron from the invariant 5' GT ... to 5' AT ..., and swi5-39 would change codon 38 from CAA (Gln) to UAA (nonsense; Figure 1). The gene SPBC409.03, now designated swi5, is predicted to encode an 85-amino-acid polypeptide whose N-terminal ~30 amino acids are predicted to form a coiled-coil (LUPAS 1996). AKAMATSU et al. (2003) independently identified swi5 as SPBC409.03.

Deletion of the swi5 coding sequence and the null phenotype:

On the basis of the above information, we deleted precisely the coding sequence of SPBC409.03 and replaced it with the kanMX6 cassette to create the swi5-201::kanMX6 allele, called here swi5{Delta}. Strains with this allele had a phenotype much like that of previously described swi5 alleles. Mitotic growth was not significantly different from that of wild type (data not shown). Mating-type switching was much reduced and produced an iodine-staining reaction, indicative of mating and sporulation (GUTZ et al. 1974), comparable to that of swi5-134 (data not shown). The deletion mutant was slightly more sensitive to UV irradiation than was swi5-134, but both mutants were considerably more sensitive than wild type (data not shown), as reported by AKAMATSU et al. (2003).

To quantitatively evaluate complementation between swi5 alleles, we measured meiotic recombination in ade6 intragenic crosses (Table 3). Gene conversion at ade6 was reduced slightly more by the swi5{Delta} substitution than by swi5-134 (factors of 12 and 5, respectively, relative to wild type). These two alleles failed to complement, but two subclones, pCE1 and pCE2, containing the swi5 coding sequence and all of the DNA between the two flanking genes (Figure 1), did complement swi5-134 (Table 3). These results indicate that SPBC409.03 is swi5.

Crossing over was also reduced by a swi5 deletion to about the same extent as by a swi5 point mutation. By tetrad analysis, crossing over between lys1 and ade4 was reduced from ~260 cM in wild type to ~35–50 cM in swi5 mutants, a reduction by a factor of ~6 (Table 2). By random spore analysis, recombination in the lys3ura1 and ura1–pro1 intervals was reduced in the swi5{Delta} mutant by factors of 37 and 8, respectively (Table 4). The swi5-39 mutation reduces crossing over in six additional intervals by factors of 4–17 (SCHMIDT 1993). In summary, swi5 deletion mutants have phenotypes similar to those of the point mutants.


View this table:
In this window
In a new window

 
TABLE 4

Recombination in swi5 mutants (random spore analysis)

 

A swi5 deletion suppresses the low viable spore yield of mus81 mutants:

The Mus81·Eme1 endonuclease appears to be a Holliday junction resolvase essential for meiotic crossing over (BODDY et al. 2001; GAILLARD et al. 2003; OSMAN et al. 2003; SMITH et al. 2003). mus81 mutants have very low viable spore yields, presumably because joint molecules are formed but remain unresolved in the absence of this endonuclease. The low viable spore yield is suppressed by a rec6 or rec12 mutation, which blocks meiotic DNA breakage and presumably joint molecule formation (CERVANTES et al. 2000; BODDY et al. 2001; YOUNG et al. 2002; OSMAN et al. 2003). Because swi5 mutants, like rec6 and rec12 mutants, are deficient in meiotic recombination but have relatively high viable spore yields (SCHMIDT et al. 1987; PONTICELLI and SMITH 1989; DEVEAUX et al. 1992; SCHMIDT 1993; LIN and SMITH 1994; YOUNG et al. 2004), we tested the ability of a swi5{Delta} mutation to suppress the low viable spore yield of a mus81 mutation. The mus81{Delta} mutation decreased the viable spore yield, relative to that of wild type, by a factor of >10,000; this low level was increased >700-fold by swi5{Delta} (Table 5). Although this suppression was strong, it was not complete, as the viable spore yield was lower than that of swi5{Delta} by a factor of ~6. These results suggest that Swi5 and perhaps other factors act before Mus81·Eme1. The Ade+ recombinant frequency was indistinguishable in swi5{Delta} and swi5{Delta} mus81{Delta} strains, indicating that Mus81·Eme1 has little effect on intragenic recombination (gene conversion) in swi5{Delta} mutants, as in swi5+ strains (OSMAN et al. 2003; SMITH et al. 2003).

Viable spore yields are reduced synergistically by swi5 and an rhp55 or rhp57 mutation but not a dmc1 mutation:

The accumulation of broken DNA in a swi5 mutant (YOUNG et al. 2004) and the suppression of mus81{Delta} by swi5{Delta} (Table 5) suggest that Swi5 acts during the DNA strand-exchange step of recombination. Other proteins have been inferred to act at this step; these proteins include the DNA strand-exchange factors Rad51 and Dmc1 and the accessory factors Rhp55 and Rhp57 (GRISHCHUK and KOHLI 2003 and references therein). This inference suggests that there might be genetic interactions among mutations in the genes encoding these proteins. To test this possibility, we measured meiotic recombination and viable spore yields in single and double mutants.

We first tested interaction of swi5{Delta} and dmc1{Delta}. Intragenic ade6 recombination was reduced by a factor of ~2 by dmc1{Delta} and by a factor of ~14 by swi5{Delta} (Table 5). In the swi5{Delta} dmc1{Delta} double mutant, recombination was intermediate between the levels in the single mutants. Viable spore yields were only modestly reduced, by a factor of ~2 or less in these mutants, but again the phenotype of the double swi5{Delta} dmc1{Delta} mutant was intermediate between those of the single mutants.

The similar phenotypes of swi5{Delta}, dmc1{Delta}, and swi5{Delta} dmc1{Delta} mutants suggest that Swi5 and Dmc1 act at closely related steps of meiosis. We therefore tested interaction of dmc1{Delta} with mus81{Delta}. Like swi5{Delta}, the dmc1{Delta} mutation increased the viable spore yield of mus81{Delta}, by a factor of >25 but below the level of mus81{Delta} swi5{Delta}. The ade6 recombinant frequency in the dmc1{Delta} mus81{Delta} mutant was near that of the dmc1{Delta} single mutant (Table 5). The triple mutant mus81{Delta} swi5{Delta} dmc1{Delta} had a phenotype similar to that of the mus81{Delta} swi5{Delta} double mutant. These results support the suggestion that Swi5 and Dmc1 act at closely related steps before Mus81·Eme1.

In contrast to the swi5{Delta} dmc1{Delta} double mutant, which had a phenotype similar to that of the single mutants, double mutants with swi5{Delta} and either rhp55{Delta} or rhp57{Delta} had a much stronger phenotype than the single mutants. Viable spore yields were reduced, relative to that of wild type, by factors of ~2–10 in the three single mutants (Table 5). The addition of the swi5{Delta} mutation to the rhp55{Delta} or rhp57{Delta} mutant reduced the viable spore yields by factors of >300 and >10,000, respectively. These yields were too low to allow a reliable measure of recombination. These results indicate that Swi5 acts at a step different from that of Rhp55 and Rhp57.

In summary, the swi5{Delta} mutation interacted strongly with mus81{Delta}, rhp55{Delta}, and rhp57{Delta} mutations, but only weakly with dmc1{Delta}. dmc1{Delta} also interacted with mus81{Delta}, but less strongly than did swi5{Delta}. Below, we discuss interpretations of these results.


DISCUSSION
Swi5 is a remarkably small protein—85 amino acids—that appears, from the evidence discussed below, to act with other proteins to form joint DNA molecules. This activity is important in the repair of single- and double-strand DNA breaks during both mitotic growth and meiosis.

Swi5 is related to the small Sae3 protein of S. cerevisiae (Figure 1). sae3 mutants were identified among sporulation-deficient mutants that are rescued by a spo11 mutation, a phenotype consistent with Sae3 acting after DNA break formation by Spo11 (MCKEE and KLECKNER 1997). SAE3 was thought to encode a 50-amino-acid polypeptide from a single exon (MCKEE and KLECKNER 1997), but further analysis suggests an additional exon and a protein of 91 amino acids (A. SHINOHARA, personal communication). This longer version has 14 amino acids identical to those of Swi5 scattered throughout the proteins (Figure 1). Physical analyses show that Sae3 and Swi5 are required for the repair of meiotic DNA double-strand breaks (MCKEE and KLECKNER 1997; YOUNG et al. 2004) and appear to act in concert with RecA-like strand exchange proteins. S. cerevisiae sae3 mutants have a phenotype indistinguishable from that of dmc1 mutants: both are meiosis specific, accumulate broken DNA hyperresected at the ends, and form less recombinant DNA than wild type does; the sae3 dmc1 double mutant has the same phenotype as the single mutants (MCKEE and KLECKNER 1997). These results suggest that Sae3 and Dmc1, a meiosis-specific DNA strand-exchange protein (BISHOP et al. 1992; SEHORN et al. 2004), act in the same step in DNA repair, the formation of joint molecules.

There are differences in the roles of Swi5 and Sae3, however. Although Sae3 is meiosis specific, Swi5 is required during mitotic growth for repair of DNA damage (SCHMIDT et al. 1989; AKAMATSU et al. 2003; data not shown) and for mating-type switching (EGEL et al. 1984). In addition, although the phenotypes of S. cerevisiae sae3 and dmc1 mutants are indistinguishable, the phenotypes of S. pombe swi5 and dmc1 mutants differ: during meiosis broken DNA accumulates in swi5 mutants but not in dmc1 mutants (YOUNG et al. 2004), spore viabilities are lower in swi5 mutants than in dmc1 mutants (GRISHCHUK and KOHLI 2003; YOUNG et al. 2004; Table 5), and intragenic recombinant frequencies are lower in swi5 mutants than in dmc1 mutants (SCHMIDT et al. 1987; DEVEAUX et al. 1992; SCHMIDT 1993; FUKUSHIMA et al. 2000; GRISHCHUK and KOHLI 2003; Table 5). Thus, S. pombe Swi5 and Dmc1 are not functionally identical, although S. cerevisiae Sae3 and Dmc1 appear to be. Below, we discuss the roles of these and related proteins in meiotic and mitotic DNA break repair.

Meiotic DNA break repair:

During meiosis in S. pombe ds DNA breaks are made at high frequency at widely separated sites in the genome (CERVANTES et al. 2000; YOUNG et al. 2002). Formation of these breaks requires Rec12, a homolog of S. cerevisiae Spo11, which contains the active site for breakage (KEENEY et al. 1997); at least nine additional proteins are also needed for high-frequency breakage (CERVANTES et al. 2000; YOUNG et al. 2002, 2004). Repair of these breaks requires several identified proteins, including Rad32, Rad50, Swi5, and Rad51 (YOUNG et al. 2004). Rad32·Rad50·Nbs1 is a homolog of the S. cerevisiae Mre11·Rad50·Xrs2 complex, which is required to remove Spo11 covalently linked to the 5' end of the broken DNA and to form ss DNA tails (HABER 1998a). Rad51 is a homolog of the S. cerevisiae Rad51 protein, which, like Escherichia coli RecA, promotes homologous DNA strand exchange between ss and ds DNA to form joint molecules (SUNG et al. 2000). Optimal activity of Rad51, however, requires additional proteins, such as Rad54, Rad55, and Rad57. Rad55 and Rad57 form a tight heterodimeric complex and share limited amino acid sequence identity with Rad51; the Rad55·Rad57 complex may aid Rad51 by forming a complex with Rad51 (SUNG et al. 2000). In S. pombe, a rad51 null mutation has a stronger meiotic phenotype than those of rhp55, rhp57, or dmc1 with respect to spore viability and recombinant frequencies (GRISHCHUK and KOHLI 2003). Double-mutant analyses suggest that Rhp55 and Rhp57 act on one branch of a DNA repair pathway and Dmc1 on another; both of these branches are proposed to require Rad51 (GRISHCHUK and KOHLI 2003).

Our results (Table 5) support the proposal of a pathway of meiotic DNA break repair with two branches leading to joint molecules (Figure 2). From the similar phenotypes of swi5{Delta}, dmc1{Delta}, and swi5{Delta} dmc1{Delta} mutants we infer that Swi5 and Dmc1 act in one branch of the pathway. From the strong synergisms between swi5{Delta} and rhp55{Delta} and between swi5{Delta} and rhp57{Delta}, we infer that Rhp55 and Rhp57 act in another branch. The Mus81·Eme1 endonuclease is required to resolve joint molecules, presumably made by Rad51, Dmc1, Swi5, Rhp55, and Rhp57, into crossover recombinants; in mus81{Delta} mutants very few viable spores are produced (BODDY et al. 2001; GAILLARD et al. 2003; OSMAN et al. 2003: SMITH et al. 2003; Table 5). Since swi5{Delta} and dmc1{Delta} suppress the low viable spore yield of mus81{Delta} mutants, we infer that Swi5 and Dmc1 act before Mus81. These inferences are concordant with current knowledge of the enzymatic activities of the proteins and indicate that Swi5 and Dmc1, and perhaps Rhp55 and Rhp57 as well, lead to joint molecules that are resolved by Mus81·Eme1.



View larger version (8K):
In this window
In a new window
Download PPT slide
 
FIGURE 2.—

Proposed branched pathway for meiotic recombination in S. pombe. After meiotic DNA replication, Rec12, aided by other proteins, makes DNA breaks independently of Rad32·Rad50·Nbs1 (the MRN complex; CERVANTES et al. 2000; YOUNG et al. 2004). The MRN complex, perhaps in conjunction with other proteins, resects one DNA strand. The resultant ss DNA forms a joint molecule with an intact homolog by either of two branches—one promoted by Swi5 plus Dmc1 and the other by Rhp55 plus Rhp57—each of which may require Rad51. The Swi5-Dmc1-dependent joint molecules are resolved by Mus81·Eme1 into recombinant chromatids (BODDY et al. 2001; OSMAN et al. 2003; SMITH et al. 2003). Functions required for joint molecule resolution by the Rhp55-Rhp57-dependent branch have not been determined. This pathway is similar to one proposed by GRISHCHUK and KOHLI (2003) and relies in part upon observations of meiotic recombination in S. cerevisiae (ROEDER 1997).

 

Mitotic DNA break repair and mating-type switching:

During mitotic growth, the recovery from DNA damage is aided by several proteins. Mutant analyses suggest that Rad51, Rhp55, Rhp57, and Swi5 have relationships similar to those in meiosis. For example, rhp57 and swi5 mutants are mildly sensitive to UV and gamma irradiation, but the double mutant is as sensitive as rad51 or rad51 swi5 (AKAMATSU et al. 2003; data not shown). Although the nature of the UV- and gamma-ray-induced lesions is not certain, these lesions may be primarily ss and ds breaks, respectively; if so, Swi5, as well as Rhp57 and perhaps Rhp55, would seem to aid Rad51 in the repair of both types of breaks.

Mating-type switching in mitotic S. pombe cells requires Swi5 and is initiated by a ss lesion at the mat1 locus; this lesion may be converted into a ds break during replication (ARCANGIOLI and THON 2003; KAYKOV et al. 2004). Single-strand DNA with a 3' end at the mat1 lesion presumably undergoes strand exchange with homologous DNA flanking the mat2 or mat3 locus; DNA synthesis primed by this end produces a copy of mat2 or mat3, which replaces the copy at mat1 (ARCANGIOLI and DE LAHONDES 2000). Thus, mating-type switching is a type of copy-choice recombination, which relies on joint molecule formation by DNA strand transfer, as do break-join and break-copy recombination. swi5 mutants have normal levels of the mat1 lesion but rarely switch mating type. The inability of swi5 mutants to use the lesion to promote switching is consistent with the Swi5 protein being required for high-level DNA strand exchange, i.e., joint molecule formation. The mechanism of resolution of these joint molecules is unclear, since mating-type switching is not notably affected by mus81{Delta} (our unpublished observations). Nevertheless, we infer that the primary function of Swi5 is the same in meiotic and mitotic cells—the formation of joint molecules during DNA break repair.


ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS
We are grateful to Hiroshi Iwasaki, Mitsuoki Morimyo, Akira Shinohara, and Val Wood for unpublished information about swi5; Linda DeVeaux, Edgar Hartsuiker, Feng Li, Hiroshi Nojima, Fred Ponticelli, Hideo Shinagawa, and Jeff Virgin for strains; and Sue Amundsen, Gareth Cromie, Luther Davis, and Andrew Taylor for helpful comments on the manuscript. This research was supported by research grant GM-32194 from the National Institutes of Health to G.R.S. and by research grant Schm 786/2-2 from the Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft to H.S.


LITERATURE CITED

AKAMATSU, Y., D. DZIADKOWIEC, M. IKEGUCHI, H. SHINAGAWA and H. IWASAKI, 2003 Two different Swi5-containing protein complexes are involved in mating-type switching and recombination repair in fission yeast. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 100: 15770–15775.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

ARCANGIOLI, B., and R. DE LAHONDES, 2000 Fission yeast switches mating type by a replication-recombination coupled process. EMBO J. 19: 1389–1396.[CrossRef][Medline]

ARCANGIOLI, B., and G. THON, 2003 Mating-type cassettes: structure, switching and silencing, pp. 129–147 in The Molecular Biology of Schizosaccharomyces pombe: Genetics, Genomics and Beyond, edited by R. EGEL. Springer, Berlin.

AUSUBEL, F. M., R. BRENT, R. E. KINGSTON, D. D. MOORE, J. G. SEIDMAN et al. (Editors), 2003 Current Protocols in Molecular Biology. John Wiley & Sons, New York.

BAHLER, J., J.-Q. WU, M. S. LONGTINE, N. G. SHAH, A. MCKENZIE, III et al., 1998 Heterologous modules for efficient and versatile PCR-based gene targeting in Schizosaccharomyces pombe. Yeast 14: 943–951.[CrossRef][Medline]

BISHOP, D. K., D. PARK, L. XU and N. KLECKNER, 1992 DMC1: a meiosis-specific homolog of E. coli recA required for recombination, synaptonemal complex formation, and cell cycle progression. Cell 69: 439–456.[CrossRef][Medline]

BODDY, M. N., P.-H. L. GAILLARD, W. H. MCDONALD, P. SHANAHAN, J. R. YATES et al., 2001 Mus81-Eme1 are essential components of a Holliday junction resolvase. Cell 107: 537–548.[CrossRef][Medline]

CERVANTES, M. D., J. A. FARAH and G. R. SMITH, 2000 Meiotic DNA breaks associated with recombination in S. pombe. Mol. Cell 5: 883–888.[CrossRef][Medline]

DAVIS, L., and G. R. SMITH, 2001 Meiotic recombination and chromosome segregation in Schizosaccharomyces pombe. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 98: 8395–8402.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

DEVEAUX, L. C., N. A. HOAGLAND and G. R. SMITH, 1992 Seventeen complementation groups of mutations decreasing meiotic recombination in Schizosaccharomyces pombe. Genetics 130: 251–262.[Abstract]

EGEL, R., D. H. BEACH and A. J. S. KLAR, 1984 Genes required for initiation and resolution steps of mating-type switching in fission yeast. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 81: 3481–3485.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

FLECK, O., H. MICHAEL and L. HEIM, 1992 The swi4+ gene of Schizosaccharomyces pombe encodes a homologue of mismatch repair enzymes. Nuc. Acids Res. 20: 2271–2278.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

FUKUSHIMA, K., T. YOSHIMI, K. NABESHIMA, T. YONEKI, T. TOUGAN et al., 2000 Dmc1 of Schizosaccharomyces pombe plays a role in meiotic recombination. Nucleic Acids Res. 28: 2709–2716.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

GAILLARD, P.-H. L., E. NOGUCHI, P. SHANAHAN and P. RUSSELL, 2003 The endogenous Mus81-Eme1 complex resolves Holliday junctions by a nick and counternick mechanism. Mol. Cell 12: 747–759.[CrossRef][Medline]

GRIMM, C., J. KOHLI, J. MURRAY and K. MAUNDRELL, 1988 Genetic engineering of Schizosaccharomyces pombe: a system for gene disruption and replacement using the ura4 gene as a selectable marker. Mol. Gen. Genet. 215: 81–86.[CrossRef][Medline]

GRISHCHUK, A. L., and J. KOHLI, 2003 Five RecA-like proteins of Schizosaccharomyces pombe are involved in meiotic recombination. Genetics 165: 1031–1043.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

GUTZ, H., and H. SCHMIDT, 1985 Switching genes in Schizosaccharomyces pombe. Curr. Genet. 9: 325–331.[CrossRef]

GUTZ, H., H. HESLOT, U. LEUPOLD and N. LOPRIENO, 1974 Schizosaccharomyces pombe, pp. 395–446 in Handbook of Genetics, edited by R. C. KING. Plenum Press, New York.

HABER, J. E., 1998a The many interfaces of Mre11. Cell 95: 583–586.[CrossRef][Medline]

HABER, J. E., 1998b Mating-type gene switching in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Annu. Rev. Genet. 32: 561–599.[CrossRef][Medline]

HALDANE, J. B. S., 1919 The combination of linkage values, and the calculation of distances between the loci of linked factors. J. Genet. 8: 299–309.

ITO, H., Y. FUKUDA, K. MURATA and A. KIMURA, 1983 Transformation of intact yeast cells treated with alkali cations. J. Bacteriol. 153: 163–168.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

KAYKOV, A., A. M. HOLMES and B. ARCANGIOLI, 2004 Formation, maintenance and consequences of the imprint at the mating-type locus in fission yeast. EMBO J. 23: 930–938.[CrossRef][Medline]

KEENEY, S., C. N. GIROUX and N. KLECKNER, 1997 Meiosis-specific DNA double-strand breaks are catalyzed by Spo11, a member of a widely conserved protein family. Cell 88: 375–384.[CrossRef][Medline]

KHASANOV, F. K., G. V. SAVCHENKO, E. V. BASHKIROVA, V. G. KOROLEV, W.-D. HEYER et al., 1999 A new recombinational DNA repair gene from Schizosaccharomyces pombe with homology to Escherichia coli RecA. Genetics 152: 1557–1572.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

LI, Y. F., M. NUMATA, W. P. WAHLS and G. R. SMITH, 1997 Region-specific meiotic recombination in Schizosaccharomyces pombe: the rec11 gene. Mol. Microbiol. 23: 869–878.[CrossRef][Medline]

LIN, Y., and G. R. SMITH, 1994 Transient meiosis-induced expression of the rec6 and rec12 genes of Schizosaccharomyces pombe. Genetics 136: 769–779.[Abstract]

LUPAS, A., 1996 Prediction and analysis of coiled-coil structures. Methods Enzymol. 266: 513–525.[Medline]

MCKEE, A. H. Z., and N. KLECKNER, 1997 Mutations in Saccharomyces cerevisiae that block meiotic prophase chromosome metabolism and confer cell cycle arrest at pachytene identify two new meiosis-specific genes SAE1 and SAE3. Genetics 146: 817–834.[Abstract]

OSMAN, F., J. DIXON, C. L. DOE and M. C. WHITBY, 2003 Generating crossovers by resolution of nicked Holliday junctions: a role for Mus81-Eme1 in meiosis. Mol. Cell 12: 761–774.[CrossRef][Medline]

PONTICELLI, A. S., and G. R. SMITH, 1989 Meiotic recombination-deficient mutants of Schizosaccharomyces pombe. Genetics 123: 45–54.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

ROEDER, G. S., 1997 Meiotic chromsomes: it takes two to tango. Genes Dev. 11: 2600–2621.[Free Full Text]

SCHMIDT, H., 1993 Effective long range mapping in Schizosaccharomyces pombe with the help of swi5. Curr. Genet. 24: 271–273.[CrossRef][Medline]

SCHMIDT, H., P. KAPITZA and H. GUTZ, 1987 Switching genes in Schizosaccharomyces pombe: their influence on cell viability and recombination. Curr. Genet. 11: 303–308.

SCHMIDT, H., P. KAPITZA-FECKE, E. R. STEPHEN and H. GUTZ, 1989 Some of the swi genes of Schizosaccharomyces pombe also have a function in the repair of radiation damage. Curr. Genet. 16: 89–94.[CrossRef][Medline]

SEHORN, M. G., S. SIGURDSSON, W. BUSSEN, V. M. UNGER and P. SUNG, 2004 Human meiotic recombinase Dmc1 promotes ATP-dependent homologous DNA strand exchange. Nature 429: 433–437.[CrossRef][Medline]

SMITH, G. R., M. N. BODDY, P. SHANAHAN and P. RUSSELL, 2003 Fission yeast Mus81•Eme1 Holliday junction resolvase is required for meiotic crossing over but not for gene conversion. Genetics 165: 2289–2293.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

STYRKARSDOTTIR, U., R. EGEL and O. NIELSEN, 1993 The smt-0 mutation which abolishes mating-type switching in fission yeast is a deletion. Curr. Genet. 23: 184–186.[CrossRef][Medline]

SUNG, P., K. M. TRUJILLO and S. VAN KOMEN, 2000 Recombination factors of Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Mutat. Res. 451: 257–275.[Medline]

TSUTSUI, Y., T. MORISHITA, H. IWASAKI, H. TOH and H. SHINAGAWA, 2000 A recombination repair gene of Schizosaccharomyces pombe, rhp57, is a functional homolog of the Saccharomyces cerevisiae RAD57 gene and is phylogenetically related to the human XRCC3 gene. Genetics 154: 1451–1461.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

WOOD, V., R. GWILLIAM, M.-A. RAJANDREAM, M. LYNE, R. LYNE et al., 2002 The genome sequence of Schizosaccharomyces pombe. Nature 415: 871–880.[CrossRef][Medline]

YOUNG, J. A., R. W. SCHRECKHISE, W. W. STEINER and G. R. SMITH, 2002 Meiotic recombination remote from prominent DNA break sites in S. pombe. Mol. Cell 9: 253–263.[CrossRef][Medline]

YOUNG, J. A., R. W. HYPPA and G. R. SMITH, 2004 Conserved and nonconserved proteins for meiotic DNA breakage and repair in yeasts. Genetics 167: 593–605.[Abstract/Free Full Text]




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J. Biol. Chem.Home page
S. R. Ferrari, J. Grubb, and D. K. Bishop
The Mei5-Sae3 Protein Complex Mediates Dmc1 Activity in Saccharomyces cerevisiae
J. Biol. Chem., May 1, 2009; 284(18): 11766 - 11770.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
GeneticsHome page
E. Parvanov, J. Kohli, and K. Ludin
The Mating-Type-Related Bias of Gene Conversion in Schizosaccharomyces pombe
Genetics, December 1, 2008; 180(4): 1859 - 1868.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
GeneticsHome page
G. A. Cromie, R. W. Hyppa, and G. R. Smith
The Fission Yeast BLM Homolog Rqh1 Promotes Meiotic Recombination
Genetics, July 1, 2008; 179(3): 1157 - 1167.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Mol. Cell. Biol.Home page
J. C. Hope, L. D. Cruzata, A. Duvshani, J. Mitsumoto, M. Maftahi, and G. A. Freyer
Mus81-Eme1-Dependent and -Independent Crossovers Form in Mitotic Cells during Double-Strand Break Repair in Schizosaccharomyces pombe
Mol. Cell. Biol., May 15, 2007; 27(10): 3828 - 3838.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USAHome page
C. Ellermeier and G. R. Smith
Cohesins are required for meiotic DNA breakage and recombination in Schizosaccharomyces pombe
PNAS, August 2, 2005; 102(31): 10952 - 10957.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
GeneticsHome page
G. A. Cromie, C. A. Rubio, R. W. Hyppa, and G. R. Smith
A Natural Meiotic DNA Break Site in Schizosaccharomyces pombe Is a Hotspot of Gene Conversion, Highly Associated With Crossing Over
Genetics, February 1, 2005; 169(2): 595 - 605.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]